Processing of icecast2_2.3.2-6_amd64.changes
icecast2_2.3.2-6_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: icecast2_2.3.2-6.dsc icecast2_2.3.2-6.diff.gz icecast2_2.3.2-6_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
icecast2_2.3.2-6_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: icecast2_2.3.2-6.diff.gz to main/i/icecast2/icecast2_2.3.2-6.diff.gz icecast2_2.3.2-6.dsc to main/i/icecast2/icecast2_2.3.2-6.dsc icecast2_2.3.2-6_amd64.deb to main/i/icecast2/icecast2_2.3.2-6_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: icecast2_2.3.2-6.dsc - source sound icecast2_2.3.2-6_amd64.deb - optional sound Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 605507 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Generous offer for debimedia / Help Wanted!
Am 07.12.2010 20:48, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: In Message-ID:4cfd7048.6050...@debian.org, Thomas Goirand made the very generous offer for DDs to Host a machine for any debian purpose. I've accepted the offer to host drive the debimedia archive: Wow, this sounds all great, thanks to you and Thomas! Technically, I now have access to a xen instance with 20gig space and 512mb RAM. I'd like to move the current debmedia archive to this host. Because we now these additional ressources, I think we can even setup a pbuilder for building i386/amd64 packages. I imagine that with this, we can also extend the archive to hold backports of important multimedia packages for stable users. Well, you get the idea. Well, I don't right now. ;) Given that lame, xvidcore and x264 are currently sitting in the NEW queue and there are chances they will get accepted into Debian, I guess nearly *all* the other packages that are listed on our wiki page can be provided by Debian as well (i.e. think of feature-enhanced gstreamer, ffmpeg, mplayer, vlc, et al). As soon as the packages are in the official Debian archive, it is posible to provide backports for them via the official way, i.e. via backports.org. So what are the debimedia core packages and is there still a need for debimedia at all if the aforementioned packages get really accepted into the Debian archive? The setup of the machine is not finished. Please contact me in private if you are interested in helping out with planning and/or setup of the machine. Perhaps we can also schedule an irc meeting for discussing further steps. Of course I am interested, but we should discuss the points I raised before to prevent doing unnecessary work. Cheers, Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Generous offer for debimedia / Help Wanted!
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de wrote: Hi Folks, In Message-ID: 4cfd7048.6050...@debian.org, Thomas Goirand made the very generous offer for DDs to Host a machine for any debian purpose. I've accepted the offer to host drive the debimedia archive: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/debimedia Technically, I now have access to a xen instance with 20gig space and 512mb RAM. I'd like to move the current debmedia archive to this host. Because we now these additional ressources, I think we can even setup a pbuilder for building i386/amd64 packages. I imagine that with this, we can also extend the archive to hold backports of important multimedia packages for stable users. Well, you get the idea. Why not sbuild/wanna-build? I imagine we eventually want to include other arches to be hosted as well. The setup of the machine is not finished. Please contact me in private if you are interested in helping out with planning and/or setup of the machine. Perhaps we can also schedule an irc meeting for discussing further steps. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers -- Regards, Andres Mejia ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Hello DebianMultimedia team!
Hi all, My name is Duy Hung TRAN, I'm 22 years old and I'm from Vietnam. I would like to be a Debian Maintainer and first I would like to work in Debian Multimedia team. I have no experience in packaging or bug fixing, but I'm willing to learn. I'm reading to Debian's guide for new maintainers now and I want to choose a simple package to work first. I hope I could join the team and help Debian better, I hope I could receive your advices. Thank you very much! Regards, Duy Hung ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Generous offer for debimedia / Help Wanted!
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:54:47 (CET), Fabian Greffrath wrote: Given that lame, xvidcore and x264 are currently sitting in the NEW queue and there are chances they will get accepted into Debian, I guess nearly *all* the other packages that are listed on our wiki page can be provided by Debian as well (i.e. think of feature-enhanced gstreamer, ffmpeg, mplayer, vlc, et al). As soon as the packages are in the official Debian archive, it is posible to provide backports for them via the official way, i.e. via backports.org. True. The thing is, I don't expect that to happen soon, TBH. No, I don't have solid information, this is just a feeling. In the mean time, debimedia could be a) an interim solution until the backports actually reach squeeze backports, and b) a staging repository for getting quicker feedback. So what are the debimedia core packages and is there still a need for debimedia at all if the aforementioned packages get really accepted into the Debian archive? I'd say let's begin with these packages. IIRC, adi mentioned the desire to provide quicker backports of jack-ish packages as well, so this might be a use-case as well. On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 10:15:40 (CET), Andres Mejia wrote: Because we now these additional ressources, I think we can even setup a pbuilder for building i386/amd64 packages. I imagine that with this, we can also extend the archive to hold backports of important multimedia packages for stable users. Well, you get the idea. Why not sbuild/wanna-build? I imagine we eventually want to include other arches to be hosted as well. I don't have any experience with wanna-build, if you volunteer to set it up, sure, that would be probably useful! -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Hello DebianMultimedia team!
Hi (again) Hùng, On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 04:50:11PM +0700, Duy Hùng Trần wrote: My name is Duy Hung TRAN, I'm 22 years old and I'm from Vietnam. I would like to be a Debian Maintainer and first I would like to work in Debian Multimedia team. I have no experience in packaging or bug fixing, but I'm willing to learn. I'm reading to Debian's guide for new maintainers now and I want to choose a simple package to work first. I hope I could join the team and help Debian better, I hope I could receive your advices. Did you already subscribe to our mailinglist? I cc'ed you in this post, but the common style on Debian lists is to only cc individuals when explicitly requesting it (rather than by default cc'ing the poster as is the style in some other communities). In other words: When you post to Debian mailinglists then please remember to mention explicitly if you are not subscribed and want a direct copy on responses. Apart from that, as I wrote you earlier in private mail, please see our wiki page for how to join our team. Your contributions here are quite appreciated! Here's our wiki page again (also for others reading along): http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bug#605827: pd-iemnet: FTBFS on non-Linux: undefined references
On 12/08/2010 06:06 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:00 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 14:23, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at wrote: On 2010-12-03 21:26, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Source: pd-iemnet Version: 0.1-1 Severity: important Hi, your package FTBFS on non-Linux with undefined references: thanks for reporting. this hould be fixed in the next upload. @pkg-multimedia-maintainers: i have updated the git repository to include the makefile fixes for both hurd and kFreeBSD. Are these fixes only on the Makefile template? (Sorry I'm not on my pc right now). If so, this patch should be applied to all the pd-* packages we have. My most recent packages included an attempt to fix these build issues. Once those prove successful, I'll update the rest of my packages. i tested the fix on kFreeBSD (though not on hurd), and it works. i find it faster and more convenient to setup an emulation (VirtualBox, qemu,...) running kFreeBSD/i386 and hurd/i386 and test changes there than to wait for a DD to upload a package that has a potential fix for a problem, then wait until the package is accepted into unstable (we are talking about NEW packages here), esp. as long as squeeze is still frozen, then wait till it gets build on the relevant architecture (i remember Gem being stalled for about 2 months because of a dead armel machine), then study the build logs and re-iterate till the problem gets really fixed. fgmasdr IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Hello DebianMultimedia team!
Hi Jonas and the team, I subscribed pkg-multimedia-maintainers and pkg-multimedia-commits already. I also have a alioth account. It's great if I have change to review other's work. The big problem for me now is I'm not familiar with managing bugs in Debian, I only know how to report bugs :). Regards, Hung On 8 December 2010 17:23, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Hi (again) Hùng, On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 04:50:11PM +0700, Duy Hùng Trần wrote: My name is Duy Hung TRAN, I'm 22 years old and I'm from Vietnam. I would like to be a Debian Maintainer and first I would like to work in Debian Multimedia team. I have no experience in packaging or bug fixing, but I'm willing to learn. I'm reading to Debian's guide for new maintainers now and I want to choose a simple package to work first. I hope I could join the team and help Debian better, I hope I could receive your advices. Did you already subscribe to our mailinglist? I cc'ed you in this post, but the common style on Debian lists is to only cc individuals when explicitly requesting it (rather than by default cc'ing the poster as is the style in some other communities). In other words: When you post to Debian mailinglists then please remember to mention explicitly if you are not subscribed and want a direct copy on responses. Apart from that, as I wrote you earlier in private mail, please see our wiki page for how to join our team. Your contributions here are quite appreciated! Here's our wiki page again (also for others reading along): http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJM/1yiAAoJECx8MUbBoAEh6vkP/RqiP16k9QkvI//o534PqFVT /F88sSiCNQvNf3v/w2609B3pl3e/PjbH8vw8oWaxxYCaZiv0vyy7lvT7U44KzF5Y wuzj/+3dCFQrmw4til3snojsAodrKJWJGo83M3h73PObAJJ2c/nKKhC7tvZRj3ds J0ZqOAWIug0IJqRs3vDA+1yEOnGFFj6H4iJlxvuhuLzqQ38ZyMbOPOSBn9SJOI8w eoBj8OwUnjGDOOx654UIX6BeIZZRqEb+YelUJLdqyLBYZ7i4E9xjxi6VjPS+uyKc nVk/r/crFv/FWbL5qwrtxEYTW+W2ciqEIcVss9SmUXf8C4aOE7/Hc7cCJHuRFngo XVFuK9hjkpgGaGMvclSDFrk3CQypUPqsSFFoqbn+mSHET+7KIBTp9Wy/kpGkjSCC xDQRSgArAeiHkUPrc1SKonvJ629k2mxxx9GbEPMfTffYaI6LaxlZlbqqgHPBCwrh cPOUPgJXynQy/npXcYePTMFbXph8GRAWIycBLR+FRhXnLuw9NVvsiaVgN6xA7tz+ 3Z7mo+ehOPME84ZBdiro0mAMyw56/BLQqT67ZboWDtsDWQxrsn3u4W2Bn75o893u lNnqXMERKxKOmK372tdo3QiZrWzPEU77Kw0Qnm6pq+b/4A8d+kzYyH53BoWgms/N zRzKHQdilMi6SFzK3Wc9 =+vwP -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Hello DebianMultimedia team!
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 06:30:56PM +0700, Duy Hùng Trần wrote: I subscribed pkg-multimedia-maintainers and pkg-multimedia-commits already. I also have a alioth account. Good! Please request membership at the bottom right of https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-multimedia/ Then one of our admins (I am just a Senior developer, not sure why) will grant you membership :-) It's great if I have change to review other's work. The big problem for me now is I'm not familiar with managing bugs in Debian, I only know how to report bugs :). First stop is read pages below here: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ Then get more and more involved in bugs: For packages you care about (e.g. Multimedia packages) look at open bugs against them, and post to the bugreport (i.e. 123...@bugs.debian.org, replacing number with actual bug number) contributing with your knowledge - whether that is requests for the bug reporter to provide more details or perhaps that you have ideas on how to solve some issue. Most bug handling is exchange of information, not juggling bugtracker hints. Of course, if you know for sure what is the solution to a bug, and you are the maintainer of that package, then go ahead and fix it and close the bugreport. ...or when you know, and are part of a team like here but not (yet) directly involved with that particular package, then ask ahead if ok to dive in and fix the issue. Or simply follow this list and see the flow of how others work - and how the flow of our git commits go along with it. Most importantly: Do ask questions! :-) Just beware that when you ask very open questions (like how do I pakcage and handle bugreports in Debian) then expect to get very broad and open responses (like this one) ;-) Welcome aboard! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: RFS: deadbeef (2nd try)
I re-uploaded the package, since I noticed I forgot to put the text
of the BSD license in debian/copyright.
Sorry for the inconvenience :)
Cheers
--
perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{...@_]};and s;\S+;inidehG ordnasselA;eg;say~~reverse'
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Generous offer for debimedia / Help Wanted!
