Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 06:17:12PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > Can you try libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1 once more now that the buildds > are done with gdal? Done Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
Hi Andreas, On 10/25/2014 09:58 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:21AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> I've just filed a binnmu bug to have it rebuilt (#766694). > > As usual ping me once I should retry the build (even if stuff in > experimental should not be that urgent). While the binnmu by the Release Team was sufficient to build libgdal-grass, the recent upload of gdal/1.11.1+dfsg-1~exp2 is even better due to the updated symbols. Can you try libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1 once more now that the buildds are done with gdal? Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
Hi Bas, On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:21AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 10/24/2014 11:03 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > -Need to get 35.1 MB/116 MB of archives. After unpacking 494 MB will be > > used. > > -The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > - libjpeg62-turbo : Conflicts: libjpeg62 but 1:1.3.1-8 is to be installed. > > - libjpeg62 : Depends: libjpeg62-turbo (= 1:1.3.1-8) but 1:1.3.1-10 is to > > be installed. > > -Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... > > This seems to be caused by gdal 1.11.1 in experimental not having been > rebuilt for the jpeg-turbo transition. Seems this transition creates some trouble (and by chance I had a talk to the libjpeg developer last weekend who thinks it is a really unfortunate move - but that's another topic). > I've just filed a binnmu bug to have it rebuilt (#766694). As usual ping me once I should retry the build (even if stuff in experimental should not be that urgent). Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
On 10/24/2014 11:03 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > -Need to get 35.1 MB/116 MB of archives. After unpacking 494 MB will be used. > -The following packages have unmet dependencies: > - libjpeg62-turbo : Conflicts: libjpeg62 but 1:1.3.1-8 is to be installed. > - libjpeg62 : Depends: libjpeg62-turbo (= 1:1.3.1-8) but 1:1.3.1-10 is to be > installed. > -Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... This seems to be caused by gdal 1.11.1 in experimental not having been rebuilt for the jpeg-turbo transition. I've just filed a binnmu bug to have it rebuilt (#766694). Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:36:19PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>
> Interestingly here apt reports 229 newly installed, yours one less. I've
> attached my build log for comparison.
--- libgdal-grass_1.11.1-1~exp1_amd64.build 2014-10-24 22:43:29.0
+0200
+++ libgdal-grass_1.11.1-1~exp1_amd64.build_my 2014-10-24 22:45:06.701223614
+0200
...
libhogweed2{a} libice6{a} libicu-dev{a} libicu52{a} libidn11{a}
- libjasper-dev{a} libjasper1{a} libjbig0{a} libjpeg-dev{a} libjpeg62{ab}
- libjpeg62-turbo{ab} libjpeg62-turbo-dev{a} libk5crypto3{a}
+ libjasper-dev{a} libjasper1{a} libjbig0{a} libjpeg-dev{a}
+ libjpeg62-turbo{a} libjpeg62-turbo-dev{a} libk5crypto3{a}
libkadm5clnt-mit9{a} libkadm5srv-mit9{a} libkdb5-7{a} libkeyutils1{a}
which then results
-Need to get 35.1 MB/116 MB of archives. After unpacking 494 MB will be used.
-The following packages have unmet dependencies:
- libjpeg62-turbo : Conflicts: libjpeg62 but 1:1.3.1-8 is to be installed.
- libjpeg62 : Depends: libjpeg62-turbo (= 1:1.3.1-8) but 1:1.3.1-10 is to be
installed.
-Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up...
$ cat /var/cache/pbuilder/base.cow/etc/apt/sources.list.d/02-experimental.list
deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ experimental main
So when upgrading cowbuilder the log says:
...
it http://http.debian.net experimental InRelease
Get:1 http://http.debian.net experimental/main amd64 Packages/DiffIndex [7819 B]
Get:2 http://http.debian.net experimental/main Translation-en/DiffIndex [7819 B]
Hit http://ftp.debian.org sid InRelease
Get:3 http://ftp.debian.org sid/main amd64 Packages/DiffIndex [7876 B]
Get:4 http://ftp.debian.org sid/main Translation-en/DiffIndex [7876 B]
Fetched 31.4 kB in 2s (10.9 kB/s)
...
So this looks as if experimental is included.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
On 10/24/2014 11:34 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:15:43AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 10/23/2014 11:36 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> I cannot reproduce this problem with my sid+experimental chroot which is >>> setup like yours as described in: >>> >>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/2014-September/021973.html >>> >>> Interestingly here apt reports 229 newly installed, yours one less. I've >>> attached my build log for comparison. >> >> Did you find out what the missing package on your build was? > > No, I need to find the diff of the build log (since lacking a better idea) > but I can't do this right now. Hope to manage this later this afternoon. I can reproduce the problem using a sid-only pbuilder chroot. With a sid+experimental or plain experimental chroot the jpeg-turbo unmet dependency prevents the build. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:15:43AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 10/23/2014 11:36 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > On 10/23/2014 10:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > >>> Unfortunately this packages also suffers from the libjpeg62-turbo unmet > >>> build dependency, so it cannot be built at the moment. > >> > >> ... so we can keep on sorting out since the problem seems to remain. > >> > >> 0 packages upgraded, 228 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. > >> Need to get 36.9 MB/115 MB of archives. After unpacking 491 MB will be > >> used. > >> The following packages have unmet dependencies: > >> pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy : Depends: libgdal-dev (>= 1.11.1-1~) but > >> 1.10.1+dfsg-8+b3 is to be installed. > >> Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... > >> The following NEW packages will be installed: > >> > >> > >> I even fetched a fresh clone via gbp-clone and did the steps you > >> suggested above. :-( > > > > The git repo looks good, and the version in the unmet Depends too. > > > > I cannot reproduce this problem with my sid+experimental chroot which is > > setup like yours as described in: > > > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/2014-September/021973.html > > > > Interestingly here apt reports 229 newly installed, yours one less. I've > > attached my build log for comparison. > > Did you find out what the missing package on your build was? No, I need to find the diff of the build log (since lacking a better idea) but I can't do this right now. Hope to manage this later this afternoon. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
On 10/23/2014 11:36 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 10/23/2014 10:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> Unfortunately this packages also suffers from the libjpeg62-turbo unmet >>> build dependency, so it cannot be built at the moment. >> >> ... so we can keep on sorting out since the problem seems to remain. >> >> 0 packages upgraded, 228 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. >> Need to get 36.9 MB/115 MB of archives. After unpacking 491 MB will be used. >> The following packages have unmet dependencies: >> pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy : Depends: libgdal-dev (>= 1.11.1-1~) but >> 1.10.1+dfsg-8+b3 is to be installed. >> Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... >> The following NEW packages will be installed: >> >> >> I even fetched a fresh clone via gbp-clone and did the steps you >> suggested above. :-( > > The git repo looks good, and the version in the unmet Depends too. > > I cannot reproduce this problem with my sid+experimental chroot which is > setup like yours as described in: > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/2014-September/021973.html > > Interestingly here apt reports 229 newly installed, yours one less. I've > attached my build log for comparison. Did you find out what the missing package on your build was? Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
Hi Andreas, On 10/23/2014 10:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> >> It looks like your experimental branch is outdated, gdal-grass 1.11.1 >> build depends on libgdal-dev (>= 1.11.1-1~). >> >> Pulling the experimental branch should suffice to fix this specific issue: >> >> git fetch origin >> git checkout experimental >> git pull > > I did so: > > $ git log > commit 4b4b0f7a63c8d35f86489e9ed515372dc35ef650 > Author: Bas Couwenberg > Date: Sun Oct 12 16:17:07 2014 +0200 > > Set distribution to experimental. > > [...] > >> Unfortunately this packages also suffers from the libjpeg62-turbo unmet >> build dependency, so it cannot be built at the moment. > > ... so we can keep on sorting out since the problem seems to remain. > > 0 packages upgraded, 228 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. > Need to get 36.9 MB/115 MB of archives. After unpacking 491 MB will be used. > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy : Depends: libgdal-dev (>= 1.11.1-1~) but > 1.10.1+dfsg-8+b3 is to be installed. > Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... > The following NEW packages will be installed: > > > I even fetched a fresh clone via gbp-clone and did the steps you > suggested above. :-( The git repo looks good, and the version in the unmet Depends too. I cannot reproduce this problem with my sid+experimental chroot which is setup like yours as described in: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/2014-September/021973.html Interestingly here apt reports 229 newly installed, yours one less. I've attached my build log for comparison. >> Thanks for your all your sponsorship efforts. > > I admit I'm waiting for the time when three or four of you new activists > in Debian GIS will become DM. I also tried to encourage Ross and Johan > to apply. You all do pretty good work and it is time to gain the > official status. I just pinged my AM again to see if we can get moving again. > Kind regards > >Andreas. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 libgdal-grass_1.11.1-1~exp1_amd64.build.gz Description: application/gzip ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
Hi Bas On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > It looks like your experimental branch is outdated, gdal-grass 1.11.1 > build depends on libgdal-dev (>= 1.11.1-1~). > > Pulling the experimental branch should suffice to fix this specific issue: > > git fetch origin > git checkout experimental > git pull I did so: $ git log commit 4b4b0f7a63c8d35f86489e9ed515372dc35ef650 Author: Bas Couwenberg Date: Sun Oct 12 16:17:07 2014 +0200 Set distribution to experimental. commit 076103ba71effe043ea0bec659ae1784ddfe6cea Author: Bas Couwenberg Date: Sat Oct 11 18:10:43 2014 +0200 Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6, no changes. ... $ git branch * experimental master pristine-tar upstream > Unfortunately this packages also suffers from the libjpeg62-turbo unmet > build dependency, so it cannot be built at the moment. ... so we can keep on sorting out since the problem seems to remain. 0 packages upgraded, 228 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 36.9 MB/115 MB of archives. After unpacking 491 MB will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy : Depends: libgdal-dev (>= 1.11.1-1~) but 1.10.1+dfsg-8+b3 is to be installed. Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... The following NEW packages will be installed: I even fetched a fresh clone via gbp-clone and did the steps you suggested above. :-( > Thanks for your all your sponsorship efforts. I admit I'm waiting for the time when three or four of you new activists in Debian GIS will become DM. I also tried to encourage Ross and Johan to apply. You all do pretty good work and it is time to gain the official status. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
Hi Bas, On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:10:43PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > [no love for enigmail today] try mutt ;-) switched to public discussion anyway. For very strange reasons I get 0 packages upgraded, 228 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 37.7 MB/115 MB of archives. After unpacking 491 MB will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy : Depends: libgdal-dev (>= 1.11.0-1~) but 1.10.1+dfsg-8+b3 is to be installed. Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... The following NEW packages will be installed: and yes, I have experimental sources.list enabled in my pbuilder environment and updated cowbuilder. I vaguely remember that we had such a case before but I forgot how we solved this. Thanks for the preparation Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libgdal-grass" Package name: libgdal-grass Version : 1.11.1-1~exp1 Upstream Author : Frank Warmerdam , Radim Blazek URL : http://www.gdal.org/ License : MIT Section : science It builds those binary packages: libgdal1-1.11.1-grass - GRASS extension for the GDAL library To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libgdal-grass Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libg/libgdal-grass/libgdal-grass_1.11.1-1~exp1.dsc More information about GDAL-GRASS can be obtained from http://www.gdal.org/. Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release. * Refresh patches. * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6, no changes. Regards, Bas Couwenberg ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
