Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2
Michael Koch wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:50:38PM +0100, Thomas Girard wrote:
Hello,
A while ago, I wrote:
Using the following pakages:
* java-gcj-compat{,-dev} 1.0.69-2
* ecj, ecj-gcj, libecj-java and libecj-gcj 3.3.0+0728-1
* libgcj-bc, libgcj8{-1,-1-awt,-jar} 4.2.1-3
* gcc-4.2-base 4.2.1-3
* gcj-4.1-base, gcj-4.1, gij-4.1, libgcj7-1 4.1.2-16
* libgcc1 1:4.2.2-3
eclipse-cdt compiles.
Updating to sid, I reach a point where it no longer compiles:
* java-gcj-compat 1.0.76-4 sets gcj-4.2 as the default gcj version
* gcj-4.2, gij-4.2 and libgcj8-* are at version 4.2.1-3
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 05:12:44PM +0100, Michael Koch replied:
I have just tried this with SUN JDK 6, Icedtea, gcj 4.3, jamvm and cacao
with the following result:
* SUN JDK 6: Just works.
* gcj-4.3: No output at all. Returns with exit code 13.
* icedtea: No output at all. Returns with exit code 13. Exactly the same
as with gcj.
* jamvm: Fails but prints quite some output. Main issue is that jamvm has
no real JAVA_HOME.
* cacao: Fails but prints some output. Again an issue with an incomplete
JAVA_HOME provided by cacao.
We made progress on this issue with Michael; it turns out that using
eclipse natively compiled -gcj packages work around the FTBFS, for some
reason.
Michael found out that only eclipse-rcp-gcj is needed, and that deleting
org.eclipse.core.runtime_3.2.0.v20060603.jar.so is enough to make the
compilation fails, while it works when it's there.
So we now have a work-around to compile Eclipse plugins: install
eclipse-rcp-gcj.
What's really weird is that icedtea, even though it does not use -gcj
packages, exhibit the very same behavior.
Any idea on this?
I'm a bit ashamed. The solution was quiet simple. Added -consolelog to
the arguments revealed the reason for this (and for some crashes of
eclipse). I will fix that bug in eclipse packaging. This really makes me
wonder why SUN JDK worked...
And what was the reason? I need to know.
Andrew.
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: And what was the reason? I need to know. !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196 !MESSAGE Application error !STACK 1 java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.eclipse.core.runtime.Plugin at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.BundleLoader.findClass(BundleLoader.java:402) at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.BundleLoader.findClass(BundleLoader.java:347) at org.eclipse.osgi.internal.baseadaptor.DefaultClassLoader.loadClass(DefaultClassLoader.java:83) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:377) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Platform.getPlugin(Platform.java:737) at org.eclipse.core.internal.preferences.legacy.InitLegacyPreferences.init(InitLegacyPreferences.java:43) at org.eclipse.core.internal.preferences.PreferenceServiceRegistryHelper.applyRuntimeDefaults(PreferenceServiceRegistryHelper.java:146) at org.eclipse.core.internal.preferences.PreferencesService.applyRuntimeDefaults(PreferencesService.java:337) at org.eclipse.core.internal.preferences.DefaultPreferences.applyRuntimeDefaults(DefaultPreferences.java:162) at org.eclipse.core.internal.preferences.DefaultPreferences.loadDefaults(DefaultPreferences.java:231) at org.eclipse.core.internal.preferences.DefaultPreferences.load(DefaultPreferences.java:227) at org.eclipse.core.internal.preferences.EclipsePreferences.create(EclipsePreferences.java:307) at org.eclipse.core.internal.preferences.EclipsePreferences.internalNode(EclipsePreferences.java:543) at org.eclipse.core.internal.preferences.DefaultPreferences.node(DefaultPreferences.java:149) at org.eclipse.core.internal.preferences.legacy.PreferenceForwarder.getDefaultPreferences(PreferenceForwarder.java:138) at org.eclipse.core.internal.preferences.legacy.PreferenceForwarder.getString(PreferenceForwarder.java:644) at org.eclipse.ant.core.AntCorePreferences.restoreAntHome(AntCorePreferences.java:284) at org.eclipse.ant.core.AntCorePreferences.restoreCustomObjects(AntCorePreferences.java:191) at org.eclipse.ant.core.AntCorePreferences.init(AntCorePreferences.java:157) at org.eclipse.ant.core.AntCorePlugin.setRunningHeadless(AntCorePlugin.java:232) at org.eclipse.ant.core.AntRunner.run(AntRunner.java:473) at org.eclipse.core.internal.runtime.PlatformActivator$1.run(PlatformActivator.java:78) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:92) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:68) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:400) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:177) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(natMethod.cc:205) at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:336) at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:280) at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:977) at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:952) make: *** [build-stamp] Fehler 13 The only small strange thing is that org.eclipse.core.runtime.Plugin and org.eclipse.core.runtime.Platform are in the same Jar. This must be some OSGi issue. At least I know now where to start debugging. Cheers, Michael ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2
Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: And what was the reason? I need to know. !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196 !MESSAGE Application error !STACK 1 java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.eclipse.core.runtime.Plugin at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.BundleLoader.findClass(BundleLoader.java:402) at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.BundleLoader.findClass(BundleLoader.java:347) make: *** [build-stamp] Fehler 13 The only small strange thing is that org.eclipse.core.runtime.Plugin and org.eclipse.core.runtime.Platform are in the same Jar. This must be some OSGi issue. At least I know now where to start debugging. Oh, right, so you *don't* actually know what the cause of this is. Me either, but I'm debugging it at the moment. gcj should not distinguish between natively compiled code and bytecode. The fact that it makes a difference must be a bug. Andrew. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2
Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 12:01:03PM +, Andrew Haley wrote: Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: And what was the reason? I need to know. !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196 !MESSAGE Application error !STACK 1 java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.eclipse.core.runtime.Plugin at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.BundleLoader.findClass(BundleLoader.java:402) at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.BundleLoader.findClass(BundleLoader.java:347) make: *** [build-stamp] Fehler 13 The only small strange thing is that org.eclipse.core.runtime.Plugin and org.eclipse.core.runtime.Platform are in the same Jar. This must be some OSGi issue. At least I know now where to start debugging. Oh, right, so you *don't* actually know what the cause of this is. Me either, but I'm debugging it at the moment. Yeah, yesterday I thought it was just a missing jar file. Today I took a closer look at at it... gcj should not distinguish between natively compiled code and bytecode. The fact that it makes a difference must be a bug. Sounds like it. Can I somehow help? I don't think so. My plan is to add a lot of class loader tracing code to libgcj, and I will then trap at the point where compiled succeeds but interpreted doesn't. There are areas where compliant jvms might behave differently. For example, the exact time when dependent classes are loaded isn't defined. Maybe at class initialization time, maybe later. All the the spec requires is that ClassNotFoundExceptions aren't raised until classes are referred to. So, it is possible that Eclipse requires some precise semantics of class loading beyond what is strictly required by the spec. Maybe compiled code loads classes earlier than interpreted code, and maybe *the effective classpath has changed* by the time gij tries to load org.eclipse.core.runtime.Plugin. Andrew. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2
Andrew Haley wrote: There are areas where compliant jvms might behave differently. For example, the exact time when dependent classes are loaded isn't defined. Maybe at class initialization time, maybe later. All the the spec requires is that ClassNotFoundExceptions aren't raised until classes are referred to. So, it is possible that Eclipse requires some precise semantics of class loading beyond what is strictly required by the spec. Maybe compiled code loads classes earlier than interpreted code, and maybe *the effective classpath has changed* by the time gij tries to load org.eclipse.core.runtime.Plugin. And, in turn, this means that potentially the same VM may behave differently in interpreted and compiled mode... Andrew. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#468947: copyright contains wrong license
Package: libcommons-cli-java Version: 1.1-1 Severity: serious -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The copyright file contans the wrong license. Accordingly to libcommons-cli-java-1.1/LICENSE.txt the license is the Apache license 2.0, not 1.1. There are differences in the compatibilities to e.g. the GPL license between these license versions. Severity set to serious, because I think it violates the Debian Policy. Regards, Daniel - -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (850, 'unstable'), (700, 'testing'), (550, 'stable'), (110, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-k7 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages libcommons-cli-java depends on: ii gij [java2-runtime] 4:4.3-1The GNU Java bytecode interpreter ii java-gcj-compat [java2-runtim 1.0.77-4 Java runtime environment using GIJ ii kaffe-pthreads [java1-runtime 2:1.1.8-3 A POSIX threads enabled version of ii libcommons-lang-java 2.3-4 Extension of the java.lang package ii sun-java5-jre [java2-runtime] 1.5.0-14-3 Sun Java(TM) Runtime Environment ( libcommons-cli-java recommends no packages. - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHyrcFm0bx+wiPa4wRAvvAAJoCxNOMtJutLaTxvxjNrdeBDkG+xgCgnSR1 vS5dOvHNsloUHjXRQEuZ3v4= =pCtM -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Incomplete upload found in Debian upload queue
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in the Debian upload queue directory: antlr3_3.0.1-1.dsc antlr3_3.0.1.orig.tar.gz This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job cannot be processed. If no .changes file arrives within 23:25:25, the files will be deleted. If you didn't upload those files, please just ignore this message. Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processing of antlr3_3.0.1-1_amd64.changes
antlr3_3.0.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: antlr3_3.0.1-1.dsc antlr3_3.0.1.orig.tar.gz antlr3_3.0.1-1.diff.gz antlr3_3.0.1-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
antlr3_3.0.1-1_amd64.changes is NEW
(new) antlr3_3.0.1-1.diff.gz optional devel (new) antlr3_3.0.1-1.dsc optional devel (new) antlr3_3.0.1-1_all.deb optional devel language tool for constructing recognizers, compilers etc ANTLR, ANother Tool for Language Recognition, (formerly PCCTS) is a language tool that provides a framework for constructing recognizers, compilers, and translators from grammatical descriptions containing C++ or Java actions [You can use PCCTS 1.xx to generate C-based parsers]. . Computer language translation has become a common task. While compilers and tools for traditional computer languages (such as C or Java) are still being built, their number is dwarfed by the thousands of mini-languages for which recognizers and translators are being developed. Programmers construct translators for database formats, graphical data files (e.g., PostScript, AutoCAD), text processing files (e.g., HTML, SGML). ANTLR is designed to handle all of your translation tasks. (new) antlr3_3.0.1.orig.tar.gz optional devel Changes: antlr3 (3.0.1-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial version. Closes: #439725 Override entries for your package: Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 439725 Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New packages are usually added to the override file about once a week. You may have gotten the distribution wrong. You'll get warnings above if files already exist in other distributions. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processed: owner 468947
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16 owner 468947 ! Bug#468947: copyright contains wrong license Owner recorded as Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED]. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processed: cloning 466860, owner -1, reassign -1 to libcommons-cli-java ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16 clone 466860 -1 Bug#466860: maven2: -D option on command line masks following goal definitions Bug 466860 cloned as bug 469082. owner -1 ! Bug#469082: maven2: -D option on command line masks following goal definitions Owner recorded as Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED]. reassign -1 libcommons-cli-java Bug#469082: maven2: -D option on command line masks following goal definitions Bug reassigned from package `maven2' to `libcommons-cli-java'. retitle -1 Does not handle mulitple options (e.g. -D) Bug#469082: maven2: -D option on command line masks following goal definitions Changed Bug title to `Does not handle mulitple options (e.g. -D)' from `maven2: -D option on command line masks following goal definitions'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processed: tagging bugs that are closed by packages in NEW as pending
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW # tags 407253 pending Bug#407253: RFP: dmucs -- A distributed multi-user compilation system There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 426123 pending Bug#426123: ITP: notification-daemon-xfce -- a daemon that displays passive pop-up notifications There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 439725 pending Bug#439725: antlr: New upstream source (3.01) There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 468946 pending Bug#468946: ITP: libmodule-starter-perl -- a simple starter kit for Perl modules There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
grinvin 1.0.3.dfsg.1-1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the grinvin source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.0.2.dfsg.1-1 Current version: 1.0.3.dfsg.1-1 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
libyanfs-java 0.0+cvs20070825-2 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the libyanfs-java source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.0+cvs20070825-1 Current version: 0.0+cvs20070825-2 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
jarjar 1.0~rc6.dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the jarjar source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.0~rc3.dfsg.1-1 Current version: 1.0~rc6.dfsg-1 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
