Re: [pkg-go] autopkgtest
On 25/05/16 10:11, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > OK. Reload https://github.com/mwhudson/autodep8/compare/master...go-support > again? Looks good. Now, I still haven't delved into this. How could I test it? -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers
[pkg-go] golang-protobuf-extensions_1.0.0-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes is NEW
binary:golang-protobuf-extensions-dev is NEW. source:golang-protobuf-extensions is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel free to browse the NEW queue[1]. If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a member of the ftpteam. If you have any questions, you may reply to this email. [1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers
[pkg-go] golang-golang-x-sys_0.0~git20160517.0.d4feaf1-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes is NEW
binary:golang-golang-x-sys-dev is NEW. source:golang-golang-x-sys is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel free to browse the NEW queue[1]. If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a member of the ftpteam. If you have any questions, you may reply to this email. [1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers
[pkg-go] Processing of golang-protobuf-extensions_1.0.0-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes
golang-protobuf-extensions_1.0.0-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: golang-protobuf-extensions_1.0.0-1~bpo8+1.dsc golang-protobuf-extensions_1.0.0-1~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz golang-protobuf-extensions-dev_1.0.0-1~bpo8+1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers
[pkg-go] Processing of golang-golang-x-sys_0.0~git20160517.0.d4feaf1-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes
golang-golang-x-sys_0.0~git20160517.0.d4feaf1-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: golang-golang-x-sys_0.0~git20160517.0.d4feaf1-1~bpo8+1.dsc golang-golang-x-sys_0.0~git20160517.0.d4feaf1-1~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz golang-golang-x-sys-dev_0.0~git20160517.0.d4feaf1-1~bpo8+1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers
Re: [pkg-go] RFS: new upstream snapshot golang-github-erikdubbelboer-gspt
On 26 May 2016 at 06:34, Peter Colberg wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 08:10:34PM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: >> Thanks. Can you upload? > > Sorry, I don’t have upload privileges :-(. > > My application for DM is pending: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-newmaint/2016/05/msg00036.html Ah, same :-) Cheers, mwh ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers
Re: [pkg-go] github.com/XXX/YYY vs gopkg.in/XXX/YYY.v1
Hi all, On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 07:29:02AM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Tuesday, 24 May 2016 1:20:34 PM AEST Vincent Bernat wrote: > > I need this package for use in gobgp which > > uses it through github.com/eapache/channels. > > > > Should I package golang-github-eapache-channels-dev or > > golang-gopkg-eapache-channels.v1-dev? > > > > In the first case, should I provide a symbolic link for > > gopkg.in/eapache/channels.v1 or wait for anything else needing this > > symbolic link? > > I would go with first option because if package ever moves to .v2 you'll only > need to update "Provides" field (and symlink). Providing compatibility > symlink may be useful even if nobody uses it yet. On the other hand, having golang-gopkg-….vN as separate source and binary packages allows having multiple major versions in Debian when applications depend on different major versions of a package. I recently had a similar case where upstream started tagging release upon our request (golang-gopkg-cheggaaa-pb.v1). I opted for packaging the versioned source package separately, and filed an upstream bug for the downstream package (acmetool) to import gopkg.in/cheggaaa/pb.v1. Once all Build-Depends are converted to the versioned package, I will request removal of the unversioned package (golang-github-cheggaaa-pb). I think it would be wise to have the Go packaging policy recommend one solution, compatibility symlinks or separate source packages. Debian Go team members, what are your thoughts on gopkg.in versioning? Would you support allowing for multiple major versions of a package? Regards, Peter ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers
Re: [pkg-go] RFS: new upstream snapshot golang-github-erikdubbelboer-gspt
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 08:10:34PM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > Thanks. Can you upload? Sorry, I don’t have upload privileges :-(. My application for DM is pending: https://lists.debian.org/debian-newmaint/2016/05/msg00036.html Peter ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers
[pkg-go] Bug#825275: golang-github-jteeuwen-go-bindata-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces: golang-bindata-dev
Package: golang-github-jteeuwen-go-bindata-dev Version: 3.0.7-2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'jessie'. It installed fine in 'jessie', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a Breaks+Replaces relation. See policy 7.6 at https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): Selecting previously unselected package golang-github-jteeuwen-go-bindata-dev. Preparing to unpack .../golang-github-jteeuwen-go-bindata-dev_3.0.7-2_all.deb ... Unpacking golang-github-jteeuwen-go-bindata-dev (3.0.7-2) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/golang-github-jteeuwen-go-bindata-dev_3.0.7-2_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/jteeuwen/go-bindata/asset.go', which is also in package golang-bindata-dev 3.0.5-1 Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/golang-github-jteeuwen-go-bindata-dev_3.0.7-2_all.deb cheers, Andreas golang-bindata-dev=3.0.5-1_golang-github-jteeuwen-go-bindata-dev=3.0.7-2.log.gz Description: application/gzip ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers
Re: [pkg-go] autopkgtest
OK. Reload https://github.com/mwhudson/autodep8/compare/master...go-support again? Cheers, mwh On 22 May 2016 at 14:51, Martín Ferrari wrote: > On 20/05/16 22:35, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > >> It won't work for debian packages that have go packages that fail tests >> (or fail to build!) in DH_GOLANG_EXCLUDES. You could argue that such >> packages are broken, but there are definitely a few in the archive. >> Perhaps we should just patch those tests out (// +build ignore, I guess) >> instead... > > Yes. I think that go packages should pass tests as installed. If they > don't, we should fix them > > > -- > Martín Ferrari (Tincho) > > ___ > Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list > Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers
Re: [pkg-go] RFS: new upstream snapshot golang-github-erikdubbelboer-gspt
On 25 May 2016 at 04:50, Peter Colberg wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:12:24AM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: >> Thanks for the feedback, all done in git. (I always forget that sbuild >> doesn't run lintian on the source package!) > > Thanks for the updates. Thanks. Can you upload? > Do you have lintian enabled in .sbuildrc? > > # ~/.sbuildrc > $run_lintian = 1; > $lintian_opts = ['-i', '-I', '--color=always']; I do, but IIRC that doesn't run lintian on the dsc, just on the debs. Maybe I do not RC... Cheers, mwh ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers
