Bug#338277: java-package: Rename the plugin back to libjavaplugin_oji.so
Package: java-package Version: 0.26 Severity: important The plugin has been renamed libjavaplugin.so at some time (the link in /usr/lib/mozilla(|-firefox)/plugins), and it doesn't work with ibm's jre (tried 1.4.2), which tries to find itself called libjavaplugin_oji.so. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-1-686 Locale: LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages java-package depends on: ii coreutils 5.2.1-2.1 The GNU core utilities ii debhelper 5.0.2 helper programs for debian/rules ii fakeroot 1.5.5 Gives a fake root environment ii unzip 5.52-3 De-archiver for .zip files java-package recommends no packages. -- no debconf information ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processed: Re: Bug#338205: lucene: Change of distribution requires source-full upload with new version
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 338205 confirmed Bug#338205: lucene: Change of distribution requires source-full upload with new version There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#338205: lucene: Change of distribution requires source-full upload with new version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tags 338205 confirmed stop Michael Koch wrote: [...] > It is enough to do an upload of 1.4.3-9 with the old orig.tar.gz that > was in contrib as this orig tarball was not in main yet it doesnt need > to get recreated. [...] Thanks for the heads up, guys. Jeff had done an -sa build with 1.4.3-8, so not exactly sure what went wrong. We are looking into this and will rectify the matter as soon as possible. Terribly sorry for the inconvenience. $ apt-get source lucene Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Need to get 785kB of source archives. Get:1 http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main lucene 1.4.3-8 (dsc) [827B] Err http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main lucene 1.4.3-8 (tar) 404 Not Found [IP: 128.101.80.133 80] Get:2 http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main lucene 1.4.3-8 (diff) [16.3kB] Fetched 17.2kB in 9s (1813B/s) Failed to fetch http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/lucene/lucene_1.4.3.orig.tar.gz 404 Not Found [IP: 128.101.80.133 80] E: Failed to fetch some archives. Regards, - -- Barry Hawkins All Things Computed site: www.alltc.com weblog: www.yepthatsme.com Registered Linux User #368650 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDcYCSHuKcDICy0QoRArjCAKCY40WW3D63jZisZFvz0J3ZSDQlogCcCwe6 k1ot0++hIbJk3guaggbwWWc= =7VWs -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processed: Re: Bug#338209: Errors in product configuration wizard
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 338209 confirmed Bug#338209: Errors in product configuration wizard There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#338209: Errors in product configuration wizard
tag 338209 confirmed thanks I can confirm this bug. Cheers, Michael -- Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/ ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#338205: lucene: Change of distribution requires source-full upload with new version
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:17:04PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > Package: lucene > Version: 1.4.3-8 > Severity: serious > Justification: missing sources in main > > Hi, > > your package lucene recently moved from contrib to main. Unfortunately > the DAK is unable to handle two debian revisions of the same upstream > version in different distributions (contrib vs. main) and the later > upload always has missing sources (for apt-get source or partial > mirrors). > > In your case this means that the binaries in main do not have source > in main which obviously is very bad. > > Currently the only way for you to fix this problem is to upload a > source-full upload with a new upstream version, e.g. 1.4.3.0-1. The > new orig.tar.gz will then be sorted into the right pool dir and > everything is fixed. It is enough to do an upload of 1.4.3-9 with the old orig.tar.gz that was in contrib as this orig tarball was not in main yet it doesnt need to get recreated. Michael -- Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/ ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#338209: Errors in product configuration wizard
Package: eclipse-sdk Version: 3.1.1-3 The product configuration wizard reachable over Help/Software Updates/Manage configuration shows an error for Eclipse project SDK 3.1.1 I get following errors in properties/status: Included feature "Eclipse Platform" version "3.1.1" contains problems. Included feature "org.eclipse.platform.source_3.1.1" is missing. Included feature "org.eclipse.jdt.source_3.1.1" is missing. Included feature "org.eclipse.pde.source_3.1.1" is missing. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#338205: lucene: Change of distribution requires source-full upload with new version
Package: lucene Version: 1.4.3-8 Severity: serious Justification: missing sources in main Hi, your package lucene recently moved from contrib to main. Unfortunately the DAK is unable to handle two debian revisions of the same upstream version in different distributions (contrib vs. main) and the later upload always has missing sources (for apt-get source or partial mirrors). In your case this means that the binaries in main do not have source in main which obviously is very bad. Currently the only way for you to fix this problem is to upload a source-full upload with a new upstream version, e.g. 1.4.3.0-1. The new orig.tar.gz will then be sorted into the right pool dir and everything is fixed. MfG Goswin -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-frosties-2 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#336984: marked as done (tomcat5: package description references tomcat4-webapps -- s/4/5/ ?)
Your message dated Tue, 08 Nov 2005 08:02:04 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336984: fixed in tomcat5 5.0.30-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Nov 2005 01:59:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 01 17:59:33 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 64-164-31-167.wavemarket.com (mail.wavemarket.com) [64.164.31.167] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EX7uX-0004e7-00; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 17:59:33 -0800 Received: from 64-164-31-160.wavemarket.com ([64.164.31.160] helo=quesadilla.engr.wavemarket.com) by mail.wavemarket.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1EX7uX-0007jz-2n for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 17:59:33 -0800 Received: from vineet by quesadilla.engr.wavemarket.com with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EX7uS-0002JV-Ez for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 17:59:28 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: tomcat5: package description references tomcat4-webapps -- s/4/5/ ? X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 17:59:28 -0800 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: tomcat5 Version: 5.0.30-7 Severity: minor The package description includes this text: No documentation or web applications (webapps) are included here, please install the tomcat4-webapps package if you want them. The package metadata Suggests: tomcat5-webapps, and I guess that that's what the description should say as well. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 336984-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Nov 2005 16:06:34 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 08 08:06:34 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EZVvA-0001VH-00; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 08:02:04 -0800 From: Wolfgang Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#336984: fixed in tomcat5 5.0.30-8 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 08:02:04 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: tomcat5 Source-Version: 5.0.30-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of tomcat5, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libtomcat5-java_5.0.30-8_all.deb to pool/main/t/tomcat5/libtomcat5-java_5.0.30-8_all.deb tomcat5-admin_5.0.30-8_all.deb to pool/main/t/tomcat5/tomcat5-admin_5.0.30-8_all.deb tomcat5-webapps_5.0.30-8_all.deb to pool/main/t/tomcat5/tomcat5-webapps_5.0.30-8_all.deb tomcat5_5.0.30-8.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tomcat5/tomcat5_5.0.30-8.diff.gz tomcat5_5.0.30-8.dsc to pool/main/t/tomcat5/tomcat5_5.0.30-8.dsc tomcat5_5.0.30-8_all.deb to pool/main/t/tomcat5/tomcat5_5.0.30-8_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Wolfgang Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated tomcat5 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:17:58 +0100 Source: tomcat5 Binary: tomcat5-admin tomcat5-webapps tomcat5 libtomcat5-java Architecture: source all Ve
Bug#337270: marked as done (tomcat5: Suggest java-gcj-compat-dev)
Your message dated Tue, 08 Nov 2005 08:02:04 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337270: fixed in tomcat5 5.0.30-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Nov 2005 16:02:03 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 03 08:02:03 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vsmtp3alice.tin.it (vsmtp3.tin.it) [212.216.176.143] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EXhXO-00020G-00; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 08:02:03 -0800 Received: from florence.casa (82.58.158.80) by vsmtp3.tin.it (7.2.060.1) id 43626795002427A9; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 17:01:28 +0100 Received: by florence.casa (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 936783EC043; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 17:01:16 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "David N. Welton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: tomcat5: Suggest java-gcj-compat-dev X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 17:01:16 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: tomcat5 Version: 5.0.30-7 Severity: minor Tomcat ought to suggest java-gcj-compat-dev so that it actually runs when you install it. As it was, I had to read the /etc/default/tomcat5 file to find the correct packages to install. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-powerpc Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages tomcat5 depends on: ii adduser 3.77 Add and remove users and groups ii apache2-common2.0.55-3 next generation, scalable, extenda ii apache2-utils [apache-utils] 2.0.55-3 utility programs for webservers ii java-gcj-compat-dev 1.0.41-2 Java runtime environment with GCJ ii kaffe 2:1.1.6-3 A JVM to run Java bytecode ii kaffe-pthreads [kaffe]2:1.1.6-3 A POSIX threads enabled version of ii libtomcat5-java 5.0.30-7 Java Servlet engine -- core librar tomcat5 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 337270-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Nov 2005 16:06:35 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 08 08:06:35 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EZVvA-0001VJ-00; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 08:02:04 -0800 From: Wolfgang Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#337270: fixed in tomcat5 5.0.30-8 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 08:02:04 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: tomcat5 Source-Version: 5.0.30-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of tomcat5, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libtomcat5-java_5.0.30-8_all.deb to pool/main/t/tomcat5/libtomcat5-java_5.0.30-8_all.deb tomcat5-admin_5.0.30-8_all.deb to pool/main/t/tomcat5/tomcat5-admin_5.0.30-8_all.deb tomcat5-webapps_5.0.30-8_all.deb to pool/main/t/tomcat5/tomcat5-webapps_5.0.30-8_all.deb tomcat5_5.0.30-8.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tomcat5/tomcat5_5.0.30-8.diff.gz tomcat5_5.0.30-8.dsc to pool/main/t/tomcat5/tomcat5_5.0.30-8.dsc tomcat5_5.0.30-8_all.deb to pool/main/t/tomcat5/tomcat5_5.0.30-8_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Wolfgang Baer <[E
tomcat5_5.0.30-8_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libtomcat5-java_5.0.30-8_all.deb to pool/main/t/tomcat5/libtomcat5-java_5.0.30-8_all.deb tomcat5-admin_5.0.30-8_all.deb to pool/main/t/tomcat5/tomcat5-admin_5.0.30-8_all.deb tomcat5-webapps_5.0.30-8_all.deb to pool/main/t/tomcat5/tomcat5-webapps_5.0.30-8_all.deb tomcat5_5.0.30-8.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tomcat5/tomcat5_5.0.30-8.diff.gz tomcat5_5.0.30-8.dsc to pool/main/t/tomcat5/tomcat5_5.0.30-8.dsc tomcat5_5.0.30-8_all.deb to pool/main/t/tomcat5/tomcat5_5.0.30-8_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 336984 337270 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processing of tomcat5_5.0.30-8_powerpc.changes
tomcat5_5.0.30-8_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tomcat5_5.0.30-8.dsc tomcat5_5.0.30-8.diff.gz tomcat5_5.0.30-8_all.deb libtomcat5-java_5.0.30-8_all.deb tomcat5-webapps_5.0.30-8_all.deb tomcat5-admin_5.0.30-8_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#338158: Please package 1.2.15
Package: libapache2-mod-jk Version: 1.2.14.1-2 Upstream has just released version 1.2.15: http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/changelog.html Thanks. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processed: Re: Bug#338158: Please package 1.2.15
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 338158 wishlist Bug#338158: Please package 1.2.15 Severity set to `wishlist'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: Removing files from CVS on Alioth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote: > Hi, > > OK, thanks for the lesson, I thought I'd read this as part of a > comparaison between CVS and SVN, but the difference might a bit more > complex than just "CVS can't remove files". CVS can't remove directories. ;-) CVS can NOT *move* files - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDcK2z4vzFZu62tMIRAof2AJ92rmXTPZqq9HoX1lGv2Ni4ApgJNgCgg/5n 2/eYwqzCO78SqhOyQg4BYhE= =gdZ+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
