Re: [pkg-go] pkg-go will migrate to salsa.debian.org on 2018-04-02

[Pirate Praveen]

On ചൊവ്വ 03 ഏപ്രിൽ 2018 09:46 രാവിലെ, Alexandre Viau wrote:
> On 2018-04-02 12:27 PM, Alexandre Viau wrote:> I am starting the
> migration now.
> 
> The migration was completed.
> 

Thanks!

> There are leftover packages with permissions issues in
> git.debian.org:/git/pkg-go/packages:
> 
>  - golang-github-kelseyhightower-envconfig-dev.git

Pushed to salsa and send mr for rewriter.

https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/AliothRewriter/merge_requests/252

I could not move it packages-migrated-to-salsa because of permission errors.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#894277: gitaly is not configured and not starting with a custom configuration

[Pirate Praveen]

Package: gitaly
Version: 0.91.0+debian-1
Severity: grave
Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitaly/issues/1119
Control: affects -1 gitlab

This breaks gitlab.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] gitlab-workhorse on salsa is moved to go-team/packages from ruby-team

[Pirate Praveen]

Hi,

Initially this was the only gitlab dependency using go and I thought it
better to have it under ruby team so its easier to manage. Now
golang-gitaly-proto, gitaly and their dependencies are already under go
team and it is natural to move gitlab-workhorse there. Please update
your local repos.

Thanks
Praveen



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#894131: Bug#894131: prometheus-alertmanager: New upstream release 0.14.0 available. Please package and backport to stretch.

[Pirate Praveen]

On ചൊവ്വ 27 മാർച്ച് 2018 06:21 വൈകു, Martín Ferrari wrote:
>> What exactly in Debian policy is preventing us shipping Alertmanager
>> built as intended by upstream?
> 
> I don't remember which section in the Policy that is. But those
> generated files are not source code, and therefore there is a
> requirement to (re)build them from source. It is the same as i was
> shipping a pre-compiled .so file.

Hi Martin,

We had this debate with handlebars templates and I'm happy to share good
news about handlebars now. I know you moved to mustache based templates,
handlebars is in main now.

This has that debate
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830978





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#893171: it is just an older version of grpc I think

[Pirate Praveen]

Control: retitle -1 Update golang-google-grpc-dev to new upstream release
Control: reassign -1 golang-google-grpc-dev
Control: found -1 1.6.0-3

Correcting bug meta data.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#893171: Support non git packages

[Pirate Praveen]

Package: dh-make-golang
Version: 0.0~git20180129.37f630a-1+b1
severity: wishlist

I'm trying to update gitaly to new upstream version.

I got
src/gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitaly/internal/rubyserver/balancer/balancer.go:24:2:
cannot find package "google.golang.org/grpc/resolver" in any of:

/<>/gitaly-0.88.0+debian/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitaly/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/resolver
 (vendor tree)
/usr/lib/go-1.10/src/google.golang.org/grpc/resolver (from $GOROOT)

/<>/gitaly-0.88.0+debian/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/google.golang.org/grpc/resolver
 (from $GOPATH)

So I try to package it.

$ dh-make-golang google.golang.org/grpc/resolver
2018/03/17 05:52:13 Downloading "google.golang.org/grpc/resolver/..."
2018/03/17 05:52:21 Could not create a tarball of the upstream source:
Not a git repository, dh-make-golang currently only supports git

I think I will keep the vendored files for now.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] Getting a new list for actual discussions

[Pirate Praveen]

On 2018, ജനുവരി 29 9:11:17 AM IST, Alexandre Viau  wrote:
>Hello,
>
>This list is pretty spammy. How do you guys keep up with actual
>discussions? Do you use filters?
>
>I personally missed out on discussions because I didn't see the
>messages.
>
>I was wondering if pkg-go would be interested in getting a new list
>maybe, and leave this one for bugs/ftpmasters message?
 
>Hopefully we get a lists.debian.org list but I don't think that is
>happening, as we don't seem to fit their requirements.

A discussion only list would fit their requirements. Or even a combined one. 
They don't want to host maintainer-only lists.

So it would be a good thing to have a discussion only list there.

>So, maybe a new list on the newly announced alioth lists
>infrastructure?
>
>Any ideas, comments?

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#886816: Removing golang-go.uber-zap or zap

[Pirate Praveen]

On 2018, ജനുവരി 29 9:00:58 AM IST, Alexandre Viau  wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I have uploaded a duplicate of src:zap as src:golang-go.uber-zap.
>
>I don't know why I missed src:zap. Probably because it didn't follow
>the
>pkg-go naming guidelines, but even then, dh-make-golang should have
>told
>me because it uses XS-Go-Import-Path.
>
>Anyways. We should remove one of the two packages.
>
>The next version of influxdb will require zap.
>
>We should open a RM bug to ftpmasters.
>
>Which one do you suggest removing?
>
>Since src:golang-go.uber-zap follows pkg-go naming guidelines, I
>suggest
>that we remove src:zap.
>
>Do you have any objections?
>
>I will open a bug as soon as you confirm.

I'm okay with, we should update all reverse build dependencies accordingly.

>Cheers,

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] Comments regarding zap_1.5.0+git20170802.3.e68420e-1_amd64.changes

[Pirate Praveen]

On ബുധന്‍ 06 സെപ്റ്റംബര്‍ 2017 05:15 വൈകു, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> (not from ftp-master, just team member of pkg-go, and not cc ftp-master)
> 
> Why ship this /usr/bin/zap-readme? I don't think this is a useful
> binary for users.

ok, We can remove it from next upload.

> the readme binary is generate from
> https://github.com/uber-go/zap/blob/master/internal/readme/readme.go
> which is in an internal directory.
> And after looked at the code roughly, I think this is used by library
> mantainer, not users, which is to generate the
> https://github.com/uber-go/zap/blob/master/README.md

my main motivation was to get the library part for gitaly, so did not
dig deeper about the binary. Thanks for looking deeper.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] Comments regarding zap_1.5.0+git20170802.3.e68420e-1_amd64.changes

[Pirate Praveen]

On ശനി 02 സെപ്റ്റംബര്‍ 2017 12:57 വൈകു, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> /usr/bin/readme is too generic to be placed under a location defined in PATH.
> Would it be possible to use a more specialized name, such as zap-readme?
>

done.
> Cheers,
> Luca
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
> Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers
> 




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#872015: convert import path to url for homepage and source

[Pirate Praveen]

package: dh-golang
version: 1.22
severity: wishlist

example package go.uber.org/atomic. Same for Source in copyright.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#872016: use licensecheck to autodetect license

[Pirate Praveen]

package: dh-golang
version: 1.22
severity: wishlist

example package go.uber.org/atomic



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#871983: cache the downloaded files

[Pirate Praveen]

On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 11:59:05 +0530 Pirate Praveen
<prav...@onenetbeyond.org> wrote:> Would it also be possible to not
clone the entire history?
> 

I think git clone --depth 1 would be enough to generate the orig tar
ball and determine the version.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#871983: cache the downloaded files

[Pirate Praveen]

package: dh-make-golang
severity: wishlist


currently dh-make-golang downloads/clones repos every time it is run. It
would be better to allow caching as an option so you can reuse the
already downloaded copies. This is useful when you don't have a fast
internet connection (my personal case, I have to run dh-make-golang on a
server after sshing).

