Bug#750643: antlr: missing licence for PyANTLR
Hello Debian, the PyAntlr extension of Antlr consists of two software parts: (1) A generator source code located in antlr/actions/python ; and a (2) runt-time library located in lib/python I herewith declare, that o part (1) has been released into the wild under the conditions of license http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause ; and further, that o part (2) has been released into the wild under the conditions of license GPL version 3 or later (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt) // Wolfgang Häfelinger On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de wrote: wolfgang haefelinger dixit: Discussed this with the original author of Antlr. The lights are on red for a new 2.7 release and I'm currently not willing to create a fork. Sure. Let’s just add editorial notes from Terence and you to clean up the licence situation. We will put that into debian/copyright, and you (Terence, probably) can put it up on the website, and that should be everything anyone could ever need. which is why the “LICENSE.txt” of Antlr itself does not work for you. (Side fact: it’s misnamed because PD means absence of the need for a licence.) What file name does Debian then propose? This is not about Debian (they do not ship those files anyway, but collect all licencing information in a central file) but about PD versus licences. But this does not matter – we’re not re-releasing, so we just put the updated info “somewhere”, and everything is good. Besides, with the proposed language I sent to Terence, there would be a licence, so this point is moot anyway. 1) antlr/actions/python/ 2) lib/python/ My statement is then: o All source code packed with (1) is released in terms of the BSD software license. That is one of these? * http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause * http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause p All source code packed with (2) is released in terms of the GPL software license. This also, unfortunately, has got several options… * GPL, any version * GPL version 2 only * GPL version 2 or later * GPL version 3 only * GPL version 3 or later * GPL version (1 or) 2 or 3 only So, can you help me reformulate them so that they look proper and can be used in an official statement? Yes, of course. Just solve the above choices ;-) Second, how shall I transmit this statement to Debian? There is a half-backed website [1] - maintained by me - where I could put those license details. Just per eMail to this bugreport is enough. It would be good if you can PGP sign it, but that’s not been required until now. If you update a website, sure, put it up there. Otherwise, I’d suggest (once finished) you also send it to Terence, so it can be shown at the official Antlr site. Thanks for your patience! bye, //mirabilos -- igli exceptions: a truly awful implementation of quite a nice idea. igli just about the worst way you could do something like that, afaic. igli it's like anti-design. mirabilos that too… may I quote you on that? igli sure, tho i doubt anyone will listen ;) -- Wolfgang Häfelinger häfelinger IT - Applied Software Architecture http://www.haefelinger.it +49 1520 32 52 981 (+31 648 27 61 59) __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#757923: Subject:
Package: eclipse Version: indigo, Kepler, Luna I am using Ubuntu and reported it on Launchpad here https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+bug/1355182 I have tested it on Debian on a virtual machine and the problem exists there too. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#702879: 1.0.x format is not backward compatible with 0.9
Windows users installing the default 1.0.x version are now generating *.mm files that will no longer load in previous versions. This hurts interoperability between Debian / Ubuntu and Windows. I've been running an unpacked archived copy of the 1.0.1 version out of /opt for a while and not noticed any issues. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
libphonenumber_6.2~svn671-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Daniel, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing licenses of (and maybe others): libphonenumber\cpp\src\phonenumbers\base\basictypes.h libphonenumber\cpp\src\phonenumbers\base\memory\scoped_ptr.h libphonenumber\cpp\src\phonenumbers\base\strings\string_piece.cc libphonenumber\cpp\src\phonenumbers\base\strings\string_piece.h libphonenumber\cpp\src\phonenumbers\utf\rune.c libphonenumber\cpp\src\phonenumbers\utf\utf.h libphonenumber\tools\cpp\src\base\basictypes.h to your debian/copyright. Can you please also explain where I can find the sources of the embedded jar files? Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
libphonenumber_6.2~svn665-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
same reason as newer version === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#757946: java-package: fatal errors while building plugin
Package: java-package Version: 0.56 Severity: normal This is a log. Just look for the string error:. $ fakeroot make-jpkg /tmp/jdk-8u11-linux-x64.tar.gz Creating temporary directory: /tmp/make-jpkg.bfFvlvLDbp Loading plugins: /usr/share/java-package/common.sh /usr/share/java-package/javase.sh /usr/share/java-package/jdk-doc.sh /usr/share/java-package/jdk.sh /usr/share/java-package/jre.sh /usr/share/java-package/oracle-jdk-doc.sh /usr/share/java-package/oracle-jdk.sh /usr/share/java-package/oracle-jre.sh Detected Debian build architecture: amd64 Detected Debian GNU type: x86_64-linux-gnu Detected product: Java(TM) Development Kit (JDK) Standard Edition, Version 8 Update 11 Oracle(TM) Is this correct [Y/n]: Checking free diskspace: done. In the next step, the binary file will be extracted. Probably a license agreement will be displayed. Please read this agreement carefully. If you do not agree to the displayed license terms, the package will not be built. Press [Return] to continue: Testing extracted archive... okay. Create debian package: dpkg-buildpackage: source package oracle-java8-jdk dpkg-buildpackage: source version 8u11 dpkg-buildpackage: source distribution unstable dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Debian Java Maintainers pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture amd64 dpkg-source --before-build package debian/rules clean dh clean dh_testdir dh_auto_clean dh_clean debian/rules build dh build dh_testdir dh_auto_configure dh_auto_build dh_auto_test debian/rules binary dh binary dh_testroot dh_prep dh_auto_install dh_install dh_installdocs dh_installchangelogs dh_perl dh_link debian/rules override_dh_compress make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/make-jpkg.bfFvlvLDbp/package' dh_compress usr/lib/jvm//jdk-8-oracle-x64/man/ja_JP.UTF-8/man1/jsadebugd.1 usr/lib/jvm//jdk-8-oracle-x64/man/ja_JP.UTF-8/man1/jstat.1 usr/lib/jvm//jdk-8-oracle-x64/man/ja_JP.UTF-8/man1/javaws.1 usr/lib/jvm//jdk-8-oracle-x64/man/ja_JP.UTF-8/man1/jmc.1 usr/lib/jvm//jdk-8-oracle-x64/man/ja_JP.UTF-8/man1/rmid.1 usr/lib/jvm//jdk-8-oracle-x64/man/ja_JP.UTF-8/man1/javah.1 usr/lib/jvm//jdk-8-oracle-x64/man/ja_JP.UTF-8/man1/jstack.1 usr/lib/jvm//jdk-8-oracle-x64/man/ja_JP.UTF-8/man1/keytool.1 usr/lib/jvm//jdk-8-oracle-x64/man/ja_JP.UTF-8/man1/appletviewer.1 usr/lib/jvm//jdk-8-oracle-x64/man/ja_JP.UTF-8/man1/jdb.1 usr/lib/jvm//jdk-8-oracle-x64/man/ja_JP.UTF-8/man1/extcheck.1 usr/lib/jvm//jdk-8-oracle-x64/man/ja_JP.UTF-8/man1/unpack200.1 usr/lib/jvm//jdk-8-oracle-x64/man/ja_JP.UTF-8/man1/rmic.1 usr/lib/jvm//jdk-8-oracle-x64/man/ja_JP.UTF-8/man1/jrunscript.1 usr/lib/jvm//jdk-8-oracle-x64/man/ja_JP.UTF-8/man1/jmap.1 usr/lib/jvm//jdk-8-oracle-x64/man/ja_JP.UTF-8/man1/rmiregistry.1 usr/lib/jvm//jdk -8-oracle-x64/man/ja_JP. make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/make-jpkg.bfFvlvLDbp/package' dh_fixperms dh_strip dh_makeshlibs debian/rules override_dh_shlibdeps make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/make-jpkg.bfFvlvLDbp/package' dh_shlibdeps --exclude=fxavcodecplugin --exclude=avplugin -lusr/lib/jvm//jdk-8-oracle-x64/jre/lib/amd64:usr/lib/jvm//jdk-8-oracle-x64/jre/lib/amd64/jli:usr/lib/jvm//jdk-8-oracle-x64/jre/lib/amd64/server:usr/lib/jvm//jdk-8-oracle-x64/lib/amd64:usr/lib/jvm//jdk-8-oracle-x64/lib/amd64/jli:usr/lib/jvm//jdk-8-oracle-x64/lib/missioncontrol:usr/lib/jvm//jdk-8-oracle-x64/lib/missioncontrol/plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.gtk.linux.x86_64_1.1.200.v20120913-144807:usr/lib/jvm//jdk-8-oracle-x64/lib/visualvm/profiler/lib/deployed/jdk15/linux-amd64:usr/lib/jvm//jdk-8-oracle-x64/lib/visualvm/profiler/lib/deployed/jdk16/linux-amd64 dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libpthread.so.0 needed by debian/oracle-java8-jdk/usr/lib/jvm/jdk-8-oracle-x64/bin/jsadebugd (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64'; RPATH: '/usr/lib/jvm/jdk-8-oracle-x64/bin/../lib/amd64/jli:/usr/lib/jvm/jdk-8-oracle-x64/bin/../lib/amd64') dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libdl.so.2 needed by debian/oracle-java8-jdk/usr/lib/jvm/jdk-8-oracle-x64/bin/jsadebugd (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64'; RPATH: '/usr/lib/jvm/jdk-8-oracle-x64/bin/../lib/amd64/jli:/usr/lib/jvm/jdk-8-oracle-x64/bin/../lib/amd64') dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libc.so.6 needed by debian/oracle-java8-jdk/usr/lib/jvm/jdk-8-oracle-x64/bin/jsadebugd (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64'; RPATH: '/usr/lib/jvm/jdk-8-oracle-x64/bin/../lib/amd64/jli:/usr/lib/jvm/jdk-8-oracle-x64/bin/../lib/amd64') dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: can't extract name and version from library name 'libjli.so' dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: can't extract name and version from library name 'libjli.so' dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: can't extract name and version from library name 'libjli.so' dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: can't extract name and version from library name 'libjli.so' dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libpthread.so.0 needed by
backport-util-concurrent REMOVED from testing
FYI: The status of the backport-util-concurrent source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 3.1-3 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Package not in unstable The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals. -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
libspring-webflow-2.0-java 2.0.9.RELEASE-5 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the libspring-webflow-2.0-java source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.0.9.RELEASE-4 Current version: 2.0.9.RELEASE-5 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processing of libphonenumber_6.3~svn680-1_amd64.changes
libphonenumber_6.3~svn680-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libphonenumber_6.3~svn680-1.dsc libphonenumber_6.3~svn680.orig.tar.bz2 libphonenumber_6.3~svn680-1.debian.tar.gz libphonenumber6-dev_6.3~svn680-1_amd64.deb libphonenumber6_6.3~svn680-1_amd64.deb libphonenumber6-java_6.3~svn680-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
libphonenumber_6.3~svn680-1_amd64.changes is NEW
binary:libphonenumber6-dev is NEW. binary:libphonenumber6 is NEW. binary:libphonenumber6-java is NEW. source:libphonenumber is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel free to browse the NEW queue[1]. If there is an issue with the upload, you will recieve an email from a member of the ftpteam. If you have any questions, you may reply to this email. [1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
