[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#650552: marked as done (node-expat: FTBFS: EBADF, Bad file descriptor '/usr/lib/package.json')

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:37:42 +0200
with message-id <20120427073742.ga6...@jones.dk>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#650552: node-expat: FTBFS: 
EBADF, Bad file descriptor '/usr/lib/package.json'
has caused the Debian Bug report #650552,
regarding node-expat: FTBFS: EBADF, Bad file descriptor '/usr/lib/package.json'
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
650552: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650552
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: node-expat
Version: 1.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source

The automated build of node-expat on i386 (the only platform besides
amd64 for which its build dependencies are available) failed with a
test suite error:

  NODE_PATH=/.../node-expat-1.4.1/debian/node-node-expat//usr/lib/nodejs node 
test.js
  
  node.js:134
  throw e; // process.nextTick error, or 'error' event on first tick
^
  Error: EBADF, Bad file descriptor '/usr/lib/package.json'
  at Object.openSync (fs.js:221:18)
  at Object.readFileSync (fs.js:112:15)
  at Object. (/usr/lib/nodejs/vows.js:254:28)
  at Module._compile (module.js:411:26)
  at Object..js (module.js:417:10)
  at Module.load (module.js:343:31)
  at Function._load (module.js:302:12)
  at require (module.js:355:19)
  at Object. (/.../node-expat-1.4.1/test.js:4:12)
  at Module._compile (module.js:411:26)
  make: *** [build/node-node-expat] Error 1
  dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2

I don't have time to dig too deeply, but see that the npm package
ships a package.json (under /usr/share/npm); a build dependency on
it may be in order.  At any rate, could you please take a look?

Thanks!


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.5.0-1

On 11-11-30 at 02:45pm, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Source: node-expat
> Version: 1.4.1-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source

The package evidently builds fine now.

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#670605: RFP: libjs-jquery-jqplot -- jQuery Plotting Plugin

[Roman V. Nikolaev]

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, 
pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

   Package name: libjs-jquery-jqplot
Version: 1.0.0b2_r1012
Upstream Author: Chris Leonello 
URL: http://www.jqplot.com
License: GPL, MIT
Description: jQuery Plotting Plugin
jqPlot is a plotting and charting plugin for the jQuery Javascript framework.
jqPlot produces beautiful line, bar and pie charts with many features:
Numerous chart style options.
Date axes with customizable formatting.
Up to 9 Y axes.
Rotated axis text.
Automatic trend line computation.
Tooltips and data point highlighting.
Sensible defaults for ease of use.


-- 

 Roman V. Nikolaev

mail:rshadowa...@gmail.com
jabber:  rsha...@jabber.org
icq: 198-364-657
site:http://www.rshadow.ru



___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processed: limit source to libv8, tagging 667991

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> #libv8 (3.8.9.16-4) unstable; urgency=low
> #
> #  * Remove mipsel from Architecture list.
> #v8 3.8 branch supports only mips32r2, not mips3 variant.
> #That's why it builds on SWARM but not on Loongson.
> #Closes:bug#667991.
> #
> limit source libv8
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'libv8'
Limit currently set to 'source':'libv8'

> tags 667991 + pending
Bug #667991 [libv8-3.8.9.16] libv8: FTBFS on mipsel - tests failures on 
Loongsoon 2E, not on Broadcom
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
667991: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667991
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#650552: Bug#650552: node-expat: FTBFS: EBADF, Bad file descriptor '/usr/lib/package.json'

[Aaron M. Ucko]

Jonas Smedegaard  writes:

> The package evidently builds fine now.

Yes, this failure mode is gone, thanks.  It looks like the armel and
armhf builds are running into test suite timeouts, though:

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=node-expat&arch=armel&ver=1.5.0-1&stamp=1334337481
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=node-expat&arch=armhf&ver=1.5.0-1&stamp=1334337523

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu



___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] libv8 latest 3.8.9.20

[Jérémy Lal]

Hi,
i had to remove mipsel from supported architectures of libv8 3.8 branch,
because it doesn't support some cpu variant that is in mipsel.
Also thought it was best to benefit from latest upstream changes, hence
the version bump.

Jonas, could you upload it ?
Available as usual in collab-maint repository.

I'll prepare the 3.9 branch next week, hopefully supporting all mipsel
cpu variants.

Jérémy.


___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#650552: Bug#650552: Bug#650552: node-expat: FTBFS: EBADF, Bad file descriptor '/usr/lib/package.json'

[Jonas Smedegaard]

On 12-04-27 at 11:59am, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Jonas Smedegaard  writes:
> 
> > The package evidently builds fine now.
> 
> Yes, this failure mode is gone, thanks.  It looks like the armel and
> armhf builds are running into test suite timeouts, though:
> 
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=node-expat&arch=armel&ver=1.5.0-1&stamp=1334337481
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=node-expat&arch=armhf&ver=1.5.0-1&stamp=1334337523

Indeed.  Most likely a different bug, though.

Both build attempts occured in february. Since then 6 newer releases of 
Nodejs have been released, some of which (if not all, when considering 
the underlying changes to libv8) has ARM-specific changes.

I therefore suspect that a simple rebuild would be enough.  I am not so 
familiar with requesting those, so could you perhaps help out with that 
now that we've gone off topic anyway ;-)

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#670678: node-expat: FTBFS on ARM: tests time out

[Aaron M. Ucko]

Source: node-expat
Version: 1.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source

Builds of node-expat on armel and armhf have both been failing with
test suite timeouts:

NODE_PATH=/.../node-expat-1.5.0/debian/node-node-expat//usr/lib/nodejs node 
test.js

timers.js:96
if (!process.listeners('uncaughtException').length) throw e;
  ^
mRuntime within maximum expected timem
at [object Object]. (/.../node-expat-1.5.0/test.js:243:14)
at [object Object]. (events.js:67:17)
at [object Object].emit (/usr/lib/nodejs/vows.js:236:24)
at [object Object].emit (/.../node-expat-1.5.0/lib/node-expat.js:18:12)
at [object Object].resume (/.../node-expat-1.5.0/lib/node-expat.js:41:24)
at Object._onTimeout (/.../node-expat-1.5.0/test.js:226:6)
at Timer.ontimeout (timers.js:94:19)
make: *** [build/node-node-expat] Error 1
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build-arch gave error exit status 2

Could you please take a look?

Thanks!



___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#650552: Bug#650552: Bug#650552: node-expat: FTBFS: EBADF, Bad file descriptor '/usr/lib/package.json'

[Aaron M. Ucko]

Jonas Smedegaard  writes:

> Indeed.  Most likely a different bug, though.

True; I'll file a separate report.

> Both build attempts occured in february. Since then 6 newer releases of 
> Nodejs have been released, some of which (if not all, when considering 
> the underlying changes to libv8) has ARM-specific changes.

AFAICT, the build attempts occurred just a couple of weeks ago, using an
sbuild version from February.

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu



___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] libv8 latest 3.8.9.20

[Jonas Smedegaard]

On 12-04-27 at 07:22pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> i had to remove mipsel from supported architectures of libv8 3.8 
> branch, because it doesn't support some cpu variant that is in mipsel.
> Also thought it was best to benefit from latest upstream changes, 
> hence the version bump.
> 
> Jonas, could you upload it ?
> Available as usual in collab-maint repository.
> 
> I'll prepare the 3.9 branch next week, hopefully supporting all mipsel 
> cpu variants.

I am on it now: Will start a build and then go to bed, and hopefully 
simply upload the succesful build tomorrow morning.


Could I ask you to take a look at bug#650552 - I suspect it is Nodejs 
stalling somehow...

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Node.js and it's future in debian

[Carl Fürstenberg]

Hello,

There has been an log struggle between the nodejs package and the node
package, which is still unresolved (bug #611698 for example) And I
wonder now what the future should look like.

To summarize the problem:
* the nodejs upstream binary is called "node", and the upstream
developers have refused to change it's binary name to nodejs for
debian;
* The the hamradio package "node" shipping a binary called "node", and
as it's so old, the developers argue that the package must ship a
binary called "node" or breakage will occur.
* The reason the nodejs developers want to ship the binary as "node"
is because all programs written for nodejs all has /usr/bin/node in
it's shebang
* the nodejs package are not allowed to conflict on the node package
just because the binary name is the same

As I'm not a hamradio user, I'm off course biased towards letting
nodejs having the "node" binary and let it pass to testing. But we
must find a solution to this, as nodejs is getting more and more used,
and developers are forced to install nodejs from source to be able to
use it instead of install it via the package manager.

Regards,

Carl Fürstenberg

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] (AD) 40 岁 以 上 人 的 最 好 的 工 作！ 10:38:07

[mazldovx]

余鱼同的所在。宋天保忽然脚下一绊，险些跌了一交，俯身看时，见一人
您好！
皮靴和条纹衣衫，到旷野中换了，把原来衣服埋在沙中。临溪一照，宛然
美 国 
跨 国 公 司 火 热 招 募 独 
立 工 作 人 士！
用 网 
络 在 家 工  作 ，经 过 
证 实 的 成 功 系 
统，
兼 职 
时 间 全 职 收 入 ， 
全 职 挑 战 6位数月 收 
入！
详 情 
请 登 录：www.NETGroup2010.com
也不一定能经得住这样的赏赐诱惑，所以还是用纸笔代替口舌吧。
他心意，说道：“我只要见哥哥把满清胡虏赶到关外，那就心满意足。
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] HALLO ...

[Akpa Blessing]

I have send a mail to you before but not yet heard from you. do you get my 
mail? I am still waiting for your urgent response.



Yours alone,

Akpa Blessing.  Ich habe eine Mail an Sie vor, aber noch nicht von dir gehört. 
bekommst du meine E-Mails? Ich warte immer noch auf Ihre dringende Antwort.



Mit freundlichen allein,

Akpa Segen.___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#650343: nodejs: please provide "nodejs" command as a synonym for node

[Jonathan Nieder]

tags 650343 + patch
quit

Hi Jérémy et al,

Jonathan Nieder wrote:

> On some machines /usr/sbin/node refers to some program that is not the
> node.js interpreter.  Therefore it would be helpful to have a "nodejs"
> command that does exactly the same thing as /usr/bin/node, for people
> to put into their scripts to reliably refer to the node.js interpreter.

The message [1] reminded me that this still wasn't finished.  Oops.
Sorry to be so slow.

After rereading [2], I am a little afraid of bringing this up upstream
without a patch.  Unfortunately the build system scares me, too, so
for now all I can offer is a patch against the Debian packaging.

(Disclaimer: the following has nothing to do with Debian policy.) I
genuinely think the best thing Debian could do in wheezy is:

 - provide Node.js as /usr/bin/node

 - provide LinuxNode as /usr/sbin/node

 - also provide unambiguous names (e.g., nodejs, ax25-node) for these
   commands, and use the unambiguous names in configuration and in
   other packages

I also hope that upstream can understand that we are not trying to
deny reality or to work against them but that it would be nice for
googlability among other reasons to move to less generic names for
these commands and avoid generic command names in the future.

The name /usr/bin/nodejs seems to have some cross-distro support.[3]

Thoughts?  Improvements?

Thanks,
Jonathan

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/04/msg00693.html
[2] http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs/browse_thread/thread/12a673a14838aa9a/
[3] :

"* There is a file conflict with the /usr/bin/node shipped by the "node" package
 in Fedora.  I rename everything to "nodejs" to avoid this, and there are
 several patches in my SRPM [3] that make Node happy with this."



___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processed: Re: nodejs: please provide "nodejs" command as a synonym for node

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 650343 + patch
Bug #650343 [nodejs] nodejs: please provide "nodejs" command as a synonym for 
node
Added tag(s) patch.
> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
650343: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650343
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#650343: nodejs: please provide "nodejs" command as a synonym for node

[Jonathan Nieder]

Jonathan Nieder wrote:

>   Unfortunately the build system scares me, too, so
> for now all I can offer is a patch against the Debian packaging.

Actually attached this time.
 debian/changelog|6 ++
 debian/nodejs.links |1 +
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 debian/nodejs.links

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 570efb33..c9090bfd 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+nodejs (0.6.14~dfsg1-2) UNRELEASE; urgency=low
+
+  * Add /usr/bin/nodejs as a symlink to node. Closes: #650343.
+
+ -- Jonathan Nieder   Fri, 27 Apr 2012 23:10:39 -0500
+
 nodejs (0.6.14~dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * debian/patches/2005_expected_failing_tests.patch:
diff --git a/debian/nodejs.links b/debian/nodejs.links
new file mode 100644
index ..ddab6c5e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/nodejs.links
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+usr/bin/node usr/bin/nodejs
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel