Bug#338277: Acknowledgement (java-package: Rename the plugin back to libjavaplugin_oji.so)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Hommey wrote: [...] > The problem is deeper than I thought initially. After finding itself as > libjavaplugin_oji.so, the plugin follows the link _once_, gets the > directory of the file it got, gets its parent, and run java in its bin > subdirectory. > > That means that it tries to run /etc/bin/java, because of alternatives. [...] That is _so_ not good news. :-) Thanks for finding this Mike, and also thanks for ipw2200-source, from both myself and my ThinkPad's PCMCIA card slot! Regards, - -- Barry Hawkins All Things Computed site: www.alltc.com weblog: www.yepthatsme.com Registered Linux User #368650 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDcrWGHuKcDICy0QoRAj83AKCjiTNe3gC00TA4FWD+shI/4OgYkACgxhWA v/qzZgM3MPWVLHVK7Vjk5Sc= =L8IN -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#338399: libmysql-java: Up-to-date request. Many bugs are fixed in Version 3.1.11-stable.
Package: libmysql-java Version: 3.1.10-1 Severity: wishlist Hi Debian Java Maintainers, This is Up-to-date request. Changelog said many bugs are fixed in Version 3.1.11-stable. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-mppe Locale: LANG=ja_JP.eucJP, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.eucJP (charmap=EUC-JP) Versions of packages libmysql-java depends on: ii gij [java1-runtime] 4:4.0.2-1 The GNU Java bytecode interpreter ii gij-4.0 [java1-runtime] 4.0.2-2The GNU Java bytecode interpreter ii j2re1.4 [java2-runtime] 1.4.2.02-1 Blackdown Java(TM) 2 Runtime Envir libmysql-java recommends no packages. -- no debconf information ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#338205: marked as done (lucene: Change of distribution requires source-full upload with new version)
Your message dated Wed, 09 Nov 2005 09:47:23 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338205: fixed in lucene 1.4.3-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Nov 2005 19:19:10 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 08 11:19:10 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.12.32] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EZYzu-0006NM-00; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 11:19:10 -0800 Received: from localhost (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5139510E; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:18:38 +0100 (MET) Received: from mx3.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de ([134.2.12.26]) by localhost (mx5 [134.2.12.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27380-04; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:18:35 +0100 (NFT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (semeai.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.15.66]) by mx3.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769C1139; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:18:34 +0100 (NFT) Received: from mrvn by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EZYxs-0007YC-Qy; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:17:04 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: lucene: Change of distribution requires source-full upload with new version X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9 Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:17:04 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new (McAfee AntiVirus) at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: lucene Version: 1.4.3-8 Severity: serious Justification: missing sources in main Hi, your package lucene recently moved from contrib to main. Unfortunately the DAK is unable to handle two debian revisions of the same upstream version in different distributions (contrib vs. main) and the later upload always has missing sources (for apt-get source or partial mirrors). In your case this means that the binaries in main do not have source in main which obviously is very bad. Currently the only way for you to fix this problem is to upload a source-full upload with a new upstream version, e.g. 1.4.3.0-1. The new orig.tar.gz will then be sorted into the right pool dir and everything is fixed. MfG Goswin -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-frosties-2 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) --- Received: (at 338205-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Nov 2005 17:52:24 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 09 09:52:24 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EZu2d-000519-00; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 09:47:23 -0800 From: Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#338205: fixed in lucene 1.4.3-9 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 09:47:23 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: lucene Source-Version: 1.4.3-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of lucene, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: liblucene-java-doc_1.4.3-9_all.deb to pool/main/l/lucene/liblucene-java-doc_1.4.3-9_all.deb liblucene-java_1.4.3-9_all.deb to pool/main/l/lucene/liblucene-java_1.4.3-9_all.deb lucene_1.4.3-9.diff.gz to pool/main/l/lucene/lucene_1.4.3-9.diff.gz lucene_1.4.3-9.dsc to pool/main/l/lucene/lucene_1.4.3-9.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if
lucene_1.4.3-9_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED
Warning: ignoring lucene_1.4.3.orig.tar.gz, since it's already in the archive. Accepted: liblucene-java-doc_1.4.3-9_all.deb to pool/main/l/lucene/liblucene-java-doc_1.4.3-9_all.deb liblucene-java_1.4.3-9_all.deb to pool/main/l/lucene/liblucene-java_1.4.3-9_all.deb lucene_1.4.3-9.diff.gz to pool/main/l/lucene/lucene_1.4.3-9.diff.gz lucene_1.4.3-9.dsc to pool/main/l/lucene/lucene_1.4.3-9.dsc Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 338205 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processing of lucene_1.4.3-9_powerpc.changes
lucene_1.4.3-9_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lucene_1.4.3-9.dsc lucene_1.4.3.orig.tar.gz lucene_1.4.3-9.diff.gz liblucene-java_1.4.3-9_all.deb liblucene-java-doc_1.4.3-9_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#337129: marked as done (java-package: Does not work with IBM Java 5.0 (patch included))
Your message dated Wed, 09 Nov 2005 08:17:05 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337129: fixed in java-package 0.27
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Nov 2005 19:25:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 02 11:25:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.195]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EXOFC-nv-00; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 11:25:58 -0800
Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t10so364368wxc
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 11:25:57 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
b=KtYUtLdRcOnijrIWI9aiTSoCEYb5Ifr7yfnPrzNL0nDSG4o2UoVlm1UcBlXxZjdDx07Nc39xJdFc/K/oHcJOF9MLiE3RXQCRi7tJSLaluj45Nkmo6JAt2ZECEg4n+qvSKdUVoov+7CQIT8s0KrpfhKyQGxzYmebN96V4DdvZyk8=
Received: by 10.65.232.19 with SMTP id j19mr2172398qbr;
Wed, 02 Nov 2005 11:25:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.65.119.10 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 11:25:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 11:25:57 -0800
From: Kevin Squire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: java-package: Does not work with IBM Java 5.0 (patch included)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="=_Part_9186_18179669.1130959557408"
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=_Part_9186_18179669.1130959557408
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: java-package: Does not work with IBM Java 5.0 (patch included)
Package: java-package
Version: 0.26
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Version 0.26 of java-package does not work with IBM's Java release 5.0.
I've included a patch which updates the package to fix this. The
package should allow the use of java-package with all available versions
of IBM's sdk and jre.
Kevin
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers breezy-updates
APT policy: (500, 'breezy-updates'), (500, 'breezy-security'), (500,
'breezy')Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-9-686
Locale: LANG=3Den_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8)
Versions of packages java-package depends on:
ii coreutils 5.2.1-2ubuntu2 The GNU core utilities
ii debhelper 4.9.5ubuntu1 helper programs for debian/rul=
es
ii fakeroot 1.5.1ubuntu2 Gives a fake root environment
ii unzip 5.52-3ubuntu2 De-archiver for .zip files
java-package recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--=_Part_9186_18179669.1130959557408
Content-Type: text/x-patch; name=java_package_ibm_update.diff;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="java_package_ibm_update.diff"
diff -Naur java-package-0.26.orig/debian/control
java-package-0.26/debian/control
--- java-package-0.26.orig/debian/control 2005-08-29 14:37:54.0
-0700
+++ java-package-0.26/debian/control2005-11-02 08:34:11.0 -0800
@@ -17,5 +17,5 @@
Environments and Development Kits:
.
