Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Wheezy update of exiv2?
Chris, Please proceed with the Debian LTS team. I don't think we are actively maintaining exiv2. Yours Aye, Mark Purcell m...@purcell.id.au 04 2822 7764 On 3 Jan. 2018 01:38, "Chris Lamb" wrote: > Dear maintainer(s), > > The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are > currently open in the Wheezy version of exiv2: > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/exiv2 > > Would you like to take care of this yourself? > > If yes, please follow the workflow we have defined here: > https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Development > > If that workflow is a burden to you, feel free to just prepare an > updated source package and send it to debian-...@lists.debian.org > (via a debdiff, or with an URL pointing to the source package, > or even with a pointer to your packaging repository), and the members > of the LTS team will take care of the rest. Indicate clearly whether you > have tested the updated package or not. > > If you don't want to take care of this update, it's not a problem, we > will do our best with your package. Just let us know whether you would > like to review and/or test the updated package before it gets released. > > You can also opt-out from receiving future similar emails in your > answer and then the LTS Team will take care of exiv2 updates > for the LTS releases. > > Thank you very much. > > Chris Lamb, > on behalf of the Debian LTS team. > > PS: A member of the LTS team might start working on this update at > any point in time. You can verify whether someone is registered > on this update in this file: > https://salsa.debian.org/security-tracker-team/ > security-tracker/raw/master/data/dla-needed.txt > > > Regards, > > -- > ,''`. > : :' : Chris Lamb > `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk >`- > ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#788701: Bug#788701: Debian package orphan
Hi Maximiliano, Very happy for this package to remain with kde-extras, I personally don't have time to maintain it. Hope it can get some love soon. Yours Aye, Mark Purcell m...@purcell.id.au 04 2822 7764 On 31 Oct. 2016 19:02, "Maximiliano Curia" wrote: > ¡Hola Mark! > > El 2016-10-31 a las 10:11 +1100, Mark Purcell escribió: > >> I no longer maintain this package. >> > > I would suggest you take up the cause as requested at bug #788701. >> > > On 30 Oct. 2016 18:54, "Esokrates" wrote: >> > >The package "partitionmanager" has not seen any upgrade since years. >> There have been major releases in that time, see: >>https://stikonas.eu/wordpress/2016/05/27/kde-partition-manager-2-2-0/ >> > >I would be happy to get an reply, >> > > The neon project is maintaining an up to date partition manager: > https://packaging.neon.kde.org/neon-packaging/partitionmanager.git/ > > It's usually a good idea to try to sync our packaging efforts with the > ones in neon. > > Also, please, keep the maintenance of the package under the kde extras > umbrella, so the rest of the team can work on it from time to time. > > And, it would be better if the package maintenance is moved to git. > > If you need help with any of this, please join to #debian-qt-kde @ > irc.debian.org or ask in the pkg-kde-talk mailing list ( > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk ) > > At least I was planning to work on partition manager after stretch is > released, so I would prefer if it's not orphaned, but I don't mind if > somebody else takes care of it. > > Happy hacking, > -- > "I decry the current tendency to seek patents on algorithms. There are > better > ways to earn a living than to prevent other people from making use of one's > contributions to computer science." > -- Donald Knuth > Saludos /\/\ /\ >< `/ > ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#788701: Debian package orphan
Esokrates, I no longer maintain this package. I would suggest you take up the cause as requested at bug #788701. Yours Aye, Mark Purcell m...@purcell.id.au 04 2822 7764 On 30 Oct. 2016 18:54, "Esokrates" wrote: > Dear Maintainer, > > The package "partitionmanager" has not seen any upgrade since years. > There have been major releases in that time, see: > https://stikonas.eu/wordpress/2016/05/27/kde-partition-manager-2-2-0/ > > I would be happy to get an reply, > > Greetins! > ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] digikam_4.0.0~beta2-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into experimental
Pino, Sorry I seem to uploaded digikam mid way through your updates. I think svn is sane again now, with your residual changes listed under -2, awaiting release. I must also say thanks for your updates as they are making digikam a very good Debian package. Mark On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 00:50:02 Debian FTP Masters wrote: > Accepted: > > Format: 1.8 > Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 09:28:43 +1100 > Source: digikam > Binary: digikam-private-libs digikam showfoto digikam-data digikam-doc > kipi-plugins kipi-plugins-common Architecture: source i386 all > Version: 4:4.0.0~beta2-1 > Distribution: experimental > Urgency: medium > Maintainer: Debian KDE Extras Team > Changed-By: Mark Purcell > Description: > digikam- digital photo management application for KDE > digikam-data - digiKam architecture-independant data > digikam-doc - handbook for digiKam > digikam-private-libs - private libraries for digiKam and kipi plugins > kipi-plugins - image manipulation/handling plugins for KIPI aware programs > kipi-plugins-common - kipi-plugins architecture-independent data > showfoto - image viewer/editor for KDE > Changes: > digikam (4:4.0.0~beta2-1) experimental; urgency=medium > . >[ Mark Purcell ] >* New upstream release > - Drop changeset_rc53994f0dbeea49a04aeec9298753a954cff427f.diff > . >[ Pino Toscano ] >* Adjust/improve the build dependencies: > - set libusb-dev for all the OSes except kfreebsd (where libusb2-dev >is used), as this is what digikam looks for > - add nepomuk-core-dev >* Since kipi-plugins uses libraries shipped in digikam-private-libs, make > this dependency strict. >* Move the debian/*.manpage files as debian/man/*.1, and adjust the > debian/*.manpages accordingly. >* Install also the NEWS file for kipi-plugins. >* Drop -Xmultithread -XREADME.MACOSX from the dh_install arguments, as > such files do not exist anymore or are not shipped. >* Slightly improve the way devel .so symlinks are removed. >* Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.5, no changes required. >* Change the section of digikam-private-libs to libs. >* Update the digikam and showfoto xpm icons according to the current > hicolor icons. > Checksums-Sha1: > 8ecf95204395204f1c67ca318522e2e79baa5b38 2723 digikam_4.0.0~beta2-1.dsc > b5adcf5fab00ae6a99f240876ef923df0418e853 67791068 > digikam_4.0.0~beta2.orig.tar.bz2 c61d45a9fa44ec664b98bb93ab08a521940311d0 > 39420 digikam_4.0.0~beta2-1.debian.tar.xz > ff8fa26ccdb501b5cee582a89c7bee716de3bdee 2484478 > digikam-private-libs_4.0.0~beta2-1_i386.deb > d2b0a939395609e10b06f40bdc01176a3e27e028 3549448 > digikam_4.0.0~beta2-1_i386.deb d6b44da3b4aa80d3435a6b5084855358c3b73e8f > 713892 showfoto_4.0.0~beta2-1_i386.deb > 0fb0c1433d0b059215910bbde25d10fa5b7edd0c 12643924 > digikam-data_4.0.0~beta2-1_all.deb f1bdde32710b785c43f13538dd6866c8aa8dc50c > 17751886 digikam-doc_4.0.0~beta2-1_all.deb > 8e322b137906a36ad77b21bf5ae3d9c9e48e9456 4214138 > kipi-plugins_4.0.0~beta2-1_i386.deb > bc9440882949f6437e3a60b516fd3cce2c2c363f 4960766 > kipi-plugins-common_4.0.0~beta2-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: > 7f3c8468c3d72c841d1ea106d8614a3c285432a43d4cacdda7831d2247d5d807 2723 > digikam_4.0.0~beta2-1.dsc > 7aa7e2920b98e9974cf582eaee22aeec37617c8aa5fdbc0d0730bd1d7b7274ac 67791068 > digikam_4.0.0~beta2.orig.tar.bz2 > cbc63104a022db83f5381787b43b30d2145fa2ab60caa73ad42cf3b17da890db 39420 > digikam_4.0.0~beta2-1.debian.tar.xz > 13bd79b59350c081d34e4bb909710d87b7d42a4b09541136d5c377bca1df3c28 2484478 > digikam-private-libs_4.0.0~beta2-1_i386.deb > ffbae1244904780f8b600aac8146ff113d6187d2098d6d25f1b02058466f58c6 3549448 > digikam_4.0.0~beta2-1_i386.deb > 38be074cda26bab7df17594853ea2548ee59326ac4ad939a1b64742f0da2bc91 713892 > showfoto_4.0.0~beta2-1_i386.deb > 2723d6e4836ec4277a4eb15c94344b28c799f0e9961c2ebc88b8be20ee267fb7 12643924 > digikam-data_4.0.0~beta2-1_all.deb > 1b82bb93f3e03f6996c9517ead5e0b26d7d250968455b3a470331c05d51dc7e7 17751886 > digikam-doc_4.0.0~beta2-1_all.deb > ca7d68859be1537240be517e0f656ac27bff124e760714f121b5be255b48b9b6 4214138 > kipi-plugins_4.0.0~beta2-1_i386.deb > be73a6410002cd08deacf838b2779fbd0b114918dd8af27bb9824995ba392f62 4960766 > kipi-plugins-common_4.0.0~beta2-1_all.deb Files: > cad79cc4a7237e0da071295b7154ae47 2723 graphics optional > digikam_4.0.0~beta2-1.dsc 37dfd71588415659e24b389bd054854f 67791068 > graphics optional digikam_4.0.0~beta2.orig.tar.bz2 > d936889611b88bdeab4906c6655e0f51 39420 graphics optional > digikam_4.0.0~beta2-1.debian.tar.xz a5b3fe5bd7f2f022062c24b817d07a96 > 2484478 libs optional digikam-private-libs_4.0.0~beta2-1_i386.deb > 74da8a569443e32a45fdd1597afae6cb 3549448 graphics optional > digikam_4.0.0~beta2-1_i386.deb d3cb
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#732957: transition: exiv2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition debian-release, Request a slot for a libexiv2-12 -> libexiv2-13 transition to unstable. libexiv2-13 has been uploaded to experimental. libexiv2-12 Significant Reverse Depends: libgexiv2-1 kphotoalbum ufraw gimp-ufraw libstreamanalyzer0 shotwell rawstudio python-pyexiv2 pinot nepomuk-core-runtime merkaartor luminance-hdr libkexiv2-11 libextractor3 krename kphotoalbum kde-runtime hugin-tools hugin gwenview gthumb gpscorrelate-gui gpscorrelate gnome-commander gnome-color-manager gimp-lensfun libgexiv2-2 geeqie ffdiaporama libexiv2-dev libexiv2-dbg exiv2 entangle darktable krita Ben file: title = "exiv2"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libexiv2-12" | .depends ~ "libexiv2-13"; is_good = .depends ~ "libexiv2-13"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libexiv2-12"; -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.11-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#727295: Update config.{guess, sub} for AArch64
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:03:14 Matthias Klose wrote:
> Update config.{guess,sub} for AArch64
> patch at
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/153122132/exiv2_0.23-1_0.23-1ubuntu1.diff.gz
Thanks Matthias,
I prefer to fix via
dh $@ --with autotools_dev
Which should also work for any future archs.
Is that OK from your perspective?
I'll include with the next upload.
Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
pkg-kde-extras mailing list
pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] digiKam Software Collection 4.0.0-beta1 - Build Errors (kevix2.h)
digikam-devel, Do we need to build with a specific version of kexiv2? Do we needs something newer than kexiv2 4.3.11? Mark /tmp/buildd/digikam-4.0.0~beta1/core/libs/widgets/metadata/exifwidget.cpp: In member function 'virtual bool Digikam::ExifWidget::decodeMetadata()': /tmp/buildd/digikam-4.0.0~beta1/core/libs/widgets/metadata/exifwidget.cpp:115:45: error: no matching function for call to 'Digikam::DMetadata::getExifTagsDataList()' setMetadataMap(data.getExifTagsDataList()); ^ /tmp/buildd/digikam-4.0.0~beta1/core/libs/widgets/metadata/exifwidget.cpp:115:45: note: candidate is: In file included from /tmp/buildd/digikam-4.0.0~beta1/core/libs/dmetadata/dmetadata.h:38:0, from /tmp/buildd/digikam-4.0.0~beta1/obj-i486-linux- gnu/core/digikam/../../../core/libs/widgets/metadata/metadatawidget.h:38, from /tmp/buildd/digikam-4.0.0~beta1/obj-i486-linux- gnu/core/digikam/../../../core/libs/widgets/metadata/exifwidget.h:33, from /tmp/buildd/digikam-4.0.0~beta1/obj-i486-linux- gnu/core/digikam/exifwidget.moc:9, from /tmp/buildd/digikam-4.0.0~beta1/core/libs/widgets/metadata/exifwidget.cpp:24: /usr/include/libkexiv2/kexiv2.h:600:25: note: KExiv2Iface::KExiv2::MetaDataMap KExiv2Iface::KExiv2::getExifTagsDataList(const QStringList&, bool) const KExiv2::MetaDataMap getExifTagsDataList(const QStringList& exifKeysFilter, bool invertSelection=false) const; ^ /usr/include/libkexiv2/kexiv2.h:600:25: note: candidate expects 2 arguments, 0 provided -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.11-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages digikam depends on: ii digikam-data 4:3.5.0-3 ii digikam-private-libs 4:3.5.0-3+b1 ii kde-runtime 4:4.11.3-1 ii libc6 2.17-97 ii libgcc1 1:4.8.2-10 ii libgphoto2-2 2.4.14-2.4 ii libgphoto2-port0 2.4.14-2.4 ii libkdcraw22 4:4.11.3-1 ii libkdecore5 4:4.11.3-2 ii libkdeui5 4:4.11.3-2 ii libkexiv2-11 4:4.11.3-1 ii libkhtml5 4:4.11.3-2 ii libkio5 4:4.11.3-2 ii libkipi11 4:4.11.3-1 ii libknotifyconfig4 4:4.11.3-2 ii libkparts44:4.11.3-2 ii libphonon44:4.7.1-1 ii libqt4-dbus 4:4.8.5+git192-g085f851+dfsg-2 ii libqt4-sql4:4.8.5+git192-g085f851+dfsg-2 ii libqt4-sql-sqlite 4:4.8.5+git192-g085f851+dfsg-2 ii libqt4-xml4:4.8.5+git192-g085f851+dfsg-2 ii libqtcore44:4.8.5+git192-g085f851+dfsg-2 ii libqtgui4 4:4.8.5+git192-g085f851+dfsg-2 ii libsolid4 4:4.11.3-2 ii libstdc++64.8.2-10 ii libthreadweaver4 4:4.11.3-2 ii perl 5.18.1-5 ii phonon4:4.7.1-1 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Kid3 3.0.2
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:45:12 Patrick Matthäi wrote: > I would be happy if you (Ana or Mark) could go ahead first I have a package ready to go, but we are having some difficulties to svn commits on pkg-kde on alioth. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Kid3 3.0.2
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 10:02:38 Urs Fleisch wrote: > If you encounter some problems, do not > hesitate to contact me. Thanks Urs, We are in the process of building the new package for Debian. Please keep up the good work. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#729119: [Bug 327337] Re: Bug#729119: digikam: Upgrade to Digikam 3.5 makes all albums disappear
Control: forward -1 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327377 Control: severity -1 important On Sat, 9 Nov 2013 15:53:04 Rainer Dorsch wrote: > Upgrade: digikam-private-libs:i386 (3.4.0-1, 3.5.0-2), digikam:i386 > (3.4.0-1, 3.5.0-2), digikam-data:i386 (3.4.0-1, 3.5.0-2) Rainer, I see you have also filed a report with upstream, so have noted the Debian bug as forwarded. There has been very little change between your upgraded versions (3.4 -> 3.5), as this was a maintenance release, I believe 5 bugs were fixed: https://bugs.kde.org/buglist.cgi?f1=cf_versionfixedin&o1=equals&query_format=advanced&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=NEEDSINFO&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&v1=3.5.0&product=digikam&product=digikamimageplugins&product=kipiplugins&product=showfoto There have also been no other reports of albums disappearing, although 3.5 has been available since 10 October, so I have set the severity of your report to important. I would imagine it has to do with the location of your digikam4.db file, is that located in your Pictures directory and have you changed this? I would recommend you check the quality of these databases, especially your backup before you used digikam/3.5: http://userbase.kde.org/Digikam/Check_Database Your tags can also be located in digikam4.db, unless you choose to store them in each picture file. I'll let the digikam team provide you some further assistance via 327337. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#729119: digikam: Upgrade to Digikam 3.5 makes all albums disappear
On Sat, 9 Nov 2013 11:18:23 Rainer Dorsch wrote: > I upgrade to digikam 3.5 to validate if Bug #714561 is still > present. After the upgrade, all albums of digikam are > gone. Rainer, Could you please provide some more details? Did you upgrade digikam only, if so from what version to 3.5.0? Did you upgrade KDE SC at the same time, if so from what version? Have you restarted KDE since the upgrade? We have a persistent issue with shared libs not being available until KDE is restarted. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] How to not handle bugs
On Sat, 9 Nov 2013 12:37:18 Adrian Bunk wrote: > I have to say I am quite disappointed by this poor handling of kaffeine > bugs: Adrian, I am quite disappointed too, but these bugs have been hanging around for three years and doing something is better than doing nothing. By all means you are welcome to assist with triage. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#628631: Photo uploading should use existing selection
On Mon, 30 May 2011 22:27:09 Moray Allan wrote: > Select images > Use Export->Export to Gallery then Add Photos Moray, This is an upstream issue, but I believe work is in progress to standardise the dialogs. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] ktp-common-internals
On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 14:51:15 you wrote: > Hi, > > ktp-common-interals made it unto unstable, however you made some small > changes to the package relative to the git repository. (Added yourself to > uploaders) > > Do you want to commit them? Or should I push them to the repo before tagging > the release? > > Diane Looks like 0.6.3 has indeed been released. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Patch for kile in debian so it can be synced in ubuntu
On Wed, 29 May 2013 19:31:55 you wrote: > Could you add that to the debian package please? Then kile could simply be > synced from debian in the future. Thanks! Thanks Philip, I have added your patch to the Debian svn repo and your changes should appear in the next debian upload. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#459300: kile crashes on startup
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 13:48:18 Patrick Winnertz wrote: > Version: 1:2.0-1 Patrick, This version is no longer supported by Debian and there have been no further reports, so I am closing your report. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] wheres the help
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 03:21:36 Imperial.superior wrote: > Hi i am looking to help on with Debian. i have installed debian wheezy > 64 with kde. i have experience and few problems with my setup and i > would like to try and point them out as accurately as possible and that > i could help fix most of what ive been dealing with. Hi we have a couple of support options available. http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/join.html is a good place to start. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#693671: ITP: hupnp -- Library for building UPnP devices
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:48:24 Thomas Goirand wrote: > We already have libgupnp-igd and the MiniUPnP suite. Why do we need > another implementation? What does it bring that the others don't? Thomas, Digikam is using hupnp for its UPnP interface: https://www.google- melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/smitmehta/1 Amarok is using the UPnP MediaServer KIO-slave based on hupnp: https://gitorious.org/kio-upnp-ms Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#693671: ITP: hupnp -- Library for building UPnP devices
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:27:27 Mark Purcell wrote: > * URL : http://www.herqq.com Unfortunatly the correct URL should be: http://www.herqq.org The other site is not PG13. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#693671: ITP: hupnp -- Library for building UPnP devices
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mark Purcell * Package name: hupnp Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : Tuomo Penttinen * URL : http://www.herqq.com * License : LGPLv3 & GPLv3 Programming Lang: C++ Description : Library for building UPnP devices Herqq UPnP (HUPnP) is a software library for building UPnP devices and control points conforming to the UPnP Device Architecture version 1.1. . It is designed to be simple to use and robust in operation. It is built using C++ and the Qt Framework following many of the design principles and programming practices used in the Qt Framework. . It integrates into Qt-based software smoothly and enables truly rapid UPnP development. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#691545: New Upstream Release - 3.x Release Plan
Package: digikam Version: 4:3.0.0~beta1a-1 Severity: wishlist Tracking Upstream Release Plan: http://www.digikam.org/drupal/about/releaseplan digiKam Software Collection 3.x Release Plan Version including all GoSC 2012 projects. 16/09/2012: 3.0.0-beta1 08/10/2012: 3.0.0-beta2 04/11/2012: 3.0.0-beta3 02/12/2012: 3.0.0-rc 23/12/2012: 3.0.0 Debian WIP packages will be available from $ debcheckout --source=never digikam or http://people.debian.org/~msp Mark -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages digikam depends on: ii digikam-data4:3.0.0~beta1a-1 ii kde-runtime 4:4.8.4-2 ii kipi-plugins4:3.0.0~beta1a-1 ii libc6 2.13-35 ii libexiv2-12 0.23-1 ii libgcc1 1:4.7.2-4 ii libgomp14.7.2-4 ii libgphoto2-22.4.14-2 ii libgphoto2-port02.4.14-2 ii libjasper1 1.900.1-14 ii libjpeg88d-1 ii libkdecore5 4:4.8.4-3 ii libkdeui5 4:4.8.4-3 ii libkdewebkit5 4:4.8.4-3 ii libkfile4 4:4.8.4-3 ii libkhtml5 4:4.8.4-3 ii libkio5 4:4.8.4-3 ii libknotifyconfig4 4:4.8.4-3 ii libkparts4 4:4.8.4-3 ii liblcms11.19.dfsg-1.2 ii liblensfun0 0.2.5-2 ii liblqr-1-0 0.4.1-2 ii libmarblewidget13 4:4.8.4-3 ii libnepomuk4 4:4.8.4-3 ii libopencv-core2.3 2.3.1-11 ii libopencv-highgui2.32.3.1-11 ii libopencv-imgproc2.32.3.1-11 ii libopencv-legacy2.3 2.3.1-11 ii libopencv-objdetect2.3 2.3.1-11 ii libphonon4 4:4.6.0.0-2 ii libpng12-0 1.2.49-3 ii libqjson0 0.7.1-6 ii libqt4-dbus 4:4.8.2+dfsg-2 ii libqt4-network 4:4.8.2+dfsg-2 ii libqt4-qt3support 4:4.8.2+dfsg-2 ii libqt4-sql 4:4.8.2+dfsg-2 ii libqt4-sql-sqlite 4:4.8.2+dfsg-2 ii libqt4-xml 4:4.8.2+dfsg-2 ii libqtcore4 4:4.8.2+dfsg-2 ii libqtgui4 4:4.8.2+dfsg-2 ii libqtwebkit42.2.1-4+b1 ii libsane 1.0.22-7.4 ii libsolid4 4:4.8.4-3 ii libsoprano4 2.7.6+dfsg.1-1 ii libstdc++6 4.7.2-4 ii libthreadweaver44:4.8.4-3 ii libtiff43.9.6-9 ii libx11-62:1.5.0-1 ii phonon 4:4.6.0.0-2 Versions of packages digikam recommends: ii chromium [www-browser] 22.0.1229.94~r161065-2 ii epiphany-browser [www-browser] 3.4.2-2 ii iceweasel [www-browser] 10.0.9esr-1 ii konqueror [www-browser] 4:4.8.4-2 ii lynx-cur [www-browser] 2.8.8dev.14-1 ii mplayerthumbs 4:4.8.4-2 ii w3m [www-browser] 0.5.3-8 Versions of packages digikam suggests: ii digikam-doc 4:3.0.0~beta1a-1 -- no debconf information ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#689004: Please enter 2.9.0 in unstable ASAP at least
On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 00:07:25 Eric Valette wrote: > If I understand correctly the frozen state will previous 2.9 to go to > wheezy. Eric, The plan at this stage is that wheezy will release with digikam/2.6 to meet with the requirements of the Wheezy Freeze Policy: http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html Once wheezy is released I will upload digikam/2.9 to sid. Digikam/3.0 will be uploaded to sid once kdegraphics/4.10 is available in sid. Until that time experimental will continue to track digikam/3.0 with Conflicts. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#689004: Bug#689047: digikam: Maintainer deliberately uploaded a package in experimental that will not be installable for months
merge 689047 689004 retitle 689004 digikam/3.0 conficts with kdegraphics/4.8 found 689047 4:3.0.0~beta1a-1 notfound 689047 3.0.0~beta1a-1 thanks On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 02:53:51 Eric Valette wrote: > Package: digikam > Version: 3.0.0~beta1a-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > See the changelog and bug 689004. > Eric, I seem to be unable to email you directly, all email returns with a 550 error, so I will continue to utilise the BTS. digikam/experimental is installable now (see below), but it does conflict with kdegraphics/unstable. It installs fine and is a fully usable package (contary to your assertions), and some users wish to utilise the latest upstream release, which is why I have uploaded to experimental. However, you are correct that this is not an acceptable long terms solution and is a release critical bug and should not be brought into unstable, hence why it is uploaded to experimental. Upstream has a peculiar approach where they start utilising newer components of kdegraphics. Again you are correct this is not the debian way and is not a sensible approach to packaging. We also had exactly the same issue with the release of digikam/2.0 which was using unreleased features from kdegraphics/4.7. The workaround we used then, and are using now is to make the bleeding edge package available via experimenal, whilst maintaining the fully compatible package via unstable. So debian users have a number of choices: 1. Bleeding edge digikam/3.0. In which case they can install via experimental but cannot utilise kdegraphics/4.8. 2. Integrated digikam/2.6 kdegraphics/4.8. In which case they can install from unstable/ testing and shortly stable.. Once stable is released I will likley release digikam/2.9 to unstable/testing. 3. Roll their own. I think this is a perfectly reasonable approach, which I understand you are not happy with. However I would refer you to the headline for experimental packages: http://packages.debian.org/experimental/digikam Package: digikam (4:3.0.0~beta1a-1) Warning: This package is from the experimental distribution. That means it is likely unstable or buggy, and it may even cause data loss. Please be sure to consult the changelog and other possible documentation before using it. Mark # apt-get -t experimental install digikam Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following extra packages will be installed: digikam-data kipi-plugins kipi-plugins-common Suggested packages: gallery gimp The following packages will be REMOVED: gwenview kdegraphics kdegraphics-thumbnailers ksnapshot libkdcraw-data libkdcraw20 libkexiv2-10 libkexiv2-data libkipi-data libkipi8 The following NEW packages will be installed: digikam digikam-data kipi-plugins kipi-plugins-common 0 upgraded, 4 newly installed, 10 to remove and 398 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B/36.5 MB of archives. After this operation, 89.4 MB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Retrieving bug reports... Done Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done grave bugs of digikam (-> 4:3.0.0~beta1a-1) #689047 - digikam: Maintainer deliberately uploaded a package in experimental that will not be installable for months #689004 - digikam again not installable Summary: digikam(2 bugs) Are you sure you want to install/upgrade the above packages? [Y/n/?/...] (Reading database ... 329290 files and directories currently installed.) Removing kdegraphics ... Removing gwenview ... Removing kdegraphics-thumbnailers ... Removing ksnapshot ... Removing libkdcraw20 ... Removing libkdcraw-data ... Removing libkexiv2-10 ... Removing libkexiv2-data ... Removing libkipi8 ... Removing libkipi-data ... Processing triggers for hicolor-icon-theme ... Processing triggers for desktop-file-utils ... Processing triggers for gnome-menus ... Selecting previously unselected package kipi-plugins-common. (Reading database ... 329159 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking kipi-plugins-common (from .../kipi-plugins- common_4%3a3.0.0~beta1a-1_all.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package kipi-plugins. Unpacking kipi-plugins (from .../kipi-plugins_4%3a3.0.0~beta1a-1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package digikam-data. Unpacking digikam-data (from .../digikam-data_4%3a3.0.0~beta1a-1_all.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package digikam. Unpacking digikam (from .../digikam_4%3a3.0.0~beta1a-1_amd64.deb) ... Processing triggers for hicolor-icon-theme ... Processing triggers for desktop-file-utils ... Processing triggers for gnome-menus ... Processing triggers for menu ... Processing triggers for man-db ... Setting up kipi-plugins-common (4:3.0.0~beta1a-1) ... Setting up digikam-data (4:3.0.0~beta1a-1) ... Setting up digikam (4:3.0.0~beta1a-1) ... Setting up kipi-plugins (4:3.0.0~beta1a-1) ... Processing triggers for
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#689004: digikam again not installable
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:22:30 valette wrote: > OK its experimental but I have hardly seen as many mistakes on a single > package than what I have seen on digikam lately. Hi Valette, This is no bug report, digikam 3.0.0 will not work with kde 4.8.4 and hence the conflicts. Have a look at the changelog: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/d/digikam/current/changelog Mark > > apt-get -t experimental install digikam > Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait > Construction de l'arbre des dépendances > Lecture des informations d'état... Fait > Les paquets suivants ont été installés automatiquement et ne sont plus > nécessaires : kdeartwork-theme-window libpoppler27 libx264-125 > Veuillez utiliser « apt-get autoremove » pour les supprimer. > Les paquets supplémentaires suivants seront installés : > kipi-plugins > Paquets suggérés : > digikam-doc gallery > Les paquets suivants seront ENLEVÉS : > gwenview kde-full kdeartwork kdegraphics kdegraphics-thumbnailers > kdeplasma-addons ksaneplugin kscreensaver ksnapshot libkdcraw-data > libkdcraw20 libkexiv2-10 libkexiv2-data libkipi-data libkipi8 libksane-dev > libksane0 plasma-widgets-addons Les NOUVEAUX paquets suivants seront > installés : > digikam kipi-plugins > 0 mis à jour, 2 nouvellement installés, 18 à enlever et 6 non mis à jour. > Il est nécessaire de prendre 9 728 ko/16,7 Mo dans les archives. > Après cette opération, 28,9 Mo d'espace disque supplémentaires seront > utilisés. Souhaitez-vous continuer [O/n] ? n > Annulation. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#670454: digikam: FTBFS on mips ("dng_flags.h:100:2: error: #error Unable to figure out byte order.")
reopen 670454 thanks On Sun, 6 May 2012 07:59:21 Andrew Goodbody wrote: > Gilles Caulier, the upstream maintainer, reports that a fix has been > applied to the current development version. 2.6.0-RC is due out > tomorrow. I'm not sure what needs to be done to get this fix validated > and included. Andrew, Unfortunatly digikam continues to fail to build from source on the mips architecture: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=digikam&arch=mips The relevant Debian bug report is located here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670454 Thanks, Mark extra/kipi-plugins/dngconverter/dngwriter/extra/dng_sdk/dng_flags.h:100:2: error: #error Unable to figure out byte order. #ifndef qDNGBigEndian #if defined(qDNGLittleEndian) #define qDNGBigEndian !qDNGLittleEndian #elif defined(__POWERPC__) [...] #else #ifndef qXCodeRez #error Unable to figure out byte order. #endif #endif signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#665360: libctemplate-dev: g++-4.7 -std=c++0x issue
On Thu, 31 May 2012 23:10:01 Olaf van der Spek wrote: > The fix is a one line change in template_string.h.in: > http://code.google.com/p/ctemplate/source/detail?r=129 > Can you make the change or would you prefer a new upstream release? Hi Olaf, I will patch, without new upstream. Thanks for the heads up. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#673709: sg3-utils: FTBFS hurd-i386
Package: src:sg3-utils Version: 1.33-1 Severity: important sg3-utils FTBFS on hurd-i386: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=sg3-utils make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'. test -z "/usr/share/man/man8" || /bin/mkdir -p "/build/buildd-sg3-utils_1.33-1-hurd-i386-irelyi/sg3-utils-1.33/debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man8" make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-sg3-utils_1.33-1-hurd-i386-irelyi/sg3-utils-1.33/doc' make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-sg3-utils_1.33-1-hurd-i386-irelyi/sg3-utils-1.33/doc' make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-sg3-utils_1.33-1-hurd-i386-irelyi/sg3-utils-1.33' make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-sg3-utils_1.33-1-hurd-i386-irelyi/sg3-utils-1.33' make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'. make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-data-am'. make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-sg3-utils_1.33-1-hurd-i386-irelyi/sg3-utils-1.33' make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-sg3-utils_1.33-1-hurd-i386-irelyi/sg3-utils-1.33' make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-sg3-utils_1.33-1-hurd-i386-irelyi/sg3-utils-1.33' cp scripts/scsi* debian/tmp/usr/bin dh_install --autodest --sourcedir=debian/tmp dh_install: sg3-utils missing files (usr/share/man/man8/*), aborting make: *** [install] Error 255 This is then flowing into gpod and digikam build-depends. Thanks, Mark -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#673488: transition: ctemplate libctemplate0 -> libctemplate2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition debian-release, ctemplate has some RC bugs regarding gcc-4.7, the new upstream release, bumps the soname and fixes gcc-4.7 build. It has been uploaded to experimental: ctemplate (2.2-1) experimental; urgency=low * New upstream release - Fixes "ftbfs with GCC-4.7" (Closes: #667145) - Fixes "New Upsstream, Watch File" (Closes: #658404) - Fix "g++-4.7 -std=c++0x issue" (Closes: #665360) * --program-prefix=ctemplate- * NEW package libctemplate2 - match-soname -- Mark Purcell Sat, 19 May 2012 07:55:00 +1000 Affected packages: libctemplate0 Reverse Depends: l2tp-ipsec-vpnunrelated FTBFS #672005 mysql-workbench binNMU OK kraft unrelated FTBFS multiarch -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#656158: digikam: move to unstable?
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:30:59 Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > Anything that prevents moving 2.5 from experimental to unstable, > in order to allow wider testing? Christoph, We are waiting for the KDE SC 4.7 tranistion to unstable: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653919 Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#650516: exiv2: please package 0.21 or newer to unstable
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 00:45:25 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > reportbug informs me that 0.22 is in experimental. I need 0.21 or > newer for pinot, however. Jonas, No problem, 0.21 also needs a tranistion, so I will try and upload 0.22. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#648130: lensfun: FTBFS with libpng 1.5
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011 14:21:37 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > I uploaded libpng 1.5 to experimental. > libpng maintainers plan to transition from libpng 1.2 to 1.5. > I am checking build it the package depend to libpng. > > I noticed your package FTBFS by libpng 1.5. I attached build log. > Could you check your package ? Nobuhiro, Thanks for the report, unfortunatly it looks like an upstream issue: http://developer.berlios.de/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=18121&group_id=9034 Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#656829: transition: exiv2 - libexiv2-9 -> libexiv2-11
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition I would like to request a transition slot for exiv2 This package has been uploaded to experimental exiv2 (0.22-1) experimental; urgency=low * New upstream release * NEW Package libexiv2-11 - soname bump * Drop usr/lib/libexiv2.la non-empty-dependency_libs-in-la-file * Ack NMU, Thanks Luk (Closes: #618747) -- Mark Purcell Sat, 24 Sep 2011 14:28:30 +1000 Changes from version 0.21.1 to 0.22 --- * Exiv2 utility - Fixed time setting of -T option when DST is in effect. - Added version hex number to the output of "exiv2 -V". * Exiv2 library - 785: Exif version 2.3 missing tag codes. (Patch by Jens Mueller) - 782: Tamron 18-270mm lens. (Patch by Jens Mueller) - 781: Exif 2.3 & DNG 1.2/1.3 tags. (Patch by Jens Mueller) - 776: Some tests depend on system settings (locale, path, etc). (Volker Grabsch) - 775: Sort iptc data by record number when encoding. (Patch by Matthias Baas) - 772: New Tamron 70-300 mm lens improperly recognized. (Reported by Marie-Noëlle Augendre, patch by Milan Knizek) - 769: "Assertion `sv == d' failed" in 0.21.1 (r2474). (Reported by Derek Chen-Becker, reproducer by Paolo Bacchilega) - 767: Build failure on MinGW with GCC >= 4.6 because of "-no-undefined". (Volker Grabsch) - 765: Debug messages of psdimages.cpp go to stdout instead of stderr. (Volker Grabsch) - 764: PSD resource block handling patch II. (Patch by Michael Ulbrich) - 761: Setting metadata on an image should always succeed. (Patch by Matthias Baas) - 760: Exiv2 fails to write to JPEG with an empty APP13 Photoshop PS3 segment. (Reported by Stefan Brandl) - 757: Wrong ELSE statement in src/CMakeLists.txt. (Reported by Michael Hansen) - 708: On Windows (MSVC and MinGW builds), charset conversions now use respective Windows functions if iconv is not available. - 689: Support for Encapsulated PostScript (*.eps) files. (Michael Ulbrich, Volker Grabsch) - 439: The exiv2 library should be re-entrant. (Patch by Jonathan Potter, GP Software) - Fixed typo: SupplementalCategory -> SupplementalCategories. (Jürgen Wolz) - Added Tokina AT-X 107 AF DX Fish-eye 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 lens. (Milan Knizek) - Added Exif.Panasonic.LensType to the Exiv2::lensName() easy-access function. (Adrian Woodley) libexiv2-9 Reverse Depends: ufraw-batch binNMU OK ufraw binNMU OK gimp-ufrawbinNMU OK libstreamanalyzer0? FTBFS unrelated :-( No rule to make target `/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libavcodec.so' shotwell binNMU OK rawstudio binNMU OK qtpfsguia binNMU OK python-pyexiv2binNMU OK merkaartorgdal transition libextractor-plugins binNMU OK krename binNMU OK kphotoalbum binNMU OK krita binNMU OK gwenview binNMU OK kdebase-runtime binNMU OK kde-runtime kde transition hugin binNMU OK gthumbbinNMU OK gpscorrelate-gui binNMU OK gpscorrelate binNMU OK gnome-commander binNMU OK gnome-color-manager binNMU OK gimp-lensfun binNMU OK libgexiv2-0 requires newer gexiv2 0.3.1 #656749 geeqiebinNMU OK darktable binNMU OK -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#656749: New Upstream Release 0.3.1 - required for exiv2 transition
Source: gexiv2 Version: 0.2.2-6 Severity: normal Hi, The transition for exiv2 depends on the new release of gexiv2. http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/gexiv2/wiki Would you be able to upload to experimental? Thanks, Mark -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] #655074 transition audiofile - kwave fixed in experimental
Alessio, Upstream have released a new version of kwave which depends on the new upstream for audiofile. I have uploaded to experimental, and thus should be ready for transition to unstable. I am happy to upload to unstable, once audiofile is uploaded. Or I am happy for other suggestions for the best way to transition together. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#633680: marked as done (skrooge: Crashing on save)
done 633680 0.9.0-1 thanks Thomas, The bug is now fixed in sid and weezy. Unfortunatly fixing bugs in squeeze is only possible in special cirmstances: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#upload-stable The workaround has been posted to the bug report, so people with issues can locate there. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=skrooge;dist=stable Mark On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 01:15:07 Thomas PIERSON wrote: > reopen 633680 > found 633680 0.7.2.2-1 > thanks > > Hi Mark, > > The skrooge package in Squeeze still have missing depend on > libqca2-plugin-ossl. > Please fix this issue for squeeze/stable users. > > Regards, > Thomas PIERSON > > On 09/10/2011 12:18, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Your message dated Sun, 09 Oct 2011 21:07:55 +1100 > > with message-id <1318154875.17350.0.camel@acer> > > and subject line Re: skrooge: Crashing on save - fixed > > has caused the Debian Bug report #633680, > > regarding skrooge: Crashing on save > > to be marked as done. > > > > This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. > > If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the > > Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. > > > > (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this > > message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system > > misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org > > immediately.) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#628019: Digikam 2.2
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 12:14 +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > What are your plans regarding upgrade of digikam package? > > I´d love to use Digikam 2.2 ;) Hi Martin, digikam 2.2 depends on elements from KDE SC 4.7, which isn't in Debian yet. That said upstream have included the relevant KDE SC 4.7 libs in the build. It is messy and will conflict with some elements of sid, but I have, just, uploaded to experimental. Mark ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#628019: digikam build
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 20:53 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > I've been eagerly waiting for the 2.x release. I tried to build it and > attached is a patch. Just some build dependencies. Thanks Ritesh, I have updated the svn archive but we have some issues with releasing, although I suppose we could to experimental, but it would be broken... Unfortunately digikam is shipping lots of upstream libraries which then turns into file conflicts between packages: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/2011-July/052493.html You can track the work in svn here: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-kde/kde-extras/digikam/trunk/debian/ Or even build directly from svn with the `debcheckout` command. Mark ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] digikam 2.0.0 packaging for distributions
Hi,
I'm the digikam packager for Debian GNU/Linux.
I have noticed that the 2.0.0 .tar.bz2 archive from sf.net is now
including a lot of extras that were distributed separately:
docs/{kipi-plugins,digikam} will these continue to ship with the apps?
extras/kipi-plugins was previous a separate tar archive
extras/libkdcrawis also distributed with kdegraphics
extras/libkexiv2is also distributed with kdegraphics
extras/libkface is unique to digikam archive
extras/libkipi is also distributed with kdegraphics
extras/libkmap is unique to digikam archive
extras/libksane is also distributed with kdegraphics
extras/libmediawiki is unique to digikam archive
I can work around, but need to know if this is the plan for 2.0.0 final?
However, having the same libs released in the digikam archive and the
KDE SC kdegraphics archive is problematic for distributions. Especially
as some are at the same soname libkipi.so.8, whilst others have
different interfaces KDE SC 4.6 kdegraphics ships libkexiv2.so.9, whilst
digikam 2.0.0 is shipping libkexiv2.so.10.
Mark
___
pkg-kde-extras mailing list
pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] kde-extras packages using kdelibs4c2a
On Sunday 27 February 2011 07:16:05 Ana Guerrero wrote: > * lensfun Ana, Happy with everying except lensfun which doesn't have any kdelibs depends, so shouldn't be removed. Thanks, Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#598966: Bug#598966: Bug#598966: skrooge: FTBFS on armel: no matching function for call to 'qMax(double, qreal)'
On Monday 04 October 2010 03:28:39 Scott Kitterman wrote: > Fixed in svn with a patch from Kubuntu. I didn't upload it since I don't have > hardware to verify it builds on Debian, but it should. Has this patch been forwarded upstream? http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-kde/?op=comp&compare%5B%5D=/kde-extras/skro...@18670&compare%5B%5D=/kde-extras/skro...@18680 Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] kipi-plugins: opencv 2.1 transitions
On Wednesday 15 September 2010 13:41:28 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > Hi, > > I've got to talk to you about your package(kipi-plugins). > > kipi-plugins depends on opencv. > And opencv/hppa is deleted by the next release. > Therefore, I think that I want to delete kipi-plugins/hppa from unstable. > # I will repot BTS of RM to ftp.debian.org If I can. Nobuhiro, Yes I am happy with your request. hppa is now not a release architecture, so we do not have to build on it. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#593933: kmymoney: Please build with AqBanking 5
severity 593933 wishlist thanks On Monday 20 September 2010 22:05:11 Emil Langrock wrote: > I see it the same way, but I would say that this is a kind of FTBFS and thus > it must have the severity serious. kmymoney 4.5 does not FTFBS: https://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg=kmymoney;ver=4.5-1 Thus the severity is not series. I agree that kmymoney should be built with aqbanking5, however this is an experimental package, thus I am assigning severity wishlist for the build against aqbanking5. I also suspect the patches to build against aqbanking5 should be forwarded upstream as they are not Debian specific. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] KMyMoney 4.5
On Sunday 22 August 2010 11:05:20 Alvaro Soliverez wrote: > Is squeeze even going to have kde3 libs and some way to configure the > kde3 settings on it? Alvaro, Which kde3 libs do you see kmymoney 3.98 depending on? We have built it against lots of KDE 4.4 libs. I can't see it needing any from squeeze: http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/kmymoney Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] KMyMoney 4.5
On Sunday 22 August 2010 09:35:56 Alvaro Soliverez wrote: > Can't you make an exception? > Otherwise you will ship squeeze with a version that requires KDE3 > libs, and we won't support it nowhere near as long as the squeeze > lifecycle. Unfortunately not. The freeze is frozen and we can't do much more than backport bug fixes. Uploading to experimental now.. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] KMyMoney 4.5
On Sunday 22 August 2010 07:38:00 Diederik de Haas wrote: > On Monday 16 August 2010 23:30:16 Diederik de Haas wrote: > > Today I got a msg that KMyMoney 4.5 was released, which completes the I'm Planning on uploading kmymoney 4.5 to experimental in the next few days. It won't be able to be uploaded to squeeze and it is undesirable to upload to unstable, until squeeze is released. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#592142: ctemplate: FTBFS on sparc: 10 of 20 tests failed
On Sunday 08 August 2010 04:42:21 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > | 10 of 20 tests failed KiBi, Thanks for the report. This is a pain as we have turned on the check tests target in -2, and it is only failing on sparc with a bus error, so I suspect it isn't the code, but rather the stress of the tests. I have forwarded to google to see if they have a view. Should I disable tests for sparc only? Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#576230: lensfun 0.2.5 into debian...
