Re: forgotten password
Thanks, but the problem is solved. It was for picolisp.com wiki site. viKid -- vuk...@fastmail.com On Thu, Nov 17, 2016, at 10:59 AM, Joh-Tob Schäg wrote: > Forgot your password for what service? > Am 17.11.2016 07:53 schrieb : >> Hi, >> >> my login name is vikid >> >> but I forgot my password. >> >> thanks, >> >> vidyuth >> >> -- >> >>vuk...@fastmail.com >> -- >> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Re: forgotten password
Forgot your password for what service? Am 17.11.2016 07:53 schrieb : > Hi, > > my login name is vikid > > but I forgot my password. > > thanks, > > vidyuth > > -- > > vuk...@fastmail.com > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe >
forgotten password
Hi, my login name is vikid but I forgot my password. thanks, vidyuth -- vuk...@fastmail.com -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Re: First post
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:52:02PM +0100, Joh-Tob Schäg wrote: > Just out of curiosity: > Is there a more elegant way to have links with properties than the way i > mentioned? No, looks good. The person objects are connected via +Link's or +Joint's, and may of course have properties like a year or simply a +Date. Also, your note about a (+List +Link) etc. is all right. ♪♫ Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Re: First post
Dear Regenaxer, Just out of curiosity: Is there a more elegant way to have links with properties than the way i mentioned? Am 16.11.2016 15:44 schrieb "Alexander Burger" : > Hi Joh-Tob, Eric, > > > i talked about storing Pilog rules in a database with Regenaxer(Alexander > > Burger) before. He did it once. > > Yes, that simply stored Pilog rules (which are Lisp data) in DB objects, > and called 'goal' and 'prove' on them. > > Of course, you can create DB objects with any kinds of properties and > relations. I'm afraid this is a bit beyond the possibilities of a mail > here ;) > > ♪♫ Alex > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe >
Re: First post
Hi Joh-Tob, Eric, > i talked about storing Pilog rules in a database with Regenaxer(Alexander > Burger) before. He did it once. Yes, that simply stored Pilog rules (which are Lisp data) in DB objects, and called 'goal' and 'prove' on them. Of course, you can create DB objects with any kinds of properties and relations. I'm afraid this is a bit beyond the possibilities of a mail here ;) ♪♫ Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Re: map-reduce
"Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced." Or something like that … freeemint_ Am 16.11.2016 12:15 schrieb "Mike Pechkin" : > > > >> The parallel magic seems to be here: >> >> > PicoLisp is pure magic itself. > > Mike > > > >
Re: map-reduce
> The parallel magic seems to be here: > > PicoLisp is pure magic itself. Mike
Re: First post
Am 16.11.2016 08:59 schrieb "CILz" :
>
> Hello freeemint_,
>
> Thanks for your answer. May be Alexander will be able to give us some
tips.
As we all do.
>
> Regarding my second question, I wonder if we can build Lisp statements
(not Pilog ones) and commit them to the database to translate:
> Person 'Vincent'
>
> LOVES
>
> Person 'Mia'
>
> since '2015'
>
> In other words, can we add a-kind-of 'property' to a relation?
>
> Two my knowledge so far, I know that we can define an 'object' Person
with a 'rel' name and an other rel +Link for 'LOVES' but can we add the
property 'since 2015' to that rel 'LOVES'?
Not directly to my knowledge.
Just create an element for the loves relationship which has +Link-s or rels
to both objects(persons) and store the year in it too. Each person +Link-s
to this relationship struct. Note since we have to store a +Link inside the
person object, a person can only love a single person. For that you might
want to take a look at +Bag or +List. However this construct can also
represent one-sided loves.
The idea us basicly:
[Mara Lin; LOVES] : person
^ I
I V
[p1; p2; +date] : relationship
I ^
V I
[Edi Ward; LOVES] : person
>
> If so we have a property graph database!!
>
> Best,
> Eric
Best,
freeemint_
>
> Le 16/11/2016 à 08:19, Joh-Tob Schäg a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> i talked about storing Pilog rules in a database with
Regenaxer(Alexander Burger) before. He did it once.
>>
>> I hope that helps.
>> Maybe he still has the source.
>>
>> I do not understand your second question. Can you reformulate it? Maybe
with an example?
>>
>> 2016-11-16 7:59 GMT+01:00 CILz :
>>>
>>> Hi Brad,
>>>
>>> In fact we already have "a-kind-of" graph database! Isn't Prolog all
about relation? And Pilog is Prolog on top of PicoLisp, no?
>>>
>>> When we write:
>>>
>>> (be person (Vincent))
>>>
>>> (be person (Mia))
>>>
>>> (be loves (Vincent Mia 2015))
>>>
>>> we define a relation called 'loves' between two 'persons' say 'Vincent'
and 'Mia' which started in '2015'.
>>>
>>> In cypher (Neo4's own query language) I would have written something
like this:
>>>
>>> create (n:Person {name: {Vincent}})-[:LOVES {since:
{2015}}]->(m:Person {name: {Mia}})
>>>
>>> Hence, as far as I understand PL, we are nearly there. My own open
questions are:
>>>
>>> 1) Can we commit the Pilog statements to the database?
>>>
>>> 2) Can we achieve something equivalent to the Pilog statements
above directly from Lisp side and commit them to the database?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Eric
>>>
>>> Le 14/11/2016 à 13:24, Brad Collins a écrit :
A graph database written in picolisp that uses something
like pilog would be very useful for me as well.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
>>
>>
>
