Bug#457571: gnome-session: fails if gdm_socket is not in /tmp
On dim, 2007-12-23 at 12:53 -0300, Gabriel Parrondo wrote: Subject: gnome-session: fails if gdm_socket is not in /tmp Package: gnome-session Version: 2.20.2-1 Severity: important *** Please type your report below this line *** Gnome tries to open the gdm_socket in /tmp/.gdm_socket and fails if it can't be found. The default location in latest versions of gdm is /var/run/gdm_socket. There's a fix in ubuntu, see bug 83810. This patch has been integrated upstream, and gnome-session 2.20.2 uses /var/run/gdm_socket. Could you please describe what is happening to you instead of trying to provide your analysis? Thanks, -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `-our own. Resistance is futile. signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée ___ pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gnome-maintainers
Bug#457297: marked as done (gajim: Missing dependency: python-gnome2-desktop)
Your message dated Tue, 25 Dec 2007 11:17:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#457297: fixed in gnome-python 2.20.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: gajim Version: 0.11.4-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After last upgrade gajim fails to start: $ gajim ImportError: could not import bonobo.ui Traceback (most recent call last): File gajim.py, line 2279, in ? cli.set_restart_command(len(argv), argv) AttributeError: '__main__.GnomeClient' object has no attribute 'set_restart_command' Installing python-gnome2-desktop package fixies this problem. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.23.1-my2 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages gajim depends on: ii dnsutils 1:9.4.2-1 Clients provided with BIND ii python2.4.4-6An interactive high-level object-o ii python-glade2 2.12.0-2 GTK+ bindings: Glade support ii python-gtk2 2.12.0-2 Python bindings for the GTK+ widge ii python-pysqlite2 2.4.0-2python interface to SQLite 3 ii python-support0.7.5 automated rebuilding support for p Versions of packages gajim recommends: ii dbus 1.1.2-1simple interprocess messaging syst ii notification-daemon 0.3.7-1+b1 a daemon that displays passive pop ii python-dbus 0.82.4-1 simple interprocess messaging syst ii python-gnupginterface 0.3.2-9Python interface to GnuPG (GPG) -- no debconf information -- Wejdz do swiata wojny wampirow! http://link.interia.pl/f1cb4 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: gnome-python Source-Version: 2.20.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gnome-python, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gnome-python_2.20.1-2.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gnome-python/gnome-python_2.20.1-2.diff.gz gnome-python_2.20.1-2.dsc to pool/main/g/gnome-python/gnome-python_2.20.1-2.dsc python-gnome2-dev_2.20.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gnome-python/python-gnome2-dev_2.20.1-2_all.deb python-gnome2_2.20.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/g/gnome-python/python-gnome2_2.20.1-2_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gnome-python package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 12:01:11 +0100 Source: gnome-python Binary: python-gnome2-dev python-gnome2 Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 2.20.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: python-gnome2 - Python bindings for the GNOME desktop environment python-gnome2-dev - Python bindings for the GNOME desktop environment - development f Closes: 457297 Changes: gnome-python (2.20.1-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Unwrap the Python-Depends field, wrapping it doesn’t work. This brings back the dependency on python-pyorbit. Closes: #457297. Files: 14b5852d89722d40b759d2c850663b1c 1441 python optional gnome-python_2.20.1-2.dsc 0fb0ab3372133f05fe6e5b47572d4dee 7628 python optional gnome-python_2.20.1-2.diff.gz bd562e6176f1927e89c42898a3cb90ff 483566 python optional python-gnome2_2.20.1-2_amd64.deb c69d561171d54432df4e6d49138a285f 65320 python optional python-gnome2-dev_2.20.1-2_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHcOWRrSla4ddfhTMRAtqDAJ4j9x9/QE/1ObAz3L+LTIfBswheegCfTwU0 BVHv61oV6OkfqrJKbetzTPk= =/dbB -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message--- ___ pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list
Accepted gnome-python 2.20.1-2 (source all amd64)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 12:01:11 +0100 Source: gnome-python Binary: python-gnome2-dev python-gnome2 Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 2.20.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: python-gnome2 - Python bindings for the GNOME desktop environment python-gnome2-dev - Python bindings for the GNOME desktop environment - development f Closes: 457297 Changes: gnome-python (2.20.1-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Unwrap the Python-Depends field, wrapping it doesn’t work. This brings back the dependency on python-pyorbit. Closes: #457297. Files: 14b5852d89722d40b759d2c850663b1c 1441 python optional gnome-python_2.20.1-2.dsc 0fb0ab3372133f05fe6e5b47572d4dee 7628 python optional gnome-python_2.20.1-2.diff.gz bd562e6176f1927e89c42898a3cb90ff 483566 python optional python-gnome2_2.20.1-2_amd64.deb c69d561171d54432df4e6d49138a285f 65320 python optional python-gnome2-dev_2.20.1-2_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHcOWRrSla4ddfhTMRAtqDAJ4j9x9/QE/1ObAz3L+LTIfBswheegCfTwU0 BVHv61oV6OkfqrJKbetzTPk= =/dbB -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: gnome-python_2.20.1-2.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gnome-python/gnome-python_2.20.1-2.diff.gz gnome-python_2.20.1-2.dsc to pool/main/g/gnome-python/gnome-python_2.20.1-2.dsc python-gnome2-dev_2.20.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gnome-python/python-gnome2-dev_2.20.1-2_all.deb python-gnome2_2.20.1-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/g/gnome-python/python-gnome2_2.20.1-2_amd64.deb ___ pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gnome-maintainers
Bug#457777: gnome-screensaver: does sometime not display login-dialog, locking out user
Package: gnome-screensaver Version: 2.20.0-2 Severity: normal Not reproducable, but at a frequent level, I get the following behaviour: After the screen is (auto-)locked, i press the shift key to login again. But sometimes the login screen is not appearing. However, the keystroke is recognized: The screensaver artworks freezes; but no dialog is appearing. This is really annoying, as the only solution -- if no network connection is a hand -- is to hard-off the laptop. The serverity is choosen, as this can lead to data loss (unsafed documents) or even corrupted filesystems. (I use a cryted fs, so this is making me a hard time every time I have to put the system down that hard.) sshing into the affected system show that the screensaver process is running at 100% (which is probably ok). Killing the process with SIGKILL will eventually make the login dialog appear. I have the impression, that the OpenGL screensavers are more likely to expose the bugs, but this can only be an personal impression. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.23-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages gnome-screensaver depends on: ii dbus1.1.2-1 simple interprocess messaging syst ii gconf2 2.20.1-2 GNOME configuration database syste ii gnome-icon-theme2.20.0-1 GNOME Desktop icon theme ii libatk1.0-0 1.20.0-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.7-5GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcairo2 1.4.12-1 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libdbus-1-3 1.1.2-1 simple interprocess messaging syst ii libdbus-glib-1-20.74-1 simple interprocess messaging syst ii libfontconfig1 2.5.0-2 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype62.3.5-1+b1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgconf2-4 2.20.1-2 GNOME configuration database syste ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1 7.0.2-3 A free implementation of the OpenG ii libglade2-0 1:2.6.2-1library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-02.14.4-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome-menu2 2.20.2-1 an implementation of the freedeskt ii libgnomekbd12.20.0-1 GNOME library to manage keyboard c ii libgnomekbdui1 2.20.0-1 User interface library for libgnom ii libgnomevfs2-0 1:2.20.1-1 GNOME Virtual File System (runtime ii libgtk2.0-0 2.12.3-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 2:1.0.4-1X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libnotify1 [libnotify1- 0.4.4-3 sends desktop notifications to a n ii liborbit2 1:2.14.7-0.1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpam0g0.99.7.1-5 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpango1.0-0 1.18.3-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-0 1.2.15~beta5-3 PNG library - runtime ii libsm6 2:1.0.3-1+b1 X11 Session Management library ii libx11-62:1.0.3-7X11 client-side library ii libxcursor1 1:1.1.9-1X cursor management library ii libxext61:1.0.3-2X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxfixes3 1:4.0.3-2X11 miscellaneous 'fixes' extensio ii libxi6 2:1.1.3-1X11 Input extension library ii libxinerama11:1.0.2-1X11 Xinerama extension library ii libxklavier11 3.3-2X Keyboard Extension high-level AP ii libxml2 2.6.30.dfsg-3GNOME XML library ii libxrandr2 2:1.2.2-1X11 RandR extension library ii libxrender1 1:0.9.4-1X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxss1 1:1.1.2-1X11 Screen Saver extension library ii libxxf86misc1 1:1.0.1-2X11 XFree86 miscellaneous extensio ii libxxf86vm1 1:1.0.1-2X11 XFree86 video mode extension l ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-8 compression library - runtime Versions of packages gnome-screensaver recommends: ii gnome-power-manager 2.20.2-1 frontend for gnome-powermanager ii libpam-gnome-keyring 2.20.2-1 GNOME keyring services PAM module ii rss-glx 0.8.1-8Really Slick Screensavers GLX Port -- no debconf information ___ pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gnome-maintainers
Bug#457365: gdm
Hi, On sam, 2007-12-22 at 09:00 +1030, Vince Ieraci wrote: The following packages have unmet dependencies: gnome: Depends: gnome-desktop-environment (= 1:2.14.3.6) but it is not going to be installed Depends: gdm-themes but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages Thanks for your report. Unfortunately this doesn’t tell us much. You should try to run “apt-get install gnome-desktop-environment” and so on, until you get a meaningful error message. Cheers, -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `-our own. Resistance is futile. signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée ___ pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gnome-maintainers
Bug#457383: libgtk2.0-0: should libcupsys2 be a recommends rather than a depends?
Hi, On ven, 2007-12-21 at 21:44 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: Package: libgtk2.0-0 Version: 2.12.3-2 Severity: normal gtk ends up getting removed if the user tries to remove cups from their system. this is because libgtk2.0-0 has a dependency on libcupsys2. it seems like this is an undesirable effect because gtk should be pretty much fully functional even without the printing system. if this is the case, then the depends on libcupsys2 should be changed to a recommends instead. This sounds like a reasonable request. I can see two ways to do this: * either we downgrade the dependencies for print backends with a number of hacks; * or we move them to a libgtk2.0-printing package that is recommended, and added to the metapackages. I don’t like adding new packages much, but the second solution looks saner. Of course, the drawback in both cases will come from the countless “YOU HAS EATED MY PRINTER” but reports. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `-our own. Resistance is futile. signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée ___ pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gnome-maintainers
Bug#368916: Patch in debian package?
On sam, 2007-12-22 at 18:23 +0100, Patrik Fimml wrote: Seeing not much progress on this issue upstream, a patch on the Debian side would be useful, I think. The variable actually should be TERM=gnome-256color, which is included in the ncurses-term package. A dependency on this package should be introduced together with the patch (kterm depends on it as well, so that shouldn't be much of a problem). This is feasible, but we’d need to test it on a wide scale, because it could break a lot of things. Daniel, do you know how the gnome-* terminfo entries were written? Are they actually based on the vte capabilities? If they do, why not shipping them directly in the vte packages? -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `-our own. Resistance is futile. signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée ___ pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gnome-maintainers
Bug#457515: gnome-panel: disable hibernate when the on-disk kernel has been upgraded to a newer version
reassign 457515 hal thanks On dim, 2007-12-23 at 11:26 +0930, Paul Wise wrote: Package: gnome-panel Version: 2.20.2-2 Severity: wishlist Yesterday I upgraded my kernel and stupidly proceeded to hibernate as I was running out of power. This resulted in the new kernel being unable to load the s2disk images and them being lost. It would be nice if the gnome-panel could detect this situation (kernel upgraded without rebooting) and either prevent me from hibernating by disabling the hibernate button or by popping up an error dialog explaining the situation. This would indeed be nice, but for GNOME (gnome-power-manager, actually) to do that, it would need hal to report it (which in turn may need a decent error message from pm-utils). Reassigning to the Utopia guys, who know better how this could be done. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `-our own. Resistance is futile. signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée ___ pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gnome-maintainers
Processed: Re: Bug#338828: gnome-panel: Some gnome-panel applets dies when logging in after logging out
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 338828 libbonobo2-common Bug#338828: gnome-panel: applet appears to have died unexpectedly at login Bug#331000: several gnome-panel applets die on startup Bug#331063: several gnome-panel applets die on startup Bug reassigned from package `gnome-panel' to `libbonobo2-common'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ___ pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gnome-maintainers
