Re: PicoLisp Book

2012-07-21 Thread Christophe Gragnic
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@googlemail.com wrote:

 BTW
 I just found out that there is an upper limit for book size (at
 Amazon some 870 pages or so) in self-publishing, so if I include the
 function reference (some 200 pages) and the rosettacode examples (huge),
 what I really would like to do, there might be no other choice than
 making it two books (i.e. there might be two different covers ;)

Do you know about Lulu:
http://www.lulu.com/
I guess Amazon is bigger so it must have some nicer stuff, do you know
how they compare?


chri
-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe


Re: PicoLisp Book

2012-07-21 Thread Laurent Artaud

Le 21/07/2012 20:05, Thorsten Jolitz a écrit :

Terry Palfrey terrypalfrey...@gmail.com
writes:

BTW
I just found out that there is an upper limit for book size (at
Amazon some 870 pages or so) in self-publishing, so if I include the
function reference (some 200 pages) and the rosettacode examples (huge),
what I really would like to do, there might be no other choice than
making it two books (i.e. there might be two different covers ;)




I fear that the price tag for a book this size would be outside of what I would 
pay for.
I would suggest that you consider PDF or ePub: it would both remove the maximum 
size limit and reduce your publication costs.


On a side note, I personally consider that a function reference MUST have a 
search engine, and as such, if you don't intend to expand on the online one 
(more examples, reasons for the use of one rather than the other in case of 
similar functionality, ...), then I don't think you should include the reference 
in a paper book.


Regards,

--
Laurent ARTAUD
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe


Re: PicoLisp Book

2012-07-21 Thread Terry Palfrey
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@googlemail.comwrote:

Terry Palfrey terrypalfrey...@gmail.com writes:

  I was thinking of some sort of graphic to imply works like a
  waterworks or something that was

 Cover design is definitely a topic where I would love to get input from
 the community, since I'm not a designer.


I was thinking of a hopper feed for ideas and code coming out in bundles or
something clever like that.


 It seems the name of the book has more or less converged to PicoLisp
 Works, so the cover design should be based on that name.


It's so appropriate.


 Your graphic looks really nice - I like it, thanks. I hope there are no
 copyright on any of the parts?


I bought this package and rendered the image and then modified it in
paint.net.


Re: PicoLisp Book

2012-07-21 Thread Terry Palfrey
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@googlemail.comwrote:

Laurent Artaud laurent.art...@free.fr writes:

  Le 21/07/2012 20:05, Thorsten Jolitz a écrit :



  Terry Palfrey terrypalfrey...@gmail.com writes:

  BTW
  I just found out that there is an upper limit for book size (at
  Amazon some 870 pages or so) in self-publishing, so if I include the
  function reference (some 200 pages) and the rosettacode examples (huge),
  what I really would like to do, there might be no other choice than
  making it two books (i.e. there might be two different covers ;)

  I fear that the price tag for a book this size would be outside of
  what I would pay for.



  I would suggest that you consider PDF or ePub: it would both remove
  the maximum size limit and reduce your publication costs.

 With the 2 volume solution, Vol.1 with all the docs, references and
 articles would probably have some 330 to 350 pages, and might be still
 affordable. Vol. 2 with the function reference and the rosettacode
 examples might be twice as big. I think ebooks are often included in
 self-publishing offers.


Adding limitations where none exist is not a good practise.

There are many people who wish to have and to hold a print version of a
book.
They will pay for their preference or not.

A PDF and a ePub and any other electronic version is not mutually exclusive