[pinhole-discussion] 'Blender' pinhole camera

2003-04-07 Thread Andrew Amundsen
From: George L Smyth glsm...@myway.com wrote:
 
 For some reason I do not get a scroll bar on the right, so I am not able to
 get to all of the images in the left frame.

I ran into the same problem with both Netscape and Internet Explorer.
I could only see the first three images for each artist. Interesting
work that I did see. Do you have any photos of what the inside of the
camera looks like and how the film loads? Best of luck!

Andrew Amundsen




Re: [pinhole-discussion] Pinhole goodies on ebay.

2003-03-23 Thread Andrew Amundsen
They work great on a rangefinder like the Leica! -Andrew

--
From: Jeff dilc...@hiddenworld.net
 I guess when these are in place, you can't use the viewfinder?
 Do you just kind of point and hope?


 On Sunday 23 March 2003 02:03 pm, D. Hill wrote:
 James,

 If I can include very cool pinhole things on ebay -
 zoneplate bodycaps for nikon and canon eos, items
 2919261336 and 2919262111.  God bless Ebay.

 Don



Re: [pinhole-discussion] 6x22 pinhole camera coverage?!

2003-03-15 Thread Andrew Amundsen
The camera is said to have a 60mm focal length. Does anyone have 
experience with images made that wide, nearly 8.5 inches, from such a
focal lenth (at f/360) on 120 film? Are the edges even useful at that
extreme?

I guess what I'm getting at is this camera a gimmick? Will the user
most likey have to crop only the center portion of the neg. for a
usable image and not really get the full 22cm effect?

What do you think?

Thanks, Andrew

--
From: Scott Sellers scottsell...@mindspring.com

 Andrew  Amundsen a...@tcinternet.net wrote (snip):

 My inquiry is regarding how an image would look from such a
 long neg.?  The stated aperture size is f/360. Would the edges
 suffer from extreme distortion? I'm surprised that the coverage
 would even fill that length of 22cm!?

 They share no images produced with said camera so I have
 doubts, with my limited understanding of pinhole imagery, to
 how good the detail would be at the extremes?

 Anyone care to enlighten us with some expertise?

 The main factor when considering coverage is focal length.  To
 get an idea of how a particular FL will cover various formats,
 you could make say an 8x10 a camera of the same focal length,
 shoot some images, then mask off the negative size you are
 considering, be it 6x6, 6x9, 6x22, 4x5, 5x7, etc.

 cheers,
 Scott



[pinhole-discussion] 6x22 pinhole camera coverage?!

2003-03-15 Thread Andrew Amundsen
(I apologize in advance to Zernike Au for bringing up the product of 
an English company, which I understand may have infringed on
copyrights to the Zero Image's beautiful, original hand made wooden
120 series of pinhole cameras.)

In the latest 'Amateur Photographer' magazine(UK) 8 March 2003, there
is a small anouncement of a new 'Silver vista' pinhole camera (pg.5)
which produces a 6x22cm negative, 3 images per 120 roll!

My inquiry is regarding how an image would look from such a long neg.?
The stated aperture size is f/360. Would the edges suffer from extreme
distortion? I'm surprised that the coverage would even fill that
length of 22cm!?

They share no images produced with said camera so I have doubts, with
my limited understanding of pinhole imagery, to how good the detail
would be at the extremes?

Anyone care to enlighten us with some expertise?

Thanks for the time, Andrew 



Re: [pinhole-discussion] The Epson Perfection 3200!

2002-12-31 Thread Andrew Amundsen
Dear Chip, Those are impressive enough, I may not wait for the 3200!
I just haven't been very impressed with my Epson Perfection 1200, but
the 2450 does an excellent job!

Thanks for sharing those, Andrew

--
From: pinholeren...@netscape.net

 the 2450 is great with med.format.I use it with my koni omega 120mm 6x7
 negs  they are outstanding.here are 4 scans from the 2450 .
 http://www1.photosig.com/viewphoto.php?id=255881
 http://www1.photosig.com/viewphoto.php?id=256055
 http://www1.photosig.com/viewphoto.php?id=94420
 http://www1.photosig.com/viewphoto.php?id=349810
 the 35mm is ok- not great but passable unless the neg is on the dark side.
 chip renner



[pinhole-discussion] The Epson Perfection 3200!

2002-12-30 Thread Andrew Amundsen
It never fails: ask for help on a question, two minutes later find the 
answer first! It's called the Epson Perfection 3200, and it was talked
about on the big...@topica.com list forum, not here after all.

Anyway I thought since I brought it up, here's what was said:

http://www.normankoren.com/Tutorials/Epson_flatbeds.html

 Dunno if anyone here has been considering buying an Epson 2450 but you
 might wanna hold off for a month or so for the Perfection 3200 which is
 due in January. This press release just appeared on the Epson german
 site (google translation). I have the 1640 SU which is fine for 4x5 but
 less than marginal for MF. However, even taking into account the usual
 Epson pixel inflation, I would imagine the 3200 would do a reasonable
 job of MF up to at least 16x16.  2540 owners might like to comment.

 It looks as though the price point will be around 490 euros. Expect the
 2540 price to drop accordingly (it's already marked as end-of-life and
 being discounted by retailers).

  EPSON Perfection 3200 photo
 
  World record: First flat bed scanner with 3.200 x 6,400 dpi optical
  dissolution
 
  Duesseldorf, November 2002 - with the EPSON Perfection 3200 photo
  presents the EPSON Germany GmbH that at present first flat bed scanner
  with an optical dissolution of 3.200 x 6,400 dpi. Thus advanced EPSON
  into a new dimension. Beside ambitionierten home users also
  professional photographers and photo laboratories might be interested
  in the new top model of the scanner row of EPSON. Because with its
  high dissolution and its also for central format collecting mains the
  EPSON Perfection 3200 photo also an adequate alternative to film
  scanners represents suitable transmitted light unit. In addition a
  high optical density of  3.4 Dmax as well as an extensive software
  package come, among other things. SilverFast SE 6. USB 2,0 and
  FireWire provide for a fast connection at PC or Mac. The EPSON
  Perfection 3200 photo is available starting from at the beginning of
  of Decembers in the specialized trade.
 
  Flat bed scanner with highest resolution
 
  With the EPSON Perfection 3200 photo sets for EPSON new yardsticks
  within the range of the flat bed scanners: In this Segement an optical
  dissolution of 3.200 x 6,400 is reached for the first time dpi. In
  connection with a 48-Bit-Farbtiefe (internal/external) as well as an
  optical density of  3.4 Dmax it makes possible thereby also
  Durchlichtscans, which become fair even highest requirements. Strong
  enlargements of photos or the treatment of high-contrast slides and
  negatives are not with the new flag ship of the EPSON Flachbettscanner
  row a problem. The proven EPSON know-how, e.g. the Micro Lenses or the
  double CCD technology, it ensures for the fact that the Scan is
  rapidly settled also when high resolutions.



[pinhole-discussion] The next Epson scanner after the 2450?

2002-12-30 Thread Andrew Amundsen
I've been trying to remember and searching the archive for, a 
reference made not long ago here, about a new Epson flat-bed scanner
to hit the market soon.

What was it called the Epson 3200? or 4800? It was said to be of
higher res. than the current 2450.

Who brought that up, because I want to review that info again for a
possible future purchase of a flat-bed film scanner for Med./large
format negs.

Thanks for the help, Andrew Amundsen



Re: [pinhole-discussion] Still Life Compositions

2002-12-29 Thread Andrew Amundsen
Mark may actually be refering to a 25mm equivalent in 35mm terms. I 
know the dual focal length (4x5) pinhole camera I purchased lists it's
focal lengths in 35mm terms: a super wide 12mm and wide 25mm.

Sincerly, Andrew Amundsen


Mike Healy wrote:
 I need to ask you a dumb question. You are able to get 25 mm of focal
 length
 on 4x5? What equipment are you employing, that you can do this? That's a
 separation of 1 lousy inch from pinhole to film plane, isn't it? I'd love
 to
 try that myself. My monorail and bag bellows **AND** recessed lens board
 allow me a fat, gross, long-length 50 mm. What is your trick?

 Okay, another dumb question. With that kind of coverage on tabletop, it
 kind
 of seems like you're going to get the doorway behind you in the image,
 plus
 six miles down the length of the hallway, to say nothing of your own
 entire
 carcass. So I'm kind of wondering, why are you working with 25 mm? That it
 distorts, would be one good reason. But you'll get distortion with 40-60
 mm,
 won't you? Do you have to stick to 25 mm? If I didn't like it that I was
 getting so much into the frame, that probably would be my first point of
 reassessment. Give yourself some bellows. I mean, unless you can position
 your camera so it's a quarter of an inch from your subject matter. I tried
 that recently w/ table top myself. The camera actually cast a shadow onto
 my
 subject. Impossible.

 Mike Healy

 - Original Message -
 From: Mark Andrews mandr...@dragonbones.com
 To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
 Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 6:47 PM
 Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Still Life Compositions


 I am novice pinhole photographer looking for some advice regarding
 shooting
 still life compositions with my 4X5 Pinhole Camera (25mm focal length).

 My issue is that I am trying to limit the elements in my composition, but
 tend to pick up a significant amount of the surrounding area no mater how
 close I am to the still life composition. Is it possible to limit the
 surrounding area? I've seen other pinhole still lifes with a limited
 composition--perhaps this was accomplished in the darkroom?



[pinhole-discussion] Re: Antonio's photos

2002-11-18 Thread Andrew Amundsen
I answered my own question about more frames of Antonio's work. Check out
his site: www.livinginabox.net  under Forest. Really great stuff!!

Tell us more about your working methods!

Andrew

--
From: Andrew  Amundsen a...@tcinternet.net

 Very nice Antonio! I like the photoshop work. Did you hand hold the shot? Do
 you have more frames from this series to share?

 Yours truly, Andrew Amundsen


 --
From: António Vieira antonio.vie...@siemens.com

 Hello

 I have uploaded a picture to the gallery:


 http://www.???/discussion/upload/gallery2002.php?cmd=maxstar
 t=pic=an
 toniovieira_1.jpg


 Made with a cardboard 6x6 camera (kit from OlpeBussiek) with Fuji NPH400.
 I have left only the red  Green channels in photoshop.



[pinhole-discussion] Re:Antonio's photo

2002-11-18 Thread Andrew Amundsen
Very nice Antonio! I like the photoshop work. Did you hand hold the shot? Do
you have more frames from this series to share?

Yours truly, Andrew Amundsen


--
From: António Vieira antonio.vie...@siemens.com

 Hello

 I have uploaded a picture to the gallery:


http://www.???/discussion/upload/gallery2002.php?cmd=maxstar
t=pic=an
 toniovieira_1.jpg


 Made with a cardboard 6x6 camera (kit from OlpeBussiek) with Fuji NPH400.
 I have left only the red  Green channels in photoshop.



Re: [pinhole-discussion] Pinhole Forum

2002-10-31 Thread Andrew Amundsen
From: Tom Miller twmil...@mr.net wrote (snip):
 Hi Andrew,
 
 It will be great to meet you at the forum.  I'm not sure how many
 Minnesotans are on the list.  Probably 4 or 5 I'd guess.  There were
 26 Minnesotans that participated in Worldwide Pinhole Photography Day
 last April.  This was surprising and pleasant to see.

I'd be curious to know how many of us who participated (my image is #98) did
so independently or how many were part of a workshop group? I saw a small
article in a British magazine which led me to contribute for the first time
this year. I had never heard about WWPD before that.

I'm going to revisit the WWPD site and explore a bit, get some insipiration!

Sincerly, Andrew



Re: [pinhole-discussion] Pinhole Forum

2002-10-31 Thread Andrew Amundsen
Are there alot of Minnesotans on this list? I am one who will try to attend!
Tom, why has pARTs changed it's name?

Sincerly, Andrew Amundsen

--
From: Tom Miller twmil...@mr.net wrote:
 Dear All,

 Bill Erickson and I will be co-hosting a pinhole forum at the
 Minnesota Center for Photography (formerly the pARTs Gallery) this
 Sunday, November 3 at 1:00 PM.  More information is at:

 http://www.???/events/index.php?event=400
 http://www.partsphoto.org/frames_ed.html

 Many thanks,
 Tom



Re: [pinhole-discussion] where is the list discussion page/where am i

2002-09-24 Thread Andrew Amundsen
Hopfully we're all out shooting up a storm to share soon!-Andrew

--
From: callum moffat callum...@yahoo.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] where is the list discussion page/where am i
Date: Mon, Sep 23, 2002, 11:53 PM

 dont know if ive deleted my dtails from the list or if
 there is a prob with the discussion list

 anyone help

 anyone out there in cyberspace?? hello??...
 hello???

 callum edinburgh



Re: [pinhole-discussion] Images in show

2002-09-04 Thread Andrew Amundsen
Very nice! (You may have sold me on trying some Holga work).
It fits just fine in with pinhole, congratulations James!

Sincerly, Andrew Amundsen


From: James Kellar pinh...@jameskellar.com
 I just got word that I had 2 images accepted in a show at the Swope Art
 Museum in Terre Haute Indiana. I guess the only bad thing is that while
 I entered 3 images, 1 a pinhole and the other 2 were holga's. The
 pinhole did not get excepted. I know it's not to cool to announce this
 on the pinhole list, but I'm  excited and this is a pretty important
 show for southern Indiana. If you want to see the two images go to
 http://www.jameskellar.com/print1.jpg and
 http://www.jameskellar.com/print2.jpg. The pinhole that didn't make it
 is, http://www.jameskellar.com/print3.jpg.

 Thanks for letting me brag.

 James



Re: [pinhole-discussion] Re: The Great Wall Project

2002-09-03 Thread Andrew Amundsen
Fantastic work! This should inspire us to get back to work with our pinhole
cameras. I've noticed an extreme calm in the 'lake', we need more people to
toss in some stones to cause the ripples to flow again (O.K. maybe TOO
deep!).

How about a monthy group project for all list members. Someone could suggest
a theme every beginning of the month for us to work on, then post our
results at the end of the month. Anyone like this idea? A 'Pinhole-Salon'?

I'll suggest Zernike give us the first theme. How about it?!

Sincerly, Andrew Amundsen

From: Zernike Au zern...@zeroimage.comwrote:

 Hi all pinhole fans,
 It's been a long time I haven't post to this discussion list.
 I finally upload some photos of the Great Wall Project during the 2WPPD and
 would like to share with you all.
 This project is to convert one of the watch tower to a large pinhole camera.
 http://www.zeroimage.com/gallerya/GreatWall/introduction.htm

 Enjoy it.



[pinhole-discussion] Pinhole panoramic camera

2002-07-24 Thread Andrew Amundsen
This link was posted on another list and thought we pinholer's would 
also be interested:
http://www.ibvr.com/NewFiles/Pinhole.html



Re: [pinhole-discussion] 3-hole 4x5 pinhole cameras?

2002-07-19 Thread Andrew Amundsen
A photo reference to the type of camera I'm looking for:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=889017

--
From: Andrew Amundsen a...@tcinternet.net
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] 3-hole 4x5 pinhole cameras?
Date: Fri, Jul 19, 2002, 9:22 AM


From: Gordon J. Holtslander hol...@duke.usask.ca

 Check out my web page  http://cyano.usask.ca/pinhole/ - specifically the
 1st and 2nd image.  These were made with a 6 hole camera that
 takes a 360 degree panoramic made from 6 images superimposed on one
 piece of film. (a 4x10 negative)

 Might be able to make you one.

