ant-contrib: status change on tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian

[Reproducible builds folks]

2018-09-03 23:43 
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/ant-contrib changed 
from FTBFS -> reproducible

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#907863: libeclipse-osgi-java, libequinox-osgi-java: error when trying to install together

[Emmanuel Bourg]

Le 03/09/2018 à 17:29, Markus Koschany a écrit :

> Just updating libequinox-osgi-java would have been
> a straightforward solution.

I agree this is mostly a change in the name of the binary package. I
could have kept the libequinox-osgi-java name with some contortions and
avoid updating the reverse dependencies, or at least provide a dummy
transitional package in src:equinox-framework.

However updating src:libequinox-osgi-java was not possible with the
packaging strategy adopted, because the eclipse-osgi bundle is just a
small part of the wider equinox-framework project, and I opted to use
the whole project as the upstream source instead of cutting source
packages at the bundle level. There is now a 1:1 mapping between the
upstream Git repositories and the Debian source packages (which allows
perfect debian/watch tracking), and there is a 1:1 mapping between the
OSGi bundles and the Debian binary packages (with the name of the
package derived automatically from the bundle name).

This model allowed me to efficiently package ~60 bundles so far with a
uniform naming and versioning scheme. And we could have even more
bundles in the future if we go deeper in the Eclipse ecosystem
(equinox-p2 alone could add ~50 bundles). From this perspective the fate
of a single bundle is not that significant, but I should have better
explained.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#907763: marked as done (ant-contrib: FTBFS in buster/sid (failing tests))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 03 Sep 2018 16:19:33 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#907763: fixed in ant-contrib 1.0~b3+svn177-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #907763,
regarding ant-contrib: FTBFS in buster/sid (failing tests)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
907763: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=907763
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:ant-contrib
Version: 1.0~b3+svn177-9
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

Dear maintainer:

I tried to build this package in buster but it failed:


[...]
 debian/rules build-indep
dh build-indep --with maven-repo-helper
   dh_update_autotools_config -i
   dh_auto_configure -i
   debian/rules override_dh_auto_build
make[1]: Entering directory '/<>/ant-contrib-1.0~b3+svn177'
dh_auto_build -- jar
ant -propertyfile ./debian/ant.properties -Duser.name debian jar
Buildfile: /<>/ant-contrib-1.0~b3+svn177/build.xml

init:

configure:

resolve:

classpath-ivy:

classpath-no-ivy:

classpath:

compile:
[mkdir] Created dir: /<>/ant-contrib-1.0~b3+svn177/target/classes
[javac] /<>/ant-contrib-1.0~b3+svn177/build.xml:113: warning: 
'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to 
false for repeatable builds
[javac] Using javac -source 1.4 is no longer supported, switching to 7
[javac] Using javac -target 1.4 is no longer supported, switching to 7
[javac] Compiling 111 source files to 
/<>/ant-contrib-1.0~b3+svn177/target/classes
[javac] warning: [options] bootstrap class path not set in conjunction with 
-source 7
[javac] Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API.
[javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details.
[javac] Note: Some input files use unchecked or unsafe operations.
[javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
[javac] 1 warning
 [copy] Copying 2 files to 
/<>/ant-contrib-1.0~b3+svn177/target/classes

jar:
  [jar] Building jar: 
/<>/ant-contrib-1.0~b3+svn177/target/ant-contrib.jar

BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 4 seconds
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>/ant-contrib-1.0~b3+svn177'
   debian/rules override_dh_auto_test
make[1]: Entering directory '/<>/ant-contrib-1.0~b3+svn177'
dh_auto_build -- test
ant -propertyfile ./debian/ant.properties -Duser.name debian test
Buildfile: /<>/ant-contrib-1.0~b3+svn177/build.xml

init:

configure:

resolve:

classpath-ivy:

classpath-no-ivy:

classpath:

compile:
[javac] /<>/ant-contrib-1.0~b3+svn177/build.xml:113: warning: 
'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to 
false for repeatable builds
[javac] Using javac -source 1.4 is no longer supported, switching to 7
[javac] Using javac -target 1.4 is no longer supported, switching to 7

compile-tests:
[mkdir] Created dir: 
/<>/ant-contrib-1.0~b3+svn177/target/test-classes
[javac] /<>/ant-contrib-1.0~b3+svn177/build.xml:127: warning: 
'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to 
false for repeatable builds
[javac] Using javac -source 1.4 is no longer supported, switching to 7
[javac] Using javac -target 1.4 is no longer supported, switching to 7
[javac] Compiling 25 source files to 
/<>/ant-contrib-1.0~b3+svn177/target/test-classes
[javac] warning: [options] bootstrap class path not set in conjunction with 
-source 7
[javac] 1 warning
 [copy] Copying 74 files to 
/<>/ant-contrib-1.0~b3+svn177/target/test-classes

gump-safe-test:

init:

configure:

resolve:

classpath-ivy:

classpath-no-ivy:

classpath:

compile:
[javac] /<>/ant-contrib-1.0~b3+svn177/build.xml:113: warning: 
'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to 
false for repeatable builds
[javac] Using javac -source 1.4 is no longer supported, switching to 7
[javac] Using javac -target 1.4 is no longer supported, switching to 7

compile-tests:
[javac] /<>/ant-contrib-1.0~b3+svn177/build.xml:127: warning: 
'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to 
false for repeatable builds
[javac] Using javac -source 1.4 is no longer supported, switching to 7
[javac] Using javac -target 1.4 is no longer supported, switching to 7

jar:

run-test:
[junit] Testsuite: net.sf.antcontrib.design.VerifyDesignTest
[junit] Tests run: 41, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 
8.467 sec
[junit] 
[junit] Testsuite: 

ant-contrib_1.0~b3+svn177-10_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 08:54:13 -0700
Source: ant-contrib
Binary: ant-contrib
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0~b3+svn177-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers 

Changed-By: tony mancill 
Description:
 ant-contrib - collection of tasks, types and other tools for Apache Ant
Closes: 907763
Changes:
 ant-contrib (1.0~b3+svn177-10) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * Add outofdate-test.patch to address FTBFS (Closes: #907763)
   * Update Vcs URLs to point to Salsa
   * Bump Standards-Version to 4.2.1
   * Freshen debian/copyright
   * Use debhelper 11
   * Update Section in debian/control from extra -> optional
Checksums-Sha1:
 a78597ecc40feb618ea26e40d4fb02b0427f9a42 2178 ant-contrib_1.0~b3+svn177-10.dsc
 cc321ea3df8b70fc46fc5d6b44647c92e00187cc 5864 
ant-contrib_1.0~b3+svn177-10.debian.tar.xz
 6cb68ffb05468f525f315ae09351bd6cc971da5d 10987 
ant-contrib_1.0~b3+svn177-10_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 69a90f6f378528efa728eb12cb336d2c4d89d1b6df2ee7482960396072ee41ab 2178 
ant-contrib_1.0~b3+svn177-10.dsc
 7b3e7f1025cb1f55c6318945bdcb2fdb03d0fdf4c7fb68c2b54f02292d41d067 5864 
ant-contrib_1.0~b3+svn177-10.debian.tar.xz
 ec734ea46c414b2257c238176efef95a2e6874c6b86df8206c2b13b6da47eb44 10987 
ant-contrib_1.0~b3+svn177-10_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 71be043787debe99544c79c33d51091c 2178 java optional 
ant-contrib_1.0~b3+svn177-10.dsc
 bb42a92f4a60551aea3eb7128fbcea8e 5864 java optional 
ant-contrib_1.0~b3+svn177-10.debian.tar.xz
 40f55ff390b33c2856de9906ce4ad858 10987 java optional 
ant-contrib_1.0~b3+svn177-10_amd64.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=zlhk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processing of ant-contrib_1.0~b3+svn177-10_source.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

ant-contrib_1.0~b3+svn177-10_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  ant-contrib_1.0~b3+svn177-10.dsc
  ant-contrib_1.0~b3+svn177-10.debian.tar.xz
  ant-contrib_1.0~b3+svn177-10_amd64.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

netty-tcnative_2.0.15-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 17:27:16 +0200
Source: netty-tcnative
Binary: libnetty-tcnative-java libnetty-tcnative-jni
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0.15-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers 

Changed-By: Emmanuel Bourg 
Description:
 libnetty-tcnative-java - Tomcat native fork for Netty
 libnetty-tcnative-jni - Tomcat native fork for Netty (JNI library)
Changes:
 netty-tcnative (2.0.15-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * Fixed the build failure with dpkg-buildpackage -A
Checksums-Sha1:
 a5b0a0c2cd13416c784a44319e52905358396406 2252 netty-tcnative_2.0.15-2.dsc
 445cf6fd1d0a21ade678d04df104edc1d68253c5 6196 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15-2.debian.tar.xz
 50e9f33c6669f70da0697a975d6a768cc8993c35 15916 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15-2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 f6677eb1e88aa6c4a5b3bb1acead028b4d718813b226063cc61ccf99a4165976 2252 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15-2.dsc
 6dfbae56b1c271f3444f46c4ecf32214542eda913e20a8154d8b88b6d805fa95 6196 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15-2.debian.tar.xz
 53d0c4466cdfdbb1bed0d50fe8de4c7f54be24f22a5c9afbd66f458c45464659 15916 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15-2_source.buildinfo
Files:
 473c53ee6413c2f6f28fe2723cda7eae 2252 java optional netty-tcnative_2.0.15-2.dsc
 20a84dfe2ec89cf5488dbe2c9dbd0f85 6196 java optional 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15-2.debian.tar.xz
 911b78e045e005aec8d715ebeafc3b57 15916 java optional 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15-2_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=Nu40
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processing of netty-tcnative_2.0.15-2_source.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

netty-tcnative_2.0.15-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  netty-tcnative_2.0.15-2.dsc
  netty-tcnative_2.0.15-2.debian.tar.xz
  netty-tcnative_2.0.15-2_source.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#907863: libeclipse-osgi-java, libequinox-osgi-java: error when trying to install together

[Markus Koschany]

Am 03.09.2018 um 15:38 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> Hi Markus,
> 
> Le 03/09/2018 à 14:48, Markus Koschany a écrit :
> 
>> I think this could have been better communicated. I was the one who
>> split libequinox-osgi-java off from Eclipse. Why can't we just use the
>> existing package and update it accordingly? In any case giving a reason
>> for a package takeover by another package even for team-maintained
>> packages seems appropriate to me. A bug report would have been ideal for
>> this sort of discussion.
> 
> Sorry if this wasn't clear but I did mention taking over
> libequinox-osgi-java with src:equinox-framework in July when I exposed
> my plan to package the Eclipse dependencies required by AspectJ [1] on
> the debian-java mailing list. I didn't receive any feedback on this
> point and I didn't expect it would be controversial.

At that point the discussion was mostly about how do we want to name
packages. I simply did not realize that you wanted to create the same
source package again and call it libeclipse-osgi-java. I thought we were
talking about entirely new packages. This is really only a name change.
Using the upstream sources from Git instead of Maven Central is merely a
packaging detail and could have been implemented in
src:libequinox-osgi-java too. As this bug report demonstrates the
resulting jar file is the same.

> Don't get me wrong, this is definitely not a disapprobation of your work
> and I apologize if it looks like it. Your move to split
> libequinox-osgi-java from src:eclipse was the right decision to move
> things forward and I fully support it. But after having packaged a large
> set of Eclipse modules the libequinox-osgi-java package now appears at
> odds with the newly introduced packages (Maven Central as upstream vs
> Eclipse Git repository, different naming convention, different build
> system, no upstream version tracking). That's why I think it's more
> consistent to replace libequinox-osgi-java now.

No worries, I don't perceive this as a disapprobation of my work. But
frankly I find this whole process unnecessary because it is merely a
name change and it creates work for the ftp team (package review and
package removal), for you/us because the reverse-dependencies have to be
updated because of the name change and last but not least we have an RC
bug now (which also had to be discovered and reported by someone). I
know you will fix this and it is not hard to fix but all that could have
been easily avoided. Just updating libequinox-osgi-java would have been
a straightforward solution.





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#907863: libeclipse-osgi-java, libequinox-osgi-java: error when trying to install together

[Emmanuel Bourg]

Hi Markus,

Le 03/09/2018 à 14:48, Markus Koschany a écrit :

> I think this could have been better communicated. I was the one who
> split libequinox-osgi-java off from Eclipse. Why can't we just use the
> existing package and update it accordingly? In any case giving a reason
> for a package takeover by another package even for team-maintained
> packages seems appropriate to me. A bug report would have been ideal for
> this sort of discussion.