Would it also be possible to not clone the entire history?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#871902: Bug#871902: Bug#871902: add golang support to dh-make

[Pirate Praveen]

On ശനി 12 ആഗസ്റ്റ് 2017 06:06 വൈകു, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think we have dh-make-golang already, please see the following
> links for reference.
> 
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/dh-make-golang
> https://github.com/debian/dh-make-golang
> https://people.debian.org/~stapelberg/2015/07/27/dh-make-golang.html
> 

Thanks! I will try this.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#871902: add golang support to dh-make

[Pirate Praveen]

package: dh-make, dh-golang
severity: wishlist

Currently we have to use dh-make to create a generic debian directory
and edit rules to add golang support. We also need to edit control file
to add dependency on golang. Both of these could be automated. It would
be nice to have direct support for this in dh-make (like python) or have
a new command dh-make-go (like dh-make-ruby) so we can automate creation
of rules and control files correctly.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#835661: Pending fixes for bugs in the prometheus package

[Pirate Praveen]

On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 01:34:24 +
pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org wrote:
> Commit message:
> 
> Replace libjs-handlebars with libjs-mustache. Closes: #835661.

Great to see prometheus remaining in main by removing dependency on
libjs-handlebars.

Any blockers to this upload? I'd like to reupload the libjs-handlebars
package in experimental to unstable once you upload prometheus without
libjs-handlebars dependency.

This will allow me to move ruby-handlebars-assets to contrib from
non-free as node-handlebars provided by libjs-handlebars source package
currently in experimental provides source code for ruby-handlebars-assets.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] help fixing gitlab-workhorse build failure on s390x

[Pirate Praveen]

[cc me on replies from s390 list]

gitlab-workhorse is blocking gitlab 8.12.3 migration to testing for
sometime now. I fixed two issues with powerpc build but this issue seems
hard to crack.

See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843148 for details

Any help fixing this issue would be great.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] Need help fixing raven-go with gccgo

[Pirate Praveen]

[Adding GCC Maintainers (please cc me on replies)]

On Wednesday 02 November 2016 04:01 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Can some one who knows golang well, respond to this question from
> upstream https://github.com/getsentry/raven-go/issues/112




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] Need help fixing raven-go with gccgo

[Pirate Praveen]

[Adding GCC Maintainers (please cc me on replies)]

On Wednesday 02 November 2016 04:01 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Can some one who knows golang well, respond to this question from
> upstream https://github.com/getsentry/raven-go/issues/112




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] Need help fixing raven-go with gccgo

[Pirate Praveen]

On Wednesday 02 November 2016 01:00 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Can someone here help with this package? Details here
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842897

Can some one who knows golang well, respond to this question from
upstream https://github.com/getsentry/raven-go/issues/112



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#842897: Bug#842897: Bug#842897: fix test failure with gccgo

[Pirate Praveen]

Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/getsentry/raven-go/issues/112

On Wednesday 02 November 2016 02:55 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> This looks like an upstream problem, have you reported in there? It
> looks like a test depending on details of the function names you get
> from runtime.Stack or similar, probably just skipping it when running
> with gccgo would be fine.

Just reported it. I'll try if I can disable it (I don't know much of go).



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Need help fixing raven-go with gccgo

[Pirate Praveen]

Hi,

Can someone here help with this package? Details here
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842897

I need this package for gitlab-workhorse (and in turn gitlab).

Thanks
Praveen



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#842897: fix test failure with gccgo

[Pirate Praveen]

package: golang-raven-go
version: 0.0~git20150721.0.74c334d-1
severity: important

Need this to make gitlab-workhorse buildable again on powerpc
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gitlab-workhorse

go test -v -p 1 github.com/getsentry/raven-go
=== RUN   TestPacketJSON
--- PASS: TestPacketJSON (0.07s)
=== RUN   TestPacketInit
--- PASS: TestPacketInit (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestSetDSN
--- PASS: TestSetDSN (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestUnmarshalTag
--- PASS: TestUnmarshalTag (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestUnmarshalTags
--- PASS: TestUnmarshalTags (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestMarshalTimestamp
--- PASS: TestMarshalTimestamp (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestUnmarshalTimestamp
--- PASS: TestUnmarshalTimestamp (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestNewException
--- PASS: TestNewException (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestNewHttp
--- PASS: TestNewHttp (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestSanitizeQuery
--- PASS: TestSanitizeQuery (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestFunctionName
--- FAIL: TestFunctionName (0.04s)
stacktrace_test.go:30: incorrect package; got
github_com_getsentry_raven_go, want github.com/getsentry/raven-go
stacktrace_test.go:33: incorrect function; got $thunk15, want tRunner
stacktrace_test.go:30: incorrect package; got , want runtime
stacktrace_test.go:33: incorrect function; got kickoff, want goexit
=== RUN   TestStacktrace
--- FAIL: TestStacktrace (0.00s)
stacktrace_test.go:58: incorrect Module: raven
stacktrace_test.go:73: expected InApp to be true
stacktrace_test.go:77: incorrect Culprit:
=== RUN   TestNewStacktrace_outOfBounds
--- PASS: TestNewStacktrace_outOfBounds (0.00s)
FAIL



