Because the integral function is relying on the range being clamped to the
non-zero portion for impulse filters and for box, and range checks are
missing for some of the other filter functions, I would be tempted to
remove the range check from here, and also from the impulse function (it
would return 1 for all x). Oded did not like that idea but I wonder if you
have any opinion.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Søren Sandmann Pedersen <
soren.sandm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Bill Spitzak
>
> v11: Restored range checks
>
> Signed-off-by: Bill Spitzak
> Reviewed-by: Oded Gabbay
> ---
> pixman/pixman-filter.c | 14 --
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/pixman/pixman-filter.c b/pixman/pixman-filter.c
> index 4abd05f..db4ab6e 100644
> --- a/pixman/pixman-filter.c
> +++ b/pixman/pixman-filter.c
> @@ -109,14 +109,16 @@ general_cubic (double x, double B, double C)
>
> if (ax < 1)
> {
> - return ((12 - 9 * B - 6 * C) * ax * ax * ax +
> - (-18 + 12 * B + 6 * C) * ax * ax + (6 - 2 * B)) / 6;
> + return (((12 - 9 * B - 6 * C) * ax +
> +(-18 + 12 * B + 6 * C)) * ax * ax +
> + (6 - 2 * B)) / 6;
> }
> -else if (ax >= 1 && ax < 2)
> +else if (ax < 2)
> {
> - return ((-B - 6 * C) * ax * ax * ax +
> - (6 * B + 30 * C) * ax * ax + (-12 * B - 48 * C) *
> - ax + (8 * B + 24 * C)) / 6;
> + return -B - 6 * C) * ax +
> + (6 * B + 30 * C)) * ax +
> +(-12 * B - 48 * C)) * ax +
> + (8 * B + 24 * C)) / 6;
> }
> else
> {
> --
> 1.7.11.7
>
>
___
Pixman mailing list
Pixman@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman