[Pkg-kde-extras] Business proposal

2018-10-27 Thread Singapore Refining Company
Hello,
  
I got your details from an online directory and having been motivated by your 
personal status, I decided to approach you for a possible partnership in a 
multi-million dollars project in crude oil trading. The company I work for is 
the Singapore Refining Company Pte Ltd (SRC). We have urgent need for a 2 
million barrel supply of NATIONAL OIL COOPERATION OF LIBYA (NOCL) crude oil per 
month for a total period of 12 month (1year).
 
Our company vice president Ms. Foo, who is directly in charge of crude oil 
purchase in our company, has given me the responsibility of looking for a crude 
oil licensed agent with the NOCL who we can make this purchase possible. This 
is so because the NOCL does not sale their product directly to the buyers 
rather, through their approved licensed agents who acts as their sales 
agent/middle man between them and their buyers.
 
My proposal is this, that we (me and you) work together to get you the NOCL 
license which will authorize you to be a sales agent for the NOCL and 
subsequently the middle man between our company and NOCL in our company’s 
purchase intentions. The NOCL license can be assigned to your name as an 
individual license operator or to your company name if you have a company owned 
by you alone registered with your local authorities.
 
I will assist you step by step in the process leading to securing the license 
from the NOCL and thereafter introduce you to our company for the signing of 
all the sales agreements with the NOCL. As the license holder, the NOCL will 
remit the sales commissions to your nominate commission receiving Banking 
coordinates after our company effects the payment of the cargo to the NOCL 
being the seller.
 
I will have a take home of 40% of your commissions for my facilitating roles 
while the remaining 60% commission goes to you as the license owner.
 
Please note:
My intentions to profit from this operation should be kept discrete between the 
both of us. It's against my work ethics to profiteer from our company’s dealing 
with NOCL but I have seen this as a good opportunity for me to save enough 
money against my imminent retirement hence my decision to source for a partner 
who can work with me in this regard.
 
Feel free to ask for clarifications to enable you understand this process 
further. Email: i...@oilgascompanyslimited.info

Richard Seng

___
pkg-kde-extras mailing list
pkg-kde-extras@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras

Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] exiv2 stretch update (CVE-2018-16336)

2018-10-27 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Roberto,

On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 11:10:17PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I prepared an update of exiv2 for jessie.  The patches I prepared
> applied to the stretch version with only one minor change required.
> 
> The main change is the patch for CVE-2018-16336.  However, I also
> included a tweak to the patch for CVE-2018-10958/CVE-2018-10999 based on
> feedback I received approximately one month after I uploaded the last
> security update for exiv2:
> 
> https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/issues/302#issuecomment-408640903
> 
> I have attached a debdiff from version 0.25-3.1+deb9u1 to
> 0.25-3.1+deb9u2 for your review and the actual packages are available
> here:
> 
> https://people.debian.org/~roberto/
> 
> If the package and proposed changes look good, please let me know and I
> can sign and upload the packages and someone on the security team can
> publish the DSA.

Looking at CVE-2018-16336 I feel it does not really warrant a DSA on
it's own. But given you have prepared a targeted fix for the issue,
can I redirect you trough the stretch-pu mechanism and have a fix
included in the next stretch point release?

Regards,
Salvatore

___
pkg-kde-extras mailing list
pkg-kde-extras@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras