Bug#577257: VLC desktop file uses %U
Package: vlc Version: 1.0.5-2 The .desktop file for VLC has the command Exec=vlc %U. This causes problems when loading files with spaces in their names. I suggest it be changed to Exec=vlc %F. I am using Debian GNU/Linux 5.0. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: jackd2 in opensuse
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 04:13:40AM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: > >> The opensuse jackd maintainer just informed me that he switched from > >> jackd1 to jackd2 on BuildService. OpenSuse 11.3 will follow soon. > >> > >> Looks like we have coordinated acting of distros, here. ;) > > > > Cool! > Did you hear from fedora maintainers? Only once, he asked me for permission to forward my mail to fedora-devel, but I haven't seen a corresponding thread in the archive, yet. HTH -- mail: a...@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP/GPG: key via keyserver ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
slv2 0.6.6-3 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the slv2 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.6.6-2 Current version: 0.6.6-3 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] lives packaging branch, master, updated. debian/1.3.2-1-1-gbde7f5e
On 10 April 2010 15:22, Harry Rickards wrote: > On 10 April 2010 15:03, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 14:39:54 (CEST), Harry Rickards wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Friday, April 9, 2010, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > did you mean to write 'sparc' instead of 'sparc64'? Debian does not have > a pure 64bit sparc port (yet). > I think Harry actually means sparc64, 'cause of this failure [1]. [1] http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=lives#fail-lives-sparc64 >>> >>> >>> Yeah I did. Any advice on what to do? >> >> file a bug against lintian to make sparc64 a recognized architecture? >> > > > The bug's already been filed > (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=563495) and fixed in > v2.3.4. Lintian 2.3.4 doesn't give me this error. Alessio, can you > upgrade to 2.3.4 (in unstable and testing) and confirm that? The error > is reported at lintian.debian.org, however lintian.debian.org says > it's running 2.3.4. Is there a way to request a rescan of lives using > the new version or similar? > Alternatively, because lives can't enter testing because of the build failure on mipsel which should be fixed in the patches I added in Git, would it be better just to upload a new Debian revision (1.3.2-2)? -- Harry Rickards - ha...@linux.com Vote Lib Dem - Building a fairer Britain - http://libdems.org.uk ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] lives packaging branch, master, updated. debian/1.3.2-1-1-gbde7f5e
On 10 April 2010 15:03, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 14:39:54 (CEST), Harry Rickards wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Friday, April 9, 2010, Alessio Treglia wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Reinhard Tartler >>> wrote: did you mean to write 'sparc' instead of 'sparc64'? Debian does not have a pure 64bit sparc port (yet). >>> >>> I think Harry actually means sparc64, 'cause of this failure [1]. >>> >>> [1] >>> http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=lives#fail-lives-sparc64 >> >> >> Yeah I did. Any advice on what to do? > > file a bug against lintian to make sparc64 a recognized architecture? > The bug's already been filed (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=563495) and fixed in v2.3.4. Lintian 2.3.4 doesn't give me this error. Alessio, can you upgrade to 2.3.4 (in unstable and testing) and confirm that? The error is reported at lintian.debian.org, however lintian.debian.org says it's running 2.3.4. Is there a way to request a rescan of lives using the new version or similar? Thanks -- Harry Rickards - ha...@linux.com Vote Lib Dem - Building a fairer Britain - http://libdems.org.uk ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] lives packaging branch, master, updated. debian/1.3.2-1-1-gbde7f5e
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 14:39:54 (CEST), Harry Rickards wrote: > Hi, > > On Friday, April 9, 2010, Alessio Treglia wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >>> did you mean to write 'sparc' instead of 'sparc64'? Debian does not have >>> a pure 64bit sparc port (yet). >>> >> >> I think Harry actually means sparc64, 'cause of this failure [1]. >> >> [1] >> http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=lives#fail-lives-sparc64 > > > Yeah I did. Any advice on what to do? file a bug against lintian to make sparc64 a recognized architecture? -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#477572: RFP: python-pymedia -- Python module for editing wav, mp3, ogg, avi, divx, dvd files
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 06:27:56 (CEST), Per W. wrote: > - The pymedia project includes much of the ffmpeg code, while it should > better dynamically link to the existing ffmpeg libs (like > libavformat.so.52 and libavcodec.so.52) > - The included ffmpeg code is badly outdated and not cleanly separated > - The code-base seems to be unmaintained. > - It depends on the i386 architecture > - We already have python-gst0.10 and pygame for python multimedia support > > So it might be a bad idea to Maintain a Debian package for pymedia. > Anyway I created a initial package for you to experiment with. > In the current state the package compiles and installs without problems > on amd64 but the import fails. I've skimmed a bit over upstream source, and it seems that not only avcodec, but also parts of liba52 and faad are included. On the first sight, all of these copy look rather ancient to me, but I may be wrong. in any case, I don't think the approach pymedia has taken is a good candidate for debian. While the project itself seems interesting, I'd strongly recommend a serious reengineering that includes using system libraries before working any further on packaging. I didn't even look at your packaging, because you have decided to only commit the debian/ directory in you svn without the upstream source. Therefore, I went to the upstream webpage and downloaded the source tarball. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- To unsubscribe, send mail to 477572-unsubscr...@bugs.debian.org. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] lives packaging branch, master, updated. debian/1.3.2-1-1-gbde7f5e
Hi, On Friday, April 9, 2010, Alessio Treglia wrote: > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> did you mean to write 'sparc' instead of 'sparc64'? Debian does not have >> a pure 64bit sparc port (yet). >> > > I think Harry actually means sparc64, 'cause of this failure [1]. > > [1] > http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=lives#fail-lives-sparc64 Yeah I did. Any advice on what to do? -- Harry Rickards - ha...@linux.com Vote Lib Dem - Building a fairer Britain - http://libdems.org.uk ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: jackd2 in opensuse
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 11:01:43PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 09:41:56PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote: >> Hi! >> >> The opensuse jackd maintainer just informed me that he switched from >> jackd1 to jackd2 on BuildService. OpenSuse 11.3 will follow soon. >> >> Looks like we have coordinated acting of distros, here. ;) > > Cool! Did you hear from fedora maintainers? -edrz ( +echo Jonas' "cool" :) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
