Bug#850921: why do we still have openjfx-java version 8 in unstable ?

[shirish शिरीष]

Dear maintainer,

Why do we have libopenjfx-java version 8 in unstable -

$ apt-cache policy libopenjfx-java
libopenjfx-java:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 8u161-b12-1
  Version table:
 8u161-b12-1 100
100 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages


When now the default-jre in testing is openjdk-10

$ aptitude show default-jre=2:1.10-65
Package: default-jre
Version: 2:1.10-65
State: installed
Automatically installed: yes
Priority: optional
Section: java
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers

Architecture: amd64
Uncompressed Size: 6,144
Depends: default-jre-headless (= 2:1.10-65), openjdk-10-jre
Suggests: default-java-plugin
Provides: java-runtime, java10-runtime, java2-runtime, java5-runtime,
java6-runtime, java7-runtime, java8-runtime, java9-runtime
Description: Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime
 This dependency package points to the Java runtime, or Java
compatible runtime recommended for this architecture, which is
openjdk-10-jre for amd64.
Homepage: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/

The only sensible reason I see it being there, is when libopenjfx-java
would be separated from openjfk-java-jre in openjfk-11 release
supposed to be released sometime in September 2018 (probably end
September 2018) .

And if no major regressions are found then soonish in Debian testing.
so it's in time with Debian buster release. So for openjfx you
wouldn't have to go through the NEW queue and any transitions needed
could be quickly done.

If no major RC regressions are found, then be released with Debian
buster and any fixes can come in later release.

Is that the plan ?

-- 
  Regards,
  Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A  2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#903916:

[shirish शिरीष]

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#946688: hyperlink to bugs.debian.org/java-common is incorrect in https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch1.en.html#s-bugs

[shirish शिरीष]

Package: java-common
Version: 0.72
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

The hyperlink given on
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch1.en.html#s-bugs
is incorrect. It should be hyperlinked to
https://bugs.debian.org/java-common instead of
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/bugs.debian.org/java-common
which is pointed or linked to java-common's list of reported bugs
which needs nowhere. Please fix the same.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (100,
'unstable-debug'), (100, 'experimental'), (100, 'unstable'), (50,
'experimental-debug')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.3.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_IN:en
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

java-common depends on no packages.

java-common recommends no packages.

Versions of packages java-common suggests:
ii  default-jre  2:1.11-72

-- no debconf information

-- 
  Regards,
  Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com

E493 D466 6D67 59F5 1FD0 930F 870E 9A5B 5869 609C

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#946737: please update maven to 3.6.3

[shirish शिरीष]

Package: maven
Version: 3.6.2-1
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,
Seems maven has been updated to 3.6.3 and seems to have some bug-fixes
as can be seen from
http://maven.apache.org/docs/3.6.3/release-notes.html . It would be
nice if we can have it in debian.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (100,
'unstable-debug'), (100, 'experimental'), (100, 'unstable'), (50,
'experimental-debug')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.3.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_IN:en
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages maven depends on:
ii  default-jre-headless [java7-runtime-headless] 2:1.11-72
ii  libjansi-java 1.18-1
ii  libmaven3-core-java   3.6.2-1
ii  libwagon-file-java3.3.3-1
ii  libwagon-http-shaded-java 3.3.3-1
ii  openjdk-11-jre-headless [java7-runtime-headless]  11.0.5+10-2
ii  openjdk-14-jre-headless [java7-runtime-headless]  14~19-1

maven recommends no packages.

maven suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
  Regards,
  Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com

E493 D466 6D67 59F5 1FD0 930F 870E 9A5B 5869 609C

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#933264: don't think the new kotlin and hence new gradle will come soon.

[shirish शिरीष]

Dear Martin,

Don't think it wil happen soon, although would be delighted to be proved wrong.

From what I understand, there seems to be issues with kotlin's
packaging or some sources in kotlin's source package. See Emmanuel
Buorg's reply to a similar asked by me couple of months ago. [1] .

Although no reason to lose hope just yet as there was another small
update to gradle in sid and now in testing today [2]

I am guessing we either have to wait for the java-team to move forward
or if you have any programming/packaging skills and wish to contribute
such skills then you can start by asking the java-team [3] . Looking
forward to any news and updates on kotlin as and when possible :)

1. https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2019/10/msg7.html
2. 
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1085795/accepted-gradle-441-10-source-into-unstable/
3. https://java.debian.net/

-- 
  Regards,
  Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com

E493 D466 6D67 59F5 1FD0 930F 870E 9A5B 5869 609C

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#952913: even I experienced the same issue, both in JRE 13 and 14

[shirish शिरीष]

Dear Emmanuel,

I found the same issue with it, also couple of other issues for which
I will bug reports separately.  I found it both on openjdk13 as well
as openjdk-14 ea on Debian testing.  Hope this satisfies you.

Here are the things you asked for -

Subject: asdf
Package: biglybt
Version: 2.3.0.0-1
Severity: normal

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (100,
'unstable-debug'), (100, 'experimental'), (100, 'unstable'), (50,
'experimental-debug')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.5.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_IN:en
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages biglybt depends on:
ii  libbcprov-java   1.61-1
ii  libcommons-cli-java  1.4-1
ii  libswt-cairo-gtk-4-jni   4.13.0-1
ii  libswt-gtk-4-java4.13.0-1
ii  libswt-webkit-gtk-4-jni  4.13.0-1

biglybt recommends no packages.

biglybt suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
  Regards,
  Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com

E493 D466 6D67 59F5 1FD0 930F 870E 9A5B 5869 609C

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#958464: Illegal reflective access by com.biglybt.core.util.spi.AENameServiceJava12

[shirish शिरीष]

Package: biglybt
Version: 2.3.0.0-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,
Got the following while launching biglybt -

$ biglybt
WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred
WARNING: Illegal reflective access by
com.biglybt.core.util.spi.AENameServiceJava12
(file:/usr/share/java/biglybt-core.jar) to field
java.net.InetAddress.nameService
WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of
com.biglybt.core.util.spi.AENameServiceJava12
WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of further
illegal reflective access operations
WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release

Perhaps this has already been shared upstream, still sharing it.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (100,
'unstable-debug'), (100, 'experimental'), (100, 'unstable'), (50,
'experimental-debug')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.5.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_IN:en
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages biglybt depends on:
ii  libbcprov-java   1.61-1
ii  libcommons-cli-java  1.4-1
ii  libswt-cairo-gtk-4-jni   4.13.0-1
ii  libswt-gtk-4-java4.13.0-1
ii  libswt-webkit-gtk-4-jni  4.13.0-1

biglybt recommends no packages.

biglybt suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
  Regards,
  Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com

E493 D466 6D67 59F5 1FD0 930F 870E 9A5B 5869 609C

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#958466: Get a java.lang.NullPointerException when starting the app.

[shirish शिरीष]

Package: biglybt
Version: 2.3.0.0-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,
Got the following java.lang.Nullpointerexception even though the
window is displayed -

DEBUG::Wed Apr 22 17:43:57 IST
2020::com.biglybt.core.util.DebugLight::printStackTrace::35:
  java.lang.NullPointerException
at 
com.biglybt.update.CoreUpdateChecker.doUsageStats(CoreUpdateChecker.java:89)
at 
com.biglybt.ui.swt.update.UpdateMonitor$5.runSupport(UpdateMonitor.java:466)
at com.biglybt.core.util.AERunnable.run(AERunnable.java:36)
at com.biglybt.core.util.DelayedEvent$1.perform(DelayedEvent.java:48)
at com.biglybt.core.util.TimerEvent.runSupport(TimerEvent.java:133)
at com.biglybt.core.util.AERunnable.run(AERunnable.java:36)
at com.biglybt.core.util.ThreadPool.runIt(ThreadPool.java:328)
at 
com.biglybt.core.util.ThreadPool$threadPoolWorker.run(ThreadPool.java:723)
at com.biglybt.core.util.AEThread2$threadWrapper.run(AEThread2.java:317)


-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (100,
'unstable-debug'), (100, 'experimental'), (100, 'unstable'), (50,
'experimental-debug')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.5.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_IN:en
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages biglybt depends on:
ii  libbcprov-java   1.61-1
ii  libcommons-cli-java  1.4-1
ii  libswt-cairo-gtk-4-jni   4.13.0-1
ii  libswt-gtk-4-java4.13.0-1
ii  libswt-webkit-gtk-4-jni  4.13.0-1

biglybt recommends no packages.

biglybt suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
  Regards,
  Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com

E493 D466 6D67 59F5 1FD0 930F 870E 9A5B 5869 609C

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#968738: seems kotlin is now in NEW

[shirish शिरीष]

Hi all,

According to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892842#67,
it seems Kotlin is now in NEW. So maybe we may get kotlin soon :)

-- 
  Regards,
  Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com

E493 D466 6D67 59F5 1FD0 930F 870E 9A5B 5869 609C

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#907296: libjackson-json-java: homepage of jackson should now be https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson

[shirish शिरीष]

Package: libjackson-json-java
Version: 1.9.2-9
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

The old homepage http://jackson.codehaus.org seems to be expired.
There is no domain name by that name anymore and even whois can't
find it while https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson seems to be the
home nowadays. It  seems that 1.x is in maintainance mode while 2.x
series is the one being developed but that's a seperate issue
altogether.

Look forward to at least seeing the homepage info. being changed.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'testing'), (100,
'unstable-debug'), (100, 'experimental-debug'), (100, 'experimental'),
(100, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.17.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_IN:en
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages libjackson-json-java depends on:
ii  libjoda-time-java   2.10-1
ii  libjsr311-api-java  1.1.1-1

libjackson-json-java recommends no packages.

Versions of packages libjackson-json-java suggests:
pn  libjackson-json-java-doc  

-- no debconf information


-- 
  Regards,
  Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A  2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#887666: any update on fixing the javahelper bug ?

[shirish शिरीष]

Dear all,

Any update on getting the javahelper bug fixed ?

-- 
  Regards,
  Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A  2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#909905: gradle FTBFS when building with openjdk-11 (needs update to 4.7.0 or upstream patch)

[shirish शिरीष]

at bottom :-

On 01/10/2018, Emmanuel Bourg  wrote:
> Le 01/10/2018 à 11:48, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
>
>> Thanks a lot for investigating this issue Tiago. I'll apply the patch.
>
> The fix for the Java version parsing issue can be reduced to:
>
> ---
> a/subprojects/base-services/src/main/java/org/gradle/api/JavaVersion.java
> +++
> b/subprojects/base-services/src/main/java/org/gradle/api/JavaVersion.java
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
>  public enum JavaVersion {
>  VERSION_1_1(false), VERSION_1_2(false), VERSION_1_3(false),
> VERSION_1_4(false),
>  // starting from here versions are 1_ but their official name is "Java
> 6", "Java 7", ...
> -VERSION_1_5(true), VERSION_1_6(true), VERSION_1_7(true),
> VERSION_1_8(true), VERSION_1_9(true), VERSION_1_10(true);
> +VERSION_1_5(true), VERSION_1_6(true), VERSION_1_7(true),
> VERSION_1_8(true), VERSION_1_9(true), VERSION_1_10(true),
> VERSION_1_11(true);
>  private static JavaVersion currentJavaVersion;
>  private final boolean hasMajorVersion;
>  private final String versionName;
>
>
> But that's not enough, the build fails later due to the removal of
> sun.misc.Unsafe.defineClass in Java 11. It seems this was fixed in
> Gradle 4.8.
>

So are we going to have gradle 4.8 in either experimental or unstable soonish.

I'm sure you may have read the freeze time-table which was shared few days ago.

It would be nice to have all the components in debian tested etc. well
before freeze.

Hope to see the new releases of gradle, openjfx and rest of openjdk 11
dependencies so we have a java 11 transition if need be before hard
freeze comes up.

-- 
  Regards,
  Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A  2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#909905: gradle FTBFS when building with openjdk-11 (needs update to 4.7.0 or upstream patch)

[shirish शिरीष]

at bottom :-

On 02/10/2018, Emmanuel Bourg  wrote:
> Le 01/10/2018 à 19:37, shirish शिरीष a écrit :
>
>> So are we going to have gradle 4.8 in either experimental or unstable
>> soonish.
>
> Unfortunately no. Starting with version 4.5 Gradle requires Kotlin, and
> we are nowhere near having Kotlin in Debian. It's more likely we'll
> instead patch Gradle 4.4 and fix the Java 11 incompatibilities.
>
>
>> I'm sure you may have read the freeze time-table which was shared few days
>> ago.
>>
>> It would be nice to have all the components in debian tested etc. well
>> before freeze.
>
> Sure but this won't happen magically, we need more contributors.
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>

I can help with testing but that's all I can help with :(

I did see in the tracker though that the newer gradle isn't migrating towards
testing due to jgit which I didn't know was a package till I saw it -

tracker.debian.org/gradle

I also saw https://bugs.debian.org/905547 which is a wishlist bug for
getting a new version of jgit also which is one of the blockages of
transitioning to testing.

I am open to testing that as well  . I did see that the recent commits
to jgit-cli and brethen were on 5th august last ,

~/games/eclipse-jgit$ git log
commit 609ea8c723cba1584f75cef8dc8378e9206cd4bd (HEAD -> master,
origin/master, origin/HEAD)
Author: Emmanuel Bourg 
Date:   Thu Aug 16 01:04:37 2018 +0200

Upload to unstable


and that's -

$ apt-cache policy jgit-cli
jgit-cli:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 3.7.1-5
  Version table:
 3.7.1-5 100
100 http://deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages

Looking forward to testing a new version of jgit assuming of course it
doesn't have
any complexities or additional package requirements as the newer
gradle seems to have.

-- 
  Regards,
  Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A  2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#850921: you could help with jgit perhaps ?

[shirish शिरीष]

Dear Rudy,

Just saw your response on https://bugs.debian.org/850921 .

There is ongoing discussion on gradle bug https://bugs.debian.org/909905 .

Maybe packaging a new jgit (if possible) may make it easier.

You could join https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/ and also talk to
people there.

IIRC, there's also #debian-java on oftc.net as well.

-- 
  Regards,
  Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A  2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#911055: homepage of libjava3d-java is no longer valid

[shirish शिरीष]

Package: libjava3d-java
Version: 1.5.2+dfsg-15
Severity: minor

Dear Maintainer,

The homepage shared http://java3d.java.net redirects to
http://www.oracle.com/splash/java.net/maintenance/index.html which
says the projects have moved elsewhere. Please share the new link for
the homepage.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'testing'), (100,
'unstable-debug'), (100, 'experimental-debug'), (100, 'experimental'),
(100, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.18.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_IN:en
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages libjava3d-java depends on:
ii  libjava3d-jni1.5.2+dfsg-15
ii  libvecmath-java  1.5.2-7

libjava3d-java recommends no packages.

Versions of packages libjava3d-java suggests:
pn  libjava3d-java-doc  

-- no debconf information


-- 
  Regards,
  Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A  2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#911060: Fwd: the homepage https://tablelayout.dev.java.net/ is no longer available

[shirish शिरीष]

Package: libtablelayout-java
Version: 20090826-4
Severity: minor

The homepage given https://tablelayout.dev.java.net/ is no longer
available. I did get
https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/tablelayout-141489.html but
dunno if that is the right place.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'testing'), (100,
'unstable-debug'), (100, 'experimental-debug'), (100, 'experimental'),
(100, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.18.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_IN:en
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

-- no debconf information

-- 
  Regards,
  Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A  2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#911080: homepage of libfontawesomefx-java has moved.

[shirish शिरीष]

Package: libfontawesomefx-java
Version: 9.1.2-1
Severity: minor

Dear Maintainer,
The homepage seems to have moved from http://www.jensd.de to
https://www.jensd.de/wordpress/ and more specifically to
https://www.jensd.de/wordpress/?p=2572 . It does seem though that the
real home is https://bitbucket.org/Jerady/fontawesomefx/src/master/
from where the current version is taken. Maybe have that link in the
homepage .


-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'testing'), (100,
'unstable-debug'), (100, 'experimental-debug'), (100, 'experimental'),
(100, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.18.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_IN:en
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

-- no debconf information

-- 
  Regards,
  Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A  2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#886394: pdfsam still shows the same error although it does give the banner as gimp does while starting up.

[shirish शिरीष]

Dear all,

The issue is still prevalent even though you do get a
'banner'/animation or whatever its called similar to when gimp starts
even though there are now versions of openjfx and openjdk . Something
seems to be still missing.

Package: pdfsam
Version: 3.3.5-1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'testing'), (100,
'unstable-debug'), (100, 'experimental-debug'), (100, 'experimental'),
(100, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.18.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_IN:en
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages pdfsam depends on:
ii  default-jre [java8-runtime] 2:1.11-69
ii  libatinject-jsr330-api-java 1.0+ds1-5
ii  libbcmail-java  1.60-1
ii  libbcprov-java  1.60-1
ii  libcommons-io-java  2.6-2
ii  libcommons-lang3-java   3.8-1
ii  libfontawesomefx-java   9.1.2-1
ii  libgettext-commons-java 0.9.6-6
ii  libhibernate-validator-java 4.3.3-5
ii  libjackson2-jr-java 2.9.7-1
ii  liblogback-java 1:1.2.3-2
ii  libsambox-java  1.1.19-1
ii  libsejda-eventstudio-java   1.0.6-2
ii  libsejda-injector-java  1.0.2-1
ii  libsejda-java   3.2.56-1
ii  libslf4j-java   1.7.25-3
ii  openjdk-10-jre [java8-runtime]  10.0.2+13-1
ii  openjdk-11-jre [java8-runtime]  11~28-3
ii  openjfx 11+26-4

pdfsam recommends no packages.

pdfsam suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information




-- 
  Regards,
  Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A  2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#911160: homepage of libspring-core-java has moved from http://projects.spring.io/spring-framework/ to http://spring.io/projects/spring-framework

[shirish शिरीष]

Package: libspring-core-java
Version: 4.3.19-1
Severity: minor

Dear Maintainer,

Whenever the next update to libspring-core-java is done please add the
new homepage. Thank you for maintaining libspring libraries in Java .

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'testing'), (100,
'unstable-debug'), (100, 'experimental-debug'), (100, 'experimental'),
(100, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.18.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_IN:en
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages libspring-core-java depends on:
ii  libasm-java  6.2.1-2
ii  libcommons-logging-java  1.2-2

libspring-core-java recommends no packages.

Versions of packages libspring-core-java suggests:
ii  libaspectj-java   1.9.2~rc2-1
ii  libcommons-collections3-java  3.2.2-1
ii  liblog4j1.2-java  1.2.17-8

-- no debconf information


-- 
  Regards,
  Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A  2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#864657: Any updates of ca-certificates-java being dependant on default-jre ?

[shirish शिरीष]

Hi all,

As shared in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864657#14

Also shouldn't openjdk-jre-8 be taken out of the mix now that
openjdk-10-jre and now openjdk-11-jre are in the mix.

 s$ aptitude show default-jre
Package: default-jre
Version: 2:1.11-69
State: installed
Automatically installed: yes
Priority: optional
Section: java
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers

Architecture: amd64
Uncompressed Size: 6,144
Depends: default-jre-headless (= 2:1.11-69), openjdk-11-jre
Provides: java-runtime, java10-runtime, java11-runtime, java2-runtime,
java5-runtime, java6-runtime, java7-runtime, java8-runtime,
java9-runtime
Description: Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime
 This dependency package points to the Java runtime, or Java
compatible runtime recommended for this architecture, which is
openjdk-11-jre for amd64.

-- 
  Regards,
  Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A  2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#917302: java common creates a hidden etc/.java directory

[shirish शिरीष]

Package: java-common
Version: 0.70
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,
According to cruft/cruft-ng java-common creates a hidden /etc/.java
directory. I came to know about it using rkhunter where it showed up
as a suspicious package. Asking on the debian-java ML came to know it
is due to java-common package
https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2018/12/msg00010.html

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500,
'testing-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.18.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_IN:en
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

java-common depends on no packages.

java-common recommends no packages.

Versions of packages java-common suggests:
ii  default-jre  2:1.11-70

-- no debconf information


-- 
  Regards,
  Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A  2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.