morituri 0.1.0-1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the morituri source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 0.1.0-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
jconvolver 0.8.6-1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the jconvolver source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.8.4-1 Current version: 0.8.6-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] bristol packaging branch, master, updated. debian/0.40.7-2-11-g59a5591
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 05:58:03PM +, quadrispro-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: Bump Standards. Disable jack support for non-linux architectures. Hmm - Isn't it ALSA that should be disabled rather than JACK? JACK seems to compile fine on e.g. kfreebsd, whereas ALSA doesn't. Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] bristol packaging branch, master, updated. debian/0.40.7-2-11-g59a5591
Hi Jonas On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Hmm - Isn't it ALSA that should be disabled rather than JACK? JACK seems to compile fine on e.g. kfreebsd, whereas ALSA doesn't. it was my mistake and I'm on it. Thank you very much! -- Alessio Treglia quadris...@ubuntu.com Ubuntu MOTU Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com 0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of snd_11.4-1_amd64.changes
snd_11.4-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: snd_11.4-1.dsc snd_11.4.orig.tar.gz snd_11.4-1.diff.gz snd_11.4-1_all.deb snd-doc_11.4-1_all.deb snd-gtk-jack_11.4-1_amd64.deb snd-gtk-pulse_11.4-1_amd64.deb snd-nox_11.4-1_amd64.deb snd-nox-alsa_11.4-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#574875: RM: bitscope -- ROM; renamed to bitmeter
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal As subject says: Please remove bitscope from unstable, as it has been renamed upstream to bitmeter - which has now entered unstable. Kind regards, - Jonas ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: What is the multimedia future for Squeeze?
Jonas, Thanks for the reply, I'm sorry to have not been more concise with my question, My question about Stable was semi-rhetorical. Having observed the pattern of Debian Stable in the past (and yes I was complaining a little wee bit). Now that there is a dedicated multimedia packaging team I wonder if AV Linux should continue with Squeeze (less fresh packages, far more core library stability) and will there be a better representation of multimedia updates through down to Stable?. Or will I need to continue using Testing as a base in order to continue keeping pace?. Does that make more sense? I'm not even sure if it is an answerable question...but opinions are a valued response as well. Thanks, -GLEN Hi Glen, On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:55:07PM -0700, i...@bandshed.net wrote: I am a member of this list but not the packaging team, I develop AV Linux and use your packages from GIT, Unstable and Squeeze regularly. Last year when I released AV Linux 2.0 based on Squeeze I had to build about 75% of the Audio applications from source in order to fulfill the status quo with other Multimedia intensive Distributions. The amount of ground this team has covered in less than a year is earth-shattering, I now have less than 10% of my applications outside of the official Debian channels. Perhaps in the long term you guys will make me redundant but my user numbers continue to grow and I have to contemplate what direction to continue in. Perhaps you could see the benefit of maintaining those remaining 10% at Alioth? In other words: Why not join the team - even if your target it a derivative of Debian rather than Debian itself? I could certainly see a benefit in working as close together as possible! :-) I haven't found Debian Testing/Unstable to be a terrible easy thing to distribute, as a single developer I don't have an extensive breakage buffering infrastructure like SiduX does and I basically have to tell my users not to update and provide them with regular updated ISO snapshots that I have broken and fixed to a point of useability. Interesting. Seriously. I have quite some opinions on ways to produce custom distributions based on Debian, but that's off topic for this list. I'd be happy to discuss this topic further at the ble...@lists.debian.org list instead. Finally to my question(s)...how much of the current pkg-multimedia inventory will find it's way into Debian 6.0? Do you know about the Debian QA pages? Have a look here: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org ...and notice the Testing column - that's what will end in next stable Debian distribution release, if all goes well. Also now that there is a pkg-multimedia team in place for the next stable release will new applications eventually make their way into Stable? Or will it be the age old pattern of Debian Stable being bliss for the first few moths of it's release and then being woefully out of date for multimedia heads? Yes, that is exactly how it is: after a few months WHAM! everything is old, boring and shitty and everyone are just longing for the next release happening ages later. Or were you not trolling? Seems you knew the answer already and really wanted to complain. Perhaps if you rephrase your question it might be easier to understand (for me at least). I wish I could say that Xorg, Udev, Grub2 and other libs have been fun to work with this past year...but NOT! I'd like to know what to expect to continue on for the next year. (Or until you guys get rid of me!) Again - what is your question here? kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [Debconf10 Talks Team] [Debconf-announce] Debconf 10: Call for Contributions!
Not anyone else from team pkg-multimedia going to debconf? Really? On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:10:33 (CET), Reinhard Tartler wrote: hi folks, who else is going to attend debconf 10? I've already booked my ticket together with Fuddl, so we'll both be there. Do we want to present something from our work? Like showing how the Debian multimedia stacks up, how is the state of jack, codec and related multimedia packaging? From: Debconf10 Talks Team ta...@debconf.org Subject: [Debconf-announce] Debconf 10: Call for Contributions! To: debian-devel-annou...@lists.debian.org, debconf-annou...@lists.debconf.org Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:36:59 -0400 Reply-To: debconf-disc...@lists.debconf.org Calling all potential contributors to Debconf 10! The Debconf team is excited to announce that we are now accepting proposals for contributions to this year's Debian conference! We invite you to submit proposals for how you would contribute until the deadline: May 1st, 2010, 23h59 UTC. There are many ways you can contribute, you could present a technical paper, host a panel discussion, put on a tutorial, do a performance, an art installation, a debate, host a meeting (BoFS, or Birds of a Feather Session), or other possibilities that you devise. This year we are also accepting proposals for tracks—a thematic grouping around a particular subject, and people to coordinate those tracks. If you are looking for ideas of things that you could contribute, or have ideas for things that you would like to see happen at Debconf, have a look at the Contribution Brainstorm[0] page. DebConf talks will be broadcast live on the Internet where possible, unless otherwise requested. Videos of the talks will be published on the web along with the presentation slides and papers. == Step 1. Submit Proposal == Proposals should provide an overview of your proposed contribution, similar to an abstract, and be no more than 600 words. Since contributions can cover a range of issues, please describe what your proposal covers, be it political (Free Software, law, advocacy, access, etc.), technical (d-i, OpenPGP, etc.), social (Debian structures and groups). It's okay to hit all three of these. Your proposal should also include some information on why you're qualified to present, or coordinate this topic. For example, you can include links to posts you have made to Debian mailing lists or other material that indicates your qualifications. Proposals and their abstracts will be accepted until May 1st, 2010, 23h59 UTC. To submit your proposal, go to Penta[1] and register as an attendee. Once you are registered, there is a Submit a proposal link. You will see your proposal on the site. You can choose between different presentation types. If you are unsure what type you should use, please read our glossary of definitions[2]. If it's not there for some reason, or you have questions, please contact us immediately at mailto:ta...@debconf.org. == Step 2. Committee Review == The review committee for this year will make its decision by May 1st, 2010. All correspondence will be done by email. == Step 3. Paper Submission == Like last year, we are asking for papers to be submitted along with the presentations. A full paper is optional, however we strongly encourage you to submit one if possible as we intend to provide written information along with transcripts of the sessions for later viewing. Having written papers in advance will allow us to get translations done to help non-native-English speakers feel more comfortable with the topics presented. Papers are due by July 1st, 2010, and should cover the topic in reasonable depth (3 pages A4 text, plus pictures and diagrams). We will use LaTeX to typeset the proceedings. Please submit your paper formatted in LaTeX. Should you be unfamiliar with LaTeX earlier submission in plain text is also fine. == Step 4. Live Presentation == Longer presentations may have a break in the middle and should include workshop items that directly involve the participants. If using slides or any other presentation, please consider that your audience will consist of people who use free software, and your choice of application to prepare and display the slides should reflect this if at all possible. == Fine Print Publication Rights == Debconf requires non-exclusive publication rights to papers, presentations, and any additional handouts or audio/visual materials used in conjunction with the presentation. The authors have the freedom to pick a DFSG-free license for the papers themselves and retain all copyrights. The presentations will be recorded, and may be broadcast over the Internet. Any copies of the presentation will be made available == Failure to Submit == In the event that a deadline is missed we reserve the right to revoke any offer to present. == About Debconf == The annual Debconf conference is a technical and social forum for
Re: [Debconf10 Talks Team] [Debconf-announce] Debconf 10: Call for Contributions!
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 18:22, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de wrote: Not anyone else from team pkg-multimedia going to debconf? Really? I'm not going. Unfortunately usually I cannot take random weeks of VAC so debconfs are not really possible for me (even when it is held closer, as in last year's Buenos Aires). -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: What is the multimedia future for Squeeze?
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 21:53:20 (CET), i...@bandshed.net wrote: I'm sorry to have not been more concise with my question, My question about Stable was semi-rhetorical. Having observed the pattern of Debian Stable in the past (and yes I was complaining a little wee bit). Now that there is a dedicated multimedia packaging team I wonder if AV Linux should continue with Squeeze (less fresh packages, far more core library stability) and will there be a better representation of multimedia updates through down to Stable?. Or will I need to continue using Testing as a base in order to continue keeping pace?. Does that make more sense? not sure, but you might have guessed it, stable will not see frequent updates to released packages. This way users can rely that security and other updates will not change the behavior of deployed packages. For getting new packages into stable inclusion of updated package in the backport.org archive can be considered. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
snd_11.4-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: snd-doc_11.4-1_all.deb to main/s/snd/snd-doc_11.4-1_all.deb snd-gtk-jack_11.4-1_amd64.deb to main/s/snd/snd-gtk-jack_11.4-1_amd64.deb snd-gtk-pulse_11.4-1_amd64.deb to main/s/snd/snd-gtk-pulse_11.4-1_amd64.deb snd-nox-alsa_11.4-1_all.deb to main/s/snd/snd-nox-alsa_11.4-1_all.deb snd-nox_11.4-1_amd64.deb to main/s/snd/snd-nox_11.4-1_amd64.deb snd_11.4-1.diff.gz to main/s/snd/snd_11.4-1.diff.gz snd_11.4-1.dsc to main/s/snd/snd_11.4-1.dsc snd_11.4-1_all.deb to main/s/snd/snd_11.4-1_all.deb snd_11.4.orig.tar.gz to main/s/snd/snd_11.4.orig.tar.gz Override entries for your package: snd-doc_11.4-1_all.deb - optional doc snd-gtk-jack_11.4-1_amd64.deb - optional sound snd-gtk-pulse_11.4-1_amd64.deb - optional sound snd-nox-alsa_11.4-1_all.deb - optional sound snd-nox_11.4-1_amd64.deb - optional sound snd_11.4-1.dsc - source sound snd_11.4-1_all.deb - optional sound Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Fix for TEMP-0000000-002932 and VideoLAN-SA-0901
Hello, Yes technically it can theoritically overflow with an very malformed AVI (i.e. more malformed that the ones trigerring VideoLAN-SA-0901) However on my simple test (attached) it doesn't wrap up to a negative value but produce a large integer. I'm not sure if we can rely on that feature of the compiler. It can't wrap to a negative value as it is promoted to unsigned. But it can wrap to something which is sizeof(str) I think. No proper fix for an integer overflow in my opinion. After a lapse of 5 months I'm coming back with a fix. you can find a diff.gz at http://people.videolan.org/~xtophe/debian/vlc_0.8.6.h-4+lenny3.diff.gz (and .dsc, debdiff and .debs) or in the git repo, branch lenny : http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/vlc.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/lenny Regards -- Xtophe ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of lives_1.3.2-1_amd64.changes
lives_1.3.2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lives_1.3.2-1.dsc lives_1.3.2.orig.tar.gz lives_1.3.2-1.diff.gz lives_1.3.2-1_amd64.deb libweed0_1.3.2-1_amd64.deb libweed-dev_1.3.2-1_amd64.deb lives-data_1.3.2-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
lives_1.3.2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libweed-dev_1.3.2-1_amd64.deb to main/l/lives/libweed-dev_1.3.2-1_amd64.deb libweed0_1.3.2-1_amd64.deb to main/l/lives/libweed0_1.3.2-1_amd64.deb lives-data_1.3.2-1_all.deb to main/l/lives/lives-data_1.3.2-1_all.deb lives_1.3.2-1.diff.gz to main/l/lives/lives_1.3.2-1.diff.gz lives_1.3.2-1.dsc to main/l/lives/lives_1.3.2-1.dsc lives_1.3.2-1_amd64.deb to main/l/lives/lives_1.3.2-1_amd64.deb lives_1.3.2.orig.tar.gz to main/l/lives/lives_1.3.2.orig.tar.gz Override entries for your package: libweed-dev_1.3.2-1_amd64.deb - optional libdevel libweed0_1.3.2-1_amd64.deb - optional libs lives-data_1.3.2-1_all.deb - optional video lives_1.3.2-1.dsc - source video lives_1.3.2-1_amd64.deb - optional video Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [Debconf10 Talks Team] [Debconf-announce] Debconf 10: Call for Contributions!
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:22:24PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote: Not anyone else from team pkg-multimedia going to debconf? I will attend Debconf. But I am quite busy this spring designing and administrate an cellphone sms system for a small experimental theater group. So I won't have time to prepare any talks, will just show up and enjoy the gathering with no preparations or special commitments :-) - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Fix for TEMP-0000000-002932 and VideoLAN-SA-0901
Hey, * Christophe Mutricy xto...@chewa.net [2010-03-21 23:34]: Yes technically it can theoritically overflow with an very malformed AVI (i.e. more malformed that the ones trigerring VideoLAN-SA-0901) However on my simple test (attached) it doesn't wrap up to a negative value but produce a large integer. I'm not sure if we can rely on that feature of the compiler. It can't wrap to a negative value as it is promoted to unsigned. But it can wrap to something which is sizeof(str) I think. No proper fix for an integer overflow in my opinion. After a lapse of 5 months I'm coming back with a fix. you can find a diff.gz at http://people.videolan.org/~xtophe/debian/vlc_0.8.6.h-4+lenny3.diff.gz (and .dsc, debdiff and .debs) or in the git repo, branch lenny : http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/vlc.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/lenny This one looks good! Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - n...@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0xA0A0 For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. pgpyAuiDUSSWy.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
