Bug#923748: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

2019-03-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:35:11 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#923756: fixed in javatools 0.72.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #923756,
regarding javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages 
in the unnamed module
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
923756: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923756
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:colorpicker
Version: 1.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

Dear maintainer:

I tried to build this package in buster but it failed:


[...]
 debian/rules build-indep
dh build-indep --with javahelper
   dh_update_autotools_config -i
   dh_autoreconf -i
   jh_linkjars -i
   debian/rules override_jh_build
make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
jh_build --javacopts="-source 1.8 -target 1.8" --javadoc-opts="-source 1.8"
find com -name *.java -and -type f -print0 | xargs -s 512000 -0 
/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/javac -g -cp :debian/_jh_build.ColorPicker -d 
debian/_jh_build.ColorPicker -encoding ISO8859-1 -source 1.8 -target 1.8
warning: [options] bootstrap class path not set in conjunction with -source 8
Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API.
Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details.
Note: Some input files use unchecked or unsafe operations.
Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
1 warning
find com -name *.java -and -type f -print0 | xargs -s 512000 -0 
/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/javadoc -locale en_US -link 
/usr/share/doc/default-jdk-doc/api -link 
/usr/share/doc/default-jre-headless/api -classpath 
:debian/_jh_build.ColorPicker -d debian/_jh_build.javadoc/api -quiet -encoding 
ISO8859-1 -notimestamp -source 1.8
Creating destination directory: "debian/_jh_build.javadoc/api/"
javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module, 
but the packages defined in /usr/share/doc/default-jdk-doc/api/ are in named 
modules.
javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module, 
but the packages defined in /usr/share/doc/default-jre-headless/api/ are in 
named modules.
com/bric/swing/DialogFooter.java:58: warning - Tag @link: reference not found: 
com.bric.swing.QDialog
com/bric/swing/DialogFooter.java:102: warning - Tag @link: reference not found: 
com.bric.swing.JLink
com/bric/util/JVM.java:40: warning - invalid usage of tag &
com/bric/util/JVM.java:33: warning - invalid usage of tag &
com/bric/util/JVM.java:33: warning - invalid usage of tag &
com/bric/util/JVM.java:40: warning - invalid usage of tag &
com/bric/util/JVM.java:40: warning - invalid usage of tag &
com/bric/util/JVM.java:33: warning - invalid usage of tag &
2 errors
8 warnings
make[1]: *** [debian/rules:18: override_jh_build] Error 123
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
make: *** [debian/rules:15: build-indep] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build-indep subprocess returned exit 
status 2


(The above is just how the build ends and not necessarily the most relevant 
part)

The build was made in my autobuilder with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
and it also fails here:

https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/colorpicker.html

where you can get a full build log if you need it.

If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use reassign and 
affects,
so that this is still visible in the BTS web page for this package.

Thanks.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: javatools
Source-Version: 0.72.5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
javatools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 923...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andrej Shadura  (supplier of updated javatools package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:26:19 +
Source: javatools
Architecture: source
Version: 0.72.5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium

Bug#923748: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

2019-03-10 Thread Andrej Shadura 
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 at 18:14, Markus Koschany  wrote:
>
> Control: reopen -1
>
> Hello Andrej,
>
> bug 923748 is about a different issue and unrelated to your recent upload.
> We need to fix it too and I proposed a patch here:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923756#30

Sorry for closing the wrong bug, and sorry for uploading buggy code.
I should have waited a bit and not do this on the go, but rather
arrive home and do it there.

-- 
Cheers,
  Andrej

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#923748: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

2019-03-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing control commands:

> reopen -1
Bug #923748 {Done: Andrej Shadura } [javahelper] 
javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the 
unnamed module
Bug #923751 {Done: Andrej Shadura } [javahelper] 
javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the 
unnamed module
Bug #923753 {Done: Andrej Shadura } [javahelper] 
javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the 
unnamed module
Bug #923754 {Done: Andrej Shadura } [javahelper] 
javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the 
unnamed module
Bug #923755 {Done: Andrej Shadura } [javahelper] 
javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the 
unnamed module
Bug #923756 {Done: Andrej Shadura } [javahelper] 
javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the 
unnamed module
Bug #923757 {Done: Andrej Shadura } [javahelper] 
javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the 
unnamed module
Bug #923758 {Done: Andrej Shadura } [javahelper] 
javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the 
unnamed module
Bug #924256 {Done: Andrej Shadura } [javahelper] 
javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the 
unnamed module
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions javatools/0.72.4.
No longer marked as fixed in versions javatools/0.72.4.
No longer marked as fixed in versions javatools/0.72.4.
No longer marked as fixed in versions javatools/0.72.4.
No longer marked as fixed in versions javatools/0.72.4.
No longer marked as fixed in versions javatools/0.72.4.
No longer marked as fixed in versions javatools/0.72.4.
No longer marked as fixed in versions javatools/0.72.4.
No longer marked as fixed in versions javatools/0.72.4.

-- 
923748: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923748
923751: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923751
923753: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923753
923754: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923754
923755: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923755
923756: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923756
923757: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923757
923758: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923758
924256: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=924256
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#923748: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

2019-03-10 Thread Markus Koschany 
Control: reopen -1

Hello Andrej,

bug 923748 is about a different issue and unrelated to your recent upload.
We need to fix it too and I proposed a patch here:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923756#30

Markus



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#923748: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

2019-03-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:04:53 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#923748: fixed in javatools 0.72.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #923748,
regarding javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages 
in the unnamed module
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
923748: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923748
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:colorpicker
Version: 1.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

Dear maintainer:

I tried to build this package in buster but it failed:


[...]
 debian/rules build-indep
dh build-indep --with javahelper
   dh_update_autotools_config -i
   dh_autoreconf -i
   jh_linkjars -i
   debian/rules override_jh_build
make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
jh_build --javacopts="-source 1.8 -target 1.8" --javadoc-opts="-source 1.8"
find com -name *.java -and -type f -print0 | xargs -s 512000 -0 
/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/javac -g -cp :debian/_jh_build.ColorPicker -d 
debian/_jh_build.ColorPicker -encoding ISO8859-1 -source 1.8 -target 1.8
warning: [options] bootstrap class path not set in conjunction with -source 8
Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API.
Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details.
Note: Some input files use unchecked or unsafe operations.
Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
1 warning
find com -name *.java -and -type f -print0 | xargs -s 512000 -0 
/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/javadoc -locale en_US -link 
/usr/share/doc/default-jdk-doc/api -link 
/usr/share/doc/default-jre-headless/api -classpath 
:debian/_jh_build.ColorPicker -d debian/_jh_build.javadoc/api -quiet -encoding 
ISO8859-1 -notimestamp -source 1.8
Creating destination directory: "debian/_jh_build.javadoc/api/"
javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module, 
but the packages defined in /usr/share/doc/default-jdk-doc/api/ are in named 
modules.
javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module, 
but the packages defined in /usr/share/doc/default-jre-headless/api/ are in 
named modules.
com/bric/swing/DialogFooter.java:58: warning - Tag @link: reference not found: 
com.bric.swing.QDialog
com/bric/swing/DialogFooter.java:102: warning - Tag @link: reference not found: 
com.bric.swing.JLink
com/bric/util/JVM.java:40: warning - invalid usage of tag &
com/bric/util/JVM.java:33: warning - invalid usage of tag &
com/bric/util/JVM.java:33: warning - invalid usage of tag &
com/bric/util/JVM.java:40: warning - invalid usage of tag &
com/bric/util/JVM.java:40: warning - invalid usage of tag &
com/bric/util/JVM.java:33: warning - invalid usage of tag &
2 errors
8 warnings
make[1]: *** [debian/rules:18: override_jh_build] Error 123
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
make: *** [debian/rules:15: build-indep] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build-indep subprocess returned exit 
status 2


(The above is just how the build ends and not necessarily the most relevant 
part)

The build was made in my autobuilder with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
and it also fails here:

https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/colorpicker.html

where you can get a full build log if you need it.

If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use reassign and 
affects,
so that this is still visible in the BTS web page for this package.

Thanks.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: javatools
Source-Version: 0.72.4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
javatools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 923...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andrej Shadura  (supplier of updated javatools package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 17:50:49 +
Source: javatools
Architecture: source
Version: 0.72.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium