reproducible.debian.net status changes for sisu-guice

2017-07-13 Thread Reproducible builds folks 
2017-07-13 00:09 
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/sisu-guice changed 
from reproducible -> FTBFS

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

reproducible.debian.net status changes for jakarta-jmeter

2017-07-13 Thread Reproducible builds folks 
2017-07-09 11:34 
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/jakarta-jmeter 
changed from unreproducible -> FTBFS

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

reproducible.debian.net status changes for commons-io

2017-07-13 Thread Reproducible builds folks 
2017-07-13 12:57 
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/commons-io changed 
from FTBFS -> reproducible

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

reproducible.debian.net status changes for jarjar

2017-07-13 Thread Reproducible builds folks 
2017-07-09 11:36 
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/jarjar changed from 
reproducible -> FTBFS

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

reproducible.debian.net status changes for maven-war-plugin

2017-07-13 Thread Reproducible builds folks 
2017-07-09 04:34 
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/maven-war-plugin 
changed from reproducible -> FTBFS

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

reproducible.debian.net status changes for jenkins-trilead-ssh2

2017-07-13 Thread Reproducible builds folks 
2017-07-09 09:33 
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/jenkins-trilead-ssh2
 changed from unreproducible -> reproducible

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

reproducible.debian.net status changes for libxbean-java

2017-07-13 Thread Reproducible builds folks 
2017-07-10 17:11 
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/libxbean-java 
changed from FTBFS -> unreproducible

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

reproducible.debian.net status changes for xmlgraphics-commons

2017-07-13 Thread Reproducible builds folks 
2017-07-13 01:11 
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/xmlgraphics-commons 
changed from unreproducible -> reproducible

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Fwd: Bug#867538: fop: Please implement sidebars floating at the side of the body of the text

2017-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 867538 upstream
Bug #867538 [fop] fop: Please implement sidebars floating at the side of the 
body of the text
Added tag(s) upstream.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
867538: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=867538
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Reproducible NetBeans

2017-07-13 Thread Markus Koschany 
Hello,

Am 13.07.2017 um 19:41 schrieb Emilian Bold:
> Hello,
> 
> I knew about reproducible-builds.org but I had no idea you are
> building NetBeans too
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/stretch/amd64/netbeans.html
> 
> Which seems to be failing at the moment.

Netbeans is currently maintained by Debian's Java team but I am more or
less the sole human maintainer. You will find more useful information
and links about Netbeans in Debian at
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/netbeans .
The reproducible builds effort is coordinated by the Reproducible builds
team. [1] I suggest to join their mailing list or IRC channel if you are
interested in this topic. They will surely help you to get a
reproducible build environment running. See also [2] for more links.

> I've also looked into reproducible builds for Apache NetBeans a while
> back and have a draft patch prepared for when we start doing builds
> under Apache (see
> https://github.com/emilianbold/reproducible-nextbeans/commits/master )
> 
> So, do you need any help? Do you have patches I could integrate upstream?
> 
> I'm looking at 
> https://sources.debian.net/src/netbeans/8.1%2Bdfsg3-2/debian/patches/reproducible-build.patch/
> and the reproducible patch is very small.

The reproducible-build.patch is straightforward. In general I suggest
you should prune Netbeans of any timestamps. In this case I chose a
fixed date for the installation time but I'm sure there is a better
solution. There are more issues with embedded timestamps in zip files
but I haven't started to work on it.

I would gladly accept help and recommendations how to maintain Netbeans
for Debian long term. We are the only Linux distribution that provides a
self-contained build of Netbeans. As you can see at [3] we carry a lot
of patches despite the fact that we only build the basic cluster, the
core of Netbeans. Most issues stem from using Debian packages for
building Netbeans instead of downloading them from your repository. All
patches that are prefixed with netbeans-* either deal with disabling
downloads from untrusted sources or fixing build failures due to
unavailable build-dependencies. The third category of patches deals with
incompatibilities between different versions of dependencies. Sometimes
we ship older packages but often also newer ones and the patches try to
fix or work around those discrepancies.

So in short: I believe most of them are Debian specific unless you
completely change your build system.

> I assume you also apply strip-nondeterminism on the output archives?

Yes, that's correct. However this tool is part of
dh-strip-nondeterminism [4] which is automatically called by dh, a core
tool of debhelper which is used by the majority of all Debian packages.
It is not specific to Debian's Netbeans package.

> I would also appreciate a quickstart on getting the Debian
> reproducible build environment setup on a machine so I can test it
> myself.

As previously suggested I would ask the reproducible builds team for
help here. [1]

Regards,

Markus

> This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
> .
>  Please use
> debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
> 

[1] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Contribute
[2] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds
[3]
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/netbeans.git/tree/debian/patches
[4] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/strip-nondeterminism



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#867538: fop: Please implement sidebars floating at the side of the body of the text

2017-07-13 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen 
Control: reopen -1
Control: forward -1 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2727

[Mathieu Malaterre]
> Please re-open and forward it upstream.

Done.

-- 
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#867538: fop: Please implement sidebars floating at the side of the body of the text

2017-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing control commands:

> reopen -1
Bug #867538 {Done: Mathieu Malaterre } [fop] fop: Please 
implement sidebars floating at the side of the body of the text
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions fop/1:2.1-6.
> forward -1 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2727
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.


-- 
867538: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=867538
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#867538: fop: Please implement sidebars floating at the side of the body of the text

2017-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> forwarded 867538 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2727
Bug #867538 [fop] fop: Please implement sidebars floating at the side of the 
body of the text
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2727'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
867538: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=867538
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#868074: marked as done (libfelix-bundlerepository-java: missing requirement osgi.wiring.package; (&(osgi.wiring.package=org.osgi.service.repository)(version>=1.0.0)(!(version>=1.1.0)))))

2017-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Thu, 13 Jul 2017 18:19:01 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#868074: fixed in felix-bundlerepository 2.0.10-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #868074,
regarding libfelix-bundlerepository-java: missing requirement 
osgi.wiring.package; 
(&(osgi.wiring.package=org.osgi.service.repository)(version>=1.0.0)(!(version>=1.1.0
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
868074: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=868074
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libfelix-bundlerepository-java
Version: 2.0.10-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Bundle fails to start due to a missing requirement:

--8<---cut here---start->8---
$ felix-framework
ERROR: Bundle org.apache.felix.bundlerepository [16] Error starting 
file:/usr/share/felix-framework/bundle/org.apache.felix.bundlerepository.jar 
(org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle 
org.apache.felix.bundlerepository [16]: Unable to resolve 16.0: missing 
requirement [16.0] osgi.wiring.package; 
(&(osgi.wiring.package=org.osgi.service.repository)(version>=1.0.0)(!(version>=1.1.0
org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle 
org.apache.felix.bundlerepository [16]: Unable to resolve 16.0: missing 
requirement [16.0] osgi.wiring.package; 
(&(osgi.wiring.package=org.osgi.service.repository)(version>=1.0.0)(!(version>=1.1.0)))
at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.resolveBundleRevision(Felix.java:4097)
at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.startBundle(Felix.java:2114)
at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.setActiveStartLevel(Felix.java:1368)
at 
org.apache.felix.framework.FrameworkStartLevelImpl.run(FrameworkStartLevelImpl.java:308)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)

Welcome to Apache Felix Gogo

g! lb
START LEVEL 1
   ID|State  |Level|Name
0|Active |0|System Bundle (4.6.1)
2|Active |1|Apache Felix Gogo Command (0.14.0)
3|Active |1|Apache Felix Gogo Runtime (0.16.2)
4|Active |1|Apache Felix Gogo Shell (0.12.0)
   16|Installed  |1|Apache Felix Bundle Repository (2.0.10)
g!
--8<---cut here---end--->8---

Downgrading back to 2.0.8 fixes this problem.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers oldoldstable
  APT policy: (500, 'oldoldstable'), (500, 'stable'), (70, 'unstable'), (60, 
'testing'), (50, 'experimental'), (40, 'oldstable')
Architecture: amd64
 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.11.0-1-rt-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages libfelix-bundlerepository-java depends on:
ii  libeasymock-java   3.4+ds-1
ii  libosgi-core-java  6.0.0-1

Versions of packages libfelix-bundlerepository-java recommends:
ii  libfelix-gogo-runtime-java  0.16.2-1
pn  libfelix-osgi-obr-java  
pn  libfelix-shell-java 
pn  libfelix-utils-java 
pn  libkxml2-java   
ii  libosgi-compendium-java 5.0.0-5

Versions of packages libfelix-bundlerepository-java suggests:
pn  libfelix-bundlerepository-java-doc  

-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: felix-bundlerepository
Source-Version: 2.0.10-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
felix-bundlerepository, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 868...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Markus Koschany  (supplier of updated felix-bundlerepository 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 19:50:19 +0200
Source: felix-bundlerepository
Binary: libfelix-bundlerepository-java libfelix-bundlerepository-java-doc
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0.10-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers

felix-bundlerepository_2.0.10-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2017-07-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters 


Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 19:50:19 +0200
Source: felix-bundlerepository
Binary: libfelix-bundlerepository-java libfelix-bundlerepository-java-doc
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0.10-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers 

Changed-By: Markus Koschany 
Description:
 libfelix-bundlerepository-java - Felix OSGi bundle repository service
 libfelix-bundlerepository-java-doc - Documentation for Felix OSGi bundle 
repository service
Closes: 868074
Changes:
 felix-bundlerepository (2.0.10-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * Add relax-Import-Package-requirements.patch.
 Do not require a specific version for org.osgi.service.repository.
 Thanks to Mykola Nikishov for the report. (Closes: #868074)
   * Drop bootstrap_packaging_jar.diff. Not applied and not needed anymore.
Checksums-Sha1:
 881cbd295658d23beae6583461cfa34ce0770362 2752 
felix-bundlerepository_2.0.10-2.dsc
 c6147193a7be05f22cb1ec6b278f98ad2522c724 4652 
felix-bundlerepository_2.0.10-2.debian.tar.xz
 00e74172a80fada6a5013007a9aa4fdc9368c2f9 14941 
felix-bundlerepository_2.0.10-2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 494e8c32630a2c432ceb2044f849a0b2fb1ca6ec97cc40d3680baba21526e668 2752 
felix-bundlerepository_2.0.10-2.dsc
 549bba9a85e984c5caeaf786eae3fb9a0661dc9d72b4584ba9a03b5e7427f06a 4652 
felix-bundlerepository_2.0.10-2.debian.tar.xz
 9df58cf6bb1b0fccaa4e9a5d0c0c0784a6916b62232de811ea8e879199e8978f 14941 
felix-bundlerepository_2.0.10-2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 d192ab4bce721c0b441630381aab84fe 2752 java optional 
felix-bundlerepository_2.0.10-2.dsc
 74d306aa251a22e4cd573c85e0318f9c 4652 java optional 
felix-bundlerepository_2.0.10-2.debian.tar.xz
 e148eafd299c990d83fdfabfea6bcc15 14941 java optional 
felix-bundlerepository_2.0.10-2_amd64.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQKjBAEBCgCNFiEErPPQiO8y7e9qGoNf2a0UuVE7UeQFAllntSZfFIAALgAo
aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEFD
RjNEMDg4RUYzMkVERUY2QTFBODM1RkQ5QUQxNEI5NTEzQjUxRTQPHGFwb0BkZWJp
YW4ub3JnAAoJENmtFLlRO1HkXfcP/iMN/hYX4KLA3vX90GF9oD728TJKOdWc1uY3
MyIrLsTGv7FwCCUctlcIFmyx9AJf1PEhFEELEIhPqh/8auuKiRcndY/YfCYszMhe
7X76alGmLc1hBB9SnZmfX4RVcna1ASUVS4/1dk++p97VOPF6bQfuyCd3HYiA7xov
k8TikQO58vrb++qXdNfRZLSMtO+sPsZ1NEkYadSf3mq+Hbhk6h2hR41gE2Eoq6SX
KzG4lUmnazbR5/YosKw3hGY3K2p27RRxSmYIH35Miw1K49bZ62vTl52nsCYRe01Z
MW9WQD9li/fwMlFJjiwLtom3IhFc6F2fuPERmmceXLmZQNBf/pJOpPJChQNI9HC4
/ZO+Pq4pB0g89EyYQe60AtBKgdeGs48UmccK2B2bNWkebG4n9MlFMvOVand9rDSK
w3sKiTMVVkvMF93nQVaDAlPNvZxbP7ChKotdPCgj0VzlSUjJ7SYPYxuMoveInsQu
Y2Da6RXsDCJsPjPIomIhYd2lNAt6T7MzpJscbtolItncmt9RjX9g0N6suRFTv29W
AQaBTGXiBudl3SIqd9ISosFskTltMgAY9aGWZiO7P11fDSW3hN1do3euso6hMuDo
3A/CHFUxGpQlcOChNljTfdNP7iNUbGjj09SwkXRM4iNwGMe+SxjZnSlaLNY53ilv
kCzeOE7N
=PLOE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processing of felix-bundlerepository_2.0.10-2_source.changes

2017-07-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters 
felix-bundlerepository_2.0.10-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to 
localhost
along with the files:
  felix-bundlerepository_2.0.10-2.dsc
  felix-bundlerepository_2.0.10-2.debian.tar.xz
  felix-bundlerepository_2.0.10-2_amd64.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#868074: libfelix-bundlerepository-java: missing requirement osgi.wiring.package; (&(osgi.wiring.package=org.osgi.service.repository)(version>=1.0.0)(!(version>=1.1.0))))

2017-07-13 Thread Markus Koschany 
On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 16:03:52 +0200 Markus Koschany  wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 23:09:21 +0300 Mykola Nikishov  wrote:
> > Package: libfelix-bundlerepository-java
> > Version: 2.0.10-1
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> > 
> > Bundle fails to start due to a missing requirement:
> 
> Thanks for reporting. Indeed this looks like another dependency must be
> updated to satisfy the bundle requirements. I will look into it.

I tried to update the whole felix-* stack in Debian but I quickly ran
into more issues. Thus I have decided to replace the newly added
Import-Package requirement

org.osgi.service.repository;resolution:=mandatory;version="[1.0,1.1)"

with its old value in 2.0.8

org.osgi.service.repository;resolution:=mandatory

Markus



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#868074: Pending fixes for bugs in the felix-bundlerepository package

2017-07-13 Thread pkg-java-maintainers 
tag 868074 + pending
thanks

Some bugs in the felix-bundlerepository package are closed in
revision 9253fd748c30df7739393df0ff3ced9f2dfaa466 in branch 'master'
by Markus Koschany

The full diff can be seen at
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/felix-bundlerepository.git/commit/?id=9253fd7

Commit message:

Add relax-Import-Package-requirements.patch.

Do not require a specific version for org.osgi.service.repository.

Closes: #868074
Thanks: Mykola Nikishov for the report.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Pending fixes for bugs in the felix-bundlerepository package

2017-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 868074 + pending
Bug #868074 [libfelix-bundlerepository-java] libfelix-bundlerepository-java: 
missing requirement osgi.wiring.package; 
(&(osgi.wiring.package=org.osgi.service.repository)(version>=1.0.0)(!(version>=1.1.0
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
868074: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=868074
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Reproducible NetBeans

2017-07-13 Thread Emilian Bold 
Hello,

I knew about reproducible-builds.org but I had no idea you are
building NetBeans too
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/stretch/amd64/netbeans.html

Which seems to be failing at the moment.

I've also looked into reproducible builds for Apache NetBeans a while
back and have a draft patch prepared for when we start doing builds
under Apache (see
https://github.com/emilianbold/reproducible-nextbeans/commits/master )

So, do you need any help? Do you have patches I could integrate upstream?

I'm looking at 
https://sources.debian.net/src/netbeans/8.1%2Bdfsg3-2/debian/patches/reproducible-build.patch/
and the reproducible patch is very small.

I assume you also apply strip-nondeterminism on the output archives?

I would also appreciate a quickstart on getting the Debian
reproducible build environment setup on a machine so I can test it
myself.

--emi

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#868074: libfelix-bundlerepository-java: missing requirement osgi.wiring.package; (&(osgi.wiring.package=org.osgi.service.repository)(version>=1.0.0)(!(version>=1.1.0))))

2017-07-13 Thread Markus Koschany 
Control: tags -1 confirmed

On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 23:09:21 +0300 Mykola Nikishov  wrote:
> Package: libfelix-bundlerepository-java
> Version: 2.0.10-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> Bundle fails to start due to a missing requirement:

Thanks for reporting. Indeed this looks like another dependency must be
updated to satisfy the bundle requirements. I will look into it.

Regards,

Markus



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: libfelix-bundlerepository-java: missing requirement osgi.wiring.package; (&(osgi.wiring.package=org.osgi.service.repository)(version>=1.0.0)(!(version>=1.1.0))))

2017-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #868074 [libfelix-bundlerepository-java] libfelix-bundlerepository-java: 
missing requirement osgi.wiring.package; 
(&(osgi.wiring.package=org.osgi.service.repository)(version>=1.0.0)(!(version>=1.1.0
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
868074: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=868074
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.