Re: [pinhole-discussion] Coffee developer - Picture uploaded

2000-12-13 Thread Guy Glorieux
Joao,
The negative was developed in regular D-76, you know, the old stuff,
nothing fancy!
Best,
Guy

Joao Ribeiro wrote:

> Hi Guy,
>
> I loved the picture!
> I'll try coffee developer soon in the future.
> I understood that the print was developed in coffee isn't it? Was the
> negative too?
>
> Thanks
>
> Joao
>
> > The picture can be seen at:
> > http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/pose_cafe.jpg
>
> ___
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.p at ???/discussion/




Re: [pinhole-discussion] Coffee developer - Picture uploaded

2000-12-13 Thread Joao Ribeiro
Hi Guy,

I loved the picture!
I'll try coffee developer soon in the future.
I understood that the print was developed in coffee isn't it? Was the
negative too?

Thanks

Joao


> The picture can be seen at:
> http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/pose_cafe.jpg






Re: [pinhole-discussion] Coffee developer - Picture uploaded

2000-12-13 Thread G.Penate
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Schmitt" 

> I guess I'll have to try processing the negatives/prints from my
veggie-cam
> in coffee...hmmm what to do with the leftover chicken from last nights
> dinner...perhaps a 3d picture frame?

Andy,
  Don't gorget that (yet another) turkey season is fast approaching,
3d picture frame goes from chicken to turkey size  so better think big
camera format, something like pumpkin size -perhaps-!!

Guillermo





Re: [pinhole-discussion] Coffee developer - Picture uploaded

2000-12-13 Thread Guy Glorieux
John,

I would think that the missing ingrdient might be the potassium hydroxide ,
which according to "The Darkroom Cookbook" is supposed to act as a developer
accelerator.  The print I've posted comes from my single experiment with
coffee developer.  I really should get back to it.

Michael Georgoff was saying in a separate posting that he was going to get
some from Bostick & Sullivan at
http://www.bostick-sullivan.com/

I've bought from them and they are very good people.  According to my
catalogue, the stuff is "caustic potash" and sells for $17.50 for 500gm from
them (plus shipping) (not exactly cheap!).  I suspect that 500mg will take
you quite some distance with your coffee.  The recipe calls for only 6
rounded teaspoons of the stuff per liter of coffee.

Best,

Guy

- Original Message -
From: "John Yeo" 


> I tried developing a print in coffee once.  It didn't work at all.  I
mixed
> up instant coffee at twice the reccomended dilution, printed a picture and
> put it in.  I didnt' use baking soda, I just assumed it was used to make
the
> soup less acidic.  I didn't monitor the pH because it said the best pH was
> 9.  I figured anything would work, but not be the best.  It did not work
at
> all.  I didn't do any exposure compensation, used ilford multigrade RC
> paper. and left it in the coffee for over an hour.
>
> Any suggestions to what could have gone wrong?
>
> John
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Guy Glorieux" 
> To: 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 5:42 AM
> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Coffee developer - Picture uploaded
>
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I took the liberty of uploading a print illustrating the results of
> > processing a print in coffee developer, as per the article published by
> > Dr. Scott Williams from Rochester Institute ot Technology, at:
> > http://www.isc.rit.edu/~andpph/text-coffee.html
> >
> > The picture can be seen at:
> > http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/pose_cafe.jpg
> >
> > Several words of caution though
> > 1.  The picture was printed on the occasion of a special exhibition of
> > my photo club three years ago, entitled "Pose-Café" (Coffee Break).  I
> > had suggested that we use this process to illustrate the point that
> > coffee is an integral part of the picture making process and that it can
> > find space even in the processing trays, rather than just the mug!
> > 2.  The picture is not mine but was taken on a 35mm camera by one of my
> > fellow club member.
> > 3.  The picture is not a pinhole (Gregg, I took your silence after my
> > last eMail on the subject as an implicit agreement that I could post the
> > picture for illustrative purposes).
> >
> > (I hope that I will not stir a debate over the use of the image area for
> > the list...  This would be quite opposite to my intentions).
> >
> > I hope members enjoy the picture and that it will stir more interest in
> > this particular process.
> >
> > Best wishes,
> >
> > Guy Glorieux
> > Montreal, Canada
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
> > unsubscribe or change your account at
> > http://www.p at ???/discussion/
> >
>
>
> ___
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.p at ???/discussion/




RE: [pinhole-discussion] Coffee developer - Picture uploaded

2000-12-13 Thread Gregg Kemp
Guy,

Considering I enjoy coffee almost as much as pinhole photography, I don't see 
any conflicts.  While I would not like to consider myself the upload gallery 
"police", I guess that if it started filling up with a lot of non-pinhole 
coffee images I might be forced to put on my pinhole sheriff's badge.

Have you experimented much with the freshness and origin of the coffee you use?

:-)
Gregg

> -Original Message-
> From: Guy Glorieux [mailto:guy.glori...@sympatico.ca]
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I took the liberty of uploading a print illustrating the results of
> processing a print in coffee developer, as per the article 
> published by
> Dr. Scott Williams from Rochester Institute ot Technology, at:
> http://www.isc.rit.edu/~andpph/text-coffee.html
> 
> The picture can be seen at:
> http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/pose_cafe.jpg
> 
> Several words of caution though
> 1.  The picture was printed on the occasion of a special exhibition of
> my photo club three years ago, entitled "Pose-Café" (Coffee Break).  I
> had suggested that we use this process to illustrate the point that
> coffee is an integral part of the picture making process and 
> that it can
> find space even in the processing trays, rather than just the mug!
> 2.  The picture is not mine but was taken on a 35mm camera by 
> one of my
> fellow club member.
> 3.  The picture is not a pinhole (Gregg, I took your silence after my
> last eMail on the subject as an implicit agreement that I 
> could post the
> picture for illustrative purposes).
> 
> (I hope that I will not stir a debate over the use of the 
> image area for
> the list...  This would be quite opposite to my intentions).
> 
> I hope members enjoy the picture and that it will stir more 
> interest in
> this particular process.
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> Guy Glorieux
> Montreal, Canada



Re: [pinhole-discussion] Coffee developer - Picture uploaded

2000-12-13 Thread John Yeo
I tried developing a print in coffee once.  It didn't work at all.  I mixed
up instant coffee at twice the reccomended dilution, printed a picture and
put it in.  I didnt' use baking soda, I just assumed it was used to make the
soup less acidic.  I didn't monitor the pH because it said the best pH was
9.  I figured anything would work, but not be the best.  It did not work at
all.  I didn't do any exposure compensation, used ilford multigrade RC
paper. and left it in the coffee for over an hour.

Any suggestions to what could have gone wrong?

John

- Original Message -
From: "Guy Glorieux" 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 5:42 AM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Coffee developer - Picture uploaded


> Hi all,
>
> I took the liberty of uploading a print illustrating the results of
> processing a print in coffee developer, as per the article published by
> Dr. Scott Williams from Rochester Institute ot Technology, at:
> http://www.isc.rit.edu/~andpph/text-coffee.html
>
> The picture can be seen at:
> http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/pose_cafe.jpg
>
> Several words of caution though
> 1.  The picture was printed on the occasion of a special exhibition of
> my photo club three years ago, entitled "Pose-Café" (Coffee Break).  I
> had suggested that we use this process to illustrate the point that
> coffee is an integral part of the picture making process and that it can
> find space even in the processing trays, rather than just the mug!
> 2.  The picture is not mine but was taken on a 35mm camera by one of my
> fellow club member.
> 3.  The picture is not a pinhole (Gregg, I took your silence after my
> last eMail on the subject as an implicit agreement that I could post the
> picture for illustrative purposes).
>
> (I hope that I will not stir a debate over the use of the image area for
> the list...  This would be quite opposite to my intentions).
>
> I hope members enjoy the picture and that it will stir more interest in
> this particular process.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Guy Glorieux
> Montreal, Canada
>
>
> ___
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.p at ???/discussion/
>




RE: [pinhole-discussion] Coffee developer - Picture uploaded

2000-12-13 Thread Andy Schmitt
I guess I'll have to try processing the negatives/prints from my veggie-cam
in coffee...hmmm what to do with the leftover chicken from last nights
dinner...perhaps a 3d picture frame?
andy

-Original Message-
From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Guy Glorieux
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 8:43 AM
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Coffee developer - Picture uploaded


Hi all,

I took the liberty of uploading a print illustrating the results of
processing a print in coffee developer, as per the article published by
Dr. Scott Williams from Rochester Institute ot Technology, at:
http://www.isc.rit.edu/~andpph/text-coffee.html

The picture can be seen at:
http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/pose_cafe.jpg

Several words of caution though
1.  The picture was printed on the occasion of a special exhibition of
my photo club three years ago, entitled "Pose-Café" (Coffee Break).  I
had suggested that we use this process to illustrate the point that
coffee is an integral part of the picture making process and that it can
find space even in the processing trays, rather than just the mug!
2.  The picture is not mine but was taken on a 35mm camera by one of my
fellow club member.
3.  The picture is not a pinhole (Gregg, I took your silence after my
last eMail on the subject as an implicit agreement that I could post the
picture for illustrative purposes).

(I hope that I will not stir a debate over the use of the image area for
the list...  This would be quite opposite to my intentions).

I hope members enjoy the picture and that it will stir more interest in
this particular process.

Best wishes,

Guy Glorieux
Montreal, Canada


___
Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
unsubscribe or change your account at
http://www.p at ???/discussion/




RE: [pinhole-discussion] Coffee developer - Picture uploaded

2000-12-13 Thread Andy Schmitt
neat...thanks Guy.
I figure there is a pinhole involved SOMEWHERE in there...if not in the
negative, then the print... 8o)
andy

-Original Message-
From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Guy Glorieux
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 8:43 AM
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Coffee developer - Picture uploaded


Hi all,

I took the liberty of uploading a print illustrating the results of
processing a print in coffee developer, as per the article published by
Dr. Scott Williams from Rochester Institute ot Technology, at:
http://www.isc.rit.edu/~andpph/text-coffee.html

The picture can be seen at:
http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/pose_cafe.jpg

Several words of caution though
1.  The picture was printed on the occasion of a special exhibition of
my photo club three years ago, entitled "Pose-Café" (Coffee Break).  I
had suggested that we use this process to illustrate the point that
coffee is an integral part of the picture making process and that it can
find space even in the processing trays, rather than just the mug!
2.  The picture is not mine but was taken on a 35mm camera by one of my
fellow club member.
3.  The picture is not a pinhole (Gregg, I took your silence after my
last eMail on the subject as an implicit agreement that I could post the
picture for illustrative purposes).

(I hope that I will not stir a debate over the use of the image area for
the list...  This would be quite opposite to my intentions).

I hope members enjoy the picture and that it will stir more interest in
this particular process.

Best wishes,

Guy Glorieux
Montreal, Canada


___
Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
unsubscribe or change your account at
http://www.p at ???/discussion/