Re: [pinhole-discussion] Re: Exposure scale

2002-03-27 Thread John Yeo
You can always convert it to a .pdf file using a program called Pstill.  Get
it at
http://download.cnet.com/downloads/0-10074-100-1628951.html?tag=st.dl.10001-
103-1.lst-7-4.1628951

If the url is broken, COPY AND PASTE IT TOGETHER!  Rob - you might want
to put up the .pdf version.

John


 I have nice paper one.  Two discs that work together just like Zernike's.
 You can find it at
 http://www.panix.com/~reynolds/photography/pinhole/pincalc.html
 It's the second link on the page.

 It's a POSTSCRIPT file... if you don't know what to do with a Postscript
 file (which is really meant for sending directly to a Postscript
printer)...
 I'd recommend opening it with Adobe Illustrator.  Otherwise, you may need
to
 download Ghostscript, MacGS, or something similar - all of which have been
 big headaches for me personally.  UNIX systems normally have utilities to
 open postscript files.  It's possible that MacOS X does as well.  Again,
 Adobe Illustrator is probably your best bet.

 If you download it and can't get it to work, PLEASE EMAIL ME... I don't
want
 to be responsible for starting a big Postscript debate on the list!!!  In
 the worst case, I'll just print it out and mail it to you!  :)

 Rob.

 BTW, if you have one and you're wondering if it's the same.. this is the
one
 that says Belichtungswert-Erweiterung (Exposure Value Extension) on it.





Re: [pinhole-discussion] Re: image circle relative to focal length/fstop

2002-03-27 Thread G.Penate
- Original Message -
From: Zernike Au zern...@zeroimage.com

 If you want to control the circular image to 2' or 3 (the range is quite
 big!), the main factor is
 the thickness of the front panel of your camera that hold the pinhole and
 where you mount the pinhole, and also the size of the opening of the front
 panel.

Sure, that's a  way to restrict the size of the image circle.   If you go that
way, instead you may just want to make  a circular cut out of opaque material,
print the image with your enlarger then place this circular cut out in the
center turn on the room lights some seconds, presto! you have your circular
image!  Photoshop would make it even easier/faster to achieve it.   Not quite
sure the aesthetics would be what Thom is looking for, tho, but as always, I may
be wrong.

Guillermo





[pinhole-discussion] Re: image circle relative to focal length/fstop

2002-03-27 Thread Zernike Au
Hello Thom,
Is that you want to get a circlar image with dark corner or dark edge?
What film format are you going to use.
I try to make pinhole camera to avoid dard corner, my 1 inch focal legnth
cameras can cover the whole 4 x 5 film!

If you want to control the circular image to 2' or 3 (the range is quite
big!), the main factor is
the thickness of the front panel of your camera that hold the pinhole and
where you mount the pinhole, and also the size of the opening of the front
panel. Focal length is also a factor.
Try to draw a section view (1:1) of your camera with the pinhole, front
panel(with opening) and the film plan,
then draw a projection line starting from the pinhole, through the upper and
lower edge of the opening of the front panel, then you can get the image
circle (you can get the diameter from the drawing).
Adjust the thickness of the front panel or the distance between the pinhole
and the front panel, or the focal length will change the size of the image
circle.
You can also control the sharpness of the circular image by adjust the
distance between the pinhole and the front panel.
***We don't take in consideration of the thickness of the pinhole material,
the one I use is 0.001 inch.
Hope this may help.

Zernike


 - Original Message -
 From: Thom Mitchell tjmi...@ix.netcom.com
 To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
 Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 5:44 PM
 Subject: [pinhole-discussion] image circle relative to focal
 length/fstop


 How can I quickly determine the size of the image circle for a given
 focal length and f/stop. I want to be able to keep an image circle
 from getting too big, i.e. I want it to be 2' or 3''. Any quick help
 would be appreciated as would simple rules of thumb as opposed to some
 of the derivative calculus I sometimes