Bug#457149: python-gnome2: does not map bonobo.ui properly
Hi, On mer, 2007-12-19 at 23:44 -0600, Michael Johnson wrote: When I upgraded from 2.20.0-1 yesterday, quodlibet stopped working for me. It would generate the following error when starting from the command line: After digging around, I discovered that the bonobo.ui error was the problem. It seems that the line import gnome, gnome.ui is supposed to automatically load bonobo.ui. Unfortunately, it cannot, for some reason. This, in turn, kill quodlibet. Downgrading to python-gnome2 2.20.0-1 fixes the problem. This could be caused by the missing dependency on python-pyorbit, but only if it has been automatically removed from your system during the upgrade. Does 2.20.1-2 work for you? Thanks, -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `-our own. Resistance is futile. signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée ___ pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gnome-maintainers
Bug#338828: gnome-panel: Some gnome-panel applets dies when logging in after logging out
reassign 338828 libbonobo2-common thanks On dim, 2007-12-23 at 04:04 +0100, Kjo Hansi Glaz wrote: after logging out and logging in under the same user (from GDM), these gnome-panel applets dies as described on ohter reports : OAFIID:GNOME_Panel_TrashApplet OAFIID:GNOME_ComputertempApplet OAFIID:GNOME_DriveMountApplet OAFIID:GNOME_MultiLoadApplet OAFIID:TomboyApplet OAFIID:GNOME_MixerApplet OAFIID:GNOME_Panel_WirelessApplet OAFIID:GNOME_NetstatusApplet OAFIID:GNOME_ComputertempApplet OAFIID:GNOME_ComputertempApplet OAFIID:GNOME_CPUFreqApplet This *never* happens at the first login and *always* happens if I have close my session before. This does not happen in the session of an other user that has less panel applets. This still happen if restarting X (/ets/init.d/gdm restart or CTRL+ALT+BACKSPACE). This behavior occurs from time to time, and seems to be caused by the combination of two things: 1. Some daemon not exiting when your session is closed; evolution-data-server used to do that, but I thought it was fixed. You can check what is still running by logging in a console after logging out. 2. In this case, bonobo-activation-server doesn’t work anymore for some not understood reason. If you are willing to give a hand, please contribute to the following bug: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359617 Thanks, -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `-our own. Resistance is futile. signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée ___ pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gnome-maintainers
Bug#457534: totem-dbg: Wrong section libs
reassign 457534 ftp.debian.org thanks On dim, 2007-12-23 at 10:51 +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote: Package: totem-dbg Version: 2.20.1-1 Severity: normal The package is in section libs and as a result orphaner presents it for removal. AFAIK (but I'm not sure) the proper sections for packages with detached debugging symbols is libdevel for libraries and devel for programs. Thanks for your report. I have fixed the section in our SVN repository, but it also needs to be changed in the override file to take effect, which is why I'm reassigning to the FTP masters. Cheers, -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `-our own. Resistance is futile. signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée ___ pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gnome-maintainers
Bug#457564: gnome-control-center: fonts too big after the upgrade!
On dim, 2007-12-23 at 18:33 +0100, gpe92 wrote: Package: gnome-control-center Version: 1:2.20.1-2 Followup-For: Bug #457564 With the last version the fonts appear too big on one of my PC and normal on another one. The PC on which the fonts appear normal has a screen resolution of 96 dpi. The other one (fonts too big) has a screen resolution of 113 dpi. So it seems that the screen resolution is no longer taken in account with this gnome-control-center version in opposition to the previous one (2.18). This is exactly the opposite: the screen resolution, that used to be ignored by GDM and forced to 96 DPI, is now correctly taken into account. If the screen resolution is wrongly detected, this may be a bug in the X server, but most probably the behavior you are describing is expected: the fonts used to look smaller or bigger than what they should, and now they have the correct size you have to fix your font settings. Cheers, -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `-our own. Resistance is futile. signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée ___ pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gnome-maintainers
Bug#457564: gnome-control-center: fonts too big after the upgrade!
Le Tue, 25 Dec 2007 23:03:47 +0100 Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit: On dim, 2007-12-23 at 18:33 +0100, gpe92 wrote: Package: gnome-control-center Version: 1:2.20.1-2 Followup-For: Bug #457564 With the last version the fonts appear too big on one of my PC and normal on another one. The PC on which the fonts appear normal has a screen resolution of 96 dpi. The other one (fonts too big) has a screen resolution of 113 dpi. So it seems that the screen resolution is no longer taken in account with this gnome-control-center version in opposition to the previous one (2.18). This is exactly the opposite: the screen resolution, that used to be ignored by GDM and forced to 96 DPI, is now correctly taken into account. If the screen resolution is wrongly detected, this may be a bug in the X server, but most probably the behavior you are describing is expected: the fonts used to look smaller or bigger than what they should, and now they have the correct size you have to fix your font settings. My screen resolution are well detected, I've checked them. In my mind if I choose a size font of 10, then it must appear with the same size (in millimeter) on my two monitors. This was the case with Gnome 2.18 but not with Gnome 2.20. So I think that the screen resolution is badly used in the calculation of the font. gpe ___ pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gnome-maintainers
Bug#457564: gnome-control-center: fonts too big after the upgrade!
Le Tue, 25 Dec 2007 23:03:47 +0100 Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit: On dim, 2007-12-23 at 18:33 +0100, gpe92 wrote: Package: gnome-control-center Version: 1:2.20.1-2 Followup-For: Bug #457564 With the last version the fonts appear too big on one of my PC and normal on another one. The PC on which the fonts appear normal has a screen resolution of 96 dpi. The other one (fonts too big) has a screen resolution of 113 dpi. So it seems that the screen resolution is no longer taken in account with this gnome-control-center version in opposition to the previous one (2.18). This is exactly the opposite: the screen resolution, that used to be ignored by GDM and forced to 96 DPI, is now correctly taken into account. If the screen resolution is wrongly detected, this may be a bug in the X server, but most probably the behavior you are describing is expected: the fonts used to look smaller or bigger than what they should, and now they have the correct size you have to fix your font settings. Moreover, with the behavior of Gnome 2.20 if you'll plug two monitors on the same PC but with two different screen resolution the fonts will appear with a different size. For me it's a very bad behavior... gpe ___ pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gnome-maintainers
Bug#457571: gnome-session: fails if gdm_socket is not in /tmp
El mar, 25-12-2007 a las 11:44 +0100, Josselin Mouette escribió: On dim, 2007-12-23 at 12:53 -0300, Gabriel Parrondo wrote: Subject: gnome-session: fails if gdm_socket is not in /tmp Package: gnome-session Version: 2.20.2-1 Severity: important *** Please type your report below this line *** Gnome tries to open the gdm_socket in /tmp/.gdm_socket and fails if it can't be found. The default location in latest versions of gdm is /var/run/gdm_socket. There's a fix in ubuntu, see bug 83810. This patch has been integrated upstream, and gnome-session 2.20.2 uses /var/run/gdm_socket. Great. I'm sorry I didn't check for bugs on upstream, noted for future problems. Could you please describe what is happening to you instead of trying to provide your analysis? Sorry about that too. The exact problem was that nothing happened when going to System-Logout-Switch User (maybe not that exact words, I use Spanish version). It started happening after an upgrade; I tried logging out and in again but nothing different. Tried with another user and again nothing. Today, for no apparent reason, it is all working again... Thanks. ___ pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gnome-maintainers
Bug#194370: Highway Girl
Tired with your poor health? http://www.Verysleenst.com Facade, Proxy, and Factory words, in real world ___ pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gnome-maintainers
