Re: [PHP] high traffic websites
it may be helpful for someone. I liked GTmetrix kinda helpful and magic. http://gtmetrix.com/#! Sincerely Negin Nickparsa On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Sebastian Krebs krebs@gmail.comwrote: 2013/9/18 Camilo Sperberg unrea...@gmail.com On Sep 18, 2013, at 14:26, Haluk Karamete halukkaram...@gmail.com wrote: I recommend OPCache, which is already included in PHP 5.5. Camilo, I'm just curious about the disadvantageous aspects of OPcache. My logic says there must be some issues with it otherwise it would have come already enabled. Sent from iPhone On Sep 18, 2013, at 2:20 AM, Camilo Sperberg unrea...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 18, 2013, at 09:38, Negin Nickparsa nickpa...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you Sebastian..actually I will already have one if qualified for the job. Yes, and I may fail to handle it that's why I asked for guidance. I wanted some tidbits to start over. I have searched through yslow, HTTtrack and others. I have searched through php list in my email too before asking this question. it is kind of beneficial for all people and not has been asked directly. Sincerely Negin Nickparsa On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Sebastian Krebs krebs@gmail.com wrote: 2013/9/18 Negin Nickparsa nickpa...@gmail.com In general, what are the best ways to handle high traffic websites? VPS(clouds)? web analyzers? dedicated servers? distributed memory cache? Yes :) But seriously: That is a topic most of us spent much time to get into it. You can explain it with a bunch of buzzwords. Additional, how do you define high traffic websites? Do you already _have_ such a site? Or do you _want_ it? It's important, because I've seen it far too often, that projects spent too much effort in their high traffic infrastructure and at the end it wasn't that high traffic ;) I wont say, that you cannot be successfull, but you should start with an effort you can handle. Regards, Sebastian Sincerely Negin Nickparsa -- github.com/KingCrunch Your question is way too vague to be answered properly... My best guess would be that it depends severely on the type of website you have and how's the current implementation being well... implemented. Simply said: what works for Facebook may/will not work for linkedIn, twitter or Google, mainly because the type of search differs A LOT: facebook is about relations between people, twitter is about small pieces of data not mainly interconnected between each other, while Google is all about links and all type of content: from little pieces of information through whole Wikipedia. You could start by studying how varnish and redis/memcached works, you could study about how proxies work (nginx et al), CDNs and that kind of stuff, but if you want more specific answers, you could better ask specific question. In the PHP area, an opcode cache does the job very well and can accelerate the page load by several orders of magnitude, I recommend OPCache, which is already included in PHP 5.5. Greetings. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php The original RFC states: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/optimizerplus The integration proposed for PHP 5.5.0 is mostly 'soft' integration. That means that there'll be no tight coupling between Optimizer+ and PHP; Those who wish to use another opcode cache will be able to do so, by not loading Optimizer+ and loading another opcode cache instead. As per the Suggested Roadmap above, we might want to review this decision in the future; There might be room for further performance or functionality gains from tighter integration; None are known at this point, and they're beyond the scope of this RFC. So that's why OPCache isn't enabled by default in PHP 5.5 Also worth to mention, that it is the first release with an opcode-cache integrated. Giving the other some release to get used to it, sounds useful :) Greetings. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- github.com/KingCrunch
[PHP] high traffic websites
In general, what are the best ways to handle high traffic websites? VPS(clouds)? web analyzers? dedicated servers? distributed memory cache? Sincerely Negin Nickparsa
Re: [PHP] high traffic websites
2013/9/18 Negin Nickparsa nickpa...@gmail.com In general, what are the best ways to handle high traffic websites? VPS(clouds)? web analyzers? dedicated servers? distributed memory cache? Yes :) But seriously: That is a topic most of us spent much time to get into it. You can explain it with a bunch of buzzwords. Additional, how do you define high traffic websites? Do you already _have_ such a site? Or do you _want_ it? It's important, because I've seen it far too often, that projects spent too much effort in their high traffic infrastructure and at the end it wasn't that high traffic ;) I wont say, that you cannot be successfull, but you should start with an effort you can handle. Regards, Sebastian Sincerely Negin Nickparsa -- github.com/KingCrunch
Re: [PHP] high traffic websites
Thank you Sebastian..actually I will already have one if qualified for the job. Yes, and I may fail to handle it that's why I asked for guidance. I wanted some tidbits to start over. I have searched through yslow, HTTtrack and others. I have searched through php list in my email too before asking this question. it is kind of beneficial for all people and not has been asked directly. Sincerely Negin Nickparsa On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Sebastian Krebs krebs@gmail.comwrote: 2013/9/18 Negin Nickparsa nickpa...@gmail.com In general, what are the best ways to handle high traffic websites? VPS(clouds)? web analyzers? dedicated servers? distributed memory cache? Yes :) But seriously: That is a topic most of us spent much time to get into it. You can explain it with a bunch of buzzwords. Additional, how do you define high traffic websites? Do you already _have_ such a site? Or do you _want_ it? It's important, because I've seen it far too often, that projects spent too much effort in their high traffic infrastructure and at the end it wasn't that high traffic ;) I wont say, that you cannot be successfull, but you should start with an effort you can handle. Regards, Sebastian Sincerely Negin Nickparsa -- github.com/KingCrunch
Re: [PHP] high traffic websites
On Sep 18, 2013, at 09:38, Negin Nickparsa nickpa...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you Sebastian..actually I will already have one if qualified for the job. Yes, and I may fail to handle it that's why I asked for guidance. I wanted some tidbits to start over. I have searched through yslow, HTTtrack and others. I have searched through php list in my email too before asking this question. it is kind of beneficial for all people and not has been asked directly. Sincerely Negin Nickparsa On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Sebastian Krebs krebs@gmail.comwrote: 2013/9/18 Negin Nickparsa nickpa...@gmail.com In general, what are the best ways to handle high traffic websites? VPS(clouds)? web analyzers? dedicated servers? distributed memory cache? Yes :) But seriously: That is a topic most of us spent much time to get into it. You can explain it with a bunch of buzzwords. Additional, how do you define high traffic websites? Do you already _have_ such a site? Or do you _want_ it? It's important, because I've seen it far too often, that projects spent too much effort in their high traffic infrastructure and at the end it wasn't that high traffic ;) I wont say, that you cannot be successfull, but you should start with an effort you can handle. Regards, Sebastian Sincerely Negin Nickparsa -- github.com/KingCrunch Your question is way too vague to be answered properly... My best guess would be that it depends severely on the type of website you have and how's the current implementation being well... implemented. Simply said: what works for Facebook may/will not work for linkedIn, twitter or Google, mainly because the type of search differs A LOT: facebook is about relations between people, twitter is about small pieces of data not mainly interconnected between each other, while Google is all about links and all type of content: from little pieces of information through whole Wikipedia. You could start by studying how varnish and redis/memcached works, you could study about how proxies work (nginx et al), CDNs and that kind of stuff, but if you want more specific answers, you could better ask specific question. In the PHP area, an opcode cache does the job very well and can accelerate the page load by several orders of magnitude, I recommend OPCache, which is already included in PHP 5.5. Greetings. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] high traffic websites
Thank you Camilo to be more in details,suppose the website has 80,000 users and each page takes 200 ms to be rendered and you have thousand hits in a second so we want to reduce the time of rendering. is there any way to reduce the rendering time? other thing is suppose they want to upload files simultaneously and the videos are in the website not on another server like YouTube and so streams are really consuming the bandwidth. Also,It is troublesome to get backups,when getting backups you have problem of lock backing up with bulk of data. Sincerely Negin Nickparsa On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Camilo Sperberg unrea...@gmail.comwrote: On Sep 18, 2013, at 09:38, Negin Nickparsa nickpa...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you Sebastian..actually I will already have one if qualified for the job. Yes, and I may fail to handle it that's why I asked for guidance. I wanted some tidbits to start over. I have searched through yslow, HTTtrack and others. I have searched through php list in my email too before asking this question. it is kind of beneficial for all people and not has been asked directly. Sincerely Negin Nickparsa On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Sebastian Krebs krebs@gmail.com wrote: 2013/9/18 Negin Nickparsa nickpa...@gmail.com In general, what are the best ways to handle high traffic websites? VPS(clouds)? web analyzers? dedicated servers? distributed memory cache? Yes :) But seriously: That is a topic most of us spent much time to get into it. You can explain it with a bunch of buzzwords. Additional, how do you define high traffic websites? Do you already _have_ such a site? Or do you _want_ it? It's important, because I've seen it far too often, that projects spent too much effort in their high traffic infrastructure and at the end it wasn't that high traffic ;) I wont say, that you cannot be successfull, but you should start with an effort you can handle. Regards, Sebastian Sincerely Negin Nickparsa -- github.com/KingCrunch Your question is way too vague to be answered properly... My best guess would be that it depends severely on the type of website you have and how's the current implementation being well... implemented. Simply said: what works for Facebook may/will not work for linkedIn, twitter or Google, mainly because the type of search differs A LOT: facebook is about relations between people, twitter is about small pieces of data not mainly interconnected between each other, while Google is all about links and all type of content: from little pieces of information through whole Wikipedia. You could start by studying how varnish and redis/memcached works, you could study about how proxies work (nginx et al), CDNs and that kind of stuff, but if you want more specific answers, you could better ask specific question. In the PHP area, an opcode cache does the job very well and can accelerate the page load by several orders of magnitude, I recommend OPCache, which is already included in PHP 5.5. Greetings.
Re: [PHP] high traffic websites
2013/9/18 Negin Nickparsa nickpa...@gmail.com Thank you Camilo to be more in details,suppose the website has 80,000 users and each page takes 200 ms to be rendered and you have thousand hits in a second so we want to reduce the time of rendering. is there any way to reduce the rendering time? Read about frontend-/proxy-caching (Nginx, Varnish) and ESI/SSI-include (also NGinx and Varnish ;)). The idea is simply If you don't have to process on every request in the backend, don't process it in the backend on every request. But maybe you mixed up some words, because the rendering time is the time consumed by the renderer within the browser (HTML and CSS). This you can improve, if you improve your HTML/CSS :) I am a little bit curious: Do you _really_ have 1000 requests/second, or do you just throw some numbers in? ;) other thing is suppose they want to upload files simultaneously and the videos are in the website not on another server like YouTube and so streams are really consuming the bandwidth. Well, if there are streams, there are streams. I cannot imagine, that there is another way someone can stream a video without downloading it. Also,It is troublesome to get backups,when getting backups you have problem of lock backing up with bulk of data. Even in times, where there is not that much traffix? Automatic backup at 3:00 in the morning for example? Sincerely Negin Nickparsa On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Camilo Sperberg unrea...@gmail.comwrote: On Sep 18, 2013, at 09:38, Negin Nickparsa nickpa...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you Sebastian..actually I will already have one if qualified for the job. Yes, and I may fail to handle it that's why I asked for guidance. I wanted some tidbits to start over. I have searched through yslow, HTTtrack and others. I have searched through php list in my email too before asking this question. it is kind of beneficial for all people and not has been asked directly. Sincerely Negin Nickparsa On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Sebastian Krebs krebs@gmail.com wrote: 2013/9/18 Negin Nickparsa nickpa...@gmail.com In general, what are the best ways to handle high traffic websites? VPS(clouds)? web analyzers? dedicated servers? distributed memory cache? Yes :) But seriously: That is a topic most of us spent much time to get into it. You can explain it with a bunch of buzzwords. Additional, how do you define high traffic websites? Do you already _have_ such a site? Or do you _want_ it? It's important, because I've seen it far too often, that projects spent too much effort in their high traffic infrastructure and at the end it wasn't that high traffic ;) I wont say, that you cannot be successfull, but you should start with an effort you can handle. Regards, Sebastian Sincerely Negin Nickparsa -- github.com/KingCrunch Your question is way too vague to be answered properly... My best guess would be that it depends severely on the type of website you have and how's the current implementation being well... implemented. Simply said: what works for Facebook may/will not work for linkedIn, twitter or Google, mainly because the type of search differs A LOT: facebook is about relations between people, twitter is about small pieces of data not mainly interconnected between each other, while Google is all about links and all type of content: from little pieces of information through whole Wikipedia. You could start by studying how varnish and redis/memcached works, you could study about how proxies work (nginx et al), CDNs and that kind of stuff, but if you want more specific answers, you could better ask specific question. In the PHP area, an opcode cache does the job very well and can accelerate the page load by several orders of magnitude, I recommend OPCache, which is already included in PHP 5.5. Greetings. -- github.com/KingCrunch
Re: [PHP] high traffic websites
On 18 Sep 2013, at 12:50, Negin Nickparsa nickpa...@gmail.com wrote: to be more in details,suppose the website has 80,000 users and each page takes 200 ms to be rendered and you have thousand hits in a second so we want to reduce the time of rendering. is there any way to reduce the rendering time? other thing is suppose they want to upload files simultaneously and the videos are in the website not on another server like YouTube and so streams are really consuming the bandwidth. Also,It is troublesome to get backups,when getting backups you have problem of lock backing up with bulk of data. Your question is impossible to answer efficiently without profiling. You need to know what PHP is doing in those 200ms before you can target your optimisations for maximum effect. I use xdebug to produce trace files. From there I can see exactly what is taking the most amount of time, and then I can look in to how to make that thing faster. When I'm certain there is no faster way to do what it's doing I move on to the next biggest thing. Of course there are generic things you should do such as adding an opcode cache and looking at your server setup, but targeted optimisation is far better than trying generic stuff. -Stuart -- Stuart Dallas 3ft9 Ltd http://3ft9.com/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] high traffic websites
I am a little bit curious: Do you _really_ have 1000 requests/second, or do you just throw some numbers in? ;) Sebastian, supposedly_asking_to_get_some_pre_evaluation :) Even in times, where there is not that much traffix? Automatic backup at 3:00 in the morning for example? 3:00 morning in one country is 9 Am in other country, 3 PM in other country . By the way Thank you so much guys, I wanted tidbits and you gave me more. Stuart, I recall your replies in other situations and always you helped me to improve.list is happy to have you. Sincerely Negin Nickparsa On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Sebastian Krebs krebs@gmail.comwrote: 2013/9/18 Negin Nickparsa nickpa...@gmail.com Thank you Camilo to be more in details,suppose the website has 80,000 users and each page takes 200 ms to be rendered and you have thousand hits in a second so we want to reduce the time of rendering. is there any way to reduce the rendering time? Read about frontend-/proxy-caching (Nginx, Varnish) and ESI/SSI-include (also NGinx and Varnish ;)). The idea is simply If you don't have to process on every request in the backend, don't process it in the backend on every request. But maybe you mixed up some words, because the rendering time is the time consumed by the renderer within the browser (HTML and CSS). This you can improve, if you improve your HTML/CSS :) I am a little bit curious: Do you _really_ have 1000 requests/second, or do you just throw some numbers in? ;) other thing is suppose they want to upload files simultaneously and the videos are in the website not on another server like YouTube and so streams are really consuming the bandwidth. Well, if there are streams, there are streams. I cannot imagine, that there is another way someone can stream a video without downloading it. Also,It is troublesome to get backups,when getting backups you have problem of lock backing up with bulk of data. Even in times, where there is not that much traffix? Automatic backup at 3:00 in the morning for example? Sincerely Negin Nickparsa On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Camilo Sperberg unrea...@gmail.comwrote: On Sep 18, 2013, at 09:38, Negin Nickparsa nickpa...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you Sebastian..actually I will already have one if qualified for the job. Yes, and I may fail to handle it that's why I asked for guidance. I wanted some tidbits to start over. I have searched through yslow, HTTtrack and others. I have searched through php list in my email too before asking this question. it is kind of beneficial for all people and not has been asked directly. Sincerely Negin Nickparsa On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Sebastian Krebs krebs@gmail.com wrote: 2013/9/18 Negin Nickparsa nickpa...@gmail.com In general, what are the best ways to handle high traffic websites? VPS(clouds)? web analyzers? dedicated servers? distributed memory cache? Yes :) But seriously: That is a topic most of us spent much time to get into it. You can explain it with a bunch of buzzwords. Additional, how do you define high traffic websites? Do you already _have_ such a site? Or do you _want_ it? It's important, because I've seen it far too often, that projects spent too much effort in their high traffic infrastructure and at the end it wasn't that high traffic ;) I wont say, that you cannot be successfull, but you should start with an effort you can handle. Regards, Sebastian Sincerely Negin Nickparsa -- github.com/KingCrunch Your question is way too vague to be answered properly... My best guess would be that it depends severely on the type of website you have and how's the current implementation being well... implemented. Simply said: what works for Facebook may/will not work for linkedIn, twitter or Google, mainly because the type of search differs A LOT: facebook is about relations between people, twitter is about small pieces of data not mainly interconnected between each other, while Google is all about links and all type of content: from little pieces of information through whole Wikipedia. You could start by studying how varnish and redis/memcached works, you could study about how proxies work (nginx et al), CDNs and that kind of stuff, but if you want more specific answers, you could better ask specific question. In the PHP area, an opcode cache does the job very well and can accelerate the page load by several orders of magnitude, I recommend OPCache, which is already included in PHP 5.5. Greetings. -- github.com/KingCrunch
Re: [PHP] high traffic websites
On Sep 18, 2013, at 14:26, Haluk Karamete halukkaram...@gmail.com wrote: I recommend OPCache, which is already included in PHP 5.5. Camilo, I'm just curious about the disadvantageous aspects of OPcache. My logic says there must be some issues with it otherwise it would have come already enabled. Sent from iPhone On Sep 18, 2013, at 2:20 AM, Camilo Sperberg unrea...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 18, 2013, at 09:38, Negin Nickparsa nickpa...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you Sebastian..actually I will already have one if qualified for the job. Yes, and I may fail to handle it that's why I asked for guidance. I wanted some tidbits to start over. I have searched through yslow, HTTtrack and others. I have searched through php list in my email too before asking this question. it is kind of beneficial for all people and not has been asked directly. Sincerely Negin Nickparsa On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Sebastian Krebs krebs@gmail.comwrote: 2013/9/18 Negin Nickparsa nickpa...@gmail.com In general, what are the best ways to handle high traffic websites? VPS(clouds)? web analyzers? dedicated servers? distributed memory cache? Yes :) But seriously: That is a topic most of us spent much time to get into it. You can explain it with a bunch of buzzwords. Additional, how do you define high traffic websites? Do you already _have_ such a site? Or do you _want_ it? It's important, because I've seen it far too often, that projects spent too much effort in their high traffic infrastructure and at the end it wasn't that high traffic ;) I wont say, that you cannot be successfull, but you should start with an effort you can handle. Regards, Sebastian Sincerely Negin Nickparsa -- github.com/KingCrunch Your question is way too vague to be answered properly... My best guess would be that it depends severely on the type of website you have and how's the current implementation being well... implemented. Simply said: what works for Facebook may/will not work for linkedIn, twitter or Google, mainly because the type of search differs A LOT: facebook is about relations between people, twitter is about small pieces of data not mainly interconnected between each other, while Google is all about links and all type of content: from little pieces of information through whole Wikipedia. You could start by studying how varnish and redis/memcached works, you could study about how proxies work (nginx et al), CDNs and that kind of stuff, but if you want more specific answers, you could better ask specific question. In the PHP area, an opcode cache does the job very well and can accelerate the page load by several orders of magnitude, I recommend OPCache, which is already included in PHP 5.5. Greetings. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php The original RFC states: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/optimizerplus The integration proposed for PHP 5.5.0 is mostly 'soft' integration. That means that there'll be no tight coupling between Optimizer+ and PHP; Those who wish to use another opcode cache will be able to do so, by not loading Optimizer+ and loading another opcode cache instead. As per the Suggested Roadmap above, we might want to review this decision in the future; There might be room for further performance or functionality gains from tighter integration; None are known at this point, and they're beyond the scope of this RFC. So that's why OPCache isn't enabled by default in PHP 5.5 Greetings. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] high traffic websites