 Thanks Gordon, Although I want to stick to a 4x5 format (or other
 readily available commercial film) and just 3 holes max. I'll try to
 find an example of what I'm thinking of, or do a sketch, so the list can
 get a better idea what I mean. I'm still hoping someone will notice this
 post and have something ready made for sale!

 Thanks all, Andrew 



Re: [pinhole-discussion] 3-hole 4x5 pinhole cameras?

2002-07-12 Thread Andrew Amundsen
From: Chris Peregoy pere...@umbc.edu
 
 What do you mean by three hole camera. I've made two hole stereo
 cameras and a none hole multiple exposure 4x5 but I don't know of any
 three hole, comercially availavle cameras.

Sorry for any confussion. I mean a multiple hole camera, all three
pinholes expose on the same sheet of film simultaneously. One pinhole
front and parallel to film plane, two pinholes on either side at slight
angles to film plane. The exposures overlap in fascinating ways. I've
seen very interesting results from such multiple simultaneous exposure
pinhole cameras. Anybody know what I'm trying to describe?

Thanks, Andrew 



[pinhole-discussion] 3-hole 4x5 pinhole cameras?

2002-07-12 Thread Andrew Amundsen
I'm interested in purchasing a 3-hole 4x5 pinhole camera. Could someone 
on the list suggest any sources(I'm checking eBay)? or would anyone have
plans to build one?

Has anyone been shooting with one before? Care to share results?

Thanks for your time, Andrew



[pinhole-discussion] Scanner pinhole??!

2002-06-19 Thread Andrew Amundsen
From: luish m. coelho lu...@ignore.com.br

 eco...@aol.com wrote:
 
 With all the discussion now centred on scanners, I wondered if anyone had
 tried a
 pinhole scanner ? I hope to try a card body with a tracing paper screen
 against the glass plate and a suitable pinhole. Aimed at a bright subject it
 should, in theory
 work !
 Watch this space.
 Ellis.


 this is a wonderful idea.
 I didn't quite get your explannation on how to do it but
 a pinhole scanner may be done with a big pinhole box fixed around the
 scanner, being the glass working in place of paper or film.

 I'll do it then show.


Sorry everyone, but this sounds NUTTY! How would you 'expose' for a long
enough period of time related to a pinhole exposure?! I think you'll
just get an out of focus scan of the inside of your 'pinhole box'. It's
the sanner that is projecting light out, not absorbing it like film.

We do have good imaginations, though don't we, on this list;)

Andrew



[pinhole-discussion] Focal lengths

2002-06-10 Thread Andrew Amundsen
Can someone tell me what the 12mm lens (in 35mm format) equivalent would 
be in 4x5 format?

I'm using a dual focal length 4x5 pinhole camera which only gives it's
focal lengths in 35mm format terms (12mm/24mm,super wide/wide). I have a
chart down to 20mm from my Calumet Catalog, so I know my wide position
is a 75mm in 4x5. I just need to know the 12mm!

Thanks for the time, Andrew Amundsen (WWPD #98)



Re: [pinhole-discussion] WPPD winding down!

2002-05-30 Thread Andrew Amundsen
James Kellar pinh...@jameskellar.com wrote:
 
 While looking at the site  you might notice that email address have been
 added to each photo. Thanks to Gregg Kemp for setting up in a way that
 you could get in touch with the individual artist, but the robots that
 collect email address so they can send you more spam can't.


Dear James, I'm glad to see the e-mails of fellow artists shown. There
are many of you I'd like to compliment personally on your submission.

Although I have not been able to read the e-mails with 'Internet
Explorer', I can with 'Netscape'! Anyone else having this problem?

Thanks again James and Gregg.

Andrew Amundsen (WWPD photo #98)



[pinhole-discussion] Interesting 1920's pinhole at eBay

2002-05-04 Thread Andrew Amundsen
Hey everyone, Here's a fascinating old pinhole camera for sale on eBay 
from the 1920's:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1350459156

Not mine, just thought you might be interested!

Take care, Andrew Amundsen