Re: [pinhole-discussion] A test of long exposures
In a message dated 12/9/01 4:02:33 PM, erick...@hickorytech.net writes: I'd be proud to share it. Send me your mailing address. You are more than kind. Many thanks!! I'll be happy to make it an exchange (swap). I am: Bernice Halpern Cutler (a.k.a. leezy) 3179 Mark Alan Drive Wantagh, NY 11793-1838
Re: [pinhole-discussion] A test of long exposures
I'd be proud to share it. Send me your mailing address. - Original Message - From: b2myo...@aol.com To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 6:19 AM Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] A test of long exposures In a message dated 12/8/01 11:38:25 PM, twmil...@mr.net writes: The parade photo is simply beautiful. Anything you want to say about it would be great. I agree...they are all wonderful. I would like to own that parade photo. How can I get one? leezy ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
Re: [pinhole-discussion] A test of long exposures
In a message dated 12/8/01 11:38:25 PM, twmil...@mr.net writes: The parade photo is simply beautiful. Anything you want to say about it would be great. I agree...they are all wonderful. I would like to own that parade photo. How can I get one? leezy
Re: [pinhole-discussion] A test of long exposures
It was a clear night. I don't think the wondow was tinted. Portra film gets blusih with very long exposures. The monkey skull was by a window after sunset. Must have been some twilight plus street lights. - Original Message - From: Tom Miller To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 9:30 PM Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] A test of long exposures Hi Bill, Excellent work!! Thanks for posting it. Naturally, they bring up questions, so hear they are: - Did any part of the overnight exposure overlap evening or dawn? Was it taken through a tinted window? Was is cloudy or snowy that night or was it a clear sky? - The parade photo is simply beautiful. Anything you want to say about it would be great. - For the monkey skull still life, was there any other light source besides the flashlight? Thanks again, Tom - Original Message - From: Bill Erickson To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 7:21 PM Subject: [pinhole-discussion] A test of long exposures I uploaded three images which are the result of exposure times arrived at with less than microscopic precision. Specifically, http://www.???/discussion/upload/overnight was just that, an overnight exposure. http://www.???/discussion/upload/parade the exposure was as long as it took for the float to pass me, and with http://www.???/discussion/upload/deadbattery I taped a monkey skull to the end of a flashlight and exposed it until the battery went dead. It seems to be impossible to fatally overexpose something. All you get with more overexposure is better detail in the shadows.
Re: [pinhole-discussion] A test of long exposures
The camera is a 2 inch focal length with optimal (purchased and focal lenghth calculated) pinhole, just a woden box glued to an old 6x7 rollfilm back. PortraVC 400 film. I find that overnight exposures that go from about a half hour after sunset to a half hour after sunrise give good shadow detail. The parade one was hand held, probably about a 5 minute exposure. - Original Message - From: Jeff Dilcher dilc...@hiddenworld.net To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 8:57 PM Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] A test of long exposures Great shots! Can you give the film and aperature / focal length you used? Thanks! On Saturday 08 December 2001 08:21 pm, you wrote: I uploaded three images which are the result of exposure times arrived at with less than microscopic precision. Specifically, http://www.???/discussion/upload/overnight was just that, an overnight exposure. http://www.???/discussion/upload/parade the exposure was as long as it took for the float to pass me, and with http://www.???/discussion/upload/deadbattery I taped a monkey skull to the end of a flashlight and exposed it until the battery went dead. It seems to be impossible to fatally overexpose something. All you get with more overexposure is better detail in the shadows. ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
Re: [pinhole-discussion] A test of long exposures
Great shots! Can you give the film and aperature / focal length you used? Thanks! On Saturday 08 December 2001 08:21 pm, you wrote: I uploaded three images which are the result of exposure times arrived at with less than microscopic precision. Specifically, http://www.???/discussion/upload/overnight was just that, an overnight exposure. http://www.???/discussion/upload/parade the exposure was as long as it took for the float to pass me, and with http://www.???/discussion/upload/deadbattery I taped a monkey skull to the end of a flashlight and exposed it until the battery went dead. It seems to be impossible to fatally overexpose something. All you get with more overexposure is better detail in the shadows.