2013/9/18 Camilo Sperberg unrea...@gmail.com On Sep 18, 2013, at 14:26, Haluk Karamete halukkaram...@gmail.com wrote: I recommend OPCache, which is already included in PHP 5.5. Camilo, I'm just curious about the disadvantageous aspects of OPcache. My logic says there must be some issues with it otherwise it would have come already enabled. Sent from iPhone On Sep 18, 2013, at 2:20 AM, Camilo Sperberg unrea...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 18, 2013, at 09:38, Negin Nickparsa nickpa...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you Sebastian..actually I will already have one if qualified for the job. Yes, and I may fail to handle it that's why I asked for guidance. I wanted some tidbits to start over. I have searched through yslow, HTTtrack and others. I have searched through php list in my email too before asking this question. it is kind of beneficial for all people and not has been asked directly. Sincerely Negin Nickparsa On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Sebastian Krebs krebs@gmail.com wrote: 2013/9/18 Negin Nickparsa nickpa...@gmail.com In general, what are the best ways to handle high traffic websites? VPS(clouds)? web analyzers? dedicated servers? distributed memory cache? Yes :) But seriously: That is a topic most of us spent much time to get into it. You can explain it with a bunch of buzzwords. Additional, how do you define high traffic websites? Do you already _have_ such a site? Or do you _want_ it? It's important, because I've seen it far too often, that projects spent too much effort in their high traffic infrastructure and at the end it wasn't that high traffic ;) I wont say, that you cannot be successfull, but you should start with an effort you can handle. Regards, Sebastian Sincerely Negin Nickparsa -- github.com/KingCrunch Your question is way too vague to be answered properly... My best guess would be that it depends severely on the type of website you have and how's the current implementation being well... implemented. Simply said: what works for Facebook may/will not work for linkedIn, twitter or Google, mainly because the type of search differs A LOT: facebook is about relations between people, twitter is about small pieces of data not mainly interconnected between each other, while Google is all about links and all type of content: from little pieces of information through whole Wikipedia. You could start by studying how varnish and redis/memcached works, you could study about how proxies work (nginx et al), CDNs and that kind of stuff, but if you want more specific answers, you could better ask specific question. In the PHP area, an opcode cache does the job very well and can accelerate the page load by several orders of magnitude, I recommend OPCache, which is already included in PHP 5.5. Greetings. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php The original RFC states: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/optimizerplus The integration proposed for PHP 5.5.0 is mostly 'soft' integration. That means that there'll be no tight coupling between Optimizer+ and PHP; Those who wish to use another opcode cache will be able to do so, by not loading Optimizer+ and loading another opcode cache instead. As per the Suggested Roadmap above, we might want to review this decision in the future; There might be room for further performance or functionality gains from tighter integration; None are known at this point, and they're beyond the scope of this RFC. So that's why OPCache isn't enabled by default in PHP 5.5 Also worth to mention, that it is the first release with an opcode-cache integrated. Giving the other some release to get used to it, sounds useful :) Greetings. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- github.com/KingCrunch
[PHP] no traffic
I've been playing with PHP for about 6 years and I have no idea why this is
happening... I've been writing a script to auth to AD. When I run the
script on my dev box, nothing. I have wireshark running in the background
on the dev box, I can see the script's traffic go out and hit the DNS
server but no other traffic. Command line, no problem talking to other
hosts with whatever port I'm trying to hit. On my box, all the scripts
work fine. LDAP is enabled, but I can't hit ANY port other than DNS and if
I use the IP in the script, I see no traffic. Both are FC16-64 patched as
of last week. I matched line-by-line in the phpinfo() on my box and the dev
box - no difference. Used this script to try any port open on other hosts
but no traffic shows up in wireshark!! Any ideas
Lawrence
?php
function ping($host,$post=25,$timeout=6)
{
$fsock = fsockopen($host, $port, $errno, $errstr, $timeout);
if ( ! $fsock )
{
return FALSE;
}
else
{
return TRUE;
}
}
/* check if the host is up $host can also be an ip address */
$host = 'mail.bac.com';
$up = ping($host);
/* optionally display either a red or green image to signify the server
status */
echo 'img src='.($up ? 'on' : 'off').'.jpg alt='.($up ? 'up' :
'down').' /';
?
or this one
?php
//using ldap bind anonymously
// connect to ldap server
$ldapconn = ldap_connect(10.13.3.10)
or die(Could not connect to LDAP server.);
if ($ldapconn) {
// binding anonymously
$ldapbind = ldap_bind($ldapconn);
if ($ldapbind) {
echo LDAP bind anonymous successful...;
} else {
echo LDAP bind anonymous failed...;
}
}
?
phpinfo()
LDAP Support enabled RCS Version $Id: ldap.c 321634 2012-01-01 13:15:04Z
felipe $ Total Links 0/unlimited API Version 3001 Vendor Name OpenLDAP Vendor
Version 20426 SASL Support Enabled
Re: [PHP] no traffic
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Lawrence Decker lld0...@gmail.com wrote: I've been playing with PHP for about 6 years and I have no idea why this is happening... I've been writing a script to auth to AD. When I run the script on my dev box, nothing. I have wireshark running in the background on the dev box, I can see the script's traffic go out and hit the DNS server but no other traffic. Command line, no problem talking to other hosts with whatever port I'm trying to hit. On my box, all the scripts work fine. LDAP is enabled, but I can't hit ANY port other than DNS and if I use the IP in the script, I see no traffic. Both are FC16-64 patched as of last week. I matched line-by-line in the phpinfo() on my box and the dev box - no difference. Used this script to try any port open on other hosts but no traffic shows up in wireshark!! Any ideas Have you checked that it's not a firewall problem? e.g. by running # telnet server-ip ldap -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] no traffic
On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:55, Lawrence Decker lld0...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been playing with PHP for about 6 years and I have no idea why this is
happening... I've been writing a script to auth to AD. When I run the
script on my dev box, nothing. I have wireshark running in the background
on the dev box, I can see the script's traffic go out and hit the DNS
server but no other traffic. Command line, no problem talking to other
hosts with whatever port I'm trying to hit. On my box, all the scripts
work fine. LDAP is enabled, but I can't hit ANY port other than DNS and if
I use the IP in the script, I see no traffic. Both are FC16-64 patched as
of last week. I matched line-by-line in the phpinfo() on my box and the dev
box - no difference. Used this script to try any port open on other hosts
but no traffic shows up in wireshark!! Any ideas
Lawrence
?php
function ping($host,$post=25,$timeout=6)
{
$fsock = fsockopen($host, $port, $errno, $errstr, $timeout);
if ( ! $fsock )
{
return FALSE;
}
else
{
return TRUE;
}
}
/* check if the host is up $host can also be an ip address */
$host = 'mail.bac.com';
$up = ping($host);
/* optionally display either a red or green image to signify the server
status */
echo 'img src='.($up ? 'on' : 'off').'.jpg alt='.($up ? 'up' :
'down').' /';
?
or this one
?php
//using ldap bind anonymously
// connect to ldap server
$ldapconn = ldap_connect(10.13.3.10)
or die(Could not connect to LDAP server.);
if ($ldapconn) {
// binding anonymously
$ldapbind = ldap_bind($ldapconn);
if ($ldapbind) {
echo LDAP bind anonymous successful...;
} else {
echo LDAP bind anonymous failed...;
}
}
?
phpinfo()
LDAP Support enabled RCS Version $Id: ldap.c 321634 2012-01-01 13:15:04Z
felipe $ Total Links 0/unlimited API Version 3001 Vendor Name OpenLDAP Vendor
Version 20426 SASL Support Enabled
How many interfaces are on your box? From the cli can you telnet 10.13.3.10 389
Also do a netstat -na | grep 389
What returns, any open outgoing sockets?
Mike Mackintosh
ZCE PHP5.3
www.highonphp.com
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] no traffic
6 mar 2012 kl. 15.29 skrev Mike Mackintosh:
On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:55, Lawrence Decker lld0...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been playing with PHP for about 6 years and I have no idea why this is
happening... I've been writing a script to auth to AD. When I run the
script on my dev box, nothing. I have wireshark running in the background
on the dev box, I can see the script's traffic go out and hit the DNS
server but no other traffic. Command line, no problem talking to other
hosts with whatever port I'm trying to hit. On my box, all the scripts
work fine. LDAP is enabled, but I can't hit ANY port other than DNS and if
I use the IP in the script, I see no traffic. Both are FC16-64 patched as
of last week. I matched line-by-line in the phpinfo() on my box and the dev
box - no difference. Used this script to try any port open on other hosts
but no traffic shows up in wireshark!! Any ideas
Lawrence
?php
function ping($host,$post=25,$timeout=6)
{
$fsock = fsockopen($host, $port, $errno, $errstr, $timeout);
if ( ! $fsock )
{
return FALSE;
}
else
{
return TRUE;
}
}
Have you noticed that you have a typo in your function? '$post' should be
'$port'...
/frank
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] no traffic
I can cli to any host/port that's open, firewall's wide open
fc-lawrence:~# telnet ad1.bac.com 389
Trying 10.13.3.10...
Connected to ad1.bac.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
^CConnection closed by foreign host.
# iptables -nL
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Mike Mackintosh
mike.mackint...@angrystatic.com wrote:
On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:55, Lawrence Decker lld0...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been playing with PHP for about 6 years and I have no idea why this
is
happening... I've been writing a script to auth to AD. When I run the
script on my dev box, nothing. I have wireshark running in the
background
on the dev box, I can see the script's traffic go out and hit the DNS
server but no other traffic. Command line, no problem talking to other
hosts with whatever port I'm trying to hit. On my box, all the scripts
work fine. LDAP is enabled, but I can't hit ANY port other than DNS and
if
I use the IP in the script, I see no traffic. Both are FC16-64 patched
as
of last week. I matched line-by-line in the phpinfo() on my box and the
dev
box - no difference. Used this script to try any port open on other
hosts
but no traffic shows up in wireshark!! Any ideas
Lawrence
?php
function ping($host,$post=25,$timeout=6)
{
$fsock = fsockopen($host, $port, $errno, $errstr, $timeout);
if ( ! $fsock )
{
return FALSE;
}
else
{
return TRUE;
}
}
/* check if the host is up $host can also be an ip address */
$host = 'mail.bac.com';
$up = ping($host);
/* optionally display either a red or green image to signify the server
status */
echo 'img src='.($up ? 'on' : 'off').'.jpg alt='.($up ? 'up' :
'down').' /';
?
or this one
?php
//using ldap bind anonymously
// connect to ldap server
$ldapconn = ldap_connect(10.13.3.10)
or die(Could not connect to LDAP server.);
if ($ldapconn) {
// binding anonymously
$ldapbind = ldap_bind($ldapconn);
if ($ldapbind) {
echo LDAP bind anonymous successful...;
} else {
echo LDAP bind anonymous failed...;
}
}
?
phpinfo()
LDAP Support enabled RCS Version $Id: ldap.c 321634 2012-01-01 13:15:04Z
felipe $ Total Links 0/unlimited API Version 3001 Vendor Name OpenLDAP
Vendor
Version 20426 SASL Support Enabled
How many interfaces are on your box? From the cli can you telnet
10.13.3.10 389
Also do a netstat -na | grep 389
What returns, any open outgoing sockets?
Mike Mackintosh
ZCE PHP5.3
www.highonphp.com
Re: [PHP] no traffic
Thanks Franks, corrected but still same problem...