* Sun Microsystems(TM) 1.4 and 1.5 Standard Edition
- * IBM(TM) 1.3 and 1.4 Standard Edition
+ * IBM(TM) 1.3, 1.4, and 5.0 Standard Edition
* Blackdown Java-Linux 1.3 and 1.4 Standard Edition
diff -Naur java-package-0.26.orig/ibm-j2re5.0/install
java-package-0.26/ibm-j2re5.0/install
--- java-package-0.26.orig/ibm-j2re5.0/install 1969-12-31 16:00:00.0
-0800
+++ java-package-0.26/ibm-j2re5.0/install 2005-11-02 08:04:18.0
-0800
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+suffix=j2re5.0-ibm
+j2se_base="/usr/lib/$suffix"
+priority=314
+
+if [ ! -e "$j2se_base/debian/info" ]; then
+exit 0
+fi
+
+# alternative
+function program_alternative() {
+local program="$1"
+cat >/usr/bin/$program-$suffix <
+function program_alternative() {
+local program="$1"
+update-alternatives \
+--remove "$
Bug#317492: marked as done (java-package: sun-j2sdk{1.4, 1.5} : Does not install alternative for keytool program)
Your message dated Wed, 09 Nov 2005 08:17:05 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317492: fixed in java-package 0.27
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jul 2005 02:39:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 08 19:39:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from venus1.veridas.net (venus.veridas.net) [202.52.32.32]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dr5G2-0005hz-00; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 19:39:58 -0700
Received: (qmail 13976 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2005 12:39:55 +1000
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by venus2 by uid 91 with qmail-scanner-1.15
(clamscan: 0.80. Clear:.
Processed in 0.57634 secs); 09 Jul 2005 02:39:55 -
Received: from dsl-210-211-77-027.sa.veridas.net (HELO mantis) (210.211.77.27)
by australis.net with SMTP; 9 Jul 2005 12:39:54 +1000
Received: from mclowry by mantis with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Dr5Nj-Zu-Qy
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 09 Jul 2005 12:17:55 +0930
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Matt Lowry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: java-package: sun-j2sdk{1.4,
1.5} : Does not install alternative for keytool program
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 12:17:55 +0930
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: java-package
Version: 0.24
Severity: normal
The keytool program needs to have an alternative installed;
presumably:
program_alternative keytool
added to /usr/share/java-package/sun-j2sdk*/install
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages java-package depends on:
ii coreutils 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities
ii debhelper 4.2.32 helper programs for debian/rules
ii fakeroot 1.2.10 Gives a fake root environment
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 317492-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Nov 2005 16:21:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 09 08:21:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EZsdF-00051X-00; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 08:17:05 -0800
From: Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#317492: fixed in java-package 0.27
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 08:17:05 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: java-package
Source-Version: 0.27
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
java-package, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
java-package_0.27.dsc
to pool/contrib/j/java-package/java-package_0.27.dsc
java-package_0.27.tar.gz
to pool/contrib/j/java-package/java-package_0.27.tar.gz
java-package_0.27_all.deb
to pool/contrib/j/java-package/java-package_0.27_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated java-package package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 12:16:24 -0500
Source: java-package
Binary: java-package
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.27
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Mai
Bug#301738: marked as done (little problem with IBM Java on ppc)
Your message dated Wed, 09 Nov 2005 08:17:05 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#301738: fixed in java-package 0.27 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 2005 00:47:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 27 16:47:04 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail4.mclink.it [195.110.128.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFiPH-0001IV-00; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 16:47:03 -0800 Received: from zaphod (adsl203-153-141.mclink.it [213.203.153.141]) by mail4.mclink.it (8.12.6p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id j2S0l1OA068060 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 02:47:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zaphod (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7BD71EE60B for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 02:46:49 +0200 (CEST) Subject: little problem with IBM Java on ppc From: Christian Surchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 02:46:49 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: java-package Version: 0.22 Severity: normal With IBMJava2-JRE-142.ppc.tgz I can use it, but with an error: ... Create debian package: dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_installchangelogs dh_installdocs dh_compress find: /tmp/make-jpkg.o7a251/install//usr/lib/j2re1.4-ibm/man: No such file or directory [...] -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-powerpc Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages java-package depends on: ii coreutils 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities ii debhelper 4.2.31 helper programs for debian/rules ii fakeroot 1.2.5 Gives a fake root environment -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 301738-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Nov 2005 16:21:36 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 09 08:21:36 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EZsdF-00051V-00; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 08:17:05 -0800 From: Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#301738: fixed in java-package 0.27 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 08:17:05 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: java-package Source-Version: 0.27 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of java-package, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: java-package_0.27.dsc to pool/contrib/j/java-package/java-package_0.27.dsc java-package_0.27.tar.gz to pool/contrib/j/java-package/java-package_0.27.tar.gz java-package_0.27_all.deb to pool/contrib/j/java-package/java-package_0.27_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated java-package package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 12:16:24 -0500 Source: java-package Binary: java-package Architecture: source all Version: 0.2
java-package_0.27_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: java-package_0.27.dsc to pool/contrib/j/java-package/java-package_0.27.dsc java-package_0.27.tar.gz to pool/contrib/j/java-package/java-package_0.27.tar.gz java-package_0.27_all.deb to pool/contrib/j/java-package/java-package_0.27_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 301738 317492 337129 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processing of java-package_0.27_powerpc.changes
java-package_0.27_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: java-package_0.27.dsc java-package_0.27.tar.gz java-package_0.27_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processed: tagging 335242
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 > tags 335242 + confirmed Bug#335242: /usr/local/lib/eclipse There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#335242: /usr/local/lib/eclipse
I added a postinst and prerm script to eclipse-platform, which creates directories for /usr/local/lib/eclipse(/plugins,/features) and chown them to root:staff and chmod to 2775, just like the scripts of python2.(3,4). The changes will be included in 3.1.1-5 $ ls -la /usr/local/lib/eclipse/ insgesamt 16 drwxrwsr-x 4 root staff 4096 2005-11-09 15:33 . drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 4096 2005-11-09 15:33 .. drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 2005-11-09 15:33 features drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 2005-11-09 15:33 plugins For the sym link within /usr/local/lib/eclipse I'm not sure if it is a good idea, Thank you, Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#338205: lucene: Change of distribution requires source-full upload with new version
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 01:36:18PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:17:04PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > >> Package: lucene > >> Version: 1.4.3-8 > >> Severity: serious > >> Justification: missing sources in main > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> your package lucene recently moved from contrib to main. Unfortunately > >> the DAK is unable to handle two debian revisions of the same upstream > >> version in different distributions (contrib vs. main) and the later > >> upload always has missing sources (for apt-get source or partial > >> mirrors). > >> > >> In your case this means that the binaries in main do not have source > >> in main which obviously is very bad. > >> > >> Currently the only way for you to fix this problem is to upload a > >> source-full upload with a new upstream version, e.g. 1.4.3.0-1. The > >> new orig.tar.gz will then be sorted into the right pool dir and > >> everything is fixed. > > > > It is enough to do an upload of 1.4.3-9 with the old orig.tar.gz that > > was in contrib as this orig tarball was not in main yet it doesnt need > > to get recreated. > > That won't work since the DAK already has an 1.4.3.orig.tar.gz in its > database and has it in contrib. The filename must differ even though > they are in different distributions. Wrong. We did it already a few times with the same orig tarball. That is no problem at all. Cheers, Michael -- Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/ ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processed: Re: Bug#336884: eclipse-platform-common cannot be installed because it tries to write to the /usr/local hierarchy
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 336884 confirmed Bug#336884: eclipse-platform-common cannot be installed because it tries to write to the /usr/local hierarchy There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#338205: lucene: Change of distribution requires source-full upload with new version
Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:17:04PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote: >> Package: lucene >> Version: 1.4.3-8 >> Severity: serious >> Justification: missing sources in main >> >> Hi, >> >> your package lucene recently moved from contrib to main. Unfortunately >> the DAK is unable to handle two debian revisions of the same upstream >> version in different distributions (contrib vs. main) and the later >> upload always has missing sources (for apt-get source or partial >> mirrors). >> >> In your case this means that the binaries in main do not have source >> in main which obviously is very bad. >> >> Currently the only way for you to fix this problem is to upload a >> source-full upload with a new upstream version, e.g. 1.4.3.0-1. The >> new orig.tar.gz will then be sorted into the right pool dir and >> everything is fixed. > > It is enough to do an upload of 1.4.3-9 with the old orig.tar.gz that > was in contrib as this orig tarball was not in main yet it doesnt need > to get recreated. That won't work since the DAK already has an 1.4.3.orig.tar.gz in its database and has it in contrib. The filename must differ even though they are in different distributions. MfG Goswin ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#336884: eclipse-platform-common cannot be installed because it tries to write to the /usr/local hierarchy
tag 336884 confirmed thanks On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 12:15:14PM -0600, David Bridges wrote: > Package: eclipse-platform-common > Version: 3.1.1-3 > Severity: normal > > > eclipse-platform-common is configured to write to the /usr/local, this > hierarchy should not be touched by packages and will not allow > installation on systems where /usr/local is an NFS mount I think we will do the same as python2.3 does in /var/lib/dpkg/info/python2.3.postinst and create the hierarchy in a postinst script and fail silently when /usr/local is read-only as it seems to be in your case. Thanks for your bug report. Cheers, Michael -- Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/ ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#336338: Solution for #336338: eclipse doesn't start
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 10:46:48AM +0100, David N. Welton wrote: > Arnaud Installe wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm having the same issue as you had: eclipse doesn't start, and > > looking in the eclipse log I see the same messages. > > > > Now I noticed in the workflow of debian bug #336338 that at some point > > your problem was fixed. In your e-mail about this bug, you mention "I > > replaced that file, and then erased my .eclipse directory". Which > > file did you replace, and with what ? > > There was a file that contained x86 specific references, and the machine > I was trying to run Eclipse on is a powerpc machine. > > org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.ppc_3.1.1.jar > > is the file in question. What platform are you running on? When eclipse was initiallz built on ppc for upload to the archive it worked for ppc (but not others). The last upload of eclipse was built on x86 so it dont worked for ppc. This problem will be fix with next upload, 3.1.1-4. Cheers, Michael -- Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/ ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#336338: Solution for #336338: eclipse doesn't start
Arnaud Installe wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having the same issue as you had: eclipse doesn't start, and > looking in the eclipse log I see the same messages. > > Now I noticed in the workflow of debian bug #336338 that at some point > your problem was fixed. In your e-mail about this bug, you mention "I > replaced that file, and then erased my .eclipse directory". Which > file did you replace, and with what ? There was a file that contained x86 specific references, and the machine I was trying to run Eclipse on is a powerpc machine. org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.ppc_3.1.1.jar is the file in question. What platform are you running on? -- David N. Welton - http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/ Linux, Open Source Consulting - http://www.dedasys.com/ ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
libcommons-validator-java 1:1.1.4-4 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the libcommons-validator-java source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1:1.1.4-3 Current version: 1:1.1.4-4 -- This email is automatically generated. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
lucene 1.4.3-8 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the lucene source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.4.3-5 Current version: 1.4.3-8 -- This email is automatically generated. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
batik 1.6-2 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the batik source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.5.1-1 Current version: 1.6-2 -- This email is automatically generated. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processed: Re: Bug#338277: Acknowledgement (java-package: Rename the plugin back to libjavaplugin_oji.so)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 338277 plugin doesn't work with IBM JRE 1.4 Bug#338277: java-package: Rename the plugin back to libjavaplugin_oji.so Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#338277: Acknowledgement (java-package: Rename the plugin back to libjavaplugin_oji.so)
retitle 338277 plugin doesn't work with IBM JRE 1.4 thanks (and supposedly 1.3 or any other from IBM) The problem is deeper than I thought initially. After finding itself as libjavaplugin_oji.so, the plugin follows the link _once_, gets the directory of the file it got, gets its parent, and run java in its bin subdirectory. That means that it tries to run /etc/bin/java, because of alternatives. Mike ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