On Wednesday 14 July 2010 19:40:08 Daniel J Blueman wrote: > Is there any chance for you to update the lensfun 0.2.4 package in > debian to 0.2.5, which will incorporate a number of updates, > particularly to the lens database. The interface doesn't change, thus > there is compatibility with the current software. Daniel, I am very keen to upload the new version. The interface maynot change, but there do appear to be additions and more importantly deletions of symbols between versions. --- debian/liblensfun0.symbols (liblensfun0_0.2.5_amd64) +++ dpkg-gensymbolsUJK8cl 2010-07-14 20:29:56.0 +1000 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ liblensfun.so.0 liblensfun0 #MINVER# - _z10_lf_addobjpppvpkvjpfbs3_s...@base 0.2.3 +#MISSING: 0.2.5# _z10_lf_addobjpppvpkvjpfbs3_s...@base 0.2.3 _z10_lf_addobjpppvpkvmpfbs3_s...@base 0.2.3 _z10_lf_addstrpppc...@base 0.2.3 _z10_lf_delobjpp...@base 0.2.3 @@ -14,12 +14,13 @@ _z18_lf_camera_comparepkv...@base 0.2.3 _z20_lf_xml_printf_mlstrp8_gstringpkcs2...@base 0.2.3 _z22_lf_lens_compare_scorepk6lflenss1_p13lffuzzystrcmpp...@base 0.2.3 + _z23_lf_detect_cpu_featur...@base 0.2.5 _z25_lf_ptr_array_find_sortedpk10_gptrarraypvpfipkvs...@base 0.2.3 _z27_lf_ptr_array_insert_sortedp10_gptrarraypvpfipkvs...@base 0.2.3 _z27_lf_ptr_array_insert_uniquep10_gptrarraypvpfipkvs3_epfvs...@base 0.2.3 - _z7_lf_r...@base 0.2.3 +#MISSING: 0.2.5# _z7_lf_r...@base 0.2.3 _zn10lfdatabase4loade...@base 0.2.3 - _zn10lfdatabase4loadepkcs...@base 0.2.3 +#MISSING: 0.2.5# _zn10lfdatabase4loadepkcs...@base 0.2.3 _zn10lfdatabase4loadepkcs...@base 0.2.3 _zn10lfdatabase4loa...@base 0.2.3 _zn10lfdatabase4saveepkpk7lfmountpkpk8lfcamerapkpk6lfl...@base 0.2.3 @@ -27,12 +28,12 @@ _zn10lfdatabase7destro...@base 0.2.3 _zn10lfmodifier10initializeepk6lflens13lfpixelformat10lflenstyp...@base 0.2.3 _zn10lfmodifier12getautoscal...@base 0.2.3 - _zn10lfmodifier16addcolorcallbackepfvpvffs0_iieis...@base 0.2.3 +#MISSING: 0.2.5# _zn10lfmodifier16addcolorcallbackepfvpvffs0_iieis...@base 0.2.3 _zn10lfmodifier16addcolorcallbackepfvpvffs0_iieis...@base 0.2.3 - _zn10lfmodifier16addcoordcallbackepfvpvpfieis...@base 0.2.3 +#MISSING: 0.2.5# _zn10lfmodifier16addcoordcallbackepfvpvpfieis...@base 0.2.3 _zn10lfmodifier16addcoordcallbackepfvpvpfieis...@base 0.2.3 _zn10lfmodifier19addcolorcallbackcciepk6lflens13lfpixelform...@base 0.2.3 - _zn10lfmodifier19addsubpixelcallbackepfvpvpfieis...@base 0.2.3 +#MISSING: 0.2.5# _zn10lfmodifier19addsubpixelcallbackepfvpvpfieis...@base 0.2.3 _zn10lfmodifier19addsubpixelcallbackepfvpvpfieis...@base 0.2.3 _zn10lfmodifier21addcoordcallbackscale...@base 0.2.3 _zn10lfmodifier22addsubpixelcallbacktcaer14lflenscalibt...@base 0.2.3 @@ -41,15 +42,17 @@ _zn10lfmodifier26addcoordcallbackdistortioner21lflenscalibdistorti...@base 0.2.3 _zn10lfmodifier6createepk6lflens...@base 0.2.3 _zn10lfmodifier7destro...@base 0.2.3 - _zn13lfextmodifier11addcallbackep10_gptrarrayp14lfcallbackdatai...@base 0.2.3 +#MISSING: 0.2.5# _zn13lfextmodifier11addcallbackep10_gptrarrayp14lfcallbackdatai...@base 0.2.3 _zn13lfextmodifier11addcallbackep10_gptrarrayp14lfcallbackdatai...@base 0.2.3 _zn13lfextmodifier17modifycoord_scaleepv...@base 0.2.3 _zn13lfextmodifier21modifycoord_dist_fov1epv...@base 0.2.3 + _zn13lfextmodifier21modifycoord_tca_poly3epv...@base 0.2.5 _zn13lfextmodifier22modifycoord_dist_poly3epv...@base 0.2.3 _zn13lfextmodifier22modifycoord_dist_poly5epv...@base 0.2.3 _zn13lfextmodifier22modifycoord_tca_linearepv...@base 0.2.3 _zn13lfextmodifier23modifycoord_dist_ptlensepv...@base 0.2.3 _zn13lfextmodifier23modifycoord_undist_fov1epv...@base 0.2.3 + _zn13lfextmodifier23modifycoord_untca_poly3epv...@base 0.2.5 _zn13lfextmodifier24modifycoord_undist_poly3epv...@base 0.2.3 _zn13lfextmodifier24modifycoord_undist_poly5epv...@base 0.2.3 _zn13lfextmodifier24modifycoord_untca_linearepv...@base 0.2.3 I am unsure if these are private symbols and thus can be ignored, or if an soname bump is warranted. Any advise which can be provided would be great. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#581070: Fwd: [Bug 243555] K3b Doesn't Add Symlinks in Folders
-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: [Bug 243555] K3b Doesn't Add Symlinks in Folders Date: Sunday 11 July 2010, 05:43:02 From: Michał Małek To: m...@debian.org https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=243555 Michał Małek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from Michał Małek 2010-07-10 21:43:00 --- SVN commit 1148478 by mmalek: Add also symbolic links when folder is added to a project BUG: 243555 M +1 -0 ChangeLog M +1 -1 libk3b/projects/datacd/k3bdatadoc.cpp M +1 -1 libk3b/tools/k3bdirsizejob.cpp M +1 -1 src/projects/k3bdataurladdingdialog.cpp WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=1148478 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug. - signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#574543: Bug#574543: My bug is, alas, still present
On Monday 05 July 2010 09:22:34 Willy Gommel wrote: > Alas, the very first thing the program did was complain that no writable CD > media drives were in my system, and that hal needs to be in and working/up > and > running. Willy, Thanks for the update. We will have to forward your report upstream as without your hardware it is almost impossible to debug remotely. Could I ask you to forward the details returned from: wodim -checkdrive wodim -scanbug Thanks, Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#336149: Processed: reopening 336149, found 336149 in 2.0.0-1, tagging 336149
On Sunday 04 July 2010 17:03:06 Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > > > reopen 336149 Thanks Paul, Lets hope upstream can work the issue. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#587996: [Bug 243549] Re: k3b: Media info reports seemingly random capacity for 25GB BD-R
forwarded 587996 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=243549 tags 587996 upstream thanks On Sunday 04 July 2010 04:18:57 Peter Karbaliotis wrote: > The drive is an LG BH10. It would be nice if k3b can be patched so that the > actual disc capacity is 3.5 TiB. I won't hold my breath though. :-) Peter, Thanks for your report, this is an upstream issue as there is little Debian can do to patch. I have forwarded your report upstream, but please feel free to include any further comments with the upstream report. Thanks, Mark The Debian team values users reports, but we are busy, and so we kindly ask you to access the upstream support facilities: There is a user mailing list which maybe used to get support: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/k3b-user To post a message to all the list members, send email to k3b-u...@lists.sourceforge.net. If you know that the bug you want to report is in the "upstream" code then please check/ file against the KDE Bug tracking system: https://bugs.kde.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=k3b You can also report bugs directly upstream using the K3b Help:Report Bug menu entry. If you feel that the bug is one that other Debian users should know about then you are welcome to file a report in the Debian BTS as well. Please keep in mind, however, that managing bug reports is part of the maintainers' workload. As a minimum we ask that you Cc: k3b-u...@lists.sourceforge.net any reports you file in the Debian Bug Tracking system so that upstream are aware of the issue you are reporting. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#585938: Bug#585938: I'm still getting a segfault
On Thursday 17 June 2010 03:04:02 Jason Woofenden wrote: > If a backtrace of geeqie with libexiv2-6 0.19-3 would still be useful, > please let me know how I can get my hands on libexiv2-dbg that is > compatible with this version. I tried building libexiv2 from source > (apt-get source libexiv2-6, etc) but it did not produce a -dbg package. Sorry to muck you around so much Jason. It appears that some versions of geeqie were built against the broken version of exiv2/0.19-2. geeqie/1:1.0-4 is correctly forced to ignore exiv2/0.19-2 and depends on exiv2/0.19-3. So to clean up your system you should install geeqie/1:1.0-4 & exiv2/0.19-3, and remove exiv2/0.20 from experimental. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#585938: Bug#585938: I'm still getting a segfault
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 21:24:23 Andreas Huggel wrote: > This std::list was introduced with the bugfix for the Nikon > performance problem. It used to be std::vector before. So it looks > like either the Debian exiv2 0.19-3 package didn't undo all of the > changes of 0.19-2 (check the typedef for ExifMetadata in exif.hpp) or > a 0.19-2 library was used to create this crash (which is not binary > compatible with the original 0.19 because of exactly this type > change). Thanks Andreas, It appears that some versions of geeqie were built against the broken version of exiv2/0.19-2. geeqie/1:1.0-4 is correctly forced to ignore exiv2/0.19-2 and depends on exiv2/0.19-3. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#585938: Bug#585938: I'm still getting a segfault
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 14:20:34 Jason Woofenden wrote: > Please let me know if I can help further (and how exactly). Thks Jason, Could you please install the libexiv2-dbg so we might get a better backtrack result. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#579835: [Bug #579835] libexiv2-6: Very slow on writing to Nikon SLR-images
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 04:52:30 Michael Holtermann wrote: > > It appears that we do require the rebuild of all libs for the Nikon fix > > (ie 0.20) and can't just sneak it on the back of 0.19. > > This sounds like a big task. Could you say something about the timeline? Or > is the fix deferred until KDE 4.5? Michael, I am pursuing through debian-release clearance to upload exiv2 0.20 to unstable. This will enable libkexiv2 4.4, digikam 1.2, gwenview, ... to be built with the Nikon fix. This isn't tied to KDE SC 4.5. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#577497: Bug#585081: Albums are empty after upgrade of exiv2 as well
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 14:25:49 Michael Holtermann wrote: > Yes, it has. Now the images are back again... > No problem. I have uploaded exiv2 0.19-3 which reverts the Nikon patch from upstream. It appears that we do require the rebuild of all libs for the Nikon fix (ie 0.20) and can't just sneak it on the back of 0.19. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#577497: Bug#585081: Albums are empty after upgrade of exiv2 as well
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 04:43:33 Michael Holtermann wrote: > I've updated my sid this evening. After that, my albums are shown as empty. > The files still exist on disk. Michael, Can you revert your installation of libexiv2-6=0.19-1 to the version in testing. Lets see if that patch has other unintended consequences. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#585081: New Upstream Release - digikam 1.3.0
On Sunday 13 June 2010 22:12:05 Michael Holtermann wrote: > Current digikam (1.2.0) depends on exiv2 0.19, which contains a bug with > Nikon > DSLR-JPGs. This bug was filled on 2010-01-27 and closed with 0.20 > (http://dev.exiv2.org/issues/show/677). It would be really nice to have a > workable digikam back again... ;-) Michael, The two are not necessarily related; digikam new version and exiv2 fix. I have requested approval to upload exiv2 0.20 to unstable, which would fix the Nikon regression: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/06/msg00070.html While I am waiting, I may just backport the Nikon fix to exiv 0.19 and upload to unstable. Either exiv2 uploads will work with digikam 1.2 or 1.3. The upload of digikam 1.3 is a little more problematic, it appears that digikam 1.3 will need to await the release of KDE SC 4.5, which I doubt will make it for squeeze. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#585081: Bug#585081: digikam 1.3.0 build issues.
> > I presume that other distributions would also have the same issues? > > I know that Mandriva include kdegraphics/libs from trunk as well... Sorry I don't agree that is sustainable at all. Pulling from trunk is verging on negligence for a distribution. How does Mandriva know when trunk is stable? Do they continue to patch until trunk is released? Sounds like an awful lot of work bypassing the upstream release process. If upstream have decided that work on a library is work in progress, ie they haven't released. Then why would/ should a distribution take on that risk. If libkdcraw and libkexiv2 are ready for release, but the rest of kdegraphics isn't then it is time to break them back out again, or accept the inherent delay by being a component of the larger kdegraphics release cycle. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#585081: digikam 1.3.0 build issues.
> Just compile and install libkdcraw/libkexiv2 (and also libkipi) from > svn trunk (kdegraphics module) Gilles, Unfortunately for a distribution such as Debian we are tied to releases of the kdegraphics module. We can't easily include the svn trunk components of some of kdegraphics :-( > all library code are managed by digiKam team. The libraries maybe managed by the digikam team, but the release is controlled by the kdegraphics release, do you know which release the updates are slated for? I would doubt that KDE SC 4.4.5 will include large changes, which means we maybe awaiting KDE SC 4.5 for updates to these libs. Previously when the digikam team released these libraries directly, we could update the library packaging independent of the upstream kdegraphics release, however we cannot do that anymore. I presume that other distributions would also have the same issues? Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#585081: New Upstream Release - digikam 1.3.0
Package: digikam Version: 2:1.2.0-5 Severity: wishlist The new upstream release for digikam 1.3.0: http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/521 -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages digikam depends on: ii digikam-data2:1.2.0-5digikam architecture-independant d ii kdebase-runtime 4:4.4.4-1runtime components from the offici ii kdepim-runtime 4:4.4.4-1Runtime components for akonadi-kde ii libc6 2.11.1-2 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.4.4-4GCC support library ii libglib2.0-02.24.1-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgphoto2-22.4.6-1 gphoto2 digital camera library ii libgphoto2-port02.4.6-1 gphoto2 digital camera port librar ii libice6 2:1.0.6-1X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjasper1 1.900.1-7The JasPer JPEG-2000 runtime libra ii libjpeg62 6b-16.1 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libkabc44:4.4.4-1library for handling address book ii libkdcraw8 4:4.4.4-1RAW picture decoding C++ library ( ii libkde3support4 4:4.4.4-1the KDE 3 Support Library for the ii libkdecore5 4:4.4.4-1the KDE Platform Core Library ii libkdeui5 4:4.4.4-1the KDE Platform User Interface Li ii libkexiv2-8 4:4.4.4-1Qt like interface for the libexiv2 ii libkfile4 4:4.4.4-1the File Selection Dialog Library ii libkhtml5 4:4.4.4-1the KHTML Web Content Rendering En ii libkio5 4:4.4.4-1the Network-enabled File Managemen ii libkipi74:4.4.4-1library for apps that want to use ii libkjsapi4 4:4.4.4-1the KJS API Library for the KDE De ii libknotifyconfig4 4:4.4.4-1library for configuring KDE Notifi ii libkparts4 4:4.4.4-1the Framework for the KDE Platform ii libkresources4 4:4.4.4-1the KDE Resource framework library ii libkutils4 4:4.4.4-1various utility classes for the KD ii liblcms11.18.dfsg-1.2+b1 Color management library ii liblensfun0 0.2.5-1 Lens Correction library - Runtime ii liblqr-1-0 0.4.1-1 converts plain array images into m ii libmarblewidget44:4.4.4-1Marble globe widget library ii libnepomuk4 4:4.4.4-1the Nepomuk Meta Data Library ii libphonon4 4:4.6.0really4.4.1-2 the core library of the Phonon mul ii libpng12-0 1.2.43-1 PNG library - runtime ii libqt4-dbus 4:4.6.2-5Qt 4 D-Bus module ii libqt4-network 4:4.6.2-5Qt 4 network module ii libqt4-qt3support 4:4.6.2-5Qt 3 compatibility library for Qt ii libqt4-sql 4:4.6.2-5Qt 4 SQL module ii libqt4-sql-sqlite 4:4.6.2-5Qt 4 SQLite 3 database driver ii libqt4-svg 4:4.6.2-5Qt 4 SVG module ii libqt4-xml 4:4.6.2-5Qt 4 XML module ii libqtcore4 4:4.6.2-5Qt 4 core module ii libqtgui4 4:4.6.2-5Qt 4 GUI module ii libsm6 2:1.1.1-1X11 Session Management library ii libsolid4 4:4.4.4-1Solid Library for KDE Platform ii libsoprano4 2.4.3+dfsg.1-1 libraries for the Soprano RDF fram ii libstdc++6 4.4.4-4 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libtiff43.9.2-3+b1 Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra ii libx11-62:1.3.3-3X11 client-side library ii libxau6 1:1.0.5-2X11 authorisation library ii libxdmcp6 1:1.0.3-2X11 Display Manager Control Protoc ii libxext62:1.1.1-3X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxft2 2.1.14-2 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxpm4 1:3.5.8-1X11 pixmap library ii phonon 4:4.6.0really4.4.1-2 metapackage for the Phonon multime ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 compression library - runtime Versions of packages digikam recommends: ii iceweasel [www-browser] 3.6.3-1 Web browser based on Firefox ii kipi-plugins1.2.0-2 image manipulation/handling plugin ii konqueror [www-browser] 4:4.4.4-1KDE 4's advanced file manager, web ii lynx-cur [www-browser] 2.8.8dev.3-3 Text-mode WWW Browser with NLS sup ii w3m [www-browser]
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Comments regarding ctemplate_0.97-1_amd64.changes
On Saturday 29 May 2010 02:54:04 Barry deFreese wrote: > Hello maintainer, > > I am accepting ctemplates. However, please add a copyright holder for the > debian/* files on your next upload. Thks Barry, No problem.. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] RFS: KVIrc
On Wednesday 19 May 2010 03:14:10 Kai Wasserbäch wrote: > but as long as #580624 stays unresolved, I'm not able to do the actual > upload. No problem. Just about to upload. Btw looks like #580624 is resolved now. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] ITP: kraft -- small business-management application
On Thursday 20 May 2010 03:17:35 Felix Geyer wrote: > I'd love to help maintaing the package in Debian so > it can simply be synced to Ubuntu. Felix, Great. Please go to https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-kde/ and request to join the kde-extras team. We can give you commit access to svn.debian.org as a guest which will allow us to collaborate on kraft from the one svn repo, but feed both Debian & Ubuntu packages. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#580718: ITP: kraft -- small business-management application
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mark Purcell Owner: Mark Purcell * Package name: kraft Version : 0.40 Upstream Author : Klaas Freitag * URL : http://kraft.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL2+ Programming Lang: C++ Description : small business-management application Kraft is an application for people who operate a small business. Kraft helps to write business communication documents like offers and invoices. . Kraft is not a program specialised on a certain trade or craft. Instead Kraft covers the practical issues of a small business and helps through ease of use yet powerful features to deal with most of the office jobs effectively. Packaging based on Ubuntu PPA; Rohan Garg This package was debianized by Jonathan Patrick Davies on Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:17:11 +0200. It was downloaded from http://kraft.sourceforge.net/ Upstream Author: Klaas Freitag Copyright: Copyright (C) 2003 - 2007 Klaas Freitag License: This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St - Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the GNU General Public License can be found in the /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL file. The Debian packaging is (C) 2007, Jonathan Patrick Davies and is licensed under the version 2 or (at your option) any later version of the GPL, see above. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] kbluetooth time for unstable?
Michael, The consensus IIRC this morning is that kbluetooth is ready for unstable: [Thursday 06 May 2010] [07:26:03] mbiebl:fabo:gkiagia: yes kbluetooth was too buggy. but it is about time we reviewed again. I have become more ruthless about removing KDE3 comonents from kde-extras [Thursday 06 May 2010] [07:26:50] pos: one of the reasons why I want to get rid of the old kdebluetooth package is, that it is the only remaining on [Thursday 06 May 2010] [07:26:58] depending on libdbus-qt-1 [Thursday 06 May 2010] [07:27:36] pos: I'd love to kick that before squeeze [Thursday 06 May 2010] [07:29:28] pos: mbiebl: the kde3 version of kdebluetooth doesn't work at all with the new bluez (it's been like that for months) and should be removed anyway [Thursday 06 May 2010] [07:31:00] gkiagia, pos: Should I file RM then? [Thursday 06 May 2010] [07:33:01] gkiagia, pos: and we upload the one from experimental to unstable as soon as you feel comfortable with it [Thursday 06 May 2010] [07:33:34] mbiebl: and for squeeze i would really like to see sqlite. This email is to get your reaction before we start migrating from experimental -> unstable Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#579835: Bug#579835: libexiv2-6: Very slow on writing to Nikon SLR-images
forwarded 579835 http://dev.exiv2.org/issues/show/677 affects 579835 digikam thanks On Saturday 01 May 2010 21:08:37 Michael Holtermann wrote: > the current version in Debian unstable has a known issue with writing > metadata to images from some Nikon SLRs. Please update libexiv to current > version from trunk, as suggested in > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218633#c10. Michael, Thanks for hunting this issue down. You don't need to close the digikam issue, as we can link one bug as blocking another issue and this will show up in digikam. Anyway I have now flagged this report as affecting digikam, so it will show up in the Debian digikam bug list. I did a bit of work with the same issue earlier and Forwarded upstream here: http://dev.exiv2.org/issues/show/677 I am a little hesitant to pull trunk into Debian as we don't know what it does and doesn't fix and trunk is generally more unstable. Andreas was talking about releasing 0.20 earlier and I would prefer to await an upstream release instead of pulling single patches from upstream. Andreas. Any ETA on 0.20? Mark ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#579309: RM: codeine -- ROM; Obsolete-KDE3, replaced by dragonplayer
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Codeine now has a suitable KDE4 replacement; dragonplayer. Mark ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#577768: RM: tripod -- ROM; obsolete-KDE3; buggy; deadupstream
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal tripod is requested for removal from the archive. It is obsolete-kde, buggy and deadupstream. Thanks, Mark ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#577767: RM: kslovar -- ROM; Obsolete-KDE3; dead upstream; buggy
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal kslovar is requested for removal from Debian as it is obsolete-kde3, unmaintained, buggy and dead upstream. Thanks, Mark ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#565138: kmymoney for KDE4 should remain in unstable for now
On Wednesday 13 January 2010 20:39:24 Mark Purcell wrote: > kmymoney for KDE4 is a work in progress and should remain in > unstable for now: > > The effort is ongoing and it is not considered stable. It is > only suitable for early adopters. Just a comment for anyone listening, the kmymoney is making good progress and I would anticipate it will be ready for release with lenny. The release candidate is due 15 May. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#577765: RM: kmymoney2-common -- ROM; src:kmymoney2 package has been merged into src:kmymoney package
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal There are currently two kmymoney src packages in the archive: 1. The obsolete KDE3 src:kmymoney2 (3.95.0+svn1069391-2) package which is the subject of this removal request. This src package also is the only source of kmymoney2-common and kmymoney2-dev binary packages. 2. The current KDE4 src;kmymoney (3.97.2-1) package which _should not_ be removed from the archive. This second package has a dummy transition package kmymoney2, to smooth upgrades from the first package. Thanks, Mark ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#576230: New Upstream Release
Package: lensfun Severity: normal Pascal, Thanks for the update, will package shortly. Mark -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Lensfun 0.2.5 release Date: Friday 02 April 2010, 03:24:25 From: Pascal de Bruijn To: Mark Purcell Hi, Lensfun 0.2.5 just got released, and there are quite some changes: http://lensfun.berlios.de/ The API has even been expanded. Regards, Pascal de Bruijn -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers jaunty APT policy: (500, 'jaunty'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#569498: digikam: Database screwup, albums no longer match what's on disk
On Friday 12 February 2010 09:15:11 Helge Hafting wrote: > I have used digikam for many years, to view and tag my photos. After not > using it for a while, > I had problems starting digikam. An upgrade to 2:1.1.0-1 fixed that. > > But then digikam surprisingly asked me where my albums was, as if the old > info was forgotten. > It spent a long time reading the disk. Well, that has happened with upgrades > before. Helge, Sorry to hear that digikam isn't working too well for you. First thing I would recommend is to backup your existing albums as is to DVD or some other high density storage. > At first things looked normal, old tagged images still have their tags. Good. > > But the albums themselves doesn't work too well. > I open the view for "september 2009" for example. And I see lots of albums, > many which are > from 2008 or 2007 or 2005. Strange. Well, looking at the filesystem, the > date on the directories > are indeed in september 2009. That didn't bother digikam before, though. Yes, > I may have > modified some files in those directories, with a new improved raw converter. > Still, it'd be nice > to fix this in some way. The files have correct dates in EXIF. > > Much worse: Albums comes up *empty* when I try to view them. This is wrong - > the files > are there and xloadimage will display them. Currently I can't use digikam as > a viewer. > I'll try reverting to older versions, but vorry about loosing my many tags. There is a re-read meta data from images option, which can be used to get your database back into sync, available under the Albums menu. I would also recommend you check your Collections Settings, under the configure digikam menu. I would also recommend you check with upstream support as they maywell have some better advice: http://www.digikam.org/drupal/support Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] RFS: skanlite (new upstream version)
On Saturday 13 February 2010 04:48:26 Kai Wasserbäch wrote: > Hello Mark, > a new version of Skanlite (0.4-kde4.4.0) was released and I prepared a new > upload. I'd be glad, if you could do said upload for me. No problem, > You'll find the debian > directory in the SVN and the new orig.tar.bz2 at [0]. I have added a get-orig-source target to debian/rules, so we can just download directly, quickly and easily. > The resulting package > (source and binary) is Lintian clean (even with --pedantic). If you want me to > upload the source package to m.d.n, please let me know. I'm not a huge fan of m.d.n, if it is in svn.d.o, then that is a lot better, as I can make quick changes like get-orig-source easily. > I hope you returned safe to Australia and had a good time in Germany! Good trip, lots of snow which was very nice... Good skiing too... Far to hot back here in Oz :-) > Also - before I forget to mention it - my GnuPG key is now signed by a DD > (Erik > Schanze) who lives close to Dresden. Excellent. > P.S.: Could you build the package with „-Zbzip2“ please? That would be nice. Well it isn't the default option, but I have given it a go.. I don't think it does actually save that much space. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#405017: spurious error message when uploading to a gallery v1 site
On Saturday 30 December 2006 13:10:27 Wouter Verhelst wrote: > When I upload my pictures from digikam, it gives me an error message > after every upload: > > "Uploaden van foto naar externe galerij mislukt: Ongeldig antwoord > ontvangen van de eterne galerij Wouter, Do you still suffer from these error messages? kipi-plugins has now been updated to version 1.1, which may of resolved your issues. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] kdebluettooth 0.4
On Wednesday 03 February 2010 15:13:14 Fathi Boudra wrote: > I noticed your commits on kdebluetooth 0.4. > We moved this package to git a year ago: > http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-kde/kde-extras/kdebluetooth4.git;a=summary Thanks Fathi, The PTS [1] still lists Subversion as the VCS, probably because it doesn't take into account uploads to experimental. I did find the git repo after seeing that 0.4~rc was in experimental, but not anywhere in svn. When a package switches from svn to git should we mark this somehow in svn? Delete svn/trunk? Leave a README in svn/trunk pointing to the git repo?? Mark [1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kdebluetooth.html signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#562197: [digikam] View 100% doesn't show real size (1:1)
On Monday 28 December 2009 14:03:08 Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Hopefully this issue will be end-user proof fixed by upstream in a newer > version. ;-) Ingo, Version 1.1.0 now warns if 100% isn't really 100%.. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] RFS: touchfreeze 0.2.3-3
On Sunday 24 January 2010 14:35:32 Kel Modderman wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Could you please revise & upload touchfreeze 0.2.3-3? > > Thanks, Kel. > No problems. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#565146: Bug#565146: Please add "Breaks: kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking (<= 1.0-1)"
On Wednesday 13 January 2010 22:57:28 Micha Lenk wrote: > In fact I'm thinking about the removal of package > kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking. This maybe a good course of action. > In case the package kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking really gets removed from > the archive and Debian Squeeze gets released without it, an upgrade to > kmymoney2 3.95.0+svn1069391-1 or later would leave the package > kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking in a unusable state. I suggest that the > package kmymoney2 should indicate this by an added dependency field in > the control file: > > Breaks: kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking (<= 1.0-1) I'm happy to include in the next upload of kmymoney.. > However, in the long run I plan to upload a fixed version of > kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking as soon as the mentioned problems have been > sorted out upstream. Great. Thanks.. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#565146: Bug#565146: Please add "Breaks: kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking (<= 1.0-1)"
On Wednesday 13 January 2010 23:05:23 Micha Lenk wrote: > Just for the records: I've deliberately choosen severity serious in > order to prevent the accidental testing-migration of package kmymoney2 > without the requested "Breaks:" dependency. In case you do not agree > with this rationale, please simply adapt the severity and be done with it. Micha, I am happy with that. I have also filed a serious bug against kmymoney for KDE4 to keep it in unstable for a little while yet. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565138 Migration should only be allowed once these issues are resolved.. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#565138: kmymoney for KDE4 should remain in unstable for now
Package: kmymoney2 Version: 3.95.0+svn1069391-1 Severity: serious kmymoney for KDE4 is a work in progress and should remain in unstable for now: http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/KMyMoney#Release_schedule port to KDE4. The effort is ongoing and it is not considered stable. It is only suitable for early adopters. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages kmymoney2 depends on: ii kdebase-runtime 4:4.3.4-2 runtime components from the offici ii kdelibs5 4:4.3.4-1 core libraries for all KDE 4 appli ii kdepimlibs5 4:4.3.4-1 core libraries for KDE PIM 4 appli ii kmymoney2-common 3.95.0+svn1069391-2 KMyMoney architecture independent ii libc62.10.2-5Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.4.2-9 GCC support library ii libgpg-error01.6-1 library for common error values an ii libgpgme11 1.2.0-1.2 GPGME - GnuPG Made Easy ii libical0 0.44-1 iCalendar library implementation i ii libofx4 1:0.9.0-3 library to support Open Financial ii libqt4-dbus 4:4.5.3-4 Qt 4 D-Bus module ii libqt4-network 4:4.5.3-4 Qt 4 network module ii libqt4-qt3support4:4.5.3-4 Qt 3 compatibility library for Qt ii libqt4-sql 4:4.5.3-4 Qt 4 SQL module ii libqt4-svg 4:4.5.3-4 Qt 4 SVG module ii libqt4-xml 4:4.5.3-4 Qt 4 XML module ii libqtcore4 4:4.5.3-4 Qt 4 core module ii libqtgui44:4.5.3-4 Qt 4 GUI module ii libstdc++6 4.4.2-9 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3compression library - runtime Versions of packages kmymoney2 recommends: pn kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking (no description available) kmymoney2 suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#563982: Ubuntu Patch for exiv2/0.19 transition
Package: python-pyexiv2 Version: 0.1.3-5 Severity: important File: pyexiv2 Tags: patch Michal, WIth the exiv2/0.19 tranistion, pyexiv2 requires a patch to build correctly: I have received the following from Luka Renko IIRC. [07:07] pos: I am doing exiv2 0.19 transition in ubuntu - pyexiv2 needs source code patch to work with exiv2 [07:09] pos: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~osomon/pyexiv2/0.1.x/revision/101 [07:09] Lure: thks [07:10] pos: https://launchpad.net/bugs/502565 and my test build ppa might be useful as reference However I have notcied that your last upload has been built correctly with exiv2/0.19: https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=pyexiv2&arch=armel&ver=0.1.3-6&stamp=126212&file=log&as=raw Mark -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages python-pyexiv2 depends on: ii libboost-python1.40.0 1.40.0-5 Boost.Python Library ii libc6 2.10.2-3 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libexiv2-60.19-1 EXIF/IPTC metadata manipulation li ii libgcc1 1:4.4.2-8 GCC support library ii libstdc++64.4.2-8The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii python2.5.4-5An interactive high-level object-o ii python-support1.0.6 automated rebuilding support for P python-pyexiv2 recommends no packages. python-pyexiv2 suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#563906: RM: kwlan -- ROM; obsolete (KDE3), buggy, deadupstream
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal kwlan has come to the end of days and should be removed from the archive. Mark ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] [RFS] kvirc_4.0.0~svn3763-1
On Monday 04 January 2010 23:21:40 Kai Wasserbäch wrote: > did you receive Raúl's e-mail (see below)? Just asking because I didn't hear > anything so far and you didn't get my e-mail (when I asked the first time for > sponsorship for the last Skanlite version). Kia, Raúl, Thanks for your emails and continued work on kvirc. I am happy to upload, just haven't gotten around to it yet. I am a little worried about the svn/hg compatibility, and that also slows down the upload process. > If you're just too busy, then I apologize for asking so shortly after the > RFS. I > don't want to put pressure on you. ;) A few emails from you guys is fine, so please don't hesitate to keep in contact. Happy new year to you as well. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#563679: Bug#563679: digikam: shows no images and all collection folders as empty (0).
On Tuesday 05 January 2010 02:41:18 datenritter wrote: > After updating from digikam 2:1.0.0~beta4-2 to digikam 2%3a1.0.0-1_i386.deb > from unstable, digikam does not show any images anymore in my collection. > All folders show "(0)" images. The problem remains after deleting the > database files and restarting digikam. Well that certainly isn't the desired behaviour. > Versions of packages digikam depends on: > ii kdebase-runtime4:4.3.2-1 runtime components from the > offici > ii kdelibs5 4:4.3.4-1 core libraries for all KDE 4 > appli > ii kdepimlibs54:4.3.4-1 core libraries for KDE PIM 4 > appli This could be problematic. kdebase-runtime should be at the same version as kdelibs5. I recommend upgrading kdebase-runtime to version 4:4.3.4-1 from unstable. > Versions of packages digikam recommends: > ii galeon [www-browser] 2.0.7-1.1 GNOME web browser for advanced > use > ii iceweasel [www-browser] 3.5.6-1lightweight web browser based on > M > ii kipi-plugins 0.7.0-1image manipulation/handling > plugin > ii konqueror [www-browser] 4:4.3.2-1 KDE 4's advanced file manager, > web Again both kipi-plugins and konqueror should also be upgraded to the most recent version in unstable. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#560893: [Bug 220236] Re: marble widget 100% CPU on exit
reassign 560893 libmarble4 4:4.3.4-1 affects 560893 digikam tag 560893 upstream fixed-upstream thanks On Thursday 31 December 2009 18:00:55 Dietz Pröpper wrote: > > I suspect this issue is being caused by the marble plugin widget in > > digikam. > > I second that. Downgrading marble to the version from kde 4.3.2 resolves > the hang during digikam shutting down and also the cpu issue seems to have > gone. http://bugs.debian.org/560893 merged-upstream: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220236 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#562944: kmymoney depends on libkleo
Hi KDE-PIM, I see with today's announcement that kmymoney now depends on libkleo development headers for the build: http://www.kdenews.org/2009/12/28/first-kmymoney-beta-version-available-kde-4- platform The problem for me, packaging kmymoney for Debian, is that libkleo isn't shipped in the external libraries kdepimlibs package, but rather an internal library in the kdepim package. What do the kde-pim team recommend in this situation? Is it possible to move libkleo into the public libraries, kdepimlibs? I see in the kdepimlibs/PLAN that kleo is listed as done: Done akonadi gpgme++ kblog kcal kholidays kimap kleo (GPL) kmime kpimidentities ktnef mailtransport qgpgme syndication But kleo doesn't appear to of migrated. Could I ask any replies to maintain the (Cc:) to keep the interested parties informed. Thanks. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#562944: First KMyMoney Beta Version Available for KDE 4 Platform
Package: kmymoney2 Version: 1.0.2-1 Severity: wishlist New Upstream Release: First KMyMoney Beta Version Available for KDE 4 Platform http://www.kdenews.org/2009/12/28/first-kmymoney-beta-version-available-kde-4-platform -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages kmymoney2 depends on: ii kdelibs4c2a 4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-2.1 core libraries and binaries for al ii kmymoney2-common 1.0.2-1 KMyMoney architecture independent ii libacl1 2.2.49-1Access control list shared library ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.20-2Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libattr1 1:2.4.44-1 Extended attribute shared library ii libaudio21.9.2-3 Network Audio System - shared libr ii libc62.10.2-2GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libfam0 2.7.0-16.1 Client library to control the FAM ii libfontconfig1 2.6.0-4.2 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.3.11-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.4.2-7 GCC support library ii libice6 2:1.0.6-1 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn11 1.15-2 GNU Libidn library, implementation ii libjpeg626b-15 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libofx4 1:0.9.0-3 library to support Open Financial ii libosp5 1.5.2-8 Runtime library for OpenJade group ii libpcre3 7.8-3 Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi ii libpng12-0 1.2.41-1PNG library - runtime ii libqt3-mt3:3.3.8b-6 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm6 2:1.1.1-1 X11 Session Management library ii libsqlite3-0 3.6.21-2SQLite 3 shared library ii libstdc++6 4.4.2-7 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 2:1.3.2-1 X11 client-side library ii libxcursor1 1:1.1.10-1 X cursor management library ii libxext6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxft2 2.1.14-1FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxi6 2:1.2.1-2 X11 Input extension library ii libxinerama1 2:1.0.3-2 X11 Xinerama extension library ii libxrandr2 2:1.3.0-2 X11 RandR extension library ii libxrender1 1:0.9.5-1 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt6 1:1.0.7-1 X11 toolkit intrinsics library ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-2compression library - runtime Versions of packages kmymoney2 recommends: pn kmymoney2-plugin-aqbanking (no description available) kmymoney2 suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#562152: digikam 1.0 should Recommend: dolphin
Package: digikam Version: 2:1.0.0-1 On Tuesday 22 December 2009 09:01:17 Luka Renko wrote: > Mark, Fathi, > > I have committed some changes to debian packaging for 1.0 release of > digikam (which was released today). I have also included one important > crasher fix as patch. I think the stuff in svn is more or less ready for > release, but I did not have debian chroot environment to quickly test > that, so I will leave it to one of you to try and upload, or I will test > in debian chroot tomorrow. Luka, One change that I will reverse from your packaging is the removal of dolphin from Recommends: Without dolphin, digikam produces the attached error message when one envokes the "Album:Open in File Manager", which is why it was included as a Recommends: Please note that a Recommends: is not absolute: Recommends This declares a strong, but not absolute, dependency. The Recommends field should list packages that would be found together with this one in all but unusual installations. If non-kde users do not want to install dolphin, then with a Recommends: they don't have too. However this has been an issue in the past and led to real usability problems: http://bugs.debian.org:80/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=440250 This has also been discussed on the kde bug tracking: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=185638#c5 If you are going to undo our previous packaging work, please discuss here first. Thanks, Mark <> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#560893: digikam broken in unstable?
On Friday 18 December 2009 23:59:29 Dietz Pröpper wrote: > it is switched off but I noticed a running nepomukserver (but not the other > nepomuk processes). Killing that process and running digikam afterwards did > not change anything :-\. Dietz, Please run strace on digikam. $ strace digikam and that will let us know what is going on. In my case I had an issue with FD 7 not being opened which led me to nepomuk. Also could I ask you to continue to cc: the bug tracking system, so we can keep a record of the debugging efforts. Thanks, Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#560893: digikam broken in unstable?
On Thursday 17 December 2009 07:02:45 Dietz Pröpper wrote: > Digikam eats up 95%+ of the cpu and does not terminate properly. > (bug ##560893) Upstreams says, this might be a Debian problem. > > Therefore, can anyone confirm the behaviour? Yes I can confirm: http://bugs.debian.org/560893 and I forwarded upstream: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218467 I think I have been seeing this behaviour in other apps as well, enabling some of the plasma active wallpapers also seems to be pushing my CPU to 100%. :-( Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Digikam-doc misses a developer
On Wednesday 16 December 2009 02:46:16 Valerio Passini wrote: > At the moment none is taking care of packaging digikam documentation. > Digikam is in extragear, nonetheless it is a very popular application > for managing and editing pictures and it's quite complex to use it > without a good manual. digikam-doc seems abandoned and many wishes/bugs > have been open for this reason. This mail can't be a RFP, since the > (old) package exists, however it is a request that some pious KDE > developer take care of it. What it needs is to be maintained considering > that the next stable release of digikam is near and it would be really a > pity to not have the relative documentation in Debian. If it's not > possible to fulfill my request for technical reasons, I would like to > know them. Valerio, Thanks for your interest in digikam-doc in Debian. Unfortunately there is very little we can do from a Debian perspective as upstream have not yet updated the documentation suite for digikam. http://www.digikam.org/drupal/docs http://sourceforge.net/projects/digikam/files/ Rest assured that once upstream do release, the Debian package will be updated. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] RFS (skanlite) and advise needed
On Sunday 13 December 2009 02:08:52 you wrote: > Dear Mark, > on December the 3rd I wrote you the e-mail you can find below. I just wanted > to > ask if you have some time to do the upload. If not, let me know and I'll try > to > find somebody else from the KDE team to take care of it. No problem with the upload. I didn't Rx your email of 3 Dec, as far as I can tell :-( > Kai Wasserbäch schrieb am 03.12.2009 20:06: > > Dear Mark, > > I just noticed that I had hidden some rather nasty typos in the German > > manpage > > which aren't to good to bear for myself as a native German speaker. ;) > > Therefore > > (and for the switch to source format »3.0 (quilt)«, because this allows us > > to > > use upstream's tarballs without repacking) I'd kindly ask for your > > sponsorship > > of the new package. Sounds good. > > Now a few questions before you actually do the upload: > > 1. How to best deal with the watch-file? (Problem is, that not every > > release of > > KDE is accompanied by a Skanlite release which leads to an watch file error > > showing up on the PTS page from time to time.) watch file errors are not too bad and provided it is right some of the time that is probable good enough.. > > 2. Do we need to reimport (somehow) the upstream version 0.3-kde4.3.1 as an > > tar.bz2 to benefit from the source format 3.0 or does svn-buildpackage > > figure > > this out on itself if it gets the -Zbzip2 flag passed? No we can reimport easily until we get a new upstream release. However svn-buildpackage seems to work with what we have so I can upload now. > > Apart from that: everything is in the SVN and ready to go. Thanks for your work on this. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#556409: Bug#556409: [digikam] Pressing OK/Cancel in geolocation editor crashes digikam
forwarded 556409 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214102 tags 556409 upstream thanks On Monday 16 November 2009 08:15:01 Jacob Kanev wrote: > This is similar (equal?) to bug 199801 on the digikam-devel mailing list, > which does not seem to have been followed up upon. Jacob, Looks more like: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214102 Which is fixed here: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209960 Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#552236: Bug#552236: kphotoalbum: Missing EXIF support dialog upon startup without remedy ?
On Monday 26 October 2009 18:04:00 Olivier Berger wrote: > tags 552236 + patch > thanks > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 05:35:44PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: > > > > Looking at the code, in XMLDB/FileReader.cpp, it seems it's the only place > > in the sources where a #ifdef HASEXIV2 is used, whereas all the other > > sources seem to use #ifdef HAVE_EXIV2 > > > > Here's a proposed patch to fix the issue : Thanks Oliver, I have forwarded your patch upstream: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211907 Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Lensfun-0.2.4
On Sunday 25 October 2009 23:14:12 Pascal de Bruijn wrote: > Both patches are already in 0.2.4. So they should be dropped as well... > > Lensfun 0.2.4 should be fine without patches. Excellent.. Easy to do then. > I'm not entirely sure on how to deal with the new lensfun version and > svn at alioth? > > Would you be so kind, to import Lensfun-0.2.4 into Debian Unstable? No problem, I can upload today. Thanks for your heads up. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#547364: digikam is not displaying photos again
On Saturday 19 September 2009 12:05:36 Jim Bauer wrote: > digikam is not displaying any photos -- again. The images still exist in the > filesystem. This problem occurred in the recent past, and was fixed, with a > later update. However it has now reappeared. > > Possibly related to #538886, #540105 Jim, I am not seeing that problem here, digikam is displaying all photos for me. :-( I see you are using a mixed KDE4 environment with packages from version 4:4.3.1-1 & 4:4.2.4-1: > Versions of packages digikam depends on: > ii kdebase-runtime4:4.3.1-1 runtime components from the > offici > ii dolphin 4:4.2.4-1 file manager for KDE 4 > ii konqueror [www-browser] 4:4.2.4-1 KDE 4's advanced file manager, > web Could I ask you to upgrade all your packages to the current unstable baseline 4:4.3.2, logout and then try digikam again. Thanks, Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Lensfun-0.2.4
On Sunday 11 October 2009 02:18:52 Pascal de Bruijn wrote: > Hi, Hi Pascal, > I just mailed with Andrew Zabolotny, the author of LensFun. He's getting > current svn in shape for release as 0.2.4. I see they have released in the last couple of days. > The new release of course has to be repackaged. No major changes as far > as I know... > > I think we can drop most if not all patches for 0.2.4. Excellent. What about the remaining two in debian.svn.org? 90-lensfun-db-update-rel-to-svn65.dpatch 91-lensfun-db-update-svn65-to-pmjdebruijn.dpatch They don't apply cleanly to 0.2.4. > However, there are some packaging issues I'm not entirely sure of... > > The library is now called liblensfun0, I'm assuming that will remain the > same as long as the API is unchanged. It will only need to be renamed to > liblensfun1 if the API has changed, right? Yes. Have a look at the Debian library packing guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html > Though there are some references to 0.2.3, in the debian package files: > > rules:DEB_DH_MAKESHLIBS_ARGS_ALL := -- -v0.2.3 > liblensfun0.symbols: lf_lens_...@base 0.2.3 My understanding is that the symbols file only details the first version that specific symbols appear. Thus the correct answer is to leave the symbols file at 0.2.3. > The rules file is easily adapted, but how would I regenerate the symbols > file? I don't think you need to change the rules file as 0.2.3 and 0.2.4 are binary compatible, ie you can leave it at 0.2.3. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] KVIrc 4.0.0~svn3240-1 now really ready for upload
On Tuesday 09 June 2009 06:19:56 Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote: > hgsubversion is planned to be fixed for July, when Mercurial 1.3 > will be released after that, the extension will be more stable and > maintained for the stable mercurial release as well. > > If you are not happy with this dates I can manage to get some fixes > before. because I think it is very important that people can keep up to > date with what happens with development in an easy way Raúl, Thanks for your reply and your detailed response. I am happy with the dates and if hgsubversion can work then everyone can be satisified. Until then I would be happy to sponsor point releases, but think we are missing out a little on the team maintenance aspects. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
