[jira] Commented: (PIG-1659) sortinfo is not set for store if there is a filter after ORDER BY
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12916998#action_12916998 ] Daniel Dai commented on PIG-1659: - We should set sortInfo after optimization. So we should add SetSortInfo after the optimization of new logical plan. This code is missing. sortinfo is not set for store if there is a filter after ORDER BY - Key: PIG-1659 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1659 Project: Pig Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.8.0 Reporter: Yan Zhou Assignee: Daniel Dai Fix For: 0.8.0 This has caused 6 (of 7) failures in the Zebra test TestOrderPreserveVariableTable. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (PIG-1659) sortinfo is not set for store if there is a filter after ORDER BY
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12917012#action_12917012 ] Yan Zhou commented on PIG-1659: --- Need to make sure it is invoked after optimization in both old and new logical plans. sortinfo is not set for store if there is a filter after ORDER BY - Key: PIG-1659 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1659 Project: Pig Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.8.0 Reporter: Yan Zhou Assignee: Daniel Dai Fix For: 0.8.0 This has caused 6 (of 7) failures in the Zebra test TestOrderPreserveVariableTable. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
