Bug#361692: libswt3.1-gtk-jni: Conflicts with libswt-gnome-gtk-3.1-jni

2006-04-09 Thread Shaun Jackman
Package: libswt3.1-gtk-jni
Version: 3.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: conflicts with libswt-gnome-gtk-3.1-jni

Unpacking libswt3.1-gtk-jni (from .../libswt3.1-gtk-jni_3.1.2-1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libswt3.1-gtk-jni_3.1.2-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
  trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/jni/libswt-gnome-gtk-3139.so', which
is also in package libswt-gnome-gtk-3.1-jni

Cheers,
Shaun
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Bug#361692: libswt3.1-gtk-jni: Conflicts with libswt-gnome-gtk-3.1-jni

2006-04-14 Thread Stephan Michels
2006/4/9, Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Unpacking libswt3.1-gtk-jni (from .../libswt3.1-gtk-jni_3.1.2-1_i386.deb) ...
> dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libswt3.1-gtk-jni_3.1.2-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
>   trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/jni/libswt-gnome-gtk-3139.so', which
> is also in package libswt-gnome-gtk-3.1-jni

To have the same swt lib into two different packages was not our intention.
It would be good to have one swt lib in the archive, then such things
won't occur.
Is it possible to merge your swt package with our swt package?
Can we resolve the current situation somehow?

Thank you, Stephan Michels..


___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Bug#361692: libswt3.1-gtk-jni: Conflicts with libswt-gnome-gtk-3.1-jni

2006-04-14 Thread Shaun Jackman
On 4/14/06, Stephan Michels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To have the same swt lib into two different packages was not our intention.
> It would be good to have one swt lib in the archive, then such things
> won't occur.
> Is it possible to merge your swt package with our swt package?
> Can we resolve the current situation somehow?
>
> Thank you, Stephan Michels..

That's primarily the reason for my filing these bug reports. I've
received a number of bug reports asking for Azureus on AMD64. Since
I've heard that Eclipse's SWT builds and runs on AMD64, I thought I'd
look into it again. However, Eclipse currently
fails-to-build-from-source on every architecture except PowerPC [1].
When Eclipse's SWT has stabilised and migrated to testing, I'll
revisit the situation.

[1] http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=eclipse

The reason for my previous bug report, is that I consider it a
requirement that Azureus not depend on either Gnome or Mozilla.

Cheers,
Shaun
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers