[PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] RE: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] For My Information
> Berber-Guy, I don't believe that there is any question today that apache [on ony platform], is the best webserver you *can't* buy ;) ingo baab > > Guys, > > > > I don't believe that there is any question today that IIS5 on win2K > > is the best webserver $$$ can buy. > > > > Sincerely > > > > berber > > > > Visit http://www.weberdev.com Today!!! > > To see where PHP might take you tomorrow. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] For My Information
Guys, I don't believe that there is any question today that IIS5 on win2K is the best webserver $$$ can buy. Sincerely berber Visit http://www.weberdev.com Today!!! To see where PHP might take you tomorrow. -Original Message- From: Dan Malcolm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 2:32 PM To: Tom Mathews Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] For My Information Tom, Thanks. I believe myaccess2000_1_4 is one of the ones I've tried. I'll try again to make sure I didn't miss anything. I used dbtools to do the dBase conversion. Agree that the older versions of IIS were crap, but newer one (version 3 and 4) seems to be pretty good. Dan - Original Message - From: "Tom Mathews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 6:09 AM Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] For My Information > 1) I think that people use Apache as old versions of IIS were crap. In addition, it is about the widest used server out there in the commercial world (Linux running Apache with PHP3 is I believe the most common config at the moment) so if you're developing something to put on such a site, it's more likely to work if you develop with something close to that setup (note probs with case sensititivity and so on on with Apache that won't necesarily be exposed on IIS) > > 2) Check out the MySQL (www.mysql.com) site and look to download myaccess2000_1_4.zip, this is an Access plug-in that someone has kindly written to convert data and structure from Access 2000 MDB to MySQL (I've not tried them, but I think it also allows dbase conversion and a few others). > > Tom > > Dan Malcolm wrote: > > > I see in the posts, that a lot of people are using Apache on NT instead of the built in IIS. Is there a reason? I have PHP up and running with dBase tables converted to MySQL and ODBC connected to Access 2000, on an NT 4 box with IIS 4 and it runs very well. Performance is great. My only problem is automating the conversion to update tables in MySQL. I would like like to convert the Access 2000 tables also but the converters either don't seem to work with Access 2k, or not much at all, or are not such that a timed batch file can be generated using them. I just looked at what I've written and it's a little jumbled. Mega-Sigh. Let me summarize. > > > > 1.. Why Apache on NT 4.0? > > 2.. Is there a good way to automatically convert Access 2000 to MySQL to keep MySQL data up to date? The data needs to be updated several times a week. No I can't just switch everything over and not have to convert again. > > 3.. A way to do #2 for dBase would be good too, but less critical because the data only gets updated every couple months. > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Dan Malcolm > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] RE: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] For My Information
Lets just say I'm glad you posted that on a Windows list :P I personally find Apache more stable, less mem hogging, and as its what is used on linux machines, I know that my PHP code CAN work on any platform ;) And ... yuo say 'best that money can buy' ... I hope you know the price of Apache? www.apache.org Sure, it doesn't have a nice wee GUI, but after 20 mins reading a FAQ sheet you can do anything that IIS can, plus more. BUT, you're entitled to your own opinion, as is everyone :) Siggy - Original Message - From: "Boaz Yahav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Dan Malcolm'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Tom Mathews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 11:23 AM Subject: [PHP-WIN] RE: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] For My Information > Guys, > > I don't believe that there is any question today that IIS5 on win2K > is the best webserver $$$ can buy. > > Sincerely > > berber > > Visit http://www.weberdev.com Today!!! > To see where PHP might take you tomorrow. > > > -Original Message- > From: Dan Malcolm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 2:32 PM > To: Tom Mathews > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] For My Information > > > Tom, > Thanks. I believe myaccess2000_1_4 is one of the ones I've tried. I'll try > again to make sure I didn't miss anything. I used dbtools to do the dBase > conversion. > > > Agree that the older versions of IIS were crap, but newer one (version 3 and > 4) seems to be pretty good. > > Dan > - Original Message - > From: "Tom Mathews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 6:09 AM > Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] For My Information > > > > 1) I think that people use Apache as old versions of IIS were crap. In > addition, it is about the widest used server out there in the commercial > world (Linux running Apache with PHP3 is I believe the most common config at > the moment) so if you're developing something to put on such a site, it's > more likely to work if you develop with something close to that setup (note > probs with case sensititivity and so on on with Apache that won't necesarily > be exposed on IIS) > > > > 2) Check out the MySQL (www.mysql.com) site and look to download > myaccess2000_1_4.zip, this is an Access plug-in that someone has kindly > written to convert data and structure from Access 2000 MDB to MySQL (I've > not tried them, but I think it also allows dbase conversion and a few > others). > > > > Tom > > > > Dan Malcolm wrote: > > > > > I see in the posts, that a lot of people are using Apache on NT instead > of the built in IIS. Is there a reason? I have PHP up and running with > dBase tables converted to MySQL and ODBC connected to Access 2000, on an NT > 4 box with IIS 4 and it runs very well. Performance is great. My only > problem is automating the conversion to update tables in MySQL. I would > like like to convert the Access 2000 tables also but the converters either > don't seem to work with Access 2k, or not much at all, or are not such that > a timed batch file can be generated using them. I just looked at what I've > written and it's a little jumbled. Mega-Sigh. Let me summarize. > > > > > > 1.. Why Apache on NT 4.0? > > > 2.. Is there a good way to automatically convert Access 2000 to MySQL > to keep MySQL data up to date? The data needs to be updated several times a > week. No I can't just switch everything over and not have to convert again. > > > 3.. A way to do #2 for dBase would be good too, but less critical > because the data only gets updated every couple months. > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > Dan Malcolm > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- -- > > > > > -- > > PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] For My Information
Tom, Thanks. I believe myaccess2000_1_4 is one of the ones I've tried. I'll try again to make sure I didn't miss anything. I used dbtools to do the dBase conversion. Agree that the older versions of IIS were crap, but newer one (version 3 and 4) seems to be pretty good. Dan - Original Message - From: "Tom Mathews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 6:09 AM Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] For My Information > 1) I think that people use Apache as old versions of IIS were crap. In addition, it is about the widest used server out there in the commercial world (Linux running Apache with PHP3 is I believe the most common config at the moment) so if you're developing something to put on such a site, it's more likely to work if you develop with something close to that setup (note probs with case sensititivity and so on on with Apache that won't necesarily be exposed on IIS) > > 2) Check out the MySQL (www.mysql.com) site and look to download myaccess2000_1_4.zip, this is an Access plug-in that someone has kindly written to convert data and structure from Access 2000 MDB to MySQL (I've not tried them, but I think it also allows dbase conversion and a few others). > > Tom > > Dan Malcolm wrote: > > > I see in the posts, that a lot of people are using Apache on NT instead of the built in IIS. Is there a reason? I have PHP up and running with dBase tables converted to MySQL and ODBC connected to Access 2000, on an NT 4 box with IIS 4 and it runs very well. Performance is great. My only problem is automating the conversion to update tables in MySQL. I would like like to convert the Access 2000 tables also but the converters either don't seem to work with Access 2k, or not much at all, or are not such that a timed batch file can be generated using them. I just looked at what I've written and it's a little jumbled. Mega-Sigh. Let me summarize. > > > > 1.. Why Apache on NT 4.0? > > 2.. Is there a good way to automatically convert Access 2000 to MySQL to keep MySQL data up to date? The data needs to be updated several times a week. No I can't just switch everything over and not have to convert again. > > 3.. A way to do #2 for dBase would be good too, but less critical because the data only gets updated every couple months. > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Dan Malcolm > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] For My Information
1) I think that people use Apache as old versions of IIS were crap. In addition, it is about the widest used server out there in the commercial world (Linux running Apache with PHP3 is I believe the most common config at the moment) so if you're developing something to put on such a site, it's more likely to work if you develop with something close to that setup (note probs with case sensititivity and so on on with Apache that won't necesarily be exposed on IIS) 2) Check out the MySQL (www.mysql.com) site and look to download myaccess2000_1_4.zip, this is an Access plug-in that someone has kindly written to convert data and structure from Access 2000 MDB to MySQL (I've not tried them, but I think it also allows dbase conversion and a few others). Tom Dan Malcolm wrote: > I see in the posts, that a lot of people are using Apache on NT instead of the built >in IIS. Is there a reason? I have PHP up and running with dBase tables converted to >MySQL and ODBC connected to Access 2000, on an NT 4 box with IIS 4 and it runs very >well. Performance is great. My only problem is automating the conversion to update >tables in MySQL. I would like like to convert the Access 2000 tables also but the >converters either don't seem to work with Access 2k, or not much at all, or are not >such that a timed batch file can be generated using them. I just looked at what I've >written and it's a little jumbled. Mega-Sigh. Let me summarize. > > 1.. Why Apache on NT 4.0? > 2.. Is there a good way to automatically convert Access 2000 to MySQL to keep >MySQL data up to date? The data needs to be updated several times a week. No I >can't just switch everything over and not have to convert again. > 3.. A way to do #2 for dBase would be good too, but less critical because the data >only gets updated every couple months. > Thanks in advance. > > Dan Malcolm > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
