Bug#733996: Generate a ‘closure-compiler’ binary package for the compiler program

2014-01-04 Thread Daniel Pocock 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256



On 05/01/14 06:16, tony mancill wrote:
> On 01/04/2014 07:07 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> 
>> The binary ‘closure-compiler’ package would install:
>> 
>> * the ‘/usr/bin/closure-compiler’ command (perhaps a symlink, as
>> now)
>> 
>> * the manpage (not yet written?)
>> 
>> * the ‘README’ file (or some subset the describes running the
>> compiler from the command line)
>> 
>> * maybe others
>> 
>> My main point in responding to your message is: the binary 
>> ‘closure-compiler’ package will not be empty. It will need to
>> install files distinct from the ‘libclosure-compiler-java’
>> package.
> 
> Hi Ben,
> 
> There isn't currently a manpage - the documentation I've seen
> regarding using it refers to invoking it as a jar file (see [0],
> and more generally [1]).  Given that all of the upstream
> documentation is focused on invoking it as a jar file, I think
> we're on our here, at least at the start.
> 
> I agree that the package should have a manpage if we're going to 
> continue to provide the /usr/bin/ symlink.  Daniel added this in
> the -3 upload.  If you or Daniel can contribute a manpage, that
> would be great.

In cases where upstream doesn't supply a man page, several packages
have created their own trivial man page and it is kept in
debian/something.1 or whatever, providing the bare minimum of information.

If we make a more comprehensive man page, we should try to contribute
it upstream so they will keep it in sync

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=nca8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

libnb-platform18-java_7.4+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-01-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters 

There was an uncaught exception when processing your upload:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_upload.py", line 213, in 
wrapper
return function(directory, upload, *args, **kwargs)
  File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_upload.py", line 305, in 
accept_to_new
upload.install_to_new()
  File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 1269, in 
install_to_new
(db_source, db_binaries) = self._install_to_suite(new_suite, 
source_component_func, binary_component_func, source_suites=True, 
extra_source_archives=[suite.archive])
  File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 976, in 
_install_to_suite
db_binary = self.transaction.install_binary(self.directory, binary, suite, 
component, fingerprint=self.fingerprint, source_suites=source_suites, 
extra_source_archives=extra_source_archives)
  File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 194, in 
install_binary
self._add_built_using(db_binary, binary.hashed_file.filename, control, 
suite, extra_archives=extra_source_archives)
  File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 249, in 
_add_built_using
assert comp == '=', 'Built-Using must contain strict dependencies'
AssertionError: Built-Using must contain strict dependencies

Any original reject reason follows below.


===

Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.


__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processing of libnb-platform18-java_7.4+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes

2014-01-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters 
libnb-platform18-java_7.4+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to 
localhost
along with the files:
  libnb-platform18-java_7.4+dfsg1-1.dsc
  libnb-platform18-java_7.4+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz
  libnb-platform18-java_7.4+dfsg1-1.debian.tar.gz
  libnb-platform18-java_7.4+dfsg1-1_all.deb
  libnb-platform-devel-java_7.4+dfsg1-1_all.deb
  libnb-platform18-java-doc_7.4+dfsg1-1_all.deb
  libnb-org-openide-util-java_7.4+dfsg1-1_all.deb
  libnb-org-openide-util-lookup-java_7.4+dfsg1-1_all.deb
  libnb-org-openide-modules-java_7.4+dfsg1-1_all.deb
  libnb-platform18-nbms-java_7.4+dfsg1-1_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#733996: closure-compiler: Install a useful manpage for ‘closure-compiler’ command

2014-01-04 Thread Ben Finney 
Package: src:closure-compiler
Version: 20130227+dfsg1-4
Severity: important


On 04-Jan-2014, tony mancill wrote:

> There isn't currently a manpage - the documentation I've seen regarding
> using it refers to invoking it as a jar file (see [0], and more generally
> [1]). Given that all of the upstream documentation is focused on invoking
> it as a jar file, I think we're on our here, at least at the start.

That's a familiar position for Debian package maintainers, yes.

I am reporting (with this message) a new bug for the missing
‘closure-compiler(1)’ manpage, per Debian policy §12.1:

 Each program, utility, and function should have an associated manual
 page included in the same package.  It is suggested that all
 configuration files also have a manual page included as well.  Manual
 pages for protocols and other auxiliary things are optional.

 If no manual page is available, this is considered as a bug and should
 be reported to the Debian Bug Tracking System (the maintainer of the
 package is allowed to write this bug report themselves, if they so
 desire).  Do not close the bug report until a proper man page is
 available.

> I agree that the package should have a manpage if we're going to continue
> to provide the /usr/bin/ symlink.

Right, and I think the ‘/usr/bin/closure-compiler’ command is very much
desirable (to allow using that command without needing to care about the
implementation). So I think adding a manpage is necessary.

> Daniel added this in the -3 upload. If you or Daniel can contribute a
> manpage, that would be great.

I will work on a suitable manpage and submit it to the bug report for this.

-- 
 \   “My aunt gave me a walkie-talkie for my birthday. She says if |
  `\I'm good, she'll give me the other one next year.” —Steven |
_o__)   Wright |
Ben Finney 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#733996: Generate a ‘closure-compiler’ binary package for the compiler program

2014-01-04 Thread Ben Finney 
On 04-Jan-2014, tony mancill wrote:
> On 01/04/2014 07:07 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> > […] the binary ‘closure-compiler’ package will not be empty. It will
> > need to install files distinct from the ‘libclosure-compiler-java’
> > package.
> 
> Currently, that manpage would be the only file in the binary package, as
> /usr/bin/closure-compiler will remain a symlink to the executable jar, so
> it's still going to be a very small package.

A small package shouldn't be a problem, if the package serves a purpose
distinct from any other package.

Since the binary ‘closure-compiler’ package will have distinct dependencies
from the dependencies of the other binary packages, be in a separate
section of the archive, etc. the small size shouldn't disqualify it from
entry into the archive.

-- 
 \  “A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. |
  `\Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in |
_o__)   principle is always a vice.” —Thomas Paine |
Ben Finney 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

migrating jblas from svn -> git

2014-01-04 Thread tony mancill 
Hello Fellow Java Maintainers:

I'd like migrate the jblas packaging repository from pkg-java on svn to
git.  Please let me know if you have any concerns, otherwise, I'll
migrate with the next upload, and drop a README in the jblas folder in
the svn repo.

Thank you,
tony



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#733996: Generate a ‘closure-compiler’ binary package for the compiler program

2014-01-04 Thread tony mancill 
On 01/04/2014 07:07 PM, Ben Finney wrote:

> The binary ‘closure-compiler’ package would install:
> 
> * the ‘/usr/bin/closure-compiler’ command (perhaps a symlink, as now)
> 
> * the manpage (not yet written?)
> 
> * the ‘README’ file (or some subset the describes running the compiler from
>   the command line)
> 
> * maybe others
> 
> My main point in responding to your message is: the binary
> ‘closure-compiler’ package will not be empty. It will need to install files
> distinct from the ‘libclosure-compiler-java’ package.

Hi Ben,

There isn't currently a manpage - the documentation I've seen regarding
using it refers to invoking it as a jar file (see [0], and more
generally [1]).  Given that all of the upstream documentation is focused
on invoking it as a jar file, I think we're on our here, at least at the
start.

I agree that the package should have a manpage if we're going to
continue to provide the /usr/bin/ symlink.  Daniel added this in the -3
upload.  If you or Daniel can contribute a manpage, that would be great.

Currently, that manpage would be the only file in the binary package, as
/usr/bin/closure-compiler will remain a symlink to the executable jar,
so it's still going to be a very small package.

Cheers,
tony

[0] https://developers.google.com/closure/compiler/docs/gettingstarted_app
[1] https://developers.google.com/closure/compiler/





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#733996: Generate a ‘closure-compiler’ binary package for the compiler program

2014-01-04 Thread Ben Finney 
(Trimming the list of recipients somewhat)

On 05-Jan-2014, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 11:50:36 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> > * a manpage for the command (required by Debian policy), which is
> >   extraneous for a libary package
> 
> That's not my interpretation of Debian Policy, or maybe I
> misunderstood you.

By placing the parenthetical where I did, it was intended only to apply to
“a manpage for the command”: i.e. every command in ‘/usr/bin/’ needs an
explanatory manpage.

The statement about library packages isn't an implication of the policy.

> So if closure-compiler can be executed it needs a manpage, no matter
> in which (kind) package under which name it is.

Right, which means:

> > No package providing a command should be empty; there needs to be the
> > command, and a manpage, at least. So this objection doesn't seem to apply
> > for bug#733996.
> 
> My understanding of the idea [0] was that the new closure-compiler
> package would only contain a symlink (and a dependency), since that
> actual "command" is the same jar as what is in
> libclosure-compiler-java [1].

Yet the command also needs a manpage. A separate ‘closure-compiler’ package
specifically for that command would also be the right place to have the
command's manpage; hence the binary ‘closure-compiler’ package would not be
empty.

