Re: [PHP] php accelorator
Cool, thanks for the tips, I am going to check them out. -- -Dan Joseph www.canishosting.com - Unlimited Hosting Plans start @ $3.95/month. Promo Code NEWTHINGS for 10% off initial order http://www.facebook.com/canishosting http://www.facebook.com/originalpoetry
Re: [PHP] php accelorator
If you're looking out for an accelerator then it means that you have a custom server. Then I suggest, you use mod_fcgid with php-fcgi. mod_fcgid uses the fastcgi protocol and also it serves the caching part (that's the biggest difference between mod_fcgid and mod_fastcgi). -- Nilesh Govindarajan Facebook: nilesh.gr Twitter: nileshgr Website: www.itech7.com Cheap and Reliable VPS Hosting: http://j.mp/arHk5e -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] php accelorator
Lester Caine wrote: Robert Cummings wrote: Dan Joseph wrote: Hi, Are any of you using any of the php accelorators such as Zend, Ioncube, or any others? Any idea which is the best? I am partial to eAccelerator for *nixes. And wincache for Windows. eAccelerator works fine for me ... on linux and windows ... I don't recall that eAccelerator works with PHP FastCGI in a windows environment -- the recommended configuration for PHP in a Windows environment. Cheers, Rob. -- E-Mail Disclaimer: Information contained in this message and any attached documents is considered confidential and legally protected. This message is intended solely for the addressee(s). Disclosure, copying, and distribution are prohibited unless authorized. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] php accelorator
Robert Cummings wrote: Lester Caine wrote: Robert Cummings wrote: Dan Joseph wrote: Hi, Are any of you using any of the php accelorators such as Zend, Ioncube, or any others? Any idea which is the best? I am partial to eAccelerator for *nixes. And wincache for Windows. eAccelerator works fine for me ... on linux and windows ... I don't recall that eAccelerator works with PHP FastCGI in a windows environment -- the recommended configuration for PHP in a Windows environment. That may be what people are trying to ram down our throuts! But I have had eaccelerator running on PHP5.x for many years without any problem and I do not intend changing that configuration for anybody. I have a matching setup on my linux servers as my windows servers and will maintain that even if it does mean ditching PHP5.3 in production ;) -- Lester Caine - G8HFL - Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] php accelorator
Lester Caine wrote: Robert Cummings wrote: Lester Caine wrote: Robert Cummings wrote: Dan Joseph wrote: Hi, Are any of you using any of the php accelorators such as Zend, Ioncube, or any others? Any idea which is the best? I am partial to eAccelerator for *nixes. And wincache for Windows. eAccelerator works fine for me ... on linux and windows ... I don't recall that eAccelerator works with PHP FastCGI in a windows environment -- the recommended configuration for PHP in a Windows environment. That may be what people are trying to ram down our throuts! But I have had eaccelerator running on PHP5.x for many years without any problem and I do not intend changing that configuration for anybody. I have a matching setup on my linux servers as my windows servers and will maintain that even if it does mean ditching PHP5.3 in production ;) I use FastCGI and the NTS version of PHP in Windows because that is the configuration recommended by PHP on their website. After experiencing the instability of PHP as relates to the module version in Windows (using eAccelerator at the time), I switched to FastCGI NTS as recommended and then had to hunt down an appropriate accelerator. Wincache was in beta at the time and worked very well. As such it is my recommended accelerator for Windows since it works with PHP FastCGI and works well. Cheers, Rob. -- E-Mail Disclaimer: Information contained in this message and any attached documents is considered confidential and legally protected. This message is intended solely for the addressee(s). Disclosure, copying, and distribution are prohibited unless authorized. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] php accelorator
Robert Cummings wrote: I use FastCGI and the NTS version of PHP in Windows because that is the configuration recommended by PHP on their website. After experiencing the instability of PHP as relates to the module version in Windows (using eAccelerator at the time), I switched to FastCGI NTS as recommended and then had to hunt down an appropriate accelerator. Wincache was in beta at the time and worked very well. As such it is my recommended accelerator for Windows since it works with PHP FastCGI and works well. Well I have no problem with my own configuration being unstable - in some 5 years of use. So that would appear to suggest you are using something that has a problem which I am not. I also have only ever used TS version again without any stability problems. Part of the problem here is people saying It does not work but not actually helping to identify WHAT does not work :( -- Lester Caine - G8HFL - Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] php accelorator
Lester Caine wrote: Robert Cummings wrote: I use FastCGI and the NTS version of PHP in Windows because that is the configuration recommended by PHP on their website. After experiencing the instability of PHP as relates to the module version in Windows (using eAccelerator at the time), I switched to FastCGI NTS as recommended and then had to hunt down an appropriate accelerator. Wincache was in beta at the time and worked very well. As such it is my recommended accelerator for Windows since it works with PHP FastCGI and works well. Well I have no problem with my own configuration being unstable - in some 5 years of use. So that would appear to suggest you are using something that has a problem which I am not. I also have only ever used TS version again without any stability problems. Part of the problem here is people saying It does not work but not actually helping to identify WHAT does not work :( I just realized btw... I haven't mentioned that the recommendation is for IIS in Windows... bleh. I don't think the problem exists when using Apache under windows. We were forced to use IIS in this particular case due to Government department policy. Cheers, Rob. -- E-Mail Disclaimer: Information contained in this message and any attached documents is considered confidential and legally protected. This message is intended solely for the addressee(s). Disclosure, copying, and distribution are prohibited unless authorized. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] php accelorator
Robert Cummings wrote: Lester Caine wrote: Robert Cummings wrote: I use FastCGI and the NTS version of PHP in Windows because that is the configuration recommended by PHP on their website. After experiencing the instability of PHP as relates to the module version in Windows (using eAccelerator at the time), I switched to FastCGI NTS as recommended and then had to hunt down an appropriate accelerator. Wincache was in beta at the time and worked very well. As such it is my recommended accelerator for Windows since it works with PHP FastCGI and works well. Well I have no problem with my own configuration being unstable - in some 5 years of use. So that would appear to suggest you are using something that has a problem which I am not. I also have only ever used TS version again without any stability problems. Part of the problem here is people saying It does not work but not actually helping to identify WHAT does not work :( I just realized btw... I haven't mentioned that the recommendation is for IIS in Windows... bleh. I don't think the problem exists when using Apache under windows. We were forced to use IIS in this particular case due to Government department policy. You have my sympathies ;) We established early on that IIS was unsuitable for the type of sites were run and have never had any problem convincing customers of the facts. MANY of them have now moved the web servers to Linux simply to remove windows from the equation, and THEY were insisting that Windows servers were not negotiable 5 years ago! How times change -- Lester Caine - G8HFL - Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] php accelorator
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 22:38 +0100, Lester Caine wrote: Robert Cummings wrote: Lester Caine wrote: Robert Cummings wrote: I use FastCGI and the NTS version of PHP in Windows because that is the configuration recommended by PHP on their website. After experiencing the instability of PHP as relates to the module version in Windows (using eAccelerator at the time), I switched to FastCGI NTS as recommended and then had to hunt down an appropriate accelerator. Wincache was in beta at the time and worked very well. As such it is my recommended accelerator for Windows since it works with PHP FastCGI and works well. Well I have no problem with my own configuration being unstable - in some 5 years of use. So that would appear to suggest you are using something that has a problem which I am not. I also have only ever used TS version again without any stability problems. Part of the problem here is people saying It does not work but not actually helping to identify WHAT does not work :( I just realized btw... I haven't mentioned that the recommendation is for IIS in Windows... bleh. I don't think the problem exists when using Apache under windows. We were forced to use IIS in this particular case due to Government department policy. You have my sympathies ;) We established early on that IIS was unsuitable for the type of sites were run and have never had any problem convincing customers of the facts. MANY of them have now moved the web servers to Linux simply to remove windows from the equation, and THEY were insisting that Windows servers were not negotiable 5 years ago! How times change -- Lester Caine - G8HFL - Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php off-topic/ It's odd sometimes how a lot of public sectors seem to shy away from open source software for one reason or another. I've heard people say they don't trust free software as there's nobody to call when something goes wrong (by someone arguing the merits of MS Office over OpenOffice, because MS have never done anything that locked people out of their own protected documents before http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2009/07/31/office_for_mac_service_pack_woes/ ) I've even heard people say Firefox wasn't trustworthy software, and was essentially a trojan (this from a school ICT technician) for malware. I'm not sure who's feeding this disinformation to the public sector, but I could take a few guesses... Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
Re: [PHP] php accelorator
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Ashley Sheridan a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote: On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 22:38 +0100, Lester Caine wrote: Robert Cummings wrote: Lester Caine wrote: Robert Cummings wrote: I use FastCGI and the NTS version of PHP in Windows because that is the configuration recommended by PHP on their website. After experiencing the instability of PHP as relates to the module version in Windows (using eAccelerator at the time), I switched to FastCGI NTS as recommended and then had to hunt down an appropriate accelerator. Wincache was in beta at the time and worked very well. As such it is my recommended accelerator for Windows since it works with PHP FastCGI and works well. Well I have no problem with my own configuration being unstable - in some 5 years of use. So that would appear to suggest you are using something that has a problem which I am not. I also have only ever used TS version again without any stability problems. Part of the problem here is people saying It does not work but not actually helping to identify WHAT does not work :( I just realized btw... I haven't mentioned that the recommendation is for IIS in Windows... bleh. I don't think the problem exists when using Apache under windows. We were forced to use IIS in this particular case due to Government department policy. You have my sympathies ;) We established early on that IIS was unsuitable for the type of sites were run and have never had any problem convincing customers of the facts. MANY of them have now moved the web servers to Linux simply to remove windows from the equation, and THEY were insisting that Windows servers were not negotiable 5 years ago! How times change -- Lester Caine - G8HFL - Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php off-topic/ It's odd sometimes how a lot of public sectors seem to shy away from open source software for one reason or another. I've heard people say they don't trust free software as there's nobody to call when something goes wrong (by someone arguing the merits of MS Office over OpenOffice, because MS have never done anything that locked people out of their own protected documents before http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2009/07/31/office_for_mac_service_pack_woes/ ) I've even heard people say Firefox wasn't trustworthy software, and was essentially a trojan (this from a school ICT technician) for malware. I'm not sure who's feeding this disinformation to the public sector, but I could take a few guesses... Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk off-topic Yeah Yeah, I know some such samplepieces. Such people are usually found in very rich households, at least in my country (India). Recently my friend's dad's computer was infected with virus it seems, and he was using QuickHeal antivirus which is worst ! And he says, he doesn't trust free products when I suggested use of Avast one of the best ! That was big OMG for me !! -- Nilesh Govindarajan Facebook: nilesh.gr Twitter: nileshgr Website: www.itech7.com Cheap and Reliable VPS Hosting: http://j.mp/arHk5e -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] php accelorator
Hi, Are any of you using any of the php accelorators such as Zend, Ioncube, or any others? Any idea which is the best? -- -Dan Joseph www.canishosting.com - Unlimited Hosting Plans start @ $3.95/month. Promo Code NEWTHINGS for 10% off initial order http://www.facebook.com/canishosting http://www.facebook.com/originalpoetry
Re: [PHP] php accelorator
Dan Joseph wrote: Hi, Are any of you using any of the php accelorators such as Zend, Ioncube, or any others? Any idea which is the best? I am partial to eAccelerator for *nixes. And wincache for Windows. Cheers, Rob. -- E-Mail Disclaimer: Information contained in this message and any attached documents is considered confidential and legally protected. This message is intended solely for the addressee(s). Disclosure, copying, and distribution are prohibited unless authorized. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] php accelorator
Robert Cummings wrote: Dan Joseph wrote: Hi, Are any of you using any of the php accelorators such as Zend, Ioncube, or any others? Any idea which is the best? I am partial to eAccelerator for *nixes. And wincache for Windows. eAccelerator works fine for me ... on linux and windows ... -- Lester Caine - G8HFL - Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] php accelorator
On 06/02/2010 12:35 AM, Dan Joseph wrote: Hi, Are any of you using any of the php accelorators such as Zend, Ioncube, or any others? Any idea which is the best? APC opcode caching works well. -- With warm regards, Sudheer. S Tech stuff: http://techchorus.net Business: http://binaryvibes.co.in -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
