Re: [pinhole-discussion] crocker pictures
Frankly, I didn't believe it myself so I made a second cracker camera and tried again. Same sharpness but I'm having severe problems with light leak in the box. Also, I think that if you don't spread the opaque-making peanut butter right up to the edge of the hole you're using, you get some "glow" through the cracker surrounding the hole, resulting in some overall fogging. I'll post more images as I get them. - Original Message - From: James Kellar To: Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 7:20 PM Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] crocker pictures > on 11/29/00 7:53 PM, William Erickson at erick...@ic.mankato.mn.us wrote: > > > View first effort at > >> http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/cracker_final_copy.jpg > > I find it hard to believe that, that image was taken through a hole in a > cracker. I guess I'll just have to take your word for it. Any one have any > other ideas for images taken with a food lens. > > james > > > ___ > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? > unsubscribe or change your account at > http://www.p at ???/discussion/ >
Re: [pinhole-discussion] crocker pictures
Wow! That's an incredible image, considering the source of the pinhole. Your concept of photographing food with food is neat -- I hope it turns out well. I recall a photo in Renner's pinhole book that was taken using a saltine cracker, but it used all the holes so there were something like 9 overlapping images. Contrast was low, probably from light leak through the cracker itself (no light-blocking peanut butter...). I would look up the specific details, but the book is all the way across the room . . . ;-) Mike Vande Bunt William Erickson wrote: > I uploaded my initial cracker image. The hole in the cracker is about 1/16", > >and is more oval than round. I used polymax paper as a negative, about 20" > >away. For those who didn't get my message of a few days ago, I decided to > >see what sort of an image I could get using one of the little holes in soda > >crackers or ritz crackers, with the cracker attached to a cardboard box > with > >peanut butter. More esthetic images will follow, the project being to > >photograph food with food. View first effort at > >http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/cracker_final_copy.jpg > > ___ > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? > unsubscribe or change your account at > http://www.p at ???/discussion/
RE: [pinhole-discussion] crocker pictures
THAT was shot through a hole in a cracker?? of course techie question follows... ritz or soda? (if soda, whos?) cool thanks andy schmitt -Original Message- From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of William Erickson Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 7:54 PM To: pinhole Discussion Subject: [pinhole-discussion] crocker pictures I uploaded my initial cracker image. The hole in the cracker is about 1/16", >and is more oval than round. I used polymax paper as a negative, about 20" >away. For those who didn't get my message of a few days ago, I decided to >see what sort of an image I could get using one of the little holes in soda >crackers or ritz crackers, with the cracker attached to a cardboard box with >peanut butter. More esthetic images will follow, the project being to >photograph food with food. View first effort at >http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/cracker_final_copy.jpg ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.p at ???/discussion/
Re: [pinhole-discussion] crocker pictures
on 11/29/00 7:53 PM, William Erickson at erick...@ic.mankato.mn.us wrote: > View first effort at >> http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/cracker_final_copy.jpg I find it hard to believe that, that image was taken through a hole in a cracker. I guess I'll just have to take your word for it. Any one have any other ideas for images taken with a food lens. james
[pinhole-discussion] crocker pictures
I uploaded my initial cracker image. The hole in the cracker is about 1/16", >and is more oval than round. I used polymax paper as a negative, about 20" >away. For those who didn't get my message of a few days ago, I decided to >see what sort of an image I could get using one of the little holes in soda >crackers or ritz crackers, with the cracker attached to a cardboard box with >peanut butter. More esthetic images will follow, the project being to >photograph food with food. View first effort at >http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/cracker_final_copy.jpg
