[phpsoa] Re: Google Groups are broken
On 27 Apr, 14:24, cem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: .. in deference to the grammar police. It's seems that Google have made a few changes recently (I've seen changes to the interface) and they seem to have introduced instability. Simon --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups phpsoa group. To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[phpsoa] Re: Running PHP Unit tests
On 27 Apr, 14:20, cem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Apr 26, 5:03 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the run.bat file under /tests the command line is phpunit SCA_SDO_TestSuite TestSuite.php Should this be php path/to/phpunit SCA_SDO_TestSuite TestSuite.php Or am I doing something wrong/have the wrong version of something? Simon I'm not sure they should be there at all - they look as if they belong with an older version of phpunit, and they are not present in the MAIN branch. Even if they worked, what advantage would they offer over just: php TestSuite.php ? OK, so shall we dump them? Simon --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups phpsoa group. To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[phpsoa] Re: New tests and examples
On 27 Apr, 16:39, Matthew Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did get some misbehaviour when I run these tests, but I have fixed them both. (1) One stems from the lines like this on in RestRpcTest.php::setUp() as follows: $this-response = file_get_contents(SCA/phpunit/RestRpc/ RestRpcTestService.response); I have fixed them to be like this: $this-response = file_get_contents(dirname(__FILE__) . / RestRpcTestService.response); which makes the tests independent of where they are run from. (2) I have also changed uses of header() to SCA::sendHttpHeader(), which I originally put in so that we could add unit tests for anything coming out of header(); also it means you don't get the Cannot modify header information messages which I otherwise get all the time. I have checked these changes in. There is now only one failure which is the SMD generation test. Shall I mark this as to be skipped? Or raise a defect? Matthew On Apr 27, 2:31 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've checked some tests in for JsonRpc and RestRpc Although they run I am getting some warnings. I've taken the approach with the tests of trying to push tests messages through as much of the infrastructure as possible and parts of it are complaining about being run in a test environment. Anyhow I prefer to have the tests with warnings rather than no tests at all. I've also added some more SCA examples base on some of the examples that have been used at recent conferences. Simon Thanks for doing that Matthew. I didn't get a failure with SMD generation so let me try it again wit your changes. Simon --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups phpsoa group. To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