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Frank Arensmeier farensme...@gmail.comwrote:
6 mar 2012 kl. 15.29 skrev Mike Mackintosh:
On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:55, Lawrence Decker lld0...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been playing with PHP for about 6 years and I have no idea why
this is
happening... I've been writing a script to auth to AD. When I run the
script on my dev box, nothing. I have wireshark running in the
background
on the dev box, I can see the script's traffic go out and hit the DNS
server but no other traffic. Command line, no problem talking to other
hosts with whatever port I'm trying to hit. On my box, all the scripts
work fine. LDAP is enabled, but I can't hit ANY port other than DNS
and if
I use the IP in the script, I see no traffic. Both are FC16-64 patched
as
of last week. I matched line-by-line in the phpinfo() on my box and the
dev
box - no difference. Used this script to try any port open on other
hosts
but no traffic shows up in wireshark!! Any ideas
Lawrence
?php
function ping($host,$post=25,$timeout=6)
{
$fsock = fsockopen($host, $port, $errno, $errstr, $timeout);
if ( ! $fsock )
{
return FALSE;
}
else
{
return TRUE;
}
}
Have you noticed that you have a typo in your function? '$post' should be
'$port'...
/frank
Re: [PHP] no traffic
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Lawrence Decker lld0...@gmail.com wrote: I've been playing with PHP for about 6 years and I have no idea why this is happening... I've been writing a script to auth to AD. When I run the script on my dev box, nothing. I have wireshark running in the background on the dev box, I can see the script's traffic go out and hit the DNS server but no other traffic. Command line, no problem talking to other hosts with whatever port I'm trying to hit. On my box, all the scripts work fine. LDAP is enabled, but I can't hit ANY port other than DNS and if I use the IP in the script, I see no traffic. Both are FC16-64 patched as of last week. I matched line-by-line in the phpinfo() on my box and the dev box - no difference. Used this script to try any port open on other hosts but no traffic shows up in wireshark!! Any ideas Do you have selinux enabled on your dev box? -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] no traffic
YEA that was it!!! Yes, selinux is enabled. Checked the selinux log, and saw all the connection failures with httpd... Excellent, thanks it's been driving me nuts!!! On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Charles peac...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Lawrence Decker lld0...@gmail.com wrote: I've been playing with PHP for about 6 years and I have no idea why this is happening... I've been writing a script to auth to AD. When I run the script on my dev box, nothing. I have wireshark running in the background on the dev box, I can see the script's traffic go out and hit the DNS server but no other traffic. Command line, no problem talking to other hosts with whatever port I'm trying to hit. On my box, all the scripts work fine. LDAP is enabled, but I can't hit ANY port other than DNS and if I use the IP in the script, I see no traffic. Both are FC16-64 patched as of last week. I matched line-by-line in the phpinfo() on my box and the dev box - no difference. Used this script to try any port open on other hosts but no traffic shows up in wireshark!! Any ideas Do you have selinux enabled on your dev box?
[PHP] Re: Traffic throttling
Hello Stuart, Am 2009-07-21 16:39:30, schrieb Stuart: http://php.net/usleep Thank you, that it was. Greetings and nice Day/Evening Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ # Debian GNU/Linux Consultant # http://www.tamay-dogan.net/ Michelle Konzack http://www.can4linux.org/ c/o Vertriebsp. KabelBW http://www.flexray4linux.org/ Blumenstrasse 2 Jabber linux4miche...@jabber.ccc.de 77694 Kehl/Germany IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) Tel. DE: +49 177 9351947 ICQ #328449886Tel. FR: +33 6 61925193 signature.pgp Description: Digital signature
[PHP] heavy traffic portal site
Hi there We have been contacted about creating a portal site which will have some heavy usage. They are talking about having 100,000 subscribed users to the system which will have the following: 1. Web based email 2. Calender (for the persons own use, not shared) 3. File store (and sharing) and image store (and sharing) and a few other things. The above are the areas that we think would create the most load on the system. Firstly, does anyone have an Open Source application that they would recommend for the above and are there any examples of other people using this in the real world? If there is no application that would handle all of the above, what would people suggest? Thanks Ade -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] heavy traffic portal site
I see you posted this to the Horde list, so you're aware of that project. Horde has been used in a few very large installations, but more important than the number of users is the load on the app. Will the 100k users be on it very frequently? Rarely? What kind of hit level are we talking about? Much of that could also be dependent on the hardware you have available. Also, are you looking for a single, (semi)-integrated app such as Horde, or would you be interested in individual solutions that could be merged together? --- Adrian Teasdale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there We have been contacted about creating a portal site which will have some heavy usage. They are talking about having 100,000 subscribed users to the system which will have the following: 1. Web based email 2. Calender (for the persons own use, not shared) 3. File store (and sharing) and image store (and sharing) and a few other things. The above are the areas that we think would create the most load on the system. Firstly, does anyone have an Open Source application that they would recommend for the above and are there any examples of other people using this in the real world? If there is no application that would handle all of the above, what would people suggest? Thanks Ade -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php = Mark Weinstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** You can't demand something as a right unless you are willing to fight to death to defend everyone else's right to the same thing. *** __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] heavy traffic portal site