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de wrote: On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:54:47 (CET), Fabian Greffrath wrote: Given that lame, xvidcore and x264 are currently sitting in the NEW queue and there are chances they will get accepted into Debian, I guess nearly *all* the other packages that are listed on our wiki page can be provided by Debian as well (i.e. think of feature-enhanced gstreamer, ffmpeg, mplayer, vlc, et al). As soon as the packages are in the official Debian archive, it is posible to provide backports for them via the official way, i.e. via backports.org. True. The thing is, I don't expect that to happen soon, TBH. No, I don't have solid information, this is just a feeling. In the mean time, debimedia could be a) an interim solution until the backports actually reach squeeze backports, and b) a staging repository for getting quicker feedback. So what are the debimedia core packages and is there still a need for debimedia at all if the aforementioned packages get really accepted into the Debian archive? I'd say let's begin with these packages. IIRC, adi mentioned the desire to provide quicker backports of jack-ish packages as well, so this might be a use-case as well. On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 10:15:40 (CET), Andres Mejia wrote: Because we now these additional ressources, I think we can even setup a pbuilder for building i386/amd64 packages. I imagine that with this, we can also extend the archive to hold backports of important multimedia packages for stable users. Well, you get the idea. Why not sbuild/wanna-build? I imagine we eventually want to include other arches to be hosted as well. I don't have any experience with wanna-build, if you volunteer to set it up, sure, that would be probably useful! I had wanted to test setting up a miniature buildd network consisting of one machine that builds for 1386 and amd64. I've not done this before so I'll have to get back to you on this. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers -- Regards, Andres Mejia ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsorship for pd-ggee
On Nov 30, 2010, at 6:20 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 15:01 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 14:16, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:11 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 14:23, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Nov 14, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Nov 13, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: pd-ggee is a short-form dh package that is a lightly modified version of the standard Makefile. pd-ggee in on git.debian.org/pkg- multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages but a couple of other ITP'ed packages depend on it. http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-ggee.git;a=summary I'm not quite comfortable with the license, and I am no legalese person so I try to stick to standard-licensed software... Could you please run this license through the debian-legal list to get some input on it? My concern is specifically about the last paragraph. Yeah, the license is a bit weird, I don't know what its officially called, but it is the same text as the [incr Tcl] license, which is included in Debian: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/i/itcl3/ itcl3_3.4~b1-2/itcl3.copyright The only difference is that the GOVERNMENT USE section is more verbose in the itcl license, but they reference the same regulation numbers. It seems to be the Tcl/Tk license: http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/license.html Indeed. Please add the pristine-tar data to the repository, so I can generate the appropriate tarball. Oops, sorry, I forgot to push the tags and branches I suppose. They should be up there now. The changelog was not correctly dated. In order to avoid even more delays I updated it myself. Uploaded. Sorry for my continuing lameness on that timestamp. Once I make updates to these packages, it'll become part of the natural flow since dch is the easiest way to update the changelog. Thanks for uploading, time to dig up a couple more! :-D .hc Hey Felipe, It seems that there was something wrong with the pd-ggee upload, its complaining about NMU stuff. I'm guessing this is because the changelog has your name/email at the bottom: http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/pd-ggee_0.26-1.html#source-lintian W: pd-ggee source: changelog-should-mention-nmu W: pd-ggee source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 0.26-1 .hc We have nothing to fear from love and commitment. - New York Senator Diane Savino, trying to convince the NY Senate to pass a gay marriage bill ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
foo-yc20 released
Hi! I don't know but one of you (rosea?) suggested (RFP/ITP?) foo-yc20, an organ. The author just pinged me and told me the new release is out: http://code.google.com/p/foo-yc20/downloads/list So whoever wanted to package it, it's now time to do so. ;) Cheers -- mail: a...@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP/GPG: key via keyserver ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: foo-yc20 released
On 12/08/2010 10:47 PM, Adrian Knoth wrote: Hi! I don't know but one of you (rosea?) suggested (RFP/ITP?) foo-yc20, an organ. The author just pinged me and told me the new release is out: http://code.google.com/p/foo-yc20/downloads/list So whoever wanted to package it, it's now time to do so. ;) It was me who reported it as RFP bug. Sometimes people note that there are not many soft instruments on Linux, so this is a nice addition I think. I'm not an experienced 'packager' myself, I think this package is better for a more experienced one. Regards, \r ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
GLUECKWUENSCHE !!! IHRE E-MAIL HAT GEWO NNEN DIE SUMME VON {€1,000,000.00 Euro}.
ABSENDER:DIE LEITUNG, INTERNATIONALEN BEFOERDERUNGENEUROPAEISCHE WOHLTTIGKEITSFONDS 2010ENGLAND AUSSENSTELLEBELGRAVE HOUSE76 BUCKINGHAM PALACE ROADLONDON SW1W 9TQUNITED KINGDOM ___ GLUECKWUENSCHE ! ENDE DER JAHRES BEFRDERUNG . __Europische Wohlttigkeitsfonds Internationalen Inc. hiermit teilt Ihnen die Ergebnisse von Europische Wohlttigkeitsfonds 2010 E-Mail- Adresse Gewinn [Europa] Programm mit. Die endgueltige Programme wurden auf dem 07. Dezember in Berlin,Deutschland gehalten. Dies Ergebnis ist jetzt zu Ihnen heute 08. Dezember freigegeben worden. Ihre E-Mail-Adresse, die in der Einer Kategorie befestigt wird,hat EUR 1,000,000.00 (EINE MILLION EUROS) gewonnen, und dazu ist Ihre E-Mailadress als ein Gewinner fuer den Geldpreis vom EUR 1,000,000.00 (EINE MILLION EUROS) gewaehlt worden.Diese Programme wurde von den Europische Wohlttigkeitsfonds International Inc. und die unten genannten Firmen fundiert:1. MSN2. Mercedes Benz3. Allianz4. Microsoft Incoporation5. Nokia6. Coca-Cola7.VolkswagenAndere Gewinner in Ihrer Kategorie lautet:1. Dr. Joerg Schuster - Aus Basel, Schweiz2. Frau Linda Reichert- Aus Linz, Oesterreich3. Herr Johann Bergendorf - Aus Klagenfurt, Oesterreich4. Herr Urs Meier- Aus Bonn, DeutschlandAlle E-mail Adressen wurde von den Europaeischen Union{EU} Einwohnerverzeichnis und Internet Benutzer Databanken aus dem ganzen Europa Gebiet ausgewaehlt , nachdem wir die Genehmigung von der Europaeischen Union{EU} erhalten haben.Ihre Gewinndaten lautet:Ticket Nummer :-846594Glueckszahl :-5Ref Nr.: Europa-0293856-2010Gewinn Nr.: Europa-1029375-2010Bewerbungsnummer: BB-10294-2010Bestaetigungscode: BB-TY273495-2010Einzahlungsscode: BB-J3948-2010Sie muessen Ihre oben Gewinn Informationen vertraulich {SEHR GEHEIM} behalten, bis Ihre Ansprueche und Ihr Fonds fertig bearbeitet worden sind, und Ihre Fonds zu Ihnen ueberwiesen worden sind.Dies ist ein Teil von unserem Sicherheitsprotokoll,um Doppelbeanspruchen und ungerechtfertigten Missbrauch von diesem Programm durch Schwindel zu vermeiden.Sie muessen Ihr Gewinn nicht spaeter als am 20. Dezember 2010 beansprucht werden. Nach diesem Datum, wird alle unbeanspruchten Fonds zu unserem Zentrale buero (als nicht beansprucht) zurueckgekehrt werden.Fuer die Verarbeitung und Auszahlung von Ihrem Gewinn,fuellen Sie sofort die unten Form und reichen Sie es zu Europische Wohlttigkeitsfonds 2010 Verarbeitung / Auszahlungsabteilung von der Offiziellen Bezahlende Bank {BARCLAYS BANK PLC} PFARRER. ANDREW SIMEON durch E-mail ein: ansprucheagent.andrewsime...@gmail.com=BARCLAYS BANK PLCVERARBEITUNG UND AUSZAHLUNGSABTEILUNG,EUROPAEISCHE WOHLTTIGKEITSFONDS 2010ANSPRECHPERSON: PFARRER. ANDREW SIMEONE-mail: ansprucheagent.andrewsime...@gmail.comLONDON, ENGLAND.=**EUROPAEISCHE WOHLTTIGKEITSFONDS 2010 GEWINNER ANMELDEFORMULAR FUERAUSZAHLUNG .**VORNAME:...GEBURTSDATUM:.. .NACHNAME:..GESCHLECHT:ADRESSE:NATIONALITAET:.BERUF:..TELEFONNUMMER:.FAXNUMMER:.BETRAG GEWONNEN:...REF NR.:...GEWINN NR.:***EUROPAEISCHE WOHLTTIGKEITSFONDS 2010 GEWINNER ANMELDEFORMULAR FUERAUSZAHLUNG .***GENEHMIGT FUER AUSZAHLUNGWir gratulieren Ihnen wegen Ihrer Gewinn und hoffen, dass Sie sich an unserem Ende vom Jahr {im Dezember} Mega Wohlttigkeitsfonds teilnehmen werden, wo Sie eine Chance haben werden, Fnf Millionen Euro {5,000,000.00 EUR} zu gewinnen.Fuer EUROPAEISCHE WOHLTTIGKEITSFONDS 2010 PROGRAM.i.A Mag. Dr. Sandra Williams.P.S. BEANTWORTEN SIE NICHT ZU DIESER EMAIL,SONDERN WENDENSIE SICH AN DER BEZAHLENDE BANK DURCH E-MAIL MIT IHREN DATEN {FUER DIE VERARBEITUNG UND AUSZAHLUNG VON IHREN FONDS ZU IHNEN}!Copyright (c) 2010 Europische Wohlttigkeitsfonds International Inc. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.Geschaeftsbedingungen -HilfeHinweis: Auf diesen Seiten sammeln wir persoenliche Informationen. Fuer weitere Details lesen Sie bitte unsere Hinweise zum Datenschutz.
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: foo-yc20 released
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 10:53:19PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote: http://code.google.com/p/foo-yc20/downloads/list I'm not an experienced 'packager' myself, I think this package is better for a more experienced one. I've just created the repo and imported the upstream tarball. I also created (read: copied) the basic packaging stuff, but there are still some open issues. Those issues are mentioned in the commit message. I imagine that our new team members could address them, so they're gaining experience. You have to be fast, otherwise, busy Alessio suddenly pops up and does all the work. ;) Cheers PS: The compilation process is pretty heavy. I saw 1.4GB memory consumption, so don't try to build this package on low-end machines. Likewise, g++ needs a few minutes to compile the file. -- mail: a...@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP/GPG: key via keyserver ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsorship for pd-ggee
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 18:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Nov 30, 2010, at 6:20 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 15:01 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 14:16, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:11 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 14:23, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Nov 14, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Nov 13, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: pd-ggee is a short-form dh package that is a lightly modified version of the standard Makefile. pd-ggee in on git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages but a couple of other ITP'ed packages depend on it. http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-ggee.git;a=summary I'm not quite comfortable with the license, and I am no legalese person so I try to stick to standard-licensed software... Could you please run this license through the debian-legal list to get some input on it? My concern is specifically about the last paragraph. Yeah, the license is a bit weird, I don't know what its officially called, but it is the same text as the [incr Tcl] license, which is included in Debian: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/i/itcl3/itcl3_3.4~b1-2/itcl3.copyright The only difference is that the GOVERNMENT USE section is more verbose in the itcl license, but they reference the same regulation numbers. It seems to be the Tcl/Tk license: http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/license.html Indeed. Please add the pristine-tar data to the repository, so I can generate the appropriate tarball. Oops, sorry, I forgot to push the tags and branches I suppose. They should be up there now. The changelog was not correctly dated. In order to avoid even more delays I updated it myself. Uploaded. Sorry for my continuing lameness on that timestamp. Once I make updates to these packages, it'll become part of the natural flow since dch is the easiest way to update the changelog. Thanks for uploading, time to dig up a couple more! :-D .hc Hey Felipe, It seems that there was something wrong with the pd-ggee upload, its complaining about NMU stuff. I'm guessing this is because the changelog has your name/email at the bottom: http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/pd-ggee_0.26-1.html#source-lintian W: pd-ggee source: changelog-should-mention-nmu W: pd-ggee source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 0.26-1 Yes, I know. It is not important, though. Next upload should have your name on it (or my name added to Uploaders, depending on how the thing goes). -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
