Bug#417888: batik: new upstream version
Any news on this topic? -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#417888: batik: new upstream version
Hello, Adriaan Peeters wrote: Adriaan Peeters wrote: Uptream released the stable version of 1.7, how is work progressing on the packaging of this? I plan to have a look at that reasonably soon. I expect a lot of work (from what I understood, it should be able to move to main) to get it in a good shape. Getting batik in main is indeed what I would like since I will be able to move some rdepends to main as well when 1.7 hits unstable. I had a look, and things are not as simple as it seems - the 1.7 version does not provide at all the same external functions as before, and still depends on some of sun.com classes, which is bad... I hope you will find some time to work on this. (consider this as another ping :)) I also hope I'll find some time. However, if you had time, I'm sure I could find a way for you to spend it ;-)... Cheers, Vincent -- Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/ find(1): A `%' at the end of the format argument causes undefined behaviour since there is no following character. In some locales, it may hide your door keys, while in others it may remove the final page from the novel you are reading. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#417888: batik: new upstream version
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 01:10 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote: Hello, Adriaan Peeters wrote: Uptream released the stable version of 1.7, how is work progressing on the packaging of this? I plan to have a look at that reasonably soon. I expect a lot of work (from what I understood, it should be able to move to main) to get it in a good shape. Getting batik in main is indeed what I would like since I will be able to move some rdepends to main as well when 1.7 hits unstable. I hope you will find some time to work on this. (consider this as another ping :)) Cheers, -- Adriaan Peeters signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#417888: batik: new upstream version
Hi, Uptream released the stable version of 1.7, how is work progressing on the packaging of this? Cheers, Adriaan ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#417888: batik: new upstream version
Hello, Adriaan Peeters wrote: Uptream released the stable version of 1.7, how is work progressing on the packaging of this? I plan to have a look at that reasonably soon. I expect a lot of work (from what I understood, it should be able to move to main) to get it in a good shape. Cheers, Vincent -- Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/ -- pretty boring signature, isn't it ? ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#417888: batik: new upstream version
Package: batik Severity: wishlist Please package the new batik 1.7beta1 for experimental. It contains a lot of fixes and several interesting change: http://apache.planetmirror.com.au/dist/xmlgraphics/batik/README.txt -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
