Re: [PHP-DOC] about users notes
> I found a error in a users notes. There is a example missing a "/". How > can I fix it? > I have a cvs account, can I do this or I must do a bug report? In order to edit user notes, you must login. There used to be an official place to do this but I don't think there is now. One place you can login at is: http://master.php.net/manage/users.php Once logged in, each user note will include three options: edit, reject, and delete. Anyone with CVS access can edit user notes. Regards, Philip -- PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DOC] about users notes
I found a error in a users notes. There is a example missing a "/". How can I fix it? I have a cvs account, can I do this or I must do a bug report? Thanks Fernando Correa da Conceição(fernandoc) -- PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DOC] #22804 [Opn]: Session page in the manual should not refer to PHPLIB
ID: 22804 Updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reported By: simon at incutio dot com Status: Open Bug Type:Documentation problem PHP Version: 4.3.1 New Comment: Here's the second paragraph of ref.session: If you are familiar with the session management of PHPLIB, you will notice that some concepts are similar to PHP's session support. Seems we have ~three options: A) Leave it alone B) Create a faq in faq.migration4 that mentions native session support exists as of php4, and that phplib did offer session support in php3 (it still does too :). phplib : http://phplib.sourceforge.net/ C) Delete it. If worded correctly I prefer (B) because history is good and it's appropriate, (C) is fine too as there are many applications that offer non-native session support. Previous Comments: [2003-03-28 17:51:51] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nitsch, welcome to your black hole. This bug database is for the language PHP and not some third party script that happens to be written in PHP. Regarding your report, how about learning what open source means before utilizing it. How much did you pay for that software? $0.00. So you found a bug, great, here are some more appropriate options: a) Submit the bug to the proper authorities in a useful manner (ex. without the baggage). b) Submit a patch (fix it for the benefit of all users, including yourself). c) Don't submit anything at all. [2003-03-28 16:04:50] Nitsch at telus dot net Printout of your ppphpbb 2.0 Users Guide. First of all the page numbers are useless! 5 to 11 for over 45 pages??? Second the contents are dismal missing reference to numerous features. Like Oldest first, Newest first etc. etc. there is a general absence of explanations as to what can and can not be modified and set to "default" function. If anything Newest first woild make a lot more sense than Oldest first. Who want's to look at old stuff. Unless you are masochistically inclined. The same goes for "All posts". Hope this isn't going into the proverbial 'Black hole in the universe'. But then nothing would surprise me on the phpbb [2003-03-20 07:18:18] simon at incutio dot com The sessions page of the PHP manual compares PHP's session handling to the session features built in to PHPLib: http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.session.php While this may have been relevant a few years ago when PHPLib was in wide spread use, these days PHPLib is hardly used and the comparison could prove confusing to new users. I suggest removing the mention of PHPLib from the description of PHP's session support. -- Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=22804&edit=1 -- PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DOC] #22804 [Opn]: Session page in the manual should not refer to PHPLIB
ID: 22804 Updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reported By: simon at incutio dot com Status: Open Bug Type:Documentation problem PHP Version: 4.3.1 New Comment: Nitsch, welcome to your black hole. This bug database is for the language PHP and not some third party script that happens to be written in PHP. Regarding your report, how about learning what open source means before utilizing it. How much did you pay for that software? $0.00. So you found a bug, great, here are some more appropriate options: a) Submit the bug to the proper authorities in a useful manner (ex. without the baggage). b) Submit a patch (fix it for the benefit of all users, including yourself). c) Don't submit anything at all. Previous Comments: [2003-03-28 16:04:50] Nitsch at telus dot net Printout of your ppphpbb 2.0 Users Guide. First of all the page numbers are useless! 5 to 11 for over 45 pages??? Second the contents are dismal missing reference to numerous features. Like Oldest first, Newest first etc. etc. there is a general absence of explanations as to what can and can not be modified and set to "default" function. If anything Newest first woild make a lot more sense than Oldest first. Who want's to look at old stuff. Unless you are masochistically inclined. The same goes for "All posts". Hope this isn't going into the proverbial 'Black hole in the universe'. But then nothing would surprise me on the phpbb [2003-03-20 07:18:18] simon at incutio dot com The sessions page of the PHP manual compares PHP's session handling to the session features built in to PHPLib: http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.session.php While this may have been relevant a few years ago when PHPLib was in wide spread use, these days PHPLib is hardly used and the comparison could prove confusing to new users. I suggest removing the mention of PHPLib from the description of PHP's session support. -- Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=22804&edit=1 -- PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DOC] #22804 [Com]: Session page in the manual should not refer to PHPLIB
ID: 22804 Comment by: Nitsch at telus dot net Reported By: simon at incutio dot com Status: Open Bug Type:Documentation problem PHP Version: 4.3.1 New Comment: Printout of your ppphpbb 2.0 Users Guide. First of all the page numbers are useless! 5 to 11 for over 45 pages??? Second the contents are dismal missing reference to numerous features. Like Oldest first, Newest first etc. etc. there is a general absence of explanations as to what can and can not be modified and set to "default" function. If anything Newest first woild make a lot more sense than Oldest first. Who want's to look at old stuff. Unless you are masochistically inclined. The same goes for "All posts". Hope this isn't going into the proverbial 'Black hole in the universe'. But then nothing would surprise me on the phpbb Previous Comments: [2003-03-20 07:18:18] simon at incutio dot com The sessions page of the PHP manual compares PHP's session handling to the session features built in to PHPLib: http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.session.php While this may have been relevant a few years ago when PHPLib was in wide spread use, these days PHPLib is hardly used and the comparison could prove confusing to new users. I suggest removing the mention of PHPLib from the description of PHP's session support. -- Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=22804&edit=1 -- PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DOC] discussion: ease of translation
hi, while translating openssl to german following comes to my mind and I wanna ask for your opinion. Paremeter is used by four functions, with identical purpose and description. Instead of repeating the same description 'many' times, it seems more convinient to have the description in one place and 'include' it where approptiate (similar to entities, but just extensionwise like openssl/note-openssl-cnf.xml introduced some time ago by wez). This would result in placing parameter-notext.xml in /refernce/openssl/ and linking &refernce.openssl.parameter-notext; the files in question. advantage: - write once, consistent, use often ;-) - speeds up translations, translate once and be sure you are done ;-) disadvantage: - cluttering of /reference/{extension} main directory for example: "/usr/bin/cvs" -z6 diff "openssl-csr-export-to-file.xml" Index: openssl-csr-export-to-file.xml === RCS file: /repository/phpdoc/en/reference/openssl/functions/openssl-csr-export-to-file.xml,v retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.4 openssl-csr-export-to-file.xml --- openssl-csr-export-to-file.xml 10 Dec 2002 19:13:48 - 1.4 +++ openssl-csr-export-to-file.xml 24 Mar 2003 13:03:08 - @@ -18,11 +18,8 @@ openssl_csr_export_to_file takes the Certificate Signing Request represented by csr and saves it as ascii-armoured text into the file named by outfilename. + &reference.openssl.parameter-notext; &return.success; - The optional notext affects - the verbosity of the output; if it is &false; then additional human-readable information is included - in the output. The default value of notext is - &true; See also openssl_csr_export, and parameter-notext.xml: The optional notext affects the verbosity of the output; if it is &false; then additional human-readable information is included in the output. The default value of notext is &true;. opinions? Friedhelm -- PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php