[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#392560: GRASS not compilable on testing
Subject: grass: Outdated build-deps for testing Source: grass Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source *** Please type your report below this line *** The grass source package from testing (6.0.2-6) has impossible build dependencies for testing, and the current grass binary in testing cannot have been built with these dependencies. This: dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: fftw3-dev libgl1-mesa-swx11-dev libglu1-xorg-dev | xlibmesa-glu-dev autoconf2.13 libgdal1-1.3.1-dev results in this: to be REMOVED: libgl1-mesa-dev libgl1-mesa-dri libgl1-mesa-glx x-window-system x-window-system-core xlibmesa-dri xlibmesa-gl xlibmesa-gl-dev xorg to be INSTALLED: autoconf2.13 fftw3-dev libgl1-mesa-swx11 libgl1-mesa-swx11-dev libglu1-xorg-dev To remove xorg just to build grass? Somewhat exaggarated, IMHO. And the current grass binary dependes on libgdal1-1.3.2, which is the current version in testing, not 1.3.1, which is required by the source package. Would be nice to have the control file that was used to build the current testing packages, not some age-old ones. Greetings, Harri K. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17 Locale: LANG=fi_FI.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#392560: GRASS not compilable on testing
severity 392560 important thanks On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 11:07:25AM +0200, Harri Kiiskinen wrote: > Subject: grass: Outdated build-deps for testing > Source: grass > Severity: serious > Justification: no longer builds from source > *** Please type your report below this line *** > The grass source package from testing (6.0.2-6) has impossible build > dependencies for testing, and the current grass binary in > testing cannot have been built with these dependencies. > dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: fftw3-dev > libgl1-mesa-swx11-dev libglu1-xorg-dev | xlibmesa-glu-dev autoconf2.13 > libgdal1-1.3.1-dev > results in this: > to be REMOVED: > libgl1-mesa-dev libgl1-mesa-dri libgl1-mesa-glx x-window-system > x-window-system-core xlibmesa-dri xlibmesa-gl xlibmesa-gl-dev xorg > to be INSTALLED: > autoconf2.13 fftw3-dev libgl1-mesa-swx11 libgl1-mesa-swx11-dev > libglu1-xorg-dev > To remove xorg just to build grass? Somewhat exaggarated, IMHO. That doesn't make it a serious bug in grass just because you choose not to install the build-dependencies. Though since grass doesn't appear to be building against libOSMesa, it should be fixed to use one of the less-conflicty implementations of libgl1-dev. > And the current grass binary dependes on libgdal1-1.3.2, which is the > current version in testing, not 1.3.1, which is required by > the source package. Would be nice to have the control file that was used > to build the current testing packages, not some age-old > ones. What are you talking about? The current version of the package build-depends on libgdal1-1.3.2-dev. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#392560: GRASS not compilable on testing
to, 2006-10-12 kello 21:55 -0700, Steve Langasek kirjoitti: > > to be REMOVED: > > libgl1-mesa-dev libgl1-mesa-dri libgl1-mesa-glx x-window-system > > x-window-system-core xlibmesa-dri xlibmesa-gl xlibmesa-gl-dev xorg > > to be INSTALLED: > > autoconf2.13 fftw3-dev libgl1-mesa-swx11 libgl1-mesa-swx11-dev > > libglu1-xorg-dev > > > To remove xorg just to build grass? Somewhat exaggarated, IMHO. > > That doesn't make it a serious bug in grass just because you choose not to > install the build-dependencies. > > Though since grass doesn't appear to be building against libOSMesa, it > should be fixed to use one of the less-conflicty implementations of > libgl1-dev. Yes, I think this was the point I was trying to make; not really knew how to put it, though. > > And the current grass binary dependes on libgdal1-1.3.2, which is the > > current version in testing, not 1.3.1, which is required by > > the source package. Would be nice to have the control file that was used > > to build the current testing packages, not some age-old > > ones. > > What are you talking about? The current version of the package > build-depends on libgdal1-1.3.2-dev. Considering the high general quality of Debian, the mistake must have been on my side; an apt-src remove grass with apt-src install grass did the trick, and suddenly the control file was updated... Don't have an explanation for that, though. -- Harri Kiiskinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel