Re: csound manual
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 04:49:11PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 16:41, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Do we have access to any documents upstream which supports the claim that all contributions have been made under the GFDL? I don't think so. However, if the code is released under a certain license, and I contribute a patch, I think it is implicit that the code is licensed under the same license as the project. I believe that to be a false assumption. I believe common practice in debian has been to trust upstream when it comes to licensing. We cannot provide a full auditory of the code's licensing status, not without investing inordinate amounts of time and effort, and possibly even money. I agree. And I see no conflict between this and what I described above. I suspect that you do, since you mention it here. Care to elaborate? If upstream tells me the work is GFDL'ed, then I have no reason to believe some parts of it are not GFDL, unless explicitly stated. What we are doing here is precisely debating whether the manual is in fact GFDL. Do upstream state that the complete work is GFDL? Then let's quote verbatim that statement. From PrefaceCopy.html: This version of the Csound Manual (The Canonical Csound Manual) is released under the GNU Free Documentation Licence. Good. Let's include that in debian/copyright. I suspect, however, that This version of the Csound Manual does not cover the complete work. You mentioned yourself in the earlier non-DEP5 copyright file that some parts were GPL (or was it LGPL?). - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Split of mhwaveedit package
Hi, I've been going ahead in splitting the package different way, I was intended to give users the chance to install both versions. Anyway, since we are a team and I'm the only one who believes that would be useful :) there is no problem to me to revert the changes done and make things back. I'll ask Luca Falavigna to reject my latest upload, then I'll revert the git repo in a while. Cheers. -- Alessio Treglia ales...@alessiotreglia.com Debian Ubuntu Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com 0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 587647 wishlist Bug #587647 [lives] lives: LiVES package doesn't have a menu file. Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' tags 587647 + pending Bug #587647 [lives] lives: LiVES package doesn't have a menu file. Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 587647: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587647 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bug#570611: ITP: mythtv -- A personal video recorder application
Am 10.06.2010 20:12, schrieb Andres Mejia: Yes, the patch I proposed was rejected upstream. After some thought, even I thought having mythtv without libmp3lame would be rather useless. But how about the approach to build against libtwolame (for MP2 encoding at least) instead of libmp3lame? Perhaps general encoding done via ffmpeg can be supported, for cases where recording via vp8/theora+vorbis is desired. I believe this was already supported? So currently mythtv is build against ffmpeg only for decoding purposes? - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
mhwaveedit_1.4.18-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
... as requested by Alessio. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#482509: idjc: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: liblame-dev
reopen 482509 found 482509 0.8.2-3 retitle 482509 Please build against libtwolame, instead of libmp3lame severity 482509 wishlist tags 482509 + patch thanks Hi, the following change has been introduced for the 0.8.1-1 upload: * Change order of the toolame/mp3lame build dependency (Closes: #482509, #534076) However, as already stated in the bug report, both toolame and twolame are command line encoders that do not add any functionality to idjc, especially not in their current role as build-depends. So this change is rather pointless. Please change the build-depends from twolame | libmp3lame-dev to libtwolame-dev and apply the patch provided by peter green so that we can at least have MP2 encoding in Debian. Users who aim to rebuild idjc against libmp3lame in order to get MP3 support should be warned to disable this patch before, though. - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
FLAC maintenance
Dear teams, I am afraid I am currently the only active FLAC maintainer for quite some time. This is not a general problem, as I use the FLAC codec on a regular basis to archive my CDs, but I'd like to share the duty with some other team mates. I also wouldn't object if the pkg-xiph team (CCed) believes it is more appropriate if they take over the package. Anyway, volunteers are welcome. ;) My second concern is that I have prepared an updated package in the master branch of our git repository. It merely fixes the two most recent bugs that have been reported to the BTS (I have forwarded one upstream, but they seem unresponsive to say the least). Furthermore I have created a new branch called update-packaging-standards, in which I have spent a bit more love on the package by converting it to quilt and dh7. I think it is fine as it is, but could use some review and testing (maybe it should go to experimental and the package from the master branch should go to unstable). What I want to say is: I'd appreciate some feedback and uploading of either branch by one of our fellow DDs. Thank you very much! - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: FLAC maintenance
Am 01.07.2010 14:46, schrieb Benjamin Drung: The git repository is not linked from http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/flac.html http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/flac.git;a=summary Not yet, sorry. this is also fixed in the prepared packages. - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: the dimmable led spotlingt/Wal-mart vender/United RGB Limited
Dear friend: How are you? Glad to hear that you are on the market for led tube light. We specialize in this field for several years, with good quality and pretty competitive price. Now let introduce our LED spotlights as follows: Item one : LED spotlight. 1) Power consumption:3-12W, 2) Port: E27/GU10/MR16 base 3) Lens angle:15/30/45/60 degree 4) Certification:CERoHS 5) Voltage: AC/DC12v;AC100-130v/AC180-240v. 6) Quality insurance:2 years 7) Lumen:240-900 LM 8) Light souce:Bridgelux and CREE 9) Sample delivery time:3-5 days 10) Delivery: 7-15days after confirmed. 11) Price term: EXW, USD$5.00-30.00; 12) Payment terms: T/T in advance; 13) Dimmable is available Welcome to place a sample order for your evaluation. Should you have any questions, pls do not hesitate to contact me.. Looking forward to hearing from you soon. Thanks and regards. Roberto.zuo. UNITED RGB LIMITED Address:building C,Area 2,Hongqiao lndustrial Garden,Heyi Village,Shajing Town,Bao'an District,Shenzhen City,Guangdong Province,China Tel: 86-755-89490339-802 Fax: 86-755-89490229 Email: unitedrg...@gmail.com MSN: unitedrg...@hotmail.com Skype: Roberto730510 Website:www.united-led.com; ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: csound manual
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 02:45, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: From PrefaceCopy.html: This version of the Csound Manual (The Canonical Csound Manual) is released under the GNU Free Documentation Licence. Good. Let's include that in debian/copyright. I suspect, however, that This version of the Csound Manual does not cover the complete work. You mentioned yourself in the earlier non-DEP5 copyright file that some parts were GPL (or was it LGPL?). Some helper scripts are GPL or LGPL, like the one to convert csd files to docbook xml for inclusion in the manual. The rest is all GFDL. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: csound manual
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 10:28, Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 02:45, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: From PrefaceCopy.html: This version of the Csound Manual (The Canonical Csound Manual) is released under the GNU Free Documentation Licence. Good. Let's include that in debian/copyright. And how to put that? The idea is to make it clear that statement comes from upstream. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#587792: Please compile with --enable-vaapi
Package: vlc Version: 1.1.0-1 Since version 1.1.0, VLC supports hardware-accelerated video decoding through VA-API. The required library is already in Debian and should fail gracefully if no hardware accelerator is available. Please consider switching this feature on for the next upload. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: csound manual
On 01/07/10 11:02, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 10:28:28AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 02:45, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: From PrefaceCopy.html: This version of the Csound Manual (The Canonical Csound Manual) is released under the GNU Free Documentation Licence. Good. Let's include that in debian/copyright. I suspect, however, that This version of the Csound Manual does not cover the complete work. You mentioned yourself in the earlier non-DEP5 copyright file that some parts were GPL (or was it LGPL?). Some helper scripts are GPL or LGPL, like the one to convert csd files to docbook xml for inclusion in the manual. The rest is all GFDL. Do upstream explicitly state so somehwere (which we can then quote), or how do you come to the conclusion that rest is all GFDL? Hmm, I don't think so. However, the tarball contains 2 things. The manual and helper scripts. The manual is GFDL and the helper scripts each have an explicit license statement. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
horgand 1.14-3 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the horgand source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.14-2 Current version: 1.14-3 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
traverso 0.49.1-3 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the traverso source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.49.0~rc1-1.1 Current version: 0.49.1-3 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
lv2vocoder 1-2 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the lv2vocoder source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1-1 Current version: 1-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: csound manual
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 12:48:38PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 01/07/10 11:02, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 10:28:28AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 02:45, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: From PrefaceCopy.html: This version of the Csound Manual (The Canonical Csound Manual) is released under the GNU Free Documentation Licence. Good. Let's include that in debian/copyright. I suspect, however, that This version of the Csound Manual does not cover the complete work. You mentioned yourself in the earlier non-DEP5 copyright file that some parts were GPL (or was it LGPL?). Some helper scripts are GPL or LGPL, like the one to convert csd files to docbook xml for inclusion in the manual. The rest is all GFDL. Do upstream explicitly state so somehwere (which we can then quote), or how do you come to the conclusion that rest is all GFDL? Hmm, I don't think so. However, the tarball contains 2 things. The manual and helper scripts. The manual is GFDL and the helper scripts each have an explicit license statement. Easy to then ask upstream for a statement that all parts of the tarball except those parts explicitly noted as GPL or LGPL. IMO not acceptable to assume as-is, due to the many participants involved. Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#587792: Please compile with --enable-vaapi
Hello - Message d'origine - Package: vlc Version: 1.1.0-1 Since version 1.1.0, VLC supports hardware-accelerated video decoding through VA-API. The required library is already in Debian and should fail gracefully if no hardware accelerator is available. Please consider switching this feature on for the next upload. It also depends on a libva-enabled libavcodec which is only in experimental. So it will have to wait for after squeeze release or maybe after vlc 1.1.1 i'll do a package in experimental -- Xtophe ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
