Re: [SCM] FFmpeg packaging branch, master.snapshot, updated. debian/0.6-1-22-g954f195
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 23:16:52 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 17:08, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 17:44:03 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:14, Fabian Greffrath >>> wrote: Am 29.06.2010 13:39, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: > > I don't have a strong opinion here, but I feel 4:0.6~ is good enough for > this. If you want to change it, go ahead. I'll change it, just to make sure... >>> >>> If the objective is to use at least the released version (and not a >>> svn snapshot), I think the correct approach would be to use 4:0.6.0~, >>> and not include the debian revision. This, however, would mean >>> changing the version from 4:0.6-1 to 4:0.6.0-1 >> >> this looks wrong to me. >> >> what's the problem with 4:0.6~? > > That you intended to restrict the dependencies to the first upstream > 0.6 released package, but you actually loosened to any previous svn > checkout of the 0.6 branch. oh, I see. Indeed. In that case, Fabian is right with 4:0.6-1~ This of course looses against 4:0.6-0ubuntu1, but that's hardly a problem that we need to consider here anyway. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: csound manual
I'm sorry if I'm being annoying with this thing, but I'm trying to really understand the issue here. On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 20:49, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: We only have detailed copyright information for the few scripts we already have documented. What do you propose to do? Expand the Andres Cabrera and others into the 35 or so names (and others)? >>> >>> Whatever it is that you believe makes this package DFSG-free, document >>> that. >>> >>> Above you argue to me that the concrete names are not the important part, >>> but the story is. Do not explain to me, but to the world. >> >> Hmm. I believe you are confusing copyright assignment with DFSG-freeness. >> The license is GFDL with no cover texts, so it is DFSG free. Copyright years >> and names are a different matter. > > They go together: Only the copyright holder can rightfully grant a license. > So if copyright holders are not properly accounted for, licensing is bogus! So your point is that, if we do not know exactly who wrote what, we need to find out a way to make sure all contributors have made the software available under the advertised license? -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: csound manual
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:31:39PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 20:03, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 03:34:18PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 17:19, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 07:44:31PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:34:05PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:00, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:16:07AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: The page lists the complicated history of the manual. The important part is that the licensing was some non commercial license, and MIT held the rights to change that (Barry Vercoe et al were working at MIT while developing csound and the manual). Finally the licensing was changed to GFDL, and the manual moved to a sourceforge CVS repository, where the current development is still done. There is no way we can track who did what change to which file, but the best we can do is expand the "Andres Cabrera and others" to a list of 35 names and still have the "and others". I think at least we should document the situation in debian/copyright, then. Not needed to include all history, only status quo is relevant (if possible without laying it all out) How to do that in the dep5 format? [Whoops, I forgot to comment on the above...] DEP-5 mandates some sections and the naming of those mandated sections. Trick is, it permits other fields too, and does not even (in most recent drafts) limit those to e.g. X-* names. The idea is, I believe (and I think it is even mentioned in the specification - too lazy to check right now) is perhaps some unofficial add-on sections becomes common practice and can then easily (i.e. without need of updating existing files using it) be adopted in a later release of the specs. See e.g. the moin package for how I currently do unofficial tags similar to what might be done here. We only have detailed copyright information for the few scripts we already have documented. What do you propose to do? Expand the Andres Cabrera and others into the 35 or so names (and others)? Whatever it is that you believe makes this package DFSG-free, document that. Above you argue to me that the concrete names are not the important part, but the story is. Do not explain to me, but to the world. Hmm. I believe you are confusing copyright assignment with DFSG-freeness. The license is GFDL with no cover texts, so it is DFSG free. Copyright years and names are a different matter. They go together: Only the copyright holder can rightfully grant a license. So if copyright holders are not properly accounted for, licensing is bogus! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: csound manual
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 20:03, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 03:34:18PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 17:19, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 07:44:31PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:34:05PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:00, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:16:07AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>> The page lists the complicated history of the manual. The important >>> part is that the licensing was some non commercial license, and MIT >>> held the >>> rights to change that (Barry Vercoe et al were working at MIT while >>> developing csound and the manual). Finally the licensing was changed to >>> GFDL, and the manual moved to a sourceforge CVS repository, where the >>> current development is still done. There is no way we can track who did >>> what >>> change to which file, but the best we can do is expand the "Andres >>> Cabrera >>> and others" to a list of 35 names and still have the "and others". >> >> I think at least we should document the situation in debian/copyright, >> then. Not needed to include all history, only status quo is relevant (if >> possible without laying it all out) > > How to do that in the dep5 format? >>> >>> [Whoops, I forgot to comment on the above...] >>> >>> DEP-5 mandates some sections and the naming of those mandated sections. >>> Trick is, it permits other fields too, and does not even (in most recent >>> drafts) limit those to e.g. X-* names. The idea is, I believe (and I think >>> it is even mentioned in the specification - too lazy to check right now) is >>> perhaps some unofficial add-on sections becomes common practice and can then >>> easily (i.e. without need of updating existing files using it) be adopted in >>> a later release of the specs. >>> >>> See e.g. the moin package for how I currently do unofficial tags similar >>> to what might be done here. >> >> We only have detailed copyright information for the few scripts we already >> have documented. What do you propose to do? Expand the Andres Cabrera and >> others into the 35 or so names (and others)? > > Whatever it is that you believe makes this package DFSG-free, document that. > > Above you argue to me that the concrete names are not the important part, > but the story is. Do not explain to me, but to the world. Hmm. I believe you are confusing copyright assignment with DFSG-freeness. The license is GFDL with no cover texts, so it is DFSG free. Copyright years and names are a different matter. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#584605: marked as done (audacity: segfault with multiple ALSA devices)
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:02:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#584605: fixed in audacity 1.3.12-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #584605, regarding audacity: segfault with multiple ALSA devices to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 584605: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=584605 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: audacity Version: 1.3.12-3 Severity: important Tags: sid The last time I used audacity, everything was working fine. (This was a few months ago... maybe January.) There have been several updates in Sid since then. Today I wanted to use audacity, but this is what I get: $ audacity Cannot connect to server socket err = No such file or directory Cannot connect to server socket jack server is not running or cannot be started Segmentation fault Removing the ~/.audacity-data directory has no effect. Is JACK now required to be able to use audacity? In the past, it worked fine for me just using ALSA. Thanks, Dave W. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (350, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.34+drt100429.0818fe9.desktop.kms (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages audacity depends on: ii audacity-data1.3.12-3A fast, cross-platform audio edito ii libasound2 1.0.22-2shared library for ALSA applicatio ii libc62.11.1-2Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libexpat12.0.1-7 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libflac++6 1.2.1-2+b1 Free Lossless Audio Codec - C++ ru ii libflac8 1.2.1-2+b1 Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtim ii libgcc1 1:4.4.4-4 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.25.7-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.21.1-1+xidfix The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libid3tag0 0.15.1b-10 ID3 tag reading library from the M ii libjack0 1.9.5~dfsg-13 JACK Audio Connection Kit (librari ii libmad0 0.15.1b-5 MPEG audio decoder library ii libogg0 1.2.0~dfsg-1Ogg bitstream library ii libsamplerate0 0.1.7-3 Audio sample rate conversion libra ii libsndfile1 1.0.21-2Library for reading/writing audio ii libsoundtouch1c2 1.3.1-2 sound stretching library ii libstdc++6 4.4.4-4 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libtwolame0 0.3.12-1MPEG Audio Layer 2 encoding librar ii libvamp-hostsdk3 2.1-1 helper library for Vamp hosts writ ii libvorbis0a 1.3.1-1 The Vorbis General Audio Compressi ii libvorbisenc21.3.1-1 The Vorbis General Audio Compressi ii libvorbisfile3 1.3.1-1 The Vorbis General Audio Compressi ii libwxbase2.8-0 2.8.10.1-3 wxBase library (runtime) - non-GUI ii libwxgtk2.8-02.8.10.1-3 wxWidgets Cross-platform C++ GUI t Versions of packages audacity recommends: ii libavcodec52 5:0.6~svn20100603-0.0 library to encode decode multimedi ii libavformat52 5:0.6~svn20100603-0.0 ffmpeg file format library Versions of packages audacity suggests: pn ladspa-plugin (no description available) ii libmp3lame0 3.98.4-0.0 LAME Ain't an MP3 Encoder -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: audacity Source-Version: 1.3.12-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of audacity, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: audacity-data_1.3.12-4_all.deb to main/a/audacity/audacity-data_1.3.12-4_all.deb audacity-dbg_1.3.12-4_amd64.deb to main/a/audacity/audacity-dbg_1.3.12-4_amd64.deb audacity_1.3.12-4.debian.tar.bz2 to main/a/audacity/audacity_1.3.12-4.debian.tar.bz2 audacity_1.3.12-4.dsc to main/a/audacity/audacity_1.3.12-4.dsc audacity_1.3.12-4_amd64.deb to main/a/audacity/audacity_1.3.12-4_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 584...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug re
Re: csound manual
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 03:34:18PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 17:19, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 07:44:31PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:34:05PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:00, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:16:07AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: The page lists the complicated history of the manual. The important part is that the licensing was some non commercial license, and MIT held the rights to change that (Barry Vercoe et al were working at MIT while developing csound and the manual). Finally the licensing was changed to GFDL, and the manual moved to a sourceforge CVS repository, where the current development is still done. There is no way we can track who did what change to which file, but the best we can do is expand the "Andres Cabrera and others" to a list of 35 names and still have the "and others". I think at least we should document the situation in debian/copyright, then. Not needed to include all history, only status quo is relevant (if possible without laying it all out) How to do that in the dep5 format? [Whoops, I forgot to comment on the above...] DEP-5 mandates some sections and the naming of those mandated sections. Trick is, it permits other fields too, and does not even (in most recent drafts) limit those to e.g. X-* names. The idea is, I believe (and I think it is even mentioned in the specification - too lazy to check right now) is perhaps some unofficial add-on sections becomes common practice and can then easily (i.e. without need of updating existing files using it) be adopted in a later release of the specs. See e.g. the moin package for how I currently do unofficial tags similar to what might be done here. We only have detailed copyright information for the few scripts we already have documented. What do you propose to do? Expand the Andres Cabrera and others into the 35 or so names (and others)? Whatever it is that you believe makes this package DFSG-free, document that. Above you argue to me that the concrete names are not the important part, but the story is. Do not explain to me, but to the world. Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
audacity_1.3.12-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: audacity-data_1.3.12-4_all.deb to main/a/audacity/audacity-data_1.3.12-4_all.deb audacity-dbg_1.3.12-4_amd64.deb to main/a/audacity/audacity-dbg_1.3.12-4_amd64.deb audacity_1.3.12-4.debian.tar.bz2 to main/a/audacity/audacity_1.3.12-4.debian.tar.bz2 audacity_1.3.12-4.dsc to main/a/audacity/audacity_1.3.12-4.dsc audacity_1.3.12-4_amd64.deb to main/a/audacity/audacity_1.3.12-4_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: audacity-data_1.3.12-4_all.deb - optional sound audacity-dbg_1.3.12-4_amd64.deb - extra debug audacity_1.3.12-4.dsc - source sound audacity_1.3.12-4_amd64.deb - optional sound Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 584605 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of audacity_1.3.12-4_amd64.changes
audacity_1.3.12-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: audacity_1.3.12-4.dsc audacity_1.3.12-4.debian.tar.bz2 audacity_1.3.12-4_amd64.deb audacity-data_1.3.12-4_all.deb audacity-dbg_1.3.12-4_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] FFmpeg packaging branch, master.snapshot, updated. debian/0.6-1-22-g954f195
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 17:08, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 17:44:03 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote: >>> Am 29.06.2010 13:39, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: I don't have a strong opinion here, but I feel 4:0.6~ is good enough for this. If you want to change it, go ahead. >>> >>> I'll change it, just to make sure... >> >> If the objective is to use at least the released version (and not a >> svn snapshot), I think the correct approach would be to use 4:0.6.0~, >> and not include the debian revision. This, however, would mean >> changing the version from 4:0.6-1 to 4:0.6.0-1 > > this looks wrong to me. > > what's the problem with 4:0.6~? That you intended to restrict the dependencies to the first upstream 0.6 released package, but you actually loosened to any previous svn checkout of the 0.6 branch. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] FFmpeg packaging branch, master.snapshot, updated. debian/0.6-1-22-g954f195
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 17:44:03 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote: >> Am 29.06.2010 13:39, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: >>> >>> I don't have a strong opinion here, but I feel 4:0.6~ is good enough for >>> this. If you want to change it, go ahead. >> >> I'll change it, just to make sure... > > If the objective is to use at least the released version (and not a > svn snapshot), I think the correct approach would be to use 4:0.6.0~, > and not include the debian revision. This, however, would mean > changing the version from 4:0.6-1 to 4:0.6.0-1 this looks wrong to me. what's the problem with 4:0.6~? -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: csound manual
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 17:19, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 07:44:31PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:34:05PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:00, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:16:07AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> > The page lists the complicated history of the manual. The important > part is that the licensing was some non commercial license, and MIT held > the > rights to change that (Barry Vercoe et al were working at MIT while > developing csound and the manual). Finally the licensing was changed to > GFDL, and the manual moved to a sourceforge CVS repository, where the > current development is still done. There is no way we can track who did > what > change to which file, but the best we can do is expand the "Andres Cabrera > and others" to a list of 35 names and still have the "and others". I think at least we should document the situation in debian/copyright, then. Not needed to include all history, only status quo is relevant (if possible without laying it all out) >>> >>> How to do that in the dep5 format? > > [Whoops, I forgot to comment on the above...] > > DEP-5 mandates some sections and the naming of those mandated sections. > Trick is, it permits other fields too, and does not even (in most recent > drafts) limit those to e.g. X-* names. The idea is, I believe (and I think > it is even mentioned in the specification - too lazy to check right now) is > perhaps some unofficial add-on sections becomes common practice and can then > easily (i.e. without need of updating existing files using it) be adopted in > a later release of the specs. > > See e.g. the moin package for how I currently do unofficial tags similar to > what might be done here. We only have detailed copyright information for the few scripts we already have documented. What do you propose to do? Expand the Andres Cabrera and others into the 35 or so names (and others)? -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] ladspa-sdk packaging branch, master, updated. debian/1.13-1
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 15:14, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 07:06:58PM +, fsate...@users.alioth.debian.org > wrote: >> >> +Standards-Version: 3.9.0.0 > > Please use only 3 digits in Standards-Version: 4th digit is reserved for > typos and similar so need not be tracked. > OK, fixed. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
ladspa-sdk_1.13-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: ladspa-sdk_1.13-1.diff.gz to main/l/ladspa-sdk/ladspa-sdk_1.13-1.diff.gz ladspa-sdk_1.13-1.dsc to main/l/ladspa-sdk/ladspa-sdk_1.13-1.dsc ladspa-sdk_1.13-1_amd64.deb to main/l/ladspa-sdk/ladspa-sdk_1.13-1_amd64.deb ladspa-sdk_1.13.orig.tar.gz to main/l/ladspa-sdk/ladspa-sdk_1.13.orig.tar.gz Override entries for your package: ladspa-sdk_1.13-1.dsc - source sound ladspa-sdk_1.13-1_amd64.deb - optional sound Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 342156 520269 561560 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] ladspa-sdk packaging branch, master, updated. debian/1.13-1
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 07:06:58PM +, fsate...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: +Standards-Version: 3.9.0.0 Please use only 3 digits in Standards-Version: 4th digit is reserved for typos and similar so need not be tracked. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#587486: (no subject)
Try vlc -I qt It's possibly a bad skin or abug in the skin engine -- Xtophe ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of ladspa-sdk_1.13-1_amd64.changes
ladspa-sdk_1.13-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ladspa-sdk_1.13-1.dsc ladspa-sdk_1.13.orig.tar.gz ladspa-sdk_1.13-1.diff.gz ladspa-sdk_1.13-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] FFmpeg packaging branch, master.snapshot, updated. debian/0.6-1-22-g954f195
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 03:57:59PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am 29.06.2010 13:33, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: I recommend to use d-shlibs to auto-resolve library dependencies. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but is it true that d-devlibdeps simply prints out the corresponding -dev packages for the libraries that the given shared library is linked against? Correct. As the very first sentence of its manpage says: Check and list dependencies of development library packages So d-devlibdeps is mostly for debugging purposes. What I suggest you consider integrating in packaging routines is the companion tool d-shlibmove. Oh, and please do speak up if you run into trouble with the tool - I have recently taken over upstream maintenance of the tool, so am obviously quite interested in feedback :-) Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
bristol 0.60.5-1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the bristol source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.60.4-1 Current version: 0.60.5-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Comments regarding mhwaveedit_1.4.18-2_amd64.changes
Hi guys! On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Adrian Knoth wrote: > What's the motivation for the split? To avoid a dependency on pulseaudio > or on jack respectively? Yes, that is the reason. I made that split to allow users (who don't want JACK) to use mhwaveedit without installing JACK stuff. > The price for this "freedom" is the loss of the > "one size fits all" version, and I don't think it's worth the effort. I thought that who uses JACK usually doesn't rely on PulseAudio for production purposes, so I thought that providing JACK support only was enough. Cheers. -- Alessio Treglia Debian & Ubuntu Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com 0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] FFmpeg packaging branch, master.snapshot, updated. debian/0.6-1-22-g954f195
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am 29.06.2010 13:39, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: >> >> I don't have a strong opinion here, but I feel 4:0.6~ is good enough for >> this. If you want to change it, go ahead. > > I'll change it, just to make sure... If the objective is to use at least the released version (and not a svn snapshot), I think the correct approach would be to use 4:0.6.0~, and not include the debian revision. This, however, would mean changing the version from 4:0.6-1 to 4:0.6.0-1 -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#586257: marked as done (jack-audio-connection-kit: FTBFS on sparc64)
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:36:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#586257: fixed in jackd2 1.9.5~dfsg-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #586257,
regarding jack-audio-connection-kit: FTBFS on sparc64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
586257: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586257
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: jack-audio-connection-kit
Version: 1.9.5~dfsg-13
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: sparc64
jack-audio-connection-kit fails to build on sparc64 and need a small
tweak to dbus/sigsegv.c, as shown in the patch below:
--- jack-audio-connection-kit-1.9.5~dfsg.orig/dbus/sigsegv.c
+++ jack-audio-connection-kit-1.9.5~dfsg/dbus/sigsegv.c
@@ -101,8 +101,10 @@ static void signal_segv(int signum, sigi
jack_error("reg[%02d] = 0x" REGFORMAT, i,
#if defined(__powerpc__)
ucontext->uc_mcontext.uc_regs[i]
+#elif defined(__sparc__) && defined(__arch64__)
+ucontext->uc_mcontext.mc_gregs[i]
#else
ucontext->uc_mcontext.gregs[i]
#endif
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: sparc64
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-bpo.5-sparc64-smp (SMP w/32 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: jackd2
Source-Version: 1.9.5~dfsg-15
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
jackd2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
jackd2-firewire_1.9.5~dfsg-15_i386.deb
to main/j/jackd2/jackd2-firewire_1.9.5~dfsg-15_i386.deb
jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-15.debian.tar.gz
to main/j/jackd2/jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-15.debian.tar.gz
jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-15.dsc
to main/j/jackd2/jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-15.dsc
jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-15_i386.deb
to main/j/jackd2/jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-15_i386.deb
libjack-jackd2-0_1.9.5~dfsg-15_i386.deb
to main/j/jackd2/libjack-jackd2-0_1.9.5~dfsg-15_i386.deb
libjack-jackd2-dev_1.9.5~dfsg-15_i386.deb
to main/j/jackd2/libjack-jackd2-dev_1.9.5~dfsg-15_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 586...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Reinhard Tartler (supplier of updated jackd2 package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 18:54:29 +0200
Source: jackd2
Binary: jackd2 libjack-jackd2-0 jackd2-firewire libjack-jackd2-dev
Architecture: i386 source
Version: 1.9.5~dfsg-15
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler
Closes: 586257
Description:
jackd2-firewire - JACK Audio Connection Kit (FFADO and FreeBoB backends)
jackd2 - JACK Audio Connection Kit (server and example clients)
libjack-jackd2-0 - JACK Audio Connection Kit (libraries)
libjack-jackd2-dev - JACK Audio Connection Kit (development files)
Changes:
jackd2 (1.9.5~dfsg-15) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Adrian Knoth ]
* Also provide the shlibs file for libjack-jackd2-0
* Fix FTBFS on sparc64 (Closes: #586257)
.
[ Reinhard Tartler ]
* jackd must not be a virtual package, use 'jack-daemon' for that
* add breaks/replaces on old libjack0
* change shlibsfile to prefer jackd2's libjack
* use conflicts instead of breaks. libjack-jackd2-0 has file conflicts
with libjack0 and will keep it
.
[ Jonas Smedegaard ]
* Update control file.
.
jackd2 (1.9.5~dfsg-14) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Rename source package to jackd2
* Don't provide libjack-dev anymore
* Don't compile libjack0, use libjack-jackd2-0 instead
* Move inprocess clients from libjack0 into jackd2 package
* Update to upstream SVN revision 4024
Checksums-Sha1:
073bf2010c2d504cdc46581c96a82454e048563b 63484
jackd2-firewire_1.9.5~dfsg-15_i386.deb
317d3275673215d41f87550e03e75a00d90d9a3c 511696 jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-15_i386.deb
5a6d8a1b5cb57cad90d8ac4ff527f614f1859b77 75650
libjack-jackd2-dev_1.9.5~dfsg-15_i386.deb
a6e4f06dd9b988d04bd6b775ea938a4754e3bf88 135353
jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-15.debian.tar.gz
d71d876a9995
jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-16_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: jackd2-firewire_1.9.5~dfsg-16_i386.deb to main/j/jackd2/jackd2-firewire_1.9.5~dfsg-16_i386.deb jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-16.debian.tar.gz to main/j/jackd2/jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-16.debian.tar.gz jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-16.dsc to main/j/jackd2/jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-16.dsc jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-16_i386.deb to main/j/jackd2/jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-16_i386.deb libjack-jackd2-0_1.9.5~dfsg-16_i386.deb to main/j/jackd2/libjack-jackd2-0_1.9.5~dfsg-16_i386.deb libjack-jackd2-dev_1.9.5~dfsg-16_i386.deb to main/j/jackd2/libjack-jackd2-dev_1.9.5~dfsg-16_i386.deb Override entries for your package: jackd2-firewire_1.9.5~dfsg-16_i386.deb - optional sound jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-16.dsc - optional sound jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-16_i386.deb - optional sound libjack-jackd2-0_1.9.5~dfsg-16_i386.deb - optional libs libjack-jackd2-dev_1.9.5~dfsg-16_i386.deb - optional libdevel Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-15_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: jackd2-firewire_1.9.5~dfsg-15_i386.deb to main/j/jackd2/jackd2-firewire_1.9.5~dfsg-15_i386.deb jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-15.debian.tar.gz to main/j/jackd2/jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-15.debian.tar.gz jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-15.dsc to main/j/jackd2/jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-15.dsc jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-15_i386.deb to main/j/jackd2/jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-15_i386.deb libjack-jackd2-0_1.9.5~dfsg-15_i386.deb to main/j/jackd2/libjack-jackd2-0_1.9.5~dfsg-15_i386.deb libjack-jackd2-dev_1.9.5~dfsg-15_i386.deb to main/j/jackd2/libjack-jackd2-dev_1.9.5~dfsg-15_i386.deb Override entries for your package: jackd2-firewire_1.9.5~dfsg-15_i386.deb - optional sound jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-15.dsc - optional sound jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-15_i386.deb - optional sound libjack-jackd2-0_1.9.5~dfsg-15_i386.deb - optional libs libjack-jackd2-dev_1.9.5~dfsg-15_i386.deb - optional libdevel Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 586257 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-14_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: jackd2-firewire_1.9.5~dfsg-14_i386.deb to main/j/jackd2/jackd2-firewire_1.9.5~dfsg-14_i386.deb jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-14.debian.tar.gz to main/j/jackd2/jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-14.debian.tar.gz jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-14.dsc to main/j/jackd2/jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-14.dsc jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-14_i386.deb to main/j/jackd2/jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-14_i386.deb jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg.orig.tar.gz to main/j/jackd2/jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg.orig.tar.gz libjack-jackd2-0_1.9.5~dfsg-14_i386.deb to main/j/jackd2/libjack-jackd2-0_1.9.5~dfsg-14_i386.deb libjack-jackd2-dev_1.9.5~dfsg-14_i386.deb to main/j/jackd2/libjack-jackd2-dev_1.9.5~dfsg-14_i386.deb Override entries for your package: jackd2-firewire_1.9.5~dfsg-14_i386.deb - optional sound jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-14.dsc - optional sound jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-14_i386.deb - optional sound libjack-jackd2-0_1.9.5~dfsg-14_i386.deb - optional libs libjack-jackd2-dev_1.9.5~dfsg-14_i386.deb - optional libdevel Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
jackd-defaults_5_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: jackd-defaults_5.dsc to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-defaults_5.dsc jackd-defaults_5.tar.gz to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-defaults_5.tar.gz jackd_5_all.deb to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd_5_all.deb Override entries for your package: jackd-defaults_5.dsc - source sound jackd_5_all.deb - optional sound Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
jackd-defaults_4_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: jackd-defaults_4.dsc to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-defaults_4.dsc jackd-defaults_4.tar.gz to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-defaults_4.tar.gz jackd_4_all.deb to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd_4_all.deb Override entries for your package: jackd-defaults_4.dsc - source sound jackd_4_all.deb - optional sound Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
jackd-defaults_3_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: jackd-defaults_3.dsc to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-defaults_3.dsc jackd-defaults_3.tar.gz to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-defaults_3.tar.gz jackd-firewire_3_all.deb to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-firewire_3_all.deb jackd_3_all.deb to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd_3_all.deb Override entries for your package: jackd-defaults_3.dsc - source sound jackd-firewire_3_all.deb - optional sound jackd_3_all.deb - optional sound Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
jackd-defaults_2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: jackd-defaults_2.dsc to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-defaults_2.dsc jackd-defaults_2.tar.gz to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-defaults_2.tar.gz jackd-firewire_2_all.deb to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-firewire_2_all.deb jackd_2_all.deb to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd_2_all.deb Override entries for your package: jackd-defaults_2.dsc - source sound jackd-firewire_2_all.deb - optional sound jackd_2_all.deb - optional sound Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
jackd-defaults_1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: jackd-defaults_1.dsc to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-defaults_1.dsc jackd-defaults_1.tar.gz to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-defaults_1.tar.gz jackd-firewire_1_all.deb to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-firewire_1_all.deb jackd_1_all.deb to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd_1_all.deb Override entries for your package: jackd-defaults_1.dsc - source sound jackd-firewire_1_all.deb - optional sound jackd_1_all.deb - optional sound Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
jack-audio-connection-kit_0.118+svn3796-6_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: jack-audio-connection-kit_0.118+svn3796-6.debian.tar.gz to main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/jack-audio-connection-kit_0.118+svn3796-6.debian.tar.gz jack-audio-connection-kit_0.118+svn3796-6.dsc to main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/jack-audio-connection-kit_0.118+svn3796-6.dsc jackd1-firewire_0.118+svn3796-6_i386.deb to main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/jackd1-firewire_0.118+svn3796-6_i386.deb jackd1_0.118+svn3796-6_i386.deb to main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/jackd1_0.118+svn3796-6_i386.deb libjack-dev_0.118+svn3796-6_i386.deb to main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/libjack-dev_0.118+svn3796-6_i386.deb libjack0_0.118+svn3796-6_i386.deb to main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/libjack0_0.118+svn3796-6_i386.deb Override entries for your package: jack-audio-connection-kit_0.118+svn3796-6.dsc - source sound jackd1-firewire_0.118+svn3796-6_i386.deb - optional sound jackd1_0.118+svn3796-6_i386.deb - optional sound libjack-dev_0.118+svn3796-6_i386.deb - optional libdevel libjack0_0.118+svn3796-6_i386.deb - optional libs Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
jack-audio-connection-kit_0.118+svn3796-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: jack-audio-connection-kit_0.118+svn3796-5.debian.tar.gz to main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/jack-audio-connection-kit_0.118+svn3796-5.debian.tar.gz jack-audio-connection-kit_0.118+svn3796-5.dsc to main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/jack-audio-connection-kit_0.118+svn3796-5.dsc jackd1-firewire_0.118+svn3796-5_i386.deb to main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/jackd1-firewire_0.118+svn3796-5_i386.deb jackd1_0.118+svn3796-5_i386.deb to main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/jackd1_0.118+svn3796-5_i386.deb libjack-dev_0.118+svn3796-5_i386.deb to main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/libjack-dev_0.118+svn3796-5_i386.deb libjack0_0.118+svn3796-5_i386.deb to main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/libjack0_0.118+svn3796-5_i386.deb Override entries for your package: jack-audio-connection-kit_0.118+svn3796-5.dsc - source sound jackd1-firewire_0.118+svn3796-5_i386.deb - optional sound jackd1_0.118+svn3796-5_i386.deb - optional sound libjack-dev_0.118+svn3796-5_i386.deb - optional libdevel libjack0_0.118+svn3796-5_i386.deb - optional libs Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
jack-audio-connection-kit_0.118+svn3796-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Warnings: Could not copy jack-audio-connection-kit_0.118+svn3796.orig.tar.gz to holding; will attempt to find in DB later ignoring jack-audio-connection-kit_0.118+svn3796.orig.tar.gz, since it's already in the archive. Accepted: jack-audio-connection-kit_0.118+svn3796-4.debian.tar.gz to main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/jack-audio-connection-kit_0.118+svn3796-4.debian.tar.gz jack-audio-connection-kit_0.118+svn3796-4.dsc to main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/jack-audio-connection-kit_0.118+svn3796-4.dsc jackd1-firewire_0.118+svn3796-4_i386.deb to main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/jackd1-firewire_0.118+svn3796-4_i386.deb jackd1_0.118+svn3796-4_i386.deb to main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/jackd1_0.118+svn3796-4_i386.deb libjack-dev_0.118+svn3796-4_i386.deb to main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/libjack-dev_0.118+svn3796-4_i386.deb libjack0_0.118+svn3796-4_i386.deb to main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/libjack0_0.118+svn3796-4_i386.deb Override entries for your package: jack-audio-connection-kit_0.118+svn3796-4.dsc - source sound jackd1-firewire_0.118+svn3796-4_i386.deb - optional sound jackd1_0.118+svn3796-4_i386.deb - optional sound libjack-dev_0.118+svn3796-4_i386.deb - optional libdevel libjack0_0.118+svn3796-4_i386.deb - optional libs Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] FFmpeg packaging branch, master.snapshot, updated. debian/0.6-1-22-g954f195
Am 29.06.2010 13:33, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: I recommend to use d-shlibs to auto-resolve library dependencies. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but is it true that d-devlibdeps simply prints out the corresponding -dev packages for the libraries that the given shared library is linked against? ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#584605: Patch attached allows audacity to run on my system
I just forwarded your patch to audacity-devel with a link to our BTS. Thanks for all your work, it was a pleasure to hunt this bug. ;) Hmmm, when I looked at the upstream website and noticed they had a Bugzilla, I assumed that would be the most appropriate way to share my info. I didn't even bother to notice their mailing lists! (Very embarassing I could easily have subscribed -- temporarily -- and let them know about all of this myself.) At any rate, thanks for forwarding the info. Let's hope it gets included in the next release (should I add it to the Debian package until then?). On the question of having a temporary Debian patch... this is judgment call, so let's consider some facts: 1) So far, I'm the only one reporting a segfault on startup having to do with the 1.3.7 -> 1.3.8 open_mixer() changes 2) I have the patch I need to make 1.3.8+ work on my hardware In your place, my approach would be to wait to see how upstream responds instead of immediately producing a patched Debian package. If upstream seems to be taking a long time without incorporating the change, and if even _one_ more bug report about the same issue hits the Debian BTS (which I doubt will happen), then I would release a patched package. Naturally, I don't know (yet) about the Debian policies, practices, and standard operating procedures that govern decisions like this... if there are any. If you are asking whether I would like to see official DEBs... just for me... then I say, "No need!": $ apt-cache policy audacity audacity: Installed: 1.3.12-3+fix04 Candidate: 1.3.12-3+fix04 Version table: *** 1.3.12-3+fix04 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1.3.12-3 0 990 http://debian.osuosl.org unstable/main Packages Thanks (to the whole team) for all of your work, and especially to Adrian for all of the helpful interaction, Dave W. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] FFmpeg packaging branch, master.snapshot, updated. debian/0.6-1-22-g954f195
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 14:51:46 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 02:15:35PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >>On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 13:33:19 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote: - Shouldn't we upload another revision of rtmpdump ASAP with librtmp-dev depending on libgnutls-dev and remove this build-depends from ffmpeg? >>> >>> I recommend to use d-shlibs to auto-resolve library dependencies. >> >>AFAIUI, this does way too much for this problem. >> >> Can d-shlibs be used standalone, i.e., without adding it as build-dep >> and integrating it to debian/rules? > > Sure - just as you can invoke debhelper commands manually too: Weird > (for anything but debugging) but possible. I'll take a look how it could help here. > I fail to see the bad in adding it as a build-dependency - it a) is an > ancient tool so unless new improvements are really needed should be > available also in unusual environments like Ubuntu, and b) is written in > shell so does not pull in the whole world. I'd prefer to minimize the amount required build dependencies to a sensible degree. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] FFmpeg packaging branch, master.snapshot, updated. debian/0.6-1-22-g954f195
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 02:15:35PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 13:33:19 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote: - Shouldn't we upload another revision of rtmpdump ASAP with librtmp-dev depending on libgnutls-dev and remove this build-depends from ffmpeg? I recommend to use d-shlibs to auto-resolve library dependencies. AFAIUI, this does way too much for this problem. Can d-shlibs be used standalone, i.e., without adding it as build-dep and integrating it to debian/rules? Sure - just as you can invoke debhelper commands manually too: Weird (for anything but debugging) but possible. I fail to see the bad in adding it as a build-dependency - it a) is an ancient tool so unless new improvements are really needed should be available also in unusual environments like Ubuntu, and b) is written in shell so does not pull in the whole world. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
rtmpdump_2.2e-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: librtmp-dev_2.2e-4_i386.deb to main/r/rtmpdump/librtmp-dev_2.2e-4_i386.deb rtmpdump_2.2e-4.diff.gz to main/r/rtmpdump/rtmpdump_2.2e-4.diff.gz rtmpdump_2.2e-4.dsc to main/r/rtmpdump/rtmpdump_2.2e-4.dsc rtmpdump_2.2e-4_i386.deb to main/r/rtmpdump/rtmpdump_2.2e-4_i386.deb Override entries for your package: librtmp-dev_2.2e-4_i386.deb - extra libdevel rtmpdump_2.2e-4.dsc - source web rtmpdump_2.2e-4_i386.deb - extra web Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of rtmpdump_2.2e-4_i386.changes
rtmpdump_2.2e-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rtmpdump_2.2e-4.dsc rtmpdump_2.2e-4.diff.gz rtmpdump_2.2e-4_i386.deb librtmp-dev_2.2e-4_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#584605: Patch attached allows audacity to run on my system
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 12:26:10AM -0400, Dave Witbrodt wrote: > Since the 'audacity' upstream does not allow individuals to create their > own Bugzilla accounts, and I doubt that I'll be touching much 'audacity' > code in the near future, I was hoping that one of you on the Debian team > could use your own connections with upstream to pass along what I have > learned. Point them at this bug report, and make it clear that they can I just forwarded your patch to audacity-devel with a link to our BTS. Thanks for all your work, it was a pleasure to hunt this bug. ;) Let's hope it gets included in the next release (should I add it to the Debian package until then?). Cheerio -- mail: a...@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP/GPG: key via keyserver ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] FFmpeg packaging branch, master.snapshot, updated. debian/0.6-1-22-g954f195
Am 29.06.2010 14:26, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: I suggest to then state in changelog that it is loosened, not tightened, as I believe most users expect the technical aspect when reading such notes. I't not even mentioned in debian/changelog and I have just corrected the shlibs version in git, so it's in the next package revision. - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] FFmpeg packaging branch, master.snapshot, updated. debian/0.6-1-22-g954f195
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 01:39:40PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 13:05:18 (CEST), Fabian Greffrath wrote: Reinhard, let's do the next upload with 4:0.6-1~ and be done with it. I don't have a strong opinion here, but I feel 4:0.6~ is good enough for this. If you want to change it, go ahead. I suggest to then state in changelog that it is loosened, not tightened, as I believe most users expect the technical aspect when reading such notes. - What does "make debian/patches gbp-pq friendly" actually mean? I was playing with gbp-pq import and gbp-pq export, and it seems to enforce it's own scheme of naming patches. Unfortunatly, it doesn't seem to work out too well for me so far :-( I would expect gbp-pq to overwrite existing patch series file, and thus not play nice with any patches added through different methods. Interesting if it can actually play nice with other routines. (as might be obvious from above, I have not yet tried gbp-pq myself). - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] FFmpeg packaging branch, master.snapshot, updated. debian/0.6-1-22-g954f195
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 13:33:19 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> - Shouldn't we upload another revision of rtmpdump ASAP with >> librtmp-dev depending on libgnutls-dev and remove this build-depends >> from ffmpeg? > > I recommend to use d-shlibs to auto-resolve library dependencies. AFAIUI, this does way too much for this problem. Can d-shlibs be used standalone, i.e., without adding it as build-dep and integrating it to debian/rules? -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] FFmpeg packaging branch, master.snapshot, updated. debian/0.6-1-22-g954f195
Am 29.06.2010 13:39, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: I don't have a strong opinion here, but I feel 4:0.6~ is good enough for this. If you want to change it, go ahead. I'll change it, just to make sure... uploading rtmpdump now sounds good, reuploading ffmpeg doesn't seem important enough to me. Me neither. Please make sure to upgrade ffmpeg's build-depends on the new librtmp-dev revision and remove libgnutls-dev as soon as the new rtmpdump is uploaded. IMHO ffmpeg'd build-depends are already cluttered enough and we should take care to keep this on a reasonable level. I was playing with gbp-pq import and gbp-pq export, and it seems to enforce it's own scheme of naming patches. I see, thanks. - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] FFmpeg packaging branch, master.snapshot, updated. debian/0.6-1-22-g954f195
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 13:05:18 (CEST), Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am 29.06.2010 12:38, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: >> Hmm, just curious (I won't waste time on discussing further): is it >> tightening by some other aspect than technical? > > It's philosophical, but by removing the svn revision, which points to a > date a few weeks before the release, from the version number you > actually get "closer" to the release. yes > Reinhard, let's do the next upload with 4:0.6-1~ and be done with it. I don't have a strong opinion here, but I feel 4:0.6~ is good enough for this. If you want to change it, go ahead. > BTW, I've got to other questions: > > - Shouldn't we upload another revision of rtmpdump ASAP with librtmp-dev > depending on libgnutls-dev and remove this build-depends from ffmpeg? uploading rtmpdump now sounds good, reuploading ffmpeg doesn't seem important enough to me. > - What does "make debian/patches gbp-pq friendly" actually mean? I was playing with gbp-pq import and gbp-pq export, and it seems to enforce it's own scheme of naming patches. Unfortunatly, it doesn't seem to work out too well for me so far :-( -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] FFmpeg packaging branch, master.snapshot, updated. debian/0.6-1-22-g954f195
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 01:05:18PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am 29.06.2010 12:38, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: Hmm, just curious (I won't waste time on discussing further): is it tightening by some other aspect than technical? It's philosophical, but by removing the svn revision, which points to a date a few weeks before the release, from the version number you actually get "closer" to the release. Thanks - I get it now :-) - Shouldn't we upload another revision of rtmpdump ASAP with librtmp-dev depending on libgnutls-dev and remove this build-depends from ffmpeg? I recommend to use d-shlibs to auto-resolve library dependencies. - What does "make debian/patches gbp-pq friendly" actually mean? I wondered about the same :-) - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] FFmpeg packaging branch, master.snapshot, updated. debian/0.6-1-22-g954f195
Am 29.06.2010 12:38, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: Hmm, just curious (I won't waste time on discussing further): is it tightening by some other aspect than technical? It's philosophical, but by removing the svn revision, which points to a date a few weeks before the release, from the version number you actually get "closer" to the release. Reinhard, let's do the next upload with 4:0.6-1~ and be done with it. BTW, I've got to other questions: - Shouldn't we upload another revision of rtmpdump ASAP with librtmp-dev depending on libgnutls-dev and remove this build-depends from ffmpeg? - What does "make debian/patches gbp-pq friendly" actually mean? - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] FFmpeg packaging branch, master.snapshot, updated. debian/0.6-1-22-g954f195
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:05:24PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:15:13 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:09:20AM +, siret...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the master.snapshot branch: commit 954f19598c736e041bd53bfb317205d8fef41c58 Author: Reinhard Tartler Date: Tue Jun 29 10:08:40 2010 +0200 tighten shlibs version a bit, now that 0.6 is officially out -SHLIBS_VERSION := 4:0.6~svn20100505-1 +SHLIBS_VERSION := 4:0.6~ Above is not a tightening, but a loosing up, I believe. oh, you're right, technically it's loosening Hmm, just curious (I won't waste time on discussing further): is it tightening by some other aspect than technical? - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] FFmpeg packaging branch, master.snapshot, updated. debian/0.6-1-22-g954f195
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:15:13 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:09:20AM +, siret...@users.alioth.debian.org > wrote: >>The following commit has been merged in the master.snapshot branch: >>commit 954f19598c736e041bd53bfb317205d8fef41c58 >>Author: Reinhard Tartler >>Date: Tue Jun 29 10:08:40 2010 +0200 >> >>tighten shlibs version a bit, now that 0.6 is officially out > >>-SHLIBS_VERSION := 4:0.6~svn20100505-1 >>+SHLIBS_VERSION := 4:0.6~ > > Above is not a tightening, but a loosing up, I believe. oh, you're right, technically it's loosening -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
ffmpeg_0.6-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: ffmpeg-dbg_0.6-2_i386.deb to main/f/ffmpeg/ffmpeg-dbg_0.6-2_i386.deb ffmpeg-doc_0.6-2_all.deb to main/f/ffmpeg/ffmpeg-doc_0.6-2_all.deb ffmpeg_0.6-2.diff.gz to main/f/ffmpeg/ffmpeg_0.6-2.diff.gz ffmpeg_0.6-2.dsc to main/f/ffmpeg/ffmpeg_0.6-2.dsc ffmpeg_0.6-2_i386.deb to main/f/ffmpeg/ffmpeg_0.6-2_i386.deb libavcodec-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb to main/f/ffmpeg/libavcodec-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb libavcodec52_0.6-2_i386.deb to main/f/ffmpeg/libavcodec52_0.6-2_i386.deb libavdevice-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb to main/f/ffmpeg/libavdevice-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb libavdevice52_0.6-2_i386.deb to main/f/ffmpeg/libavdevice52_0.6-2_i386.deb libavfilter-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb to main/f/ffmpeg/libavfilter-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb libavfilter1_0.6-2_i386.deb to main/f/ffmpeg/libavfilter1_0.6-2_i386.deb libavformat-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb to main/f/ffmpeg/libavformat-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb libavformat52_0.6-2_i386.deb to main/f/ffmpeg/libavformat52_0.6-2_i386.deb libavutil-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb to main/f/ffmpeg/libavutil-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb libavutil50_0.6-2_i386.deb to main/f/ffmpeg/libavutil50_0.6-2_i386.deb libpostproc-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb to main/f/ffmpeg/libpostproc-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb libpostproc51_0.6-2_i386.deb to main/f/ffmpeg/libpostproc51_0.6-2_i386.deb libswscale-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb to main/f/ffmpeg/libswscale-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb libswscale0_0.6-2_i386.deb to main/f/ffmpeg/libswscale0_0.6-2_i386.deb Override entries for your package: ffmpeg-dbg_0.6-2_i386.deb - extra debug ffmpeg-doc_0.6-2_all.deb - optional doc ffmpeg_0.6-2.dsc - source video ffmpeg_0.6-2_i386.deb - optional video libavcodec-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb - optional libdevel libavcodec52_0.6-2_i386.deb - optional libs libavdevice-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb - optional libdevel libavdevice52_0.6-2_i386.deb - optional libs libavfilter-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb - optional libdevel libavfilter1_0.6-2_i386.deb - optional libs libavformat-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb - optional libdevel libavformat52_0.6-2_i386.deb - optional libs libavutil-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb - optional libdevel libavutil50_0.6-2_i386.deb - optional libs libpostproc-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb - optional libdevel libpostproc51_0.6-2_i386.deb - optional libs libswscale-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb - optional libdevel libswscale0_0.6-2_i386.deb - optional libs Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] FFmpeg packaging branch, master.snapshot, updated. debian/0.6-1-22-g954f195
Am 29.06.2010 10:15, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: -SHLIBS_VERSION := 4:0.6~svn20100505-1 +SHLIBS_VERSION := 4:0.6~ Above is not a tightening, but a loosing up, I believe. Technically, yes. I think 4:0.6-1~ would be better. - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of ffmpeg_0.6-2_i386.changes
ffmpeg_0.6-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ffmpeg_0.6-2.dsc ffmpeg_0.6-2.diff.gz ffmpeg_0.6-2_i386.deb ffmpeg-dbg_0.6-2_i386.deb ffmpeg-doc_0.6-2_all.deb libavutil50_0.6-2_i386.deb libavcodec52_0.6-2_i386.deb libavdevice52_0.6-2_i386.deb libavformat52_0.6-2_i386.deb libavfilter1_0.6-2_i386.deb libpostproc51_0.6-2_i386.deb libswscale0_0.6-2_i386.deb libavutil-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb libavcodec-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb libavdevice-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb libavformat-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb libavfilter-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb libpostproc-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb libswscale-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] FFmpeg packaging branch, master.snapshot, updated. debian/0.6-1-22-g954f195
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:09:20AM +, siret...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the master.snapshot branch: commit 954f19598c736e041bd53bfb317205d8fef41c58 Author: Reinhard Tartler Date: Tue Jun 29 10:08:40 2010 +0200 tighten shlibs version a bit, now that 0.6 is officially out -SHLIBS_VERSION := 4:0.6~svn20100505-1 +SHLIBS_VERSION := 4:0.6~ Above is not a tightening, but a loosing up, I believe. Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