Mark Thanks for the quick reply. Basically, I think that the users will be using it quite frequently - well, that's my clients idea of how it will work! In terms of hit level, we really don't know at this stage. In terms of hardware, they have a good budget and we would be looking to work with someone like rackpsace to cover all the hardware issues. Regarding your last comment, we aren't looking necessarily for a single appp to cover everything, but this is why Horde was looked at first. However, we will probably have to do some fairly heavy tweeking with whatever we go with so that everything matches together (as there are a few other PHP apps that need to be built and integrated into the whole). One aspect is that they want to skin the whole site so that it can be altered. On top of that is a crazy deadline too, just to make things real fun! Any comments, laughter, suggestions - all appreciated Ade -Original Message- From: Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 June 2003 11:27 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP] heavy traffic portal site I see you posted this to the Horde list, so you're aware of that project. Horde has been used in a few very large installations, but more important than the number of users is the load on the app. Will the 100k users be on it very frequently? Rarely? What kind of hit level are we talking about? Much of that could also be dependent on the hardware you have available. Also, are you looking for a single, (semi)-integrated app such as Horde, or would you be interested in individual solutions that could be merged together? --- Adrian Teasdale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there We have been contacted about creating a portal site which will have some heavy usage. They are talking about having 100,000 subscribed users to the system which will have the following: 1. Web based email 2. Calender (for the persons own use, not shared) 3. File store (and sharing) and image store (and sharing) and a few other things. The above are the areas that we think would create the most load on the system. Firstly, does anyone have an Open Source application that they would recommend for the above and are there any examples of other people using this in the real world? If there is no application that would handle all of the above, what would people suggest? Thanks Ade -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php = Mark Weinstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** You can't demand something as a right unless you are willing to fight to death to defend everyone else's right to the same thing. *** __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] outbound traffic, sessions reg expressions
Hi, I want to create a file (out.php???) which measures and keeps stats on the sites we link OUT to, including affiliates... i've got a few ideas how to do this, so that's not the problem... the problem is that a lot of the content on the site is contributed through writers, not programmers, and since we know and trust these contributors, we're comfortable with them being allowed to add links in the text, etc etc, and don't strip those tags. however, it's one thing to teach a whole heap of writers to link in this way: A HREF=http://somewhere; TARGET=_newclick/a but it's a lot harder (or perhaps, more prone to errors, etc) to ask them to do something like: A HREF=out.php?url=http://somewhere.com;click/a ... and then if it's wise to take the special characters out, replacing them with ASCI (eg %20), then it's virtualy impossible. THEN I thought about the fact that i'll be looking to add URL based sessiosn to the site soon, which will require all links to carry a session id... again, too much to ask of them, and too unreliable. So, one solution would be to use regular expressions to analyse text for links, determin if they are internal or external, check for target=_new, encode sessions, etc etc. Big job for me, maybe not for some of the regexp pros :) OR, another option would be to establish a custom tag LINK (for internal) and ELINK for external pages eg ELINK http://somewhere.com;click/a, and let PHP convert it to a suitable link, with sessions, TARGET=_new, etc etc... and better still, take that link, and pipe it through something like out.php as discussed above, without anyone having to worry about fussy syntax, sessions, etc. Has anyone tried anything like this? has anyone got code snippets, or perhaps the ability to write the reg exps? Many thanks, Justin French -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PHP] Monitoring traffic
Hi, This is kind of off topic but I need to monitor the traffic in kilobytes/bits on my net card adapter (in/out) or server (PHP, HTML, etc.), do you know of any software? I'm using Win2000. Thanks, SED -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PHP] Monitoring traffic
check out www.mrtg.org for a pre-packaged solution, otherwise check out the SNMP functions of PHP. http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.snmp.php in either case, you'll need to install the snmp support from your win2000 installation disk. /* SED asked: */ This is kind of off topic but I need to monitor the traffic in kilobytes/bits on my net card adapter (in/out) or server (PHP, HTML, etc.), do you know of any software? I'm using Win2000. Thanks, SED -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PHP] web traffic report
At 03.08.2001 04:44, mike cullerton wrote: another vote for analog. Dunno what this has got to do with php, but my vote is for webalyzer... fast and easy to use... -- Andreas D Landmark / noXtension Real Time, adj.: Here and now, as opposed to fake time, which only occurs there and then. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PHP] web traffic report
Can't you just run a cron job (set it to do it automatically every so often) to delete the file from your web account's tmp folder.. ? Has anyone figured a way to purge access-log files after webalizer is done using to data only so far back? -eric - Original Message - I'm rather fond of Webalizer (www.mrunix.net/webalizer). -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Corey Chapman Xnull CEO (Chat with us: http://forum.xnull.com) -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PHP] web traffic report
another vote for analog. on 8/2/01 9:46 PM, Chris Fry at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: analog seems to be the industry standard - use it with the extended log format. http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~sret1/analog/ -- mike cullerton -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PHP] web traffic report
Your process should be: logrotate access_log Use Webalizer on old log. Purge old log. Webalizer does not need the raw data after it has processed it once. -- WARNING [EMAIL PROTECTED] address is an endangered species -- Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wanna help me out? Like Music? Buy a CD: http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm Volunteer a little time: http://chatmusic.com/volunteer.htm - Original Message - From: Corey Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: php.general To: Eric Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 1:38 PM Subject: Re: [PHP] web traffic report Can't you just run a cron job (set it to do it automatically every so often) to delete the file from your web account's tmp folder.. ? Has anyone figured a way to purge access-log files after webalizer is done using to data only so far back? -eric - Original Message - I'm rather fond of Webalizer (www.mrunix.net/webalizer). -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Corey Chapman Xnull CEO (Chat with us: http://forum.xnull.com) -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