Sorry if this wasn't clear but I did mention taking over
libequinox-osgi-java with src:equinox-framework in July when I exposed
my plan to package the Eclipse dependencies required by AspectJ [1] on
the debian-java mailing list. I didn't receive any feedback on this
point and I didn't expect it would be controversial.

Don't get me wrong, this is definitely not a disapprobation of your work
and I apologize if it looks like it. Your move to split
libequinox-osgi-java from src:eclipse was the right decision to move
things forward and I fully support it. But after having packaged a large
set of Eclipse modules the libequinox-osgi-java package now appears at
odds with the newly introduced packages (Maven Central as upstream vs
Eclipse Git repository, different naming convention, different build
system, no upstream version tracking). That's why I think it's more
consistent to replace libequinox-osgi-java now.

Emmanuel Bourg

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2018/07/msg00020.html

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#828451: marked as done (netty-tcnative: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 03 Sep 2018 13:03:58 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#828451: fixed in netty-tcnative 2.0.15-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #828451,
regarding netty-tcnative: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
828451: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828451
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: netty-tcnative
Version: 1.1.33.Fork15-1
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1

Hi,

OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released.  During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build.  A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/netty-tcnative_1.1.33.Fork15-1_amd64-20160529-1455

On https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/1.1_API_Changes you can see various of the
reasons why it might fail.  There are also updated man pages at
https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/ that should contain useful information.

There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent
snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works.

If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us.


Kurt
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: netty-tcnative
Source-Version: 2.0.15-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
netty-tcnative, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 828...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Emmanuel Bourg  (supplier of updated netty-tcnative package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 14:40:10 +0200
Source: netty-tcnative
Binary: libnetty-tcnative-java libnetty-tcnative-jni
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0.15-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers 

Changed-By: Emmanuel Bourg 
Description:
 libnetty-tcnative-java - Tomcat native fork for Netty
 libnetty-tcnative-jni - Tomcat native fork for Netty (JNI library)
Closes: 828451
Changes:
 netty-tcnative (2.0.15-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * New upstream release
 - Depend on libssl-dev instead of libssl1.0-dev (Closes: #828451)
 - Refreshed debian/native-build/Makefile.am
 - Adapted the build to run the unit tests
 - Removed the docker files and the Maven wrapper from the upstream tarball
 - Removed the --has-package-version flag
   * Modified debian/watch to track the 2.x tags
   * Removed the unused lintian overrides
   * Standards-Version updated to 4.2.1
   * Switch to debhelper level 11
   * Use salsa.debian.org Vcs-* URLs
Checksums-Sha1:
 2ece5196152f010c78002d034245c52c70e4c0ac 2252 netty-tcnative_2.0.15-1.dsc
 d7bfb885b62c1a9567f95323091ee33e975ca3e4 76336 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15.orig.tar.xz
 e4e951d6fd86a69febf2a3cc99a15629195f6013 6108 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15-1.debian.tar.xz
 33b28e388b02a9eaf252f712e33677f837e93daa 15916 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 a2305a610a86e981881fcdc9e2e15d6c828cbabd2de7a03e039cd723d2923b10 2252 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15-1.dsc
 9210e0cc1be8d0cd9e51c5012e813aaff38ff83560aa2ca2bc6536f500fe507b 76336 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15.orig.tar.xz
 b460dc3e159db6f2475a61ddfd83f907a80a9027302df5be90abe93ae2f7a878 6108 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15-1.debian.tar.xz
 6aae21b2d201e1366e3a09af4793829fc86c35b22dfdb7fe8e722f007d85a756 15916 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 748aa22cde2af64da2c6c7798e126a8a 2252 java optional netty-tcnative_2.0.15-1.dsc
 bbe3b0279d12b57c665816b4cc16fab3 76336 java optional 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15.orig.tar.xz
 df438dc069b4825493c0f30cc7fa6669 6108 java optional 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15-1.debian.tar.xz
 d91b5abffec8248b27bb54abf0120324 15916 java optional 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15-1_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQJGBAEBCgAwFiEEuM5N4hCA3PkD4WxA9RPEGeS50KwFAluNLAwSHGVib3VyZ0Bh
cGFjaGUub3JnAAoJEPUTxBnkudCsC6YP/Rp5as4MrW+Y7nWO1p4Q3N3s0+U1ReFG
iocHHcKGSFjaWie8/q1DDMDdtRmdFCiKwagd5vNiAN7caA+DWcc3CZ6VjOrBZdSV
gcnBBNR+QWQxky5y2tiKN+YEDb5O4ooHqvHFE7niREz155kcYn/jWj+Y67S5yNQd

netty-tcnative_2.0.15-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 14:40:10 +0200
Source: netty-tcnative
Binary: libnetty-tcnative-java libnetty-tcnative-jni
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0.15-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers 

Changed-By: Emmanuel Bourg 
Description:
 libnetty-tcnative-java - Tomcat native fork for Netty
 libnetty-tcnative-jni - Tomcat native fork for Netty (JNI library)
Closes: 828451
Changes:
 netty-tcnative (2.0.15-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * New upstream release
 - Depend on libssl-dev instead of libssl1.0-dev (Closes: #828451)
 - Refreshed debian/native-build/Makefile.am
 - Adapted the build to run the unit tests
 - Removed the docker files and the Maven wrapper from the upstream tarball
 - Removed the --has-package-version flag
   * Modified debian/watch to track the 2.x tags
   * Removed the unused lintian overrides
   * Standards-Version updated to 4.2.1
   * Switch to debhelper level 11
   * Use salsa.debian.org Vcs-* URLs
Checksums-Sha1:
 2ece5196152f010c78002d034245c52c70e4c0ac 2252 netty-tcnative_2.0.15-1.dsc
 d7bfb885b62c1a9567f95323091ee33e975ca3e4 76336 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15.orig.tar.xz
 e4e951d6fd86a69febf2a3cc99a15629195f6013 6108 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15-1.debian.tar.xz
 33b28e388b02a9eaf252f712e33677f837e93daa 15916 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 a2305a610a86e981881fcdc9e2e15d6c828cbabd2de7a03e039cd723d2923b10 2252 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15-1.dsc
 9210e0cc1be8d0cd9e51c5012e813aaff38ff83560aa2ca2bc6536f500fe507b 76336 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15.orig.tar.xz
 b460dc3e159db6f2475a61ddfd83f907a80a9027302df5be90abe93ae2f7a878 6108 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15-1.debian.tar.xz
 6aae21b2d201e1366e3a09af4793829fc86c35b22dfdb7fe8e722f007d85a756 15916 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 748aa22cde2af64da2c6c7798e126a8a 2252 java optional netty-tcnative_2.0.15-1.dsc
 bbe3b0279d12b57c665816b4cc16fab3 76336 java optional 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15.orig.tar.xz
 df438dc069b4825493c0f30cc7fa6669 6108 java optional 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15-1.debian.tar.xz
 d91b5abffec8248b27bb54abf0120324 15916 java optional 
netty-tcnative_2.0.15-1_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=bzuA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processing of netty-tcnative_2.0.15-1_source.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

netty-tcnative_2.0.15-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  netty-tcnative_2.0.15-1.dsc
  netty-tcnative_2.0.15.orig.tar.xz
  netty-tcnative_2.0.15-1.debian.tar.xz
  netty-tcnative_2.0.15-1_source.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#907863: libeclipse-osgi-java, libequinox-osgi-java: error when trying to install together

[Markus Koschany]

Hi,

Am 03.09.2018 um 14:04 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> Control: reassign -1 libeclipse-osgi-java
> Control: affects -1 libequinox-osgi-java
> 
> libeclipse-osgi-java will replace libequinox-osgi-java. I forgot to add
> the proper Breaks/Replaces fields.

I think this could have been better communicated. I was the one who
split libequinox-osgi-java off from Eclipse. Why can't we just use the
existing package and update it accordingly? In any case giving a reason
for a package takeover by another package even for team-maintained
packages seems appropriate to me. A bug report would have been ideal for
this sort of discussion.

Regards,

Markus



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#907863: libeclipse-osgi-java, libequinox-osgi-java: error when trying to install together

[Emmanuel Bourg]

Control: reassign -1 libeclipse-osgi-java
Control: affects -1 libequinox-osgi-java

libeclipse-osgi-java will replace libequinox-osgi-java. I forgot to add
the proper Breaks/Replaces fields.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#907863: libeclipse-osgi-java, libequinox-osgi-java: error when trying to install together

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 libeclipse-osgi-java
Bug #907863 [libeclipse-osgi-java,libequinox-osgi-java] 
libeclipse-osgi-java,libequinox-osgi-java: error when trying to install together
Bug reassigned from package 'libeclipse-osgi-java,libequinox-osgi-java' to 
'libeclipse-osgi-java'.
No longer marked as found in versions equinox-framework/4.7.3-1 and 
libequinox-osgi-java/3.9.1-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #907863 to the same values 
previously set
> affects -1 libequinox-osgi-java
Bug #907863 [libeclipse-osgi-java] libeclipse-osgi-java,libequinox-osgi-java: 
error when trying to install together
Added indication that 907863 affects libequinox-osgi-java

-- 
907863: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=907863
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#907863: libeclipse-osgi-java, libequinox-osgi-java: error when trying to install together

[Andreas Beckmann]

Package: libeclipse-osgi-java,libequinox-osgi-java
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Control: found -1 3.12.100+eclipse4.7.3-1
Control: found -1 3.9.1-1

Hi,

automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has
detected the following problem:

  Selecting previously unselected package libequinox-osgi-java.
  Preparing to unpack .../libequinox-osgi-java_3.9.1-1_all.deb ...
  Unpacking libequinox-osgi-java (3.9.1-1) ...
  dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libequinox-osgi-java_3.9.1-1_all.deb (--unpack):
   trying to overwrite 
'/usr/share/maven-repo/org/eclipse/osgi/org.eclipse.osgi/debian/org.eclipse.osgi-debian.pom',
 which is also in package libeclipse-osgi-java 3.12.100+eclipse4.7.3-1
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   /var/cache/apt/archives/libequinox-osgi-java_3.9.1-1_all.deb

This is a serious bug as it makes installation fail, and violates
sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. An optimal solution would
consist in only one of the packages installing that file, and renaming
or removing the file in the other package. Depending on the
circumstances you might also consider Replace relations or file
diversions. If the conflicting situation cannot be resolved then, as a
last resort, the two packages have to declare a mutual
Conflict. Please take into account that Replaces, Conflicts and
diversions should only be used when packages provide different
implementations for the same functionality.

Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages
(according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be
slightly out of sync):

  
usr/share/maven-repo/org/eclipse/osgi/org.eclipse.osgi/debian/org.eclipse.osgi-debian.jar
  
usr/share/maven-repo/org/eclipse/osgi/org.eclipse.osgi/debian/org.eclipse.osgi-debian.pom

This bug is assigned to both packages. If you, the maintainers of
the two packages in question, have agreed on which of the packages will
resolve the problem please reassign the bug to that package. You may
also register in the BTS that the other package is affected by the bug.

Cheers,

Andreas

PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors
of this kind see https://qa.debian.org/dose/file-overwrites.html


libeclipse-osgi-java=3.12.100+eclipse4.7.3-1_libequinox-osgi-java=3.9.1-1.log.gz
Description: application/gzip
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: libeclipse-osgi-java,libequinox-osgi-java: error when trying to install together

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> found -1 3.12.100+eclipse4.7.3-1
Bug #907863 [libeclipse-osgi-java,libequinox-osgi-java] 
libeclipse-osgi-java,libequinox-osgi-java: error when trying to install together
There is no source info for the package 'libequinox-osgi-java' at version 
'3.12.100+eclipse4.7.3-1' with architecture ''
Marked as found in versions equinox-framework/4.7.3-1.
> found -1 3.9.1-1
Bug #907863 [libeclipse-osgi-java,libequinox-osgi-java] 
libeclipse-osgi-java,libequinox-osgi-java: error when trying to install together
There is no source info for the package 'libeclipse-osgi-java' at version 
'3.9.1-1' with architecture ''
Marked as found in versions libequinox-osgi-java/3.9.1-1.

-- 
907863: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=907863
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.