Re: [Pixman] [PATCH v13 11/14] pixman-filter: Negative subsample values produces scaled result

[Oded Gabbay]

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Bill Spitzak  wrote:
> On 02/16/2016 01:58 PM, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Bill Spitzak  wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a new version of this patch, which fixes a math error that
>>> caused it to produce too many samples at small sizes (large scales). I
>>> am not clear if I can submit a v14 of just this patch or I should
>>> instead submit a v14 of the entire patch series.
>>> ___
>>> Pixman mailing list
>>> Pixman@lists.freedesktop.org
>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman
>>
>>
>> My suggestion is to wait for Soren's review (I believe we will see
>> something around the start of next week) and when you fix his
>> comments, add this fix as well and then mark it as v14.
>>
>> Oded
>
>
> Have you been able to contact Søren?
>
>

Yes, I believe we will see his review in the next few days.

Oded
___
Pixman mailing list
Pixman@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman

Re: [Pixman] [PATCH v13 11/14] pixman-filter: Negative subsample values produces scaled result

[Bill Spitzak]

On 02/16/2016 01:58 PM, Oded Gabbay wrote:

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Bill Spitzak  wrote:

I have a new version of this patch, which fixes a math error that
caused it to produce too many samples at small sizes (large scales). I
am not clear if I can submit a v14 of just this patch or I should
instead submit a v14 of the entire patch series.
___
Pixman mailing list
Pixman@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman


My suggestion is to wait for Soren's review (I believe we will see
something around the start of next week) and when you fix his
comments, add this fix as well and then mark it as v14.

Oded


Have you been able to contact Søren?


___
Pixman mailing list
Pixman@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman