[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#741361: Bug#741361: Please migrate to xine-lib-1.2
tag 741361 moreinfo thanks On Tuesday 11 March 2014 18:14:17 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Source: kaffeine > Severity: important > > Hi, > xine-lib is scheduled for removal in jessie. Please build-depend on > libxine2-dev instead of libxine-dev (a test compile worked fine for me) > > The severity will be bumped to RC status in a few weeks/months. Hi Moritz! If libxine is going to be *removed*, can't you simply make libxine- dev provide libxine2 stuff? In that way you will only need binNMUs for this packages. You normally add the soname to dev packages if you intend to provide more than one version at the time. I'll wait for your reply before doing any change :) Kinds regards, Lisandro. -- I must confess, I was born at a very early age. -- Groucho Marx Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#741361: Bug#741361: Please migrate to xine-lib-1.2
tag 741361 moreinfo thanks On Tuesday 11 March 2014 18:14:17 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Source: kaffeine > Severity: important > > Hi, > xine-lib is scheduled for removal in jessie. Please build-depend on > libxine2-dev instead of libxine-dev (a test compile worked fine for me) > > The severity will be bumped to RC status in a few weeks/months. Hi Moritz! If libxine is going to be *removed*, can't you simply make libxine- dev provide libxine2 stuff? In that way you will only need binNMUs for this packages. You normally add the soname to dev packages if you intend to provide more than one version at the time. I'll wait for your reply before doing any change :) Kinds regards, Lisandro. -- I must confess, I was born at a very early age. -- Groucho Marx Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#741361: Bug#741361: Please migrate to xine-lib-1.2
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:16:42PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > tag 741361 moreinfo > thanks > > On Tuesday 11 March 2014 18:14:17 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > Source: kaffeine > > Severity: important > > > > Hi, > > xine-lib is scheduled for removal in jessie. Please build-depend on > > libxine2-dev instead of libxine-dev (a test compile worked fine for me) > > > > The severity will be bumped to RC status in a few weeks/months. > > Hi Moritz! If libxine is going to be *removed*, can't you simply make libxine- > dev provide libxine2 stuff? In that way you will only need binNMUs for this > packages. You normally add the soname to dev packages if you intend to > provide > more than one version at the time. Note that I'm not the xine-lib maintainer, I'm adding Darren to CC. Since there are only three packages still using libxine-dev (plus one which needs to be removed), simply fixing these three packages and removing the package might be simpler. Cheers, Moritz ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#741361: Bug#741361: Please migrate to xine-lib-1.2
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 04:03:15PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:16:42PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > wrote: > > tag 741361 moreinfo > > thanks > > > > On Tuesday 11 March 2014 18:14:17 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > Source: kaffeine > > > Severity: important > > > > > > Hi, > > > xine-lib is scheduled for removal in jessie. Please build-depend on > > > libxine2-dev instead of libxine-dev (a test compile worked fine for me) > > > > > > The severity will be bumped to RC status in a few weeks/months. > > > > Hi Moritz! If libxine is going to be *removed*, can't you simply make > > libxine- > > dev provide libxine2 stuff? In that way you will only need binNMUs for this > > packages. You normally add the soname to dev packages if you intend to > > provide > > more than one version at the time. > > Note that I'm not the xine-lib maintainer, I'm adding Darren to CC. > > Since there are only three packages still using libxine-dev (plus one which > needs to be removed), simply fixing these three packages and removing the > package might be simpler. kaffeine is now the only package left (beside pyxine, which is filed for removal), so it would be nice if you could either fix this soon or give me the green light to fix it myself (this is indirectly holding the libav10 transition) Cheers, Moritz ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
