Re: otb_4.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Paolo, can you please confirm that you understood that it is a packaging problem to simply list all the license in the debian/copyright file? Ftpmaster was not saying that the licenses are wrong - they are just not specified in d/copyright. Kind regards Andreas. On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:03:15AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Paolo, On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 07:23:18AM +0200, Paolo Cavallini wrote: Il 15/10/2014 14:52, Johan Van de Wauw ha scritto: You can use licensecheck in the package devscripts to check which licenses are used and update the debian/copyright file. https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ Just running it myself I wonder if you are using the copies of libraries (eg boost, zlib, ...) FYI: I added a ticket upstream, where I think the issue is best solved http://bugs.orfeo-toolbox.org/view.php?id=981 While this is probably correct, it is only half of the problem. Ftpmaster found *several other* files with licenses / copyright which are not mentioned in debian/copyright. This needs to be fixed before we could upload again. The code copies would be acceptable to some extend if there would be no way around - if and only if their copyright would be properly specified. So somebody needs to go down the list which can be obtained by licensecheck -r * Hope this helps Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: frequent buildd issues with postgis
Dejan, On 10/20/2014 01:21 PM, Dejan Latinovic wrote: Is seems that build fail on Broadcom boards, and pass on cavium and loongson. I will run build locally to confirm this theory. Any results from that exercise? Regards Markus Wanner signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
RE: frequent buildd issues with postgis
Hello Markus, As I suspected, build filed on Broadcom and pass on Cavium board. But I did not figure it out yet what is the reason of this behavior. I am getting the same output like this one: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=postgisarch=mipselver=2.1.4%2Bdfsg-2stamp=1413547028 Regards Dejan From: Markus Wanner [mar...@bluegap.ch] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 11:25 AM To: Dejan Latinovic; debian-m...@lists.debian.org Cc: Debian GIS Project; Christoph Berg Subject: Re: frequent buildd issues with postgis Dejan, On 10/20/2014 01:21 PM, Dejan Latinovic wrote: Is seems that build fail on Broadcom boards, and pass on cavium and loongson. I will run build locally to confirm this theory. Any results from that exercise? Regards Markus Wanner ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: frequent buildd issues with postgis
On 10/23/2014 01:35 PM, Dejan Latinovic wrote: As I suspected, build filed on Broadcom and pass on Cavium board. Okay, thanks for your tests and confirmation. But I did not figure it out yet what is the reason of this behavior. I am getting the same output like this one: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=postgisarch=mipselver=2.1.4%2Bdfsg-2stamp=1413547028 These indicate that Postgres restarted for some reason. Leading to connection failures, first. Then, during the restart, the is in recovery mode errors. The Postgres log should have some indication of why it restarted in the first place. Regards Markus ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[jmapviewer] branch master updated (33f755c - 77537c5)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. fnatter-guest pushed a change to branch master in repository jmapviewer. from 33f755c mention 'download bing logo at runtime' hack in README.Debian new 77537c5 upgrade to standards-version 3.9.6 The 1 revisions listed above as new are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as adds were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: debian/changelog | 3 ++- debian/control | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/jmapviewer.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[jmapviewer] 01/01: upgrade to standards-version 3.9.6
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. fnatter-guest pushed a commit to branch master in repository jmapviewer. commit 77537c54e829ed0dce2c7290f91d6c52dd8affde Author: Felix Natter fnat...@gmx.net Date: Thu Oct 23 18:53:43 2014 +0200 upgrade to standards-version 3.9.6 --- debian/changelog | 3 ++- debian/control | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 3d9de00..a888e21 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ jmapviewer (1.03+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Download the bing logo at runtime from the link in the attribution XML (thanks to Marcus Lundblad m...@update.uu.se and Martin Krüger martin.krue...@gmx.com) - * Closes: #765421 +Closes: #765421 + * Upgrade to Standards-Version 3.9.6 -- Felix Natter fnat...@gmx.net Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:39:41 +0200 diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 33ee2c8..55716e5 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Build-Depends: docbook-xsl, docbook-xml, xsltproc -Standards-Version: 3.9.5 +Standards-Version: 3.9.6 Homepage: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JMapViewer Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-grass/jmapviewer.git Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-grass/jmapviewer.git -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/jmapviewer.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Libjpeg trouble in jmapviewer
Hi Felix, unfortunately there is some conflict in the Build-Depends: 0 packages upgraded, 132 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 62.8 MB/92.4 MB of archives. After unpacking 210 MB will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: libjpeg62-turbo : Conflicts: libjpeg62 but 1:1.3.1-8 is to be installed. libjpeg62 : Depends: libjpeg62-turbo (= 1:1.3.1-8) but 1:1.3.1-10 is to be installed. Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... The following NEW packages will be installed: Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Libjpeg trouble in jmapviewer
On 10/23/2014 08:20 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: unfortunately there is some conflict in the Build-Depends: 0 packages upgraded, 132 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 62.8 MB/92.4 MB of archives. After unpacking 210 MB will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: libjpeg62-turbo : Conflicts: libjpeg62 but 1:1.3.1-8 is to be installed. libjpeg62 : Depends: libjpeg62-turbo (= 1:1.3.1-8) but 1:1.3.1-10 is to be installed. Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... The following NEW packages will be installed: This is caused by the build-dependency on default-jdk which needed an update for the jpeg-turbo transition. It was earlier today reported on debian-release in the gettext is BD-Uninstallable thread: https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2014/10/msg00445.html It should be fixed with the latest openjdk-7 upload, but it hasn't hit the mirrors yet. Kind regards Andreas. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#766508: Libjpeg trouble in jmapviewer
Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu writes: Hi Felix, hello Andreas, unfortunately there is some conflict in the Build-Depends: 0 packages upgraded, 132 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 62.8 MB/92.4 MB of archives. After unpacking 210 MB will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: libjpeg62-turbo : Conflicts: libjpeg62 but 1:1.3.1-8 is to be installed. libjpeg62 : Depends: libjpeg62-turbo (= 1:1.3.1-8) but 1:1.3.1-10 is to be installed. Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... The following NEW packages will be installed: This is a problem with installing openjdk-7-jre (which is pulled from default-jdk): https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=766483 It has nothing to do with jmapviewer (except that jmapviewer depends on default-jdk). I'm not sure whether an update will already fix that problem :-( time allows maybe you should sponsor other packages and try again tomorrow? If the time until the freeze is pressing, I could ask for a workaround on debian-java. Thanks and Best Regards, -- Felix Natter ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
Hi Bas, On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:10:43PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: [no love for enigmail today] try mutt ;-) switched to public discussion anyway. For very strange reasons I get 0 packages upgraded, 228 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 37.7 MB/115 MB of archives. After unpacking 491 MB will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy : Depends: libgdal-dev (= 1.11.0-1~) but 1.10.1+dfsg-8+b3 is to be installed. Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... The following NEW packages will be installed: and yes, I have experimental sources.list enabled in my pbuilder environment and updated cowbuilder. I vaguely remember that we had such a case before but I forgot how we solved this. Thanks for the preparation Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
Hi Bas On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: It looks like your experimental branch is outdated, gdal-grass 1.11.1 build depends on libgdal-dev (= 1.11.1-1~). Pulling the experimental branch should suffice to fix this specific issue: git fetch origin git checkout experimental git pull I did so: $ git log commit 4b4b0f7a63c8d35f86489e9ed515372dc35ef650 Author: Bas Couwenberg sebas...@xs4all.nl Date: Sun Oct 12 16:17:07 2014 +0200 Set distribution to experimental. commit 076103ba71effe043ea0bec659ae1784ddfe6cea Author: Bas Couwenberg sebas...@xs4all.nl Date: Sat Oct 11 18:10:43 2014 +0200 Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6, no changes. ... $ git branch * experimental master pristine-tar upstream Unfortunately this packages also suffers from the libjpeg62-turbo unmet build dependency, so it cannot be built at the moment. ... so we can keep on sorting out since the problem seems to remain. 0 packages upgraded, 228 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 36.9 MB/115 MB of archives. After unpacking 491 MB will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy : Depends: libgdal-dev (= 1.11.1-1~) but 1.10.1+dfsg-8+b3 is to be installed. Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... The following NEW packages will be installed: I even fetched a fresh clone via gbp-clone and did the steps you suggested above. :-( Thanks for your all your sponsorship efforts. I admit I'm waiting for the time when three or four of you new activists in Debian GIS will become DM. I also tried to encourage Ross and Johan to apply. You all do pretty good work and it is time to gain the official status. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
Hi Andreas, On 10/23/2014 10:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: It looks like your experimental branch is outdated, gdal-grass 1.11.1 build depends on libgdal-dev (= 1.11.1-1~). Pulling the experimental branch should suffice to fix this specific issue: git fetch origin git checkout experimental git pull I did so: $ git log commit 4b4b0f7a63c8d35f86489e9ed515372dc35ef650 Author: Bas Couwenberg sebas...@xs4all.nl Date: Sun Oct 12 16:17:07 2014 +0200 Set distribution to experimental. [...] Unfortunately this packages also suffers from the libjpeg62-turbo unmet build dependency, so it cannot be built at the moment. ... so we can keep on sorting out since the problem seems to remain. 0 packages upgraded, 228 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 36.9 MB/115 MB of archives. After unpacking 491 MB will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy : Depends: libgdal-dev (= 1.11.1-1~) but 1.10.1+dfsg-8+b3 is to be installed. Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... The following NEW packages will be installed: I even fetched a fresh clone via gbp-clone and did the steps you suggested above. :-( The git repo looks good, and the version in the unmet Depends too. I cannot reproduce this problem with my sid+experimental chroot which is setup like yours as described in: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/2014-September/021973.html Interestingly here apt reports 229 newly installed, yours one less. I've attached my build log for comparison. Thanks for your all your sponsorship efforts. I admit I'm waiting for the time when three or four of you new activists in Debian GIS will become DM. I also tried to encourage Ross and Johan to apply. You all do pretty good work and it is time to gain the official status. I just pinged my AM again to see if we can get moving again. Kind regards Andreas. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 libgdal-grass_1.11.1-1~exp1_amd64.build.gz Description: application/gzip ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