> If that's the case, it still feels a bit odd to me.

There's also the fact that the ‘closure-compiler’ would have quite
different dependencies from ‘libclosure-compiler-java’, so that is also a
good reason to have distinct real binary packages. See Bug#733996.

> If I misunderstood the situation or there are other ideas on how to
> separate a binary and a library package, that's fine for me :)

(I think by “separate a binary and a library package”, you mean “separate
binary packages for a command and a library”. Apologies if I've
misunderstood you.)

I'm not familiar with packaging Java libraries, but I would think it
sufficient to do something like what I've described in Bug#733996. For
example, the ‘debian/control’ would have:

Source: closure-compiler
…

Package: libclosure-compiler-java
Section: java
Suggests: libclosure-compiler-java-doc
Description: JavaScript optimizing compiler — runtime libraries
…

Package: closure-compiler
Section: devel
Depends: default-jre-headless, libclosure-compiler-java
Description: JavaScript optimizing compiler
…

Package: libclosure-compiler-java-doc
Section: doc
Suggests: libclosure-compiler-java
Description: JavaScript optimizing compiler — API documentation
…

The binary ‘closure-compiler’ package would install:

* the ‘/usr/bin/closure-compiler’ command (perhaps a symlink, as now)

* the manpage (not yet written?)

* the ‘README’ file (or some subset the describes running the compiler from
  the command line)

* maybe others

My main point in responding to your message is: the binary
‘closure-compiler’ package will not be empty. It will need to install files
distinct from the ‘libclosure-compiler-java’ package.

-- 
 \   “I'm having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I feel like |
  `\  I've forgotten this before sometime.” —Steven Wright |
_o__)  |
Ben Finney 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Bug#733996: Generate a ‘closure-compiler’ binary package for the compiler program

2014-01-04 Thread gregor herrmann 
On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 11:50:36 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:


> On 31-Dec-2013, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > Can't this be solved with a simple
> > Provides: closure-compiler
> > in the libclosure-compiler-java package?
> > (Or the other way round.)
> 
> That doesn't address:
> 
> * a manpage for the command (required by Debian policy), which is
>   extraneous for a libary package

That's not my interpretation of Debian Policy, or maybe I
misunderstood you.

12.1.

 Each program, utility, and function should have an associated
 manual page included in the same package. It is suggested that
 all configuration files also have a manual page included as
 well. Manual pages for protocols and other auxiliary things are
 optional.
 
I can't find any reference to "library packages" or similar.

So if closure-compiler can be executed it needs a manpage, no matter
in which (kind) package under which name it is.

> > Having a de facto empty package doesn't seem very appealing to me.
> No package providing a command should be empty; there needs to be the
> command, and a manpage, at least. So this objection doesn't seem to apply
> for bug#733996.

My understanding of the idea [0] was that the new closure-compiler
package would only contain a symlink (and a dependency), since that
actual "command" is the same jar as what is in
libclosure-compiler-java [1].

If that's the case, it still feels a bit odd to me.

If I misunderstood the situation or there are other ideas on how to
separate a binary and a library package, that's fine for me :)


Cheers,
gregor


[0]
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705565#100 

[1]
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705565#90

-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Dire Straits: Lions


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#705565: Bug#733996: Generate a ‘closure-compiler’ binary package for the compiler program

2014-01-04 Thread Ben Finney 
On 30-Dec-2013, Thomas Koch wrote:
> closure compiler is also a library dependency, e.g. of gwt. It might be a
> good idea to provide two binary packages, one for the library jar and
> another one for the manpage + executable.

I have reported bug#733996 http://bugs.debian.org/733996> for this
request.


On 30-Dec-2013, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> On 30/12/13 21:03, tony mancill wrote:
> > I'm not sure if there is a best practice for executable JARs that are
> > used in both contexts, but adding an additional binary package doesn't
> > seem too bad.

It seems quite appropriate to me. Especially since Lintian (IMO correctly)
warns when a Java library package depends on a JRE package.

> I'll change my own packages to depend on closure-compiler when it exists

That's what I'm hoping for also.


On 31-Dec-2013, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Can't this be solved with a simple
> Provides: closure-compiler
> in the libclosure-compiler-java package?
> (Or the other way round.)

That doesn't address:

* a manpage for the command (required by Debian policy), which is
  extraneous for a libary package

* separate API documentation for the library, which is extraneous for a
  command package

* better focussed dependencies: the command package needs a JRE, the
  library package should not have that dependency

> Having a de facto empty package doesn't seem very appealing to me.

No package providing a command should be empty; there needs to be the
command, and a manpage, at least. So this objection doesn't seem to apply
for bug#733996.

-- 
 \“A life spent making mistakes is not only most honorable but |
  `\  more useful than a life spent doing nothing.” —anonymous |
_o__)  |
Ben Finney 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#733996: Generate a ‘closure-compiler’ binary package for the compiler program

2014-01-04 Thread tony mancill 
On 01/02/2014 04:00 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Package: src:closure-compiler
> Version: 20130227+dfsg1-4
> Severity: minor
> 
> Howdy, thank you for packaging the Closure compiler.
> 
> Searching APT for a package containing the Closure compiler command for
> compiling ECMAScript, I expect to find the package in the “web” section by
> the name ‘closure-compiler’.
> 
> I shouldn't need to care that it's implemented in Java, and am not
> expecting a command-line program to be classified in the library packages.
> 
> The source package should produce separate binary packages:
> [...]

Hi Ben,

The upload of 20130227+dfsg1-4 Provides "closure-compiler" so at least
it can be installed by this name now.

There is some discussion regarding this topic towards the end of #705565
[0], and as I understand the general consensus, developers aren't that
enthusiastic about an empty binary package.  I don't have a strong
opinion one way or the other as to whether being able to find the
package by section outweighs the need to prevent the creation of empty
binary packages.  However, given the recent discussion on debian-devel
about trying to avoid and/or collapse small packages into larger
packages, I tend to think that having the Provides is preferred, at
least for now.  It also has the benefit of not putting more burden on
the FTP team to view an upload that must go through the NEW queue.

Thanks,
tony

[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705565



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#726988: marked as done (findbugs: fails to build from source)

2014-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2014 22:33:26 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#726988: fixed in findbugs 2.0.3+repack-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #726988,
regarding findbugs: fails to build from source
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
726988: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726988
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: findbugs
Version: 2.0.2-1
Severity: important


The findbugs package fails to build from source with the following error 
messages:

generatemanual:
 [echo] Generating HTML version of manual
 [echo] Running saxon: /usr/share/java/saxon.jar
 [java] Error at xsl:import on line 8 of 
file:/home/ronny/lernstick/backports/wheezy/src/findbugs-2.0.2/doc/manual.xsl:
 [java]   Failure reading 
file:/Users/pugh/tools/docbook-xsl-1.76.1/html/chunk.xsl: 
/Users/pugh/tools/docbook-xsl-1.76.1/html/chunk.xsl (No such file or directory)
 [java] Transformation failed: Failed to compile stylesheet. 1 error 
detected.

BUILD FAILED
/home/ronny/lernstick/backports/wheezy/src/findbugs-2.0.2/build.xml:748: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
/home/ronny/lernstick/backports/wheezy/src/findbugs-2.0.2/build.xml:919: Java 
returned: 2

Total time: 11 seconds
make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_build] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory 
`/home/ronny/lernstick/backports/wheezy/src/findbugs-2.0.2'
make: *** [build] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
debuild: fatal error at line 1357:
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc -nc failed


Looks like the hard-coded path 
"/Users/pugh/tools/docbook-xsl-1.76.1/html/chunk.xsl" is the culprit here...
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: findbugs
Source-Version: 2.0.3+repack-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
findbugs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 726...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
James Page  (supplier of updated findbugs package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 22:11:39 +
Source: findbugs
Binary: findbugs
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.3+repack-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers 

Changed-By: James Page 
Description: 
 findbugs   - Static java code analyzer to find bugs
Closes: 726988 733186
Changes: 
 findbugs (2.0.3+repack-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * Install annotations.jar file and pom into /usr/share/maven-repo for
 use of findbugs annotations with projects that use maven.
   * Update orig-tar.sh to fully clean all generated sources from upstream
 tarball (Closes: #726988), repack 2.0.3 release.
   * d/p/0008-fix-docbook-ref.patch: Switch use of online docbookx.dtd
 to locally shipped copy to fixup offline builds (Closes: #733186).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 b150da2bf468af0bc09596ff2ba3cf58f31d7ed9 2391 findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1.dsc
 a64126c810f45d0c3dea5f5b13e8e6e82d590410 2319669 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack.orig.tar.bz2
 ab34f01a4772ddae93b786f6fd504eecd1b928c6 13234 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1.debian.tar.gz
 9fb0db6ef7a36116c72d60c614727edfd5fe4836 3427230 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 19a73dfd58a8910d6b3e59b95587b98fb1d651b3d4f4639ea25f69586d0110a2 2391 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1.dsc
 7bda0fa70205bba77173d617d7fb44c5e1780b855762691d22198692b1c73b7f 2319669 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack.orig.tar.bz2
 643eae70c83c3d5782419efb90ca431408fa62216c31fee143549dac86db877b 13234 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1.debian.tar.gz
 04f3c217b4d6706149e400b60bd106ac6bd7d0795b5fb823e37093a831cb99ee 3427230 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1_all.deb
Files: 
 0f57710908a5d8568e36b55eeb4172ac 2391 java extra findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1.dsc
 749e60897699859e614977e1d1a59ce3 2319669 java extra 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack.orig.tar.bz2
 800a472c1080df13fb8b00e47709494c 13234 java extra 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1.debian.tar.gz
 e2378b36f66a91c131fe735ead96a7cc 3427230 java extra 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIG

Bug#733186: marked as done (findbugs: FTBFS: Failure reading file:/home/andreas/temp/findbugs-2.0.3/doc/ja/../manual_ja.xml: findbugs.googlecode.com)

2014-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2014 22:33:26 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#733186: fixed in findbugs 2.0.3+repack-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #733186,
regarding findbugs: FTBFS: Failure reading 
file:/home/andreas/temp/findbugs-2.0.3/doc/ja/../manual_ja.xml: 
findbugs.googlecode.com
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
733186: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=733186
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: findbugs
Version: 2.0.3-1
Severity: serious

Hi there,

the package findbugs fails to build when no internet connection is
available:

>  [java] Writing manual/license.html for chapter(license)
>  [java] Writing manual/acknowledgments.html for chapter(acknowledgments)
>  [java] Writing manual/index.html for book(findbugs-manual)
>  [java] Error 
>  [java]   Failure reading 
> file:/home/andreas/temp/findbugs-2.0.3/doc/ja/../manual_ja.xml: 
> findbugs.googlecode.com
>  [java] Transformation failed: Run-time errors were reported
> 
> BUILD FAILED
> /home/andreas/temp/findbugs-2.0.3/build.xml:780: The following error occurred 
> while executing this line:
> /home/andreas/temp/findbugs-2.0.3/build.xml:962: Java returned: 2

Thanks for your time!

-- 
Andreas Moog, Berliner Str. 29, 36205 Sontra/Germany
PGP-encrypted mails preferred (Key-ID: 74DE6624)
PGP Fingerprint: 74CD D9FE 5BCB FE0D 13EE 8EEA 61F3 4426 74DE 6624



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: findbugs
Source-Version: 2.0.3+repack-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
findbugs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 733...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
James Page  (supplier of updated findbugs package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 22:11:39 +
Source: findbugs
Binary: findbugs
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.3+repack-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers 

Changed-By: James Page 
Description: 
 findbugs   - Static java code analyzer to find bugs
Closes: 726988 733186
Changes: 
 findbugs (2.0.3+repack-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * Install annotations.jar file and pom into /usr/share/maven-repo for
 use of findbugs annotations with projects that use maven.
   * Update orig-tar.sh to fully clean all generated sources from upstream
 tarball (Closes: #726988), repack 2.0.3 release.
   * d/p/0008-fix-docbook-ref.patch: Switch use of online docbookx.dtd
 to locally shipped copy to fixup offline builds (Closes: #733186).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 b150da2bf468af0bc09596ff2ba3cf58f31d7ed9 2391 findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1.dsc
 a64126c810f45d0c3dea5f5b13e8e6e82d590410 2319669 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack.orig.tar.bz2
 ab34f01a4772ddae93b786f6fd504eecd1b928c6 13234 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1.debian.tar.gz
 9fb0db6ef7a36116c72d60c614727edfd5fe4836 3427230 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 19a73dfd58a8910d6b3e59b95587b98fb1d651b3d4f4639ea25f69586d0110a2 2391 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1.dsc
 7bda0fa70205bba77173d617d7fb44c5e1780b855762691d22198692b1c73b7f 2319669 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack.orig.tar.bz2
 643eae70c83c3d5782419efb90ca431408fa62216c31fee143549dac86db877b 13234 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1.debian.tar.gz
 04f3c217b4d6706149e400b60bd106ac6bd7d0795b5fb823e37093a831cb99ee 3427230 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1_all.deb
Files: 
 0f57710908a5d8568e36b55eeb4172ac 2391 java extra findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1.dsc
 749e60897699859e614977e1d1a59ce3 2319669 java extra 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack.orig.tar.bz2
 800a472c1080df13fb8b00e47709494c 13234 java extra 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1.debian.tar.gz
 e2378b36f66a91c131fe735ead96a7cc 3427230 java extra 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSyIg9AAoJEL/srsug59jDNQgQAJurVP71pAYyeEaA9IouJSKe
jzh+BM+7qfJgSnrtYQfKngGa2YdDwSfYlvqvD+9gBWz5dp3CpQ/+HBeZxp51BUQu
t1VxRvlNUazaGu5fiGB95T4TIL5Am532AgM0Z9stuvJeGdhGyZ2wihS7jjXcJAU1
lcAoeSojcO6t2OZa8W

findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2014-01-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters 


Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 22:11:39 +
Source: findbugs
Binary: findbugs
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.3+repack-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers 

Changed-By: James Page 
Description: 
 findbugs   - Static java code analyzer to find bugs
Closes: 726988 733186
Changes: 
 findbugs (2.0.3+repack-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * Install annotations.jar file and pom into /usr/share/maven-repo for
 use of findbugs annotations with projects that use maven.
   * Update orig-tar.sh to fully clean all generated sources from upstream
 tarball (Closes: #726988), repack 2.0.3 release.
   * d/p/0008-fix-docbook-ref.patch: Switch use of online docbookx.dtd
 to locally shipped copy to fixup offline builds (Closes: #733186).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 b150da2bf468af0bc09596ff2ba3cf58f31d7ed9 2391 findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1.dsc
 a64126c810f45d0c3dea5f5b13e8e6e82d590410 2319669 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack.orig.tar.bz2
 ab34f01a4772ddae93b786f6fd504eecd1b928c6 13234 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1.debian.tar.gz
 9fb0db6ef7a36116c72d60c614727edfd5fe4836 3427230 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 19a73dfd58a8910d6b3e59b95587b98fb1d651b3d4f4639ea25f69586d0110a2 2391 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1.dsc
 7bda0fa70205bba77173d617d7fb44c5e1780b855762691d22198692b1c73b7f 2319669 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack.orig.tar.bz2
 643eae70c83c3d5782419efb90ca431408fa62216c31fee143549dac86db877b 13234 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1.debian.tar.gz
 04f3c217b4d6706149e400b60bd106ac6bd7d0795b5fb823e37093a831cb99ee 3427230 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1_all.deb
Files: 
 0f57710908a5d8568e36b55eeb4172ac 2391 java extra findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1.dsc
 749e60897699859e614977e1d1a59ce3 2319669 java extra 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack.orig.tar.bz2
 800a472c1080df13fb8b00e47709494c 13234 java extra 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1.debian.tar.gz
 e2378b36f66a91c131fe735ead96a7cc 3427230 java extra 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
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=sCXn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processing of findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1_i386.changes

2014-01-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters 
findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1.dsc
  findbugs_2.0.3+repack.orig.tar.bz2
  findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1.debian.tar.gz
  findbugs_2.0.3+repack-1_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: jessie

2014-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 730352 + sid jessie
Bug #730352 [isl] libisl-dev: /usr/include/isl/union_map.h:114:45: error: 
unknown type name 'isl_multi_aff'
Added tag(s) sid and jessie.
> tags 732848 + sid jessie
Bug #732848 [gimp-plugin-registry] gimp-plugin-registry: Packages uninstallable
Added tag(s) sid and jessie.
> tags 707903 + sid jessie
Bug #707903 [drgeo] drgeo: please migrate to guile-2.0
Added tag(s) sid and jessie.
> tags 731783 + sid jessie
Bug #731783 [freehdl] freehdl: please migrate to guile-2.0
Added tag(s) sid and jessie.
> tags 731784 + sid jessie
Bug #731784 [bobot++] bobot++: please migrate to guile-2.0
Added tag(s) sid and jessie.
> tags 731786 + sid jessie
Bug #731786 [q-tools] q-tools: please migrate to guile-2.0
Added tag(s) sid and jessie.
> tags 733012 + sid jessie
Bug #733012 [src:mojarra] mojarra: FTBFS: error: package 
javax.faces.component.html does not exist
Added tag(s) sid and jessie.
> tags 734168 + sid jessie
Bug #734168 [wzdftpd] Should this package be removed?
Added tag(s) sid and jessie.
> tags 707903 + sid jessie
Bug #707903 [drgeo] drgeo: please migrate to guile-2.0
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #707903 to the same tags previously set
> severity 733157 important
Bug #733157 {Done: Cédric Boutillier } [ruby-gd] ruby-gd: 
undefined method newFromJpeg and new_from_jpeg
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> retitle 734168 wzdftpd - should this package be removed?
Bug #734168 [wzdftpd] Should this package be removed?
Changed Bug title to 'wzdftpd - should this package be removed?' from 'Should 
this package be removed?'
> found 730352 0.12.1-1
Bug #730352 [isl] libisl-dev: /usr/include/isl/union_map.h:114:45: error: 
unknown type name 'isl_multi_aff'
There is no source info for the package 'isl' at version '0.12.1-1' with 
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '0.12.1-1'
Marked as found in versions 0.12.1-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
707903: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707903
730352: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=730352
731783: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731783
731784: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731784
731786: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731786
732848: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732848
733012: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=733012
733157: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=733157
734168: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734168
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#733773: marked as done (jblas - please migrate to ruby 1.9/2.0)

