Bug#667966: postgis: PostGIS 2.0.0 Released
Moritz Lennert mlenn...@club.worldonline.be writes: I would like to ping this issue. Is this just an issue of manpower, or are there other reasons why PostGIS is not packaged, yet ? Postgis 2 is packaged in Git, but has not been uploaded to Debian (I assume it exists in some version of Ubuntu, however). The fact that Debian is currently frozen and attempting to release is also a reason. We currently have the same version of Postgis in both unstable and wheezy, which is an advantage in case Postgis still needs an update before the release. Normal updates to unstable will resume after wheezy is released. -- Arto Jantunen ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#667966: postgis: PostGIS 2.0.0 Released
Just a note that the postgis-java has been disabled in the current 2.0 package. We aren't familiar with java packaging and there were some bugs. If anyone knows Ant and Maven... I'm sure this can be fixed easily. Alan On 13-01-25 09:03 AM, Arto Jantunen wrote: Moritz Lennert mlenn...@club.worldonline.be writes: I would like to ping this issue. Is this just an issue of manpower, or are there other reasons why PostGIS is not packaged, yet ? Postgis 2 is packaged in Git, but has not been uploaded to Debian (I assume it exists in some version of Ubuntu, however). The fact that Debian is currently frozen and attempting to release is also a reason. We currently have the same version of Postgis in both unstable and wheezy, which is an advantage in case Postgis still needs an update before the release. Normal updates to unstable will resume after wheezy is released. -- Alan Boudreault http://www.mapgears.com/ ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#674213: gpsdrive: not installable in sid
Hi Hamish, What's the status on the upstream work here? Is it worth waiting for a new upstream release, or is it better to go ahead and package 2.11? Could the fixes for mapnik be applied to the 2.11 packages as patches, or are the changes too extensive for that? Note that this FTBFS has been (temporarily) resolved in the latest Debian packages of 2.10 with patches disabling mapnik in the build. Allison ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
