scala-xml is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

scala-xml 1.0.3-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2018-05-28

It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
895675: scala: scala build depends on openjdk-8-jdk


__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

scala-parser-combinators is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

scala-parser-combinators 1.0.3-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 
2018-05-28

It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
895675: scala: scala build depends on openjdk-8-jdk


__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

scala is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

scala 2.11.12-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2018-05-28

It is affected by these RC bugs:
895675: scala: scala build depends on openjdk-8-jdk


__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#770580: marked as done (junitperf: Please remove me from uploaders)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 22 Apr 2018 04:07:35 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#895930: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #770580,
regarding junitperf: Please remove me from uploaders
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
770580: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770580
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: junitperf
Severity: minor
Usertags: retirement-java

Hi,

I have retired from the Java Team[1] and kindly ask to be removed as
uploader of junitperf. Thanks for having me. :)

~Niels

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2014/11/msg00032.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.9.1-8+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package junitperf has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/895930

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#822185: marked as done (libcolorchooser-java - Add maven support)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 22 Apr 2018 04:06:20 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#895910: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #822185,
regarding libcolorchooser-java - Add maven support
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
822185: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=822185
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libcolorchooser-java
Version: 1.0+dfsg-1


Please add maven support to use this library.
Thanks

Best regards



-- 
Ing. Yadickson Soto
+56 9 9668 8798
Usuario Linux #497718
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.0+dfsg-1+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package colorchooser has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/895910

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#877662: marked as done (libjazzy-java: please remove Arnaud from uploaders)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 22 Apr 2018 04:07:35 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#895930: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #877662,
regarding libjazzy-java: please remove Arnaud from uploaders
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
877662: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=877662
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libjazzy-java

Please remove Arnaud Vandyck  from the "Uploaders" field in
debian/control.  Arnaud Vandyck has "X-MIA: Status is retired".

Regards,

Bart Martens


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.9.1-8+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package junitperf has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/895930

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#895933: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

libjboss-marshalling-java | 1.1.3.GA-3 | source, all

--- Reason ---
ROM; No longer used, low popcon, last updated 7 years ago
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 895...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/895933

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#895930: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

 junitperf |1.9.1-8 | source
libjunitperf-java |1.9.1-8 | all
libjunitperf-java-doc |1.9.1-8 | all

--- Reason ---
ROM; No longer used, low popcon, last release in 2005
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 895...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/895930

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#895930: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Version: 1.9.1-8+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package junitperf has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/895930

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#895929: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

libstaxutils-java | 20110309+svn238-1 | all
libstaxutils-java-doc | 20110309+svn238-1 | all
stax-utils | 20110309+svn238-1 | source

--- Reason ---
ROM; Low popcon, never used in 7 years
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 895...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/895929

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#895910: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Version: 1.0+dfsg-1+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package colorchooser has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/895910

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#895909: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

libspark-java |  1.2-3 | source, all
libspark-java-doc |  1.2-3 | all

--- Reason ---
ROM; Low popcon, never used in 7 years
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 895...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/895909

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#895907: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

libtggraphlayout-java |  122-2 | source, all
libtggraphlayout-java-doc |  122-2 | all

--- Reason ---
ROM; Low popcon, never used in 8 years
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 895...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/895907

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#896439: gradle-debian-helper points to an invalid java api directory

[Markus Koschany]

Am 21.04.2018 um 19:57 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> Hi Tiago,
> 
> I don't think gradle-debian-helper should depend on default-jdk-doc by
> default, this is a rather big dependency and it's preferable to keep it
> optional to speed up the builds a bit. I think the packages using
> gradle-debian-helper should instead depend on default-jdk-doc if they
> build a javadoc package. That's what most packages building a javadoc
> already do.
> 
> As for changing the path to the JDK doc why not, but I don't really
> understand the benefit. It seems both URLs are currently in use, with
> /usr/share/doc/default-jdk-doc/api being more popular than
> /usr/share/doc/default-jdk/api despite the longer path.

By the way since Debian Policy 3.9.7 it is recommended to install
additional documentation via -doc packages into /usr/share/doc/pkg and
no longer /usr/share/doc/pkg-doc. This is also enforced with
debhelper/compat >= 11. If we were consequent then we should use
/usr/share/doc/default-jdk/api everywhere.

Markus




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#896439: gradle-debian-helper points to an invalid java api directory

[Emmanuel Bourg]

Hi Tiago,

I don't think gradle-debian-helper should depend on default-jdk-doc by
default, this is a rather big dependency and it's preferable to keep it
optional to speed up the builds a bit. I think the packages using
gradle-debian-helper should instead depend on default-jdk-doc if they
build a javadoc package. That's what most packages building a javadoc
already do.

As for changing the path to the JDK doc why not, but I don't really
understand the benefit. It seems both URLs are currently in use, with
/usr/share/doc/default-jdk-doc/api being more popular than
/usr/share/doc/default-jdk/api despite the longer path.

Emmanuel Bourg

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.