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go_3.0.0-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Pirate Praveen]

On Tuesday 25 October 2016 06:10 PM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 25/10/16 06:57, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> On Wednesday 12 October 2016 08:19 PM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
>>> I need to check with upstream if they are breaking API compatibility for
>>> good, and in that case will need to create a new package with a API
>>> version embedded.
>>
>> What do you think the best here now? I have to fix
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841617 (it needs
>> golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go 3.0).
>>
>> Can I create a new package golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go3?
> 
> I filed a bug upstream (https://github.com/dgrijalva/jwt-go/issues/176)
> and the upstream author said he plans to keep fixing bugs for 2.x, so
> I'd say that having a different package makes sense.
> 
> Two things would need to happen, though: the new package will have to
> use a different import path, and dependencies will have to be patched to
> use it. Upstream mentioned gopkg.in, so maybe he will switch to that at
> some point, but for now, we will have to do it the hackish way.
> 
> The same should probably be done to the v2 package too.
> 
> Also, we should probably discuss with the team the version naming
> scheme, since it is possible this will happen more often in the future.
> What do you folks think? golang-fooN, golang-foo-vN?
> 

I chose -vN as that seems the way gopkg.in suggests. I have made changes
in master-v3 branch. Can you check it?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go_3.0.0-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Pirate Praveen]

On Wednesday 12 October 2016 08:19 PM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> I need to check with upstream if they are breaking API compatibility for
> good, and in that case will need to create a new package with a API
> version embedded.

What do you think the best here now? I have to fix
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841617 (it needs
golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go 3.0).

Can I create a new package golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go3?




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] Sponsor uploads of golang-github-hlandau-{goutils, buildinfo, dexlogconfig}

[Pirate Praveen]

On 2016, ഒക്‌ടോബർ 12 8:24:57 PM IST, "Martín Ferrari"  wrote:
>
>> Done. To test compilation with gccgo, I temporarily replaced the
>build
>> dependency on golang-any with gccgo-6, but the build fails on amd64:
>>
>>   dh build --buildsystem=golang --with=golang
>>  dh_testdir -O--buildsystem=golang
>>  dh_update_autotools_config -O--buildsystem=golang
>>  dh_auto_configure -O--buildsystem=golang
>>  dh_auto_build -O--buildsystem=golang
>>go install -v -p 1
>>   dh_auto_build: go install -v -p 1 failed to to execute: No such
>file
>or directory
>>   debian/rules:4: recipe for target 'build' failed
>>   make: *** [build] Error 2
>>   dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status
>2
>>
>> Is this a bug in dh-golang or gccgo-6?
>
>No, it is that golang-any provides the symlink only on non-golang
>architectures.. I don't know of any easy way to test this nowadays,
>except for manyally creating a link from /usr/bin/go to gccgo-6

Last upload of gccgo-6 included this via alternatives. So no special handling 
required.
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go_3.0.0-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Pirate Praveen]

On ചൊവ്വ 11 ഒക്ടോബര്‍ 2016 10:36 വൈകു, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> OK, please do the same with both libraries, and revert any other changes
> you have done.

