Bug#701951: libecj-java-gcj: Not installable with /var on 9p(non-hdd) filesystem
Hi, Daniel Dickinson said: This appears to be due to a permissions problem of some kind due to use a 9p filesystem rather than native ext4 or the like. Probably fails on nfs too, but I haven't tried that. Or maybe use of extended attributes (not sure 9p supports them or not)? I don't know what the policy is in such a case (best effort? Implement if patch provided?) but according to [1] 9p is not even part of the standard Debian kernel (and I suspect that there might be a reason for this). Cheers, Eric [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696292 -- Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#597528: freemind: Won't start
Hello, can you please call freemind with: DEBUG=1 freemind and send the debug output? Honestly, I suspect rather a Java problem than a FreeMind one. Could you also install another Java/Swing program (e.g. jedit) and try to run it? Thanks, Eric starenka said: Package: freemind Version: 0.9.0~rc7+dfsg-1 Severity: important stare...@kosmik1:~$ freemind [...] at freemind.main.FreeMindStarter.main(FreeMindStarter.java:56) Panic! Error while loading default properties. Exception in thread main java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: Can't load library: /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/i386/xawt/libmawt.so [...] -- Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#574029: jh_manifest utf8 errors
Hi Matthew, Matthew Johnson said: I really could do with seeing the manifest from either of your packages - I suspect that there is non-utf8 data in there. Without seeing it though I can't reproduce or suggest a fix. (I'm afraid I can't read winmail.dat) Matt As I wrote in my email, there is no manifest to share! jh_manifest only gets called because I'm using CDBS, I have no debian/manifest or debian/package.manifest file. Nevertheless, one thing I forgot to mentioned and which I'm not sure about, but it seemed to me that the error appearance did depend on the svn-buildpackage command line: with --svn-dont-purge I got the error, but not without this option, and then I changed something to the content of the debian/ directory, and I always got the error. I know it sounds stupid, and I have no explanation, but that's what I experienced. Eric -- You don't need to CC me on debian-java, debian-mentors and pkg-java-maintainers. Please CC me on other Debian lists. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#569169: freemind: open link with konqueror 4.3.2
Hi Sebastian,
what does xdg-open yourURL, called from the command line, say?
(it is the command that FreeMind calls per default).
If xdg-open itself doesn't fail, you could also write a small script:
$ cat /tmp/my-xdg-open EOF
#!/bin/sh
exec \$0.out 21
exec xdg-open \$@
EOF
$ chmod +x /tmp/my-xdg-open
and enter this script as Default Browser Command Other OS in FreeMind,
then attach the file /tmp/my-xdg-open.out to this bug report, this would
surely help a lot.
Thanks, Eric
Sebastian Schroeder said:
Package: freemind
Version: 0.9.0~rc6+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
trying to open a hyperlink fails if konquerer is default browser
changing Default Browser Command Other OS to konqueror {0}=no contact
to klaucher
changing to kfmclient openURL '{0}' (which should be the right way I
think) does't do anything, no error message, even while Freemind in DEBUG
mode
--
Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#557308: libopenide-util-java: Non-informative package descriptionand outdated homepage link
Hello Giovanni, Giovanni Mascellani said: This description is wrong, as this library is not netbeans platform. I'll try to write a more informative description, but this task is not easy, because this packages is really _very_ miscellaneous. OK, I was mislead by the homepage link, but thanks. 2. the Homepage link http://openide.netbeans.org/ is outdated, it's now http://platform.netbeans.org/ For what I know, there is no updated homepage for this library. platform.n.o is wrong and I couldn't find anything updated, so I prefer to keep an out-of-date homepage rather than giving a false information or no information at all. I would tend to disagree, no homepage would be better, and a link to where the source code remains would be even better (I'm assuming there is such a place else it wouldn't be opensource :-) ). Thanks, Eric -- Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#526611: New upstream version
Hello, PLEASE, create a new package for this version of Jibx: 1.2.x is not backward compatible with 1.0.x (and neither with 1.1.x), and FreeMind 0.9.0 depends on version 1.0.x (and doesn't work already with 1.1.x). I'm trying since years to get a newer version of FreeMind and failed due to mainly licensing reasons, and I'm now only one upstream release from success. Please don't make it fail now for technical reasons! Thanks, Eric Michael Koch said: On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 10:05:42AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: Package: libjibx-java Version: 1.0.2-1 Please upgrade the package to version 1.2.1, which is a build dependency of OpenJDK 7. I have done a prelimiary package if libjibx-java 1.2.1. Unfortunatly it needs Eclipse libraries for building the jibx-tools.jar. I think about disabling this feature for now. I got notified that OpenJDK 7 will drop the dependency on jibx in one of the next releases. Cheers, Michael ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers -- Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#526611: New upstream version
Great, thanks! Eric Michael Koch said: On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 08:51:15AM +0200, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote: Hello, PLEASE, create a new package for this version of Jibx: 1.2.x is not backward compatible with 1.0.x (and neither with 1.1.x), and FreeMind 0.9.0 depends on version 1.0.x (and doesn't work already with 1.1.x). I'm trying since years to get a newer version of FreeMind and failed due to mainly licensing reasons, and I'm now only one upstream release from success. Please don't make it fail now for technical reasons! Good to know. I checked reverse depends in the archive and found none. So I thought it would be okay. Lets do it this way: I update libjibx-java to 1.2.x. I also introduce libjibx1.0-java for freemind. This way freemind can depend on it and when/if freemind updates to a newer version we can savely remove the versioned package. Cheers, Michael -- You don't need to CC me on debian-java, debian-mentors and pkg-java-maintainers. Please CC me on other Debian lists. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: Tomcate 5.0.x
Hi, On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 11:08:42AM +0200, Martijn Kint / True wrote: L.S, Hi guys! I'm having some trouble with a client of mine who insists on that Tomcat 5.0.28 is stable and 5.0.30 isn't. The problem is that I can't install 5.0.28 from Apt as we only have 5.0.30-11 available. I think, I know why the customer means this: the download page from Tomcat [1] lists only 5.0.30-beta and 5.0.28. This said, I don't know how to convince your customer that the Debian version is stable enough for his purposes. Just tell him that OpenSource betas are more stable than many commercial releases ;-) More seriously, you could try to argue that beta doesn't mean unstable, it just means that the product has not been completely tested; and the fact that it reached etch/stable means that it has been tested and that it's stable enough for Debian standards, which are knowingly high. Hope this helps, Eric [1]http://tomcat.apache.org/download-55.cgi -- Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: Anybody working on Sun's JavaHelp .jar (GPLed)
Hi, Steffen Moeller said: On Sunday 14 January 2007 22:18, Loïc Minier wrote: On Sun, Jan 14, 2007, Steffen Moeller wrote: Has anybody of yours worked on that already? (The canonical place to avoid work duplication / to reuse work on Debian packages should be WNPP. :) Done that, have not found anything, asked google, too, which is pretty good at finding ITPs - nothing. And I also checked the pkg-java SVN. Admittedly, no is a not overly unexpected answer but I still hope that I do not need to do it myself :o) I expressed recently the possibility that I do it, but I'm privately and professionally rather overloaded, and I did not create an ITP on purpose for this reason, i.e. the field should be free for you. Eric PS: if you create an ITP, you might want to let me know: I gathered some emails from the JPackage mailing list, concerning packaging of JavaHelp, which might be of interest to you. -- Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#385257: No matching plugin was found
severity 385257 wishlist retitle 385257 make-jpkg could detect EE Java and display helpful error text thanks Hi Giuseppe, you've downloaded the EE (Enterprise/Server version), make-jpkg does only work with Java SE (Desktop), so you need to download the Java SE JDK. Alternatively, you can now use the sun-java5-* packages in unstable/non-free; or of course use one of the free alternatives, kaffe, gcj/gci ... (if it works for your application). Nevertheless, make-jpkg could perhaps recognize the error and output a more helpful message (perhaps by creating a minimal plugin, that would just spit an error?!). Cheers, Eric package: java-package version: 0.28 priority: important I just installed an etch machine on a core duo, dowloaded java_ee_sdk-5-linux.bin from SUN site and run java-package. This is what happens now: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Desktop$ make-jpkg java_ee_sdk-5-linux.bin Creating temporary directory: /tmp/make-jpkg.lBkNf16863 Loading plugins: blackdown-j2re.sh blackdown-j2sdk.sh common.sh ibm-j2re.sh ibm-j2sdk.sh j2re.sh j2sdk-doc.sh j2sdk.sh j2se.sh sun-j2re.sh sun-j2sdk-doc.sh sun-j2sdk.sh Detected Debian build architecture: i386 Detected Debian GNU type: i486-linux-gnu No matching plugin was found. Removing temporary directory: done -- Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: Problem with SVN and DOS end-of-line
OK, forget about this: 'svn propdel svn:eol-style 02_default_properties.patch' did the trick... Eric Hello, the file '02_default_properties.patch' in 'svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/pkg-java/trunk/libjgoodies-forms-java/debian/patches' had DOS end-of-lines because it patches a file with such endings (upstream!). After the move from CVS to SVN, this end-of-lines were replaced through unix ones (and as a result applying the patch fails). This wouldn't be so bad if I could fix this, but svn refuses to commit a corrected file, with proper Windows end-of-lines. Error message is 'Inconsistent line ending style'. Any idea on how to fix the mess? I couldn't find any valuable hint on Google, as said using UNIX-style end-of-lines is not an option. Thanks, Eric -- Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers -- Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Removing files from CVS on Alioth
Hi, it appears that for the next version of libforms-java, hopefully to be uploaded, certain files in the debian directory are not required anymore (one patch and a TODO file). As CVS doesn't offer the possibility to remove a file, how should this be handled? Thanks, Eric -- Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: RFS for libforms-java
Hi, OK, I activated a chroot (unstable) and did it again, this time everything should be fine. I just have an issue with ant vs. libant1.6 and gjdoc/javadoc (see http://bugs.debian.org/324884). How strict are you on this one? : Eric -- N/A signature ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
