||*()*|| Hi, Sean. ...
SC> I look at the proposal system as a way to work ideas into a solution SC> that the majority (and sure, ideally everyone) can be happy with. SC> For example, I have a pseudo-proposal that I've been stalling on, SC> waiting for the RFC system. Philip also has one (that may have already SC> been adopted.. ?). http://wiki.phpdoc.info/RFC. My Nomenclature SC> proposal, for example, isn't something I want to work out on my own. I SC> don't want to say "Here are the rules. Follow them." I want us to come SC> to a concensus (as you put it) on the best practices. I think we can do SC> that. SC> Please don't look at it as "conflict" and "force", but as "problem" and SC> "possible solution." Ok. =) But I think proposal system is bad technicaly, because: 1. It doesn't have revision history - you can't track discussion flow. 2. No revision history - smb. can't be sure, that he/she agreed on first revision of proposal or some later edition. 3. No separated feature votings - there is often a situation when you generally agree with proposal, but some of the features are badly wrong an you have to put accent on them every time. Well, frankly speaking I don't mind if we will use that system to draw more attention to this part of phpdoc activity. I don't even know why me personally dislike the PePr in application to RFC - perhaps I have a feeling, that it will not be so popular or will be misused. =) t --