2014-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2014 21:20:22 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#733773: fixed in jblas 1.2.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #733773,
regarding jblas - please migrate to ruby 1.9/2.0
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
733773: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=733773
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: jblas
Version: 1.2.0-4
Severity: important
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby18-removal

Hi,

Your package "jblas" Build-Depends on ruby1.8, which is an old,
upstream unmaintained version of the Ruby interpreter.
The Debian Ruby team plans to get rid of it soon.

Please change your package to use Ruby 1.9 or 2.0. The "ruby"
metapackage depends on the current default interpreter version.

Thanks,
-- 
 ,''`.  Christian Hofstaedtler 
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   7D1A CFFA D9E0 806C 9C4C  D392 5C13 D6DB 9305 2E03
  `-
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: jblas
Source-Version: 1.2.0-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
jblas, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 733...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
tony mancill  (supplier of updated jblas package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 12:29:52 -0800
Source: jblas
Binary: jblas jblas-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.2.0-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers 

Changed-By: tony mancill 
Description: 
 jblas  - fast linear algebra library for Java
 jblas-doc  - fast linear algebra library for Java
Closes: 733773
Changes: 
 jblas (1.2.0-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * Add build-with-ruby19.patch (Closes: #733773)
 - package now has build-dep on locales
   * Enable tests.
 - package now has build-dep on junit4
   * Update Vcs URLs to be canonical.
   * Depend on DH 9.
   * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.5 (no changes).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 2e6049d9ad6af7391c872651926ab49b60eaf7fc 2040 jblas_1.2.0-5.dsc
 ccc2713a3cc5fb10768dc73a9d973b9f04b7fd09 4508 jblas_1.2.0-5.debian.tar.gz
 0f0fe7fa182edf1f42b4df6375f0463b1322aeed 225608 jblas-doc_1.2.0-5_all.deb
 832fac9abcbda8dc842f4d5a93f610ef8e672e44 137180 jblas_1.2.0-5_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 a1c34bf385b3140b66e77a739ab614c512ccc00c8c8d4c23297a4f033a426aa1 2040 
jblas_1.2.0-5.dsc
 2d809484d39e83d4c3e7611377f9415bf8bc8cebf67a2bb07fd5bba8514761d3 4508 
jblas_1.2.0-5.debian.tar.gz
 80f37162f767656930f400f0a1cecba0f3e4da04c3160bf0fd2713b8ec4340f0 225608 
jblas-doc_1.2.0-5_all.deb
 5212c72e868d483366ffa0808585a95bc7825b85e2323f7c10534af6f7696012 137180 
jblas_1.2.0-5_amd64.deb
Files: 
 743f750ad76f34207a5f96fd0feb8d91 2040 science optional jblas_1.2.0-5.dsc
 8d93e8667a8135447510ef1978cffc15 4508 science optional 
jblas_1.2.0-5.debian.tar.gz
 00210c15abd4d78602c3537925078596 225608 doc optional jblas-doc_1.2.0-5_all.deb
 2bf22e142c1dcfe70b02ed8fc41bcadb 137180 science optional 
jblas_1.2.0-5_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
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=v5C/
-END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

jblas_1.2.0-5_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2014-01-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters 


Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 12:29:52 -0800
Source: jblas
Binary: jblas jblas-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.2.0-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers 

Changed-By: tony mancill 
Description: 
 jblas  - fast linear algebra library for Java
 jblas-doc  - fast linear algebra library for Java
Closes: 733773
Changes: 
 jblas (1.2.0-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * Add build-with-ruby19.patch (Closes: #733773)
 - package now has build-dep on locales
   * Enable tests.
 - package now has build-dep on junit4
   * Update Vcs URLs to be canonical.
   * Depend on DH 9.
   * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.5 (no changes).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 2e6049d9ad6af7391c872651926ab49b60eaf7fc 2040 jblas_1.2.0-5.dsc
 ccc2713a3cc5fb10768dc73a9d973b9f04b7fd09 4508 jblas_1.2.0-5.debian.tar.gz
 0f0fe7fa182edf1f42b4df6375f0463b1322aeed 225608 jblas-doc_1.2.0-5_all.deb
 832fac9abcbda8dc842f4d5a93f610ef8e672e44 137180 jblas_1.2.0-5_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 a1c34bf385b3140b66e77a739ab614c512ccc00c8c8d4c23297a4f033a426aa1 2040 
jblas_1.2.0-5.dsc
 2d809484d39e83d4c3e7611377f9415bf8bc8cebf67a2bb07fd5bba8514761d3 4508 
jblas_1.2.0-5.debian.tar.gz
 80f37162f767656930f400f0a1cecba0f3e4da04c3160bf0fd2713b8ec4340f0 225608 
jblas-doc_1.2.0-5_all.deb
 5212c72e868d483366ffa0808585a95bc7825b85e2323f7c10534af6f7696012 137180 
jblas_1.2.0-5_amd64.deb
Files: 
 743f750ad76f34207a5f96fd0feb8d91 2040 science optional jblas_1.2.0-5.dsc
 8d93e8667a8135447510ef1978cffc15 4508 science optional 
jblas_1.2.0-5.debian.tar.gz
 00210c15abd4d78602c3537925078596 225608 doc optional jblas-doc_1.2.0-5_all.deb
 2bf22e142c1dcfe70b02ed8fc41bcadb 137180 science optional 
jblas_1.2.0-5_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJSyHI6AAoJECHSBYmXSz6W2sIQALzbewCOLHzHxiHY7Z9e0cTE
opb+b71CKbi6aHb2A26q+B2A5nnCsgvmX9fyiOFIwzG4oYOdMSNoqoSaoVKJxKSC
JpO9oHyhaBKjqDZ8O9v41WuQ9e4hGCEGksrOJthEu15pvp0MIcsjZET0BdMxbPzE
KvHBQpaELCSQEcb2F2khF0PTvk2ykROBwtlaWRIVEAt2gHrj44DvjDDXeV57pOuS
gdROQ16NJzcpniHKELTj4wILmdnp5rihcD+XSd6cC0AO1RGGG+t9kYK+L7Xn4UUh
R8OCBzC2kRmQoOeZ6EF0y54gnsdbmxPqWkVbPUg9mK0O59g/rBkFn8fnZ5r/n+um
1xLcgNFB3zfvP8UeXncUx/3EPtvfyzctHOb+n0a/5DtGbVWdQXMefEJZic1SQ81X
LVky05g09QGzKp4OTom44Ksk+W7ETi5XsMX/7McjVUN8YKdmM4u2zG1FHh0Wkr0+
i4binAyNuFy9Rkmy9GJiqZHqB70AVk6DOslB+AWdznrzi03VkGvvh1B36+avcAzQ
rDLmoTmSxsnBnDICwWpPHaTqetvMyYKXGYgMhQMTNmfRDxeQJJ/4nHTC+4qgksoQ
nf4h45hpj0vbeeXqEplVu96B++1IvFvOmUlPVlw/mDZHP0wpqEPr1q08ucLzEise
z0rV3V+nYGNzDq52nmeu
=v5C/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processing of jblas_1.2.0-5_amd64.changes

2014-01-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters 
jblas_1.2.0-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  jblas_1.2.0-5.dsc
  jblas_1.2.0-5.debian.tar.gz
  jblas-doc_1.2.0-5_all.deb
  jblas_1.2.0-5_amd64.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: tagging 733773

2014-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 733773 + pending
Bug #733773 [jblas] jblas - please migrate to ruby 1.9/2.0
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
733773: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=733773
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

tomcat7 7.0.47-1 MIGRATED to testing

2014-01-04 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the tomcat7 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 7.0.42-1
  Current version:  7.0.47-1

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

libnb-javaparser-java 7.4-1 MIGRATED to testing

2014-01-04 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the libnb-javaparser-java source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 7.3-1
  Current version:  7.4-1

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

tomcat-native 1.1.29-1 MIGRATED to testing

2014-01-04 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the tomcat-native source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.1.27-1
  Current version:  1.1.29-1

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

jenkins REMOVED from testing

2014-01-04 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the jenkins source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.509.2+dfsg-2
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
# 730457,730695

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.