[jira] Commented: (PIG-1635) Logical simplifier does not simplify away constants under AND and OR; after simplificaion the ordering of operands of AND and OR may get changed
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12914662#action_12914662 ] Daniel Dai commented on PIG-1635: - +1, patch looks good. Also can you have a review of all connect/disconnect usage in ExpressionSimplifer, according to [PIG-1644|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1644]? I see lots of misuse in other rules. Logical simplifier does not simplify away constants under AND and OR; after simplificaion the ordering of operands of AND and OR may get changed Key: PIG-1635 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1635 Project: Pig Issue Type: Bug Components: impl Affects Versions: 0.8.0 Reporter: Yan Zhou Assignee: Yan Zhou Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.8.0 Attachments: PIG-1635.patch b = FILTER a by (( f1 1) AND (1 == 1)) or b = FILTER a by ((f1 1) OR ( 1==0)) should be simplified to b = FILTER a by f1 1; Regarding ordering change, an example is that b = filter a by ((f1 is not null) AND (f2 is not null)); Even without possible simplification, the expression is changed to b = filter a by ((f2 is not null) AND (f1 is not null)); Even though the ordering change in this case, and probably in most other cases, does not create any difference, but for two reasons some users might care about the ordering: if stateful UDFs are used as operands of AND or OR; and if the ordering is intended by the application designer to maximize the chances to shortcut the composite boolean evaluation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (PIG-1635) Logical simplifier does not simplify away constants under AND and OR; after simplificaion the ordering of operands of AND and OR may get changed
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12914672#action_12914672 ] Yan Zhou commented on PIG-1635: --- I did a thorough check for this patch. Actually some of the ordering changes were caused by the mentioned misuse. Thanks. Logical simplifier does not simplify away constants under AND and OR; after simplificaion the ordering of operands of AND and OR may get changed Key: PIG-1635 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1635 Project: Pig Issue Type: Bug Components: impl Affects Versions: 0.8.0 Reporter: Yan Zhou Assignee: Yan Zhou Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.8.0 Attachments: PIG-1635.patch b = FILTER a by (( f1 1) AND (1 == 1)) or b = FILTER a by ((f1 1) OR ( 1==0)) should be simplified to b = FILTER a by f1 1; Regarding ordering change, an example is that b = filter a by ((f1 is not null) AND (f2 is not null)); Even without possible simplification, the expression is changed to b = filter a by ((f2 is not null) AND (f1 is not null)); Even though the ordering change in this case, and probably in most other cases, does not create any difference, but for two reasons some users might care about the ordering: if stateful UDFs are used as operands of AND or OR; and if the ordering is intended by the application designer to maximize the chances to shortcut the composite boolean evaluation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (PIG-1635) Logical simplifier does not simplify away constants under AND and OR; after simplificaion the ordering of operands of AND and OR may get changed
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12914675#action_12914675 ] Daniel Dai commented on PIG-1635: - +1 for commit. Logical simplifier does not simplify away constants under AND and OR; after simplificaion the ordering of operands of AND and OR may get changed Key: PIG-1635 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1635 Project: Pig Issue Type: Bug Components: impl Affects Versions: 0.8.0 Reporter: Yan Zhou Assignee: Yan Zhou Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.8.0 Attachments: PIG-1635.patch b = FILTER a by (( f1 1) AND (1 == 1)) or b = FILTER a by ((f1 1) OR ( 1==0)) should be simplified to b = FILTER a by f1 1; Regarding ordering change, an example is that b = filter a by ((f1 is not null) AND (f2 is not null)); Even without possible simplification, the expression is changed to b = filter a by ((f2 is not null) AND (f1 is not null)); Even though the ordering change in this case, and probably in most other cases, does not create any difference, but for two reasons some users might care about the ordering: if stateful UDFs are used as operands of AND or OR; and if the ordering is intended by the application designer to maximize the chances to shortcut the composite boolean evaluation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (PIG-1635) Logical simplifier does not simplify away constants under AND and OR; after simplificaion the ordering of operands of AND and OR may get changed
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12914145#action_12914145 ] Yan Zhou commented on PIG-1635: --- test-patch results: [exec] +1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. Logical simplifier does not simplify away constants under AND and OR; after simplificaion the ordering of operands of AND and OR may get changed Key: PIG-1635 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1635 Project: Pig Issue Type: Bug Components: impl Affects Versions: 0.8.0 Reporter: Yan Zhou Assignee: Yan Zhou Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.8.0 Attachments: PIG-1635.patch b = FILTER a by (( f1 1) AND (1 == 1)) or b = FILTER a by ((f1 1) OR ( 1==0)) should be simplified to b = FILTER a by f1 1; Regarding ordering change, an example is that b = filter a by ((f1 is not null) AND (f2 is not null)); Even without possible simplification, the expression is changed to b = filter a by ((f2 is not null) AND (f1 is not null)); Even though the ordering change in this case, and probably in most other cases, does not create any difference, but for two reasons some users might care about the ordering: if stateful UDFs are used as operands of AND or OR; and if the ordering is intended by the application designer to maximize the chances to shortcut the composite boolean evaluation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (PIG-1635) Logical simplifier does not simplify away constants under AND and OR; after simplificaion the ordering of operands of AND and OR may get changed
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12914150#action_12914150 ] Yan Zhou commented on PIG-1635: --- All test-core tests also run clean. Logical simplifier does not simplify away constants under AND and OR; after simplificaion the ordering of operands of AND and OR may get changed Key: PIG-1635 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1635 Project: Pig Issue Type: Bug Components: impl Affects Versions: 0.8.0 Reporter: Yan Zhou Assignee: Yan Zhou Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.8.0 Attachments: PIG-1635.patch b = FILTER a by (( f1 1) AND (1 == 1)) or b = FILTER a by ((f1 1) OR ( 1==0)) should be simplified to b = FILTER a by f1 1; Regarding ordering change, an example is that b = filter a by ((f1 is not null) AND (f2 is not null)); Even without possible simplification, the expression is changed to b = filter a by ((f2 is not null) AND (f1 is not null)); Even though the ordering change in this case, and probably in most other cases, does not create any difference, but for two reasons some users might care about the ordering: if stateful UDFs are used as operands of AND or OR; and if the ordering is intended by the application designer to maximize the chances to shortcut the composite boolean evaluation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (PIG-1635) Logical simplifier does not simplify away constants under AND and OR; after simplificaion the ordering of operands of AND and OR may get changed
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12913036#action_12913036 ] Yan Zhou commented on PIG-1635: --- This is regarding a new feature (PIG-1399) added for 0.8. Logical simplifier does not simplify away constants under AND and OR; after simplificaion the ordering of operands of AND and OR may get changed Key: PIG-1635 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1635 Project: Pig Issue Type: Bug Components: impl Affects Versions: 0.8.0 Reporter: Yan Zhou Assignee: Yan Zhou Priority: Minor b = FILTER a by (( f1 1) AND (1 == 1)) or b = FILTER a by ((f1 1) OR ( 1==0)) should be simplified to b = FILTER a by f1 1; Regarding ordering change, an example is that b = filter a by ((f1 is not null) AND (f2 is not null)); Even without possible simplification, the expression is changed to b = filter a by ((f2 is not null) AND (f1 is not null)); Even though the ordering change in this case, and probably in most other cases, does not create any difference, but for two reasons some users might care about the ordering: if stateful UDFs are used as operands of AND or OR; and if the ordering is intended by the application designer to maximize the chances to shortcut the composite boolean evaluation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