Reverted both packages to previous versions.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#839597: Bug#839597: Bug#839597: update golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go to new upstream release

[Pirate Praveen]

On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 13:52:48 +0200 Martín Ferrari  wrote:
> I will take a look at your changes, but I would be interested in seeing
> which failures you are getting with gcc-go and on which architecture.

I got this test failure on amd64.

I ran

# dpkg -r --force-all golang-go
# ln -s /usr/bin/go-6 /usr/bin/go

I have filed #840190 so the symlink step can be avoided. All tests
passed with golang-go.

I also uploaded golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go to experimental. Test log
below. Ruby testing libraries are more friendly as they print the failed
tests at the end, here we have to go through all tests manually to find
failed tests.

Failed tests:
--- FAIL: TestCopyAndDecodeAlwaysReturnsACopy (0.00s)
utility_test.go:85: autorest: CopyAndDecode failed to return a valid
copy of the data -

There are more failures, but does not print which tests failed.

Full log:

go test -v -p 1 github.com/Azure/go-autorest/autorest
github.com/Azure/go-autorest/autorest/azure
github.com/Azure/go-autorest/autorest/azure/example
github.com/Azure/go-autorest/autorest/date
github.com/Azure/go-autorest/autorest/mocks
github.com/Azure/go-autorest/autorest/to
github.com/Azure/go-autorest/autorest/validation
=== RUN   TestResponseHasStatusCode
--- PASS: TestResponseHasStatusCode (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestResponseHasStatusCodeNotPresent
--- PASS: TestResponseHasStatusCodeNotPresent (0.00s)
=== RUN
TestNewPollingRequestDoesNotReturnARequestWhenLocationHeaderIsMissing
--- PASS:
TestNewPollingRequestDoesNotReturnARequestWhenLocationHeaderIsMissing
(0.00s)
=== RUN   TestNewPollingRequestReturnsAnErrorWhenPrepareFails
--- PASS: TestNewPollingRequestReturnsAnErrorWhenPrepareFails (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestNewPollingRequestDoesNotReturnARequestWhenPrepareFails
--- PASS: TestNewPollingRequestDoesNotReturnARequestWhenPrepareFails (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestNewPollingRequestReturnsAGetRequest
--- PASS: TestNewPollingRequestReturnsAGetRequest (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestNewPollingRequestProvidesTheURL
--- PASS: TestNewPollingRequestProvidesTheURL (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestGetLocation
--- PASS: TestGetLocation (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestGetLocationReturnsEmptyStringForMissingLocation
--- PASS: TestGetLocationReturnsEmptyStringForMissingLocation (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestGetRetryAfter
--- PASS: TestGetRetryAfter (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestGetRetryAfterReturnsDefaultDelayIfRetryHeaderIsMissing
--- PASS: TestGetRetryAfterReturnsDefaultDelayIfRetryHeaderIsMissing (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestGetRetryAfterReturnsDefaultDelayIfRetryHeaderIsMalformed
--- PASS: TestGetRetryAfterReturnsDefaultDelayIfRetryHeaderIsMalformed
(0.00s)
=== RUN   TestLoggingInspectorWithInspection
--- PASS: TestLoggingInspectorWithInspection (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestLoggingInspectorWithInspectionEmitsErrors
--- PASS: TestLoggingInspectorWithInspectionEmitsErrors (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestLoggingInspectorWithInspectionRestoresBody
--- PASS: TestLoggingInspectorWithInspectionRestoresBody (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestLoggingInspectorByInspecting
--- PASS: TestLoggingInspectorByInspecting (0.01s)
=== RUN   TestLoggingInspectorByInspectingEmitsErrors
--- PASS: TestLoggingInspectorByInspectingEmitsErrors (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestLoggingInspectorByInspectingRestoresBody
--- PASS: TestLoggingInspectorByInspectingRestoresBody (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestNewClientWithUserAgent
--- PASS: TestNewClientWithUserAgent (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestClientSenderReturnsHttpClientByDefault
--- PASS: TestClientSenderReturnsHttpClientByDefault (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestClientSenderReturnsSetSender
--- PASS: TestClientSenderReturnsSetSender (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestClientDoInvokesSender
--- PASS: TestClientDoInvokesSender (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestClientDoSetsUserAgent
--- PASS: TestClientDoSetsUserAgent (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestClientDoSetsAuthorization
--- PASS: TestClientDoSetsAuthorization (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestClientDoInvokesRequestInspector
--- PASS: TestClientDoInvokesRequestInspector (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestClientDoInvokesResponseInspector
--- PASS: TestClientDoInvokesResponseInspector (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestClientDoReturnsErrorIfPrepareFails
--- PASS: TestClientDoReturnsErrorIfPrepareFails (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestClientDoDoesNotSendIfPrepareFails
--- PASS: TestClientDoDoesNotSendIfPrepareFails (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestClientAuthorizerReturnsNullAuthorizerByDefault
--- PASS: TestClientAuthorizerReturnsNullAuthorizerByDefault (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestClientAuthorizerReturnsSetAuthorizer
--- PASS: TestClientAuthorizerReturnsSetAuthorizer (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestClientWithAuthorizer
--- PASS: TestClientWithAuthorizer (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestClientWithInspection
--- PASS: TestClientWithInspection (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestClientWithInspectionSetsDefault
--- PASS: TestClientWithInspectionSetsDefault (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestClientByInspecting
--- PASS: TestClientByInspecting (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestClientByInspectingSetsDefault
--- PASS: TestClientByInspectingSetsDefault (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestNewErrorWithError_AssignsPackageType
--- PASS: 

[pkg-go] Bug#839597: Bug#839597: update golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go to new upstream release

[Pirate Praveen]

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 00:08:48 +0200 Martín Ferrari  wrote:
> I don't usually work with this package, but be careful when updating
> this as 3.0 has breaking changes that might affect rdependencies:
> 
> https://github.com/dgrijalva/jwt-go/blob/master/VERSION_HISTORY.md

I have prepared the update at
https://git.fosscommunity.in/praveen/golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go (I
have also requested membership at pkg-go on alioth)

I have also updated its reverse dependency here
https://git.fosscommunity.in/praveen/golang-github-azure-go-autorest

Though the second package's tests are failing with gccgo-6. I don't know
any go, so if one of you can check it, that would be great. May be we
can ignore these failures.

Please review and upload if it is good enough.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#835661: Bug#835661: drop dependency on libjs-handlebars

[Pirate Praveen]

On 2016, ആഗസ്റ്റ് 29 8:40:00 AM IST, "Martín Ferrari" <tin...@debian.org> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On 28/08/16 08:33, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
>> libjs-handlebars is missing source (see
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830986 and
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830978). I'm
>planning
>> to drop this package (other option is to keep in non-free) soon.
>> 
>> if you can help keep it in main by generating handlebars.js from its
>> source, that would be another option (but this would require
>packaging
>> grunt or mimicking grunt using other tools in main).
>
>I understand your pain, but possibly this could be reproduced with some
>commands in debian/rules, using browserify? I took a brief look today,
>but did not seem to find all the scripts for building the source
>completely, but surely there is way.. I will try to help with this.

Thanks.

>Having said all this, I think the serious severity is not correct. This
>package is not yet removed from main, so I don't see any reason for
>this
>bug to be RC (yet).

libjs-handlebars cannot be released in main in the current form, so I think the 
severity is correct. Even if libjs-handlebars is moved to non-free, prometheus 
will have to be moved to contrib.

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#835661: drop dependency on libjs-handlebars

[Pirate Praveen]

package: prometheus
version: 1.0.1+ds-1
severity: serious

libjs-handlebars is missing source (see
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830986 and
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830978). I'm planning
to drop this package (other option is to keep in non-free) soon.

if you can help keep it in main by generating handlebars.js from its
source, that would be another option (but this would require packaging
grunt or mimicking grunt using other tools in main).



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers