Re: vo-aacenc_0.1.0~rc1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 16:59:07 (CEST), Fabian Greffrath wrote: Dear ftp-masters, while I *highly appreciate* your timely acceptance of the vo-aacenc package (AAC is an MPEG specification after all), I still fail to see why very similar packages like lame are left unattended in the NEW queue for 9 months now! Side remark: AAC is *the* MPEG4 audio codec, AKA MPEG-4 Part 3. Also in NEW is the xvidcore package, which implements MPEG-4 Part 2 and the x264 package, which implements MPEG-4 Part 10. Cheers, Reinhard. Best Regards, Fabian Greffrath Am 18.04.2011 06:33, schrieb Debian FTP Masters: Accepted: libvo-aacenc-dev_0.1.0~rc1-1_i386.deb to main/v/vo-aacenc/libvo-aacenc-dev_0.1.0~rc1-1_i386.deb libvo-aacenc0_0.1.0~rc1-1_i386.deb to main/v/vo-aacenc/libvo-aacenc0_0.1.0~rc1-1_i386.deb vo-aacenc-dbg_0.1.0~rc1-1_i386.deb to main/v/vo-aacenc/vo-aacenc-dbg_0.1.0~rc1-1_i386.deb vo-aacenc_0.1.0~rc1-1.debian.tar.gz to main/v/vo-aacenc/vo-aacenc_0.1.0~rc1-1.debian.tar.gz vo-aacenc_0.1.0~rc1-1.dsc to main/v/vo-aacenc/vo-aacenc_0.1.0~rc1-1.dsc vo-aacenc_0.1.0~rc1.orig.tar.gz to main/v/vo-aacenc/vo-aacenc_0.1.0~rc1.orig.tar.gz Override entries for your package: libvo-aacenc-dev_0.1.0~rc1-1_i386.deb - extra libdevel libvo-aacenc0_0.1.0~rc1-1_i386.deb - extra libs vo-aacenc-dbg_0.1.0~rc1-1_i386.deb - extra debug vo-aacenc_0.1.0~rc1-1.dsc - source libs Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 619885 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: vo-aacenc_0.1.0~rc1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 16:55 +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote: On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 16:46 -0700, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Cool, are there already gstreamer plugins for these codecs? For the AAC encoder there is: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647748 Unfortunately nothing for the amrwb encoder yet, if you're interested you could file a bug upstream or could even work on it. Shouldn't be that hard if the API is similar to the AAC encoder. Doing that now... the AAC and AMRWB encoders will be in the next release after the one that will be released this or next week. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: vo-aacenc_0.1.0~rc1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Am 19.04.2011 01:08, schrieb Sebastian Dröge: Doing that now... the AAC and AMRWB encoders will be in the next release after the one that will be released this or next week. Great, thanks a lot! BTW, which release, -bad or -ugly? - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: vo-aacenc_0.1.0~rc1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 10:10 -0700, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am 19.04.2011 01:08, schrieb Sebastian Dröge: Doing that now... the AAC and AMRWB encoders will be in the next release after the one that will be released this or next week. Great, thanks a lot! BTW, which release, -bad or -ugly? -bad, will be in 0.10.23. But maybe both can be moved to -ugly before that, we'll see :) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: vo-aacenc_0.1.0~rc1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 10:21 +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote: On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 10:10 -0700, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am 19.04.2011 01:08, schrieb Sebastian Dröge: Doing that now... the AAC and AMRWB encoders will be in the next release after the one that will be released this or next week. Great, thanks a lot! BTW, which release, -bad or -ugly? -bad, will be in 0.10.23. But maybe both can be moved to -ugly before that, we'll see :) FWIW, you can get both from http://git.collabora.co.uk/?p=user/slomo/gst-plugins-bad.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/post-release if you need them now ;) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: vo-aacenc_0.1.0~rc1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Hi! Am 19.04.2011 08:45, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: while I *highly appreciate* your timely acceptance of the vo-aacenc package (AAC is an MPEG specification after all), I still fail to see why very similar packages like lame are left unattended in the NEW queue for 9 months now! Do you consider that a good way to start a productive discussion, or you just want to dump some heat? If it's the second, I recommend to stop reading here, and send all your replies to /dev/null. Thanks in advance! And just for the record: lame hasn't been left unattended in the NEW queue. Just because something waits there, doesn't mean we ignore it and don't do anything with it. Best regards, Alexander ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: vo-aacenc_0.1.0~rc1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Hi Alexander, On 11-04-19 at 11:15am, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: Am 19.04.2011 08:45, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: while I *highly appreciate* your timely acceptance of the vo-aacenc package (AAC is an MPEG specification after all), I still fail to see why very similar packages like lame are left unattended in the NEW queue for 9 months now! Do you consider that a good way to start a productive discussion, or you just want to dump some heat? If it's the second, I recommend to stop reading here, and send all your replies to /dev/null. Thanks in advance! And just for the record: lame hasn't been left unattended in the NEW queue. Just because something waits there, doesn't mean we ignore it and don't do anything with it. This news on the matter is highly appreciated. Thanks a lot! I agree it is not a nice way of putting it here above by Reinhard, but I believe there have been several nice attempts to get a status from the ftpmasters in the past, which have been met with silence. Kind regards, and thanks for all the great work you do! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
request for upload of pd-pdogg (was Re: Bug#620994: [pd-pdogg] ogg not capitalized in descriptions)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 while fixing the capitalization of the description of pd-pdogg, i noticed that there is also an FTBFS (#609433). i fixed both (FTBFS is fixed with an upstream bugfix release, which was uploaded today, so it doesn't show up in uscan yet), and pushed to git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia/pd-pdogg the package appears to be lintian clean. if somebody could have a look and upload it, i'd be thankful. fgmasdr IOhannes ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk2tXj0ACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvTCsACfeXcsecN6gBLTtaz5J67wwOLu rugAnRiXsWa67OGxVR2Ej7TXpqE00uCY =UVgS -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: vo-aacenc_0.1.0~rc1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Hi Alexander, Am 19.04.2011 02:15, schrieb Alexander Reichle-Schmehl: Do you consider that a good way to start a productive discussion, or you just want to dump some heat? If it's the second, I recommend to stop reading here, and send all your replies to /dev/null. Thanks in advance! I did not intend to write such a harsh email to you and I am sorry it turns out I did. It's just that I am frustrated because of the lack of tranparency with regard to this topic from the ftp-masters side (take for example the complete lack of any statement in the two years course of #522373) and this frustration solidified in the way I chose my words. It was indeed my intention to start a productive discussion and elicit a statement from your side like the one that follows. ;) And just for the record: lame hasn't been left unattended in the NEW queue. Just because something waits there, doesn't mean we ignore it and don't do anything with it. Alright, that's good to know. But if a certain group of packages takes a lot longer than others to proceed the NEW queue this suggests that these packages are ignored on purpose. Furthermore there has not been any communication with us maintainers at all. If there are issues that you check and discuss it would be nice to keep us informed at least. Best Regards, Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of jnoise_0.6.0-3_amd64.changes
jnoise_0.6.0-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: jnoise_0.6.0-3.dsc jnoise_0.6.0-3.debian.tar.gz jnoise_0.6.0-3_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: vo-aacenc_0.1.0~rc1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:41:10 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote: I agree it is not a nice way of putting it here above by Reinhard, but I believe there have been several nice attempts to get a status from the ftpmasters in the past, which have been met with silence. This is not entirely true. In the past months, I did a couple of pings to the DPL and ftp-master. It doesn't make sense to reiterate everything in detail as there is nothing 'solid' to report (otherwise I of course would have reported it), but espc. Alexander and our DPL have been very responsive to my inquries in /queries! -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: vo-aacenc_0.1.0~rc1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Am 19.04.2011 04:45, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: In the past months, I did a couple of pings to the DPL and ftp-master. It doesn't make sense to reiterate everything in detail as there is nothing 'solid' to report (otherwise I of course would have reported it), but espc. Alexander and our DPL have been very responsive to my inquries in /queries! Private communication with single maintainers may not be considered the most transparent form of communication, especially if there is a whole team of maintainers involved that is waiting for a clear public statement for months. Best Regards, Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: vo-aacenc_0.1.0~rc1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
On 11-04-19 at 02:02pm, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am 19.04.2011 04:45, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: In the past months, I did a couple of pings to the DPL and ftp-master. It doesn't make sense to reiterate everything in detail as there is nothing 'solid' to report (otherwise I of course would have reported it), but espc. Alexander and our DPL have been very responsive to my inquries in /queries! Private communication with single maintainers may not be considered the most transparent form of communication, especially if there is a whole team of maintainers involved that is waiting for a clear public statement for months. Indeed. The queries are referred to was (obviously) the ones public which I therefore knew about, not discrete queries. And with silence as the response thus far from ftpmasters I did not mean that ftpmasters did not discuss with each other or their friends, but that those public queries had not received a response from them. I apologize for my inaccuracy, and really really hope that this is read only as clarification: I am happy that we now have a response from ftpmasters on this, and I am generally happy with the work of ftpmasters. Thanks for listening, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] ardour3 packaging branch, master, created. b7ea5c8d892bd83694961f0ebd0641113453b673
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de wrote: ardour2 and ardour3 can be installed and used together, I hence decided to go for different source names. As a consequence, I cannot upload the package myself (DM), a DD needs to have a look. New source package would need an ITP bug, would you open it please? I'll have a look at the package ASAP. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer | quadris...@ubuntu.com 0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] ardour3 packaging branch, master, created. b7ea5c8d892bd83694961f0ebd0641113453b673
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 02:58:16PM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Adrian Knoth ardour2 and ardour3 can be installed and used together, I hence decided to go for different source names. As a consequence, I cannot upload the package myself (DM), a DD needs to have a look. New source package would need an ITP bug, would you open it please? On my way. I'll add the ITP bug number to the changelog, so you'll notice. Cheers -- mail: a...@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP/GPG: key via keyserver ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#588171: audacious: on song change, moves playlist selection to currently playing song
tags 588171 fixed-upstream thanks Hi, Audacious 2.5.0 has an option to disable this behavior. -- John Package: audacious Version: 2.3-2 Severity: minor When a new song starts playing, audacious will change the playlist selection and focus to be the currently playing song. This is uneccessary and annoying; when I'm editing a playlist while listening to music, I have to stop at the end of a song, wait for the next song to start playing, then find where I was. This is especially annoying when editing via keyboard, or when I am in the middle of selecting several songs to move/delete. - Tyler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processed: Re: audacious: on song change, moves playlist selection to currently playing song
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 588171 fixed-upstream Bug #588171 [audacious] audacious: on song change, moves playlist selection to currently playing song Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 588171: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588171 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processed: Re: audacious: on song change, moves playlist selection to currently playing song
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 588171 - wontfix Bug #588171 [audacious] audacious: on song change, moves playlist selection to currently playing song Removed tag(s) wontfix. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 588171: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588171 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
libav_0.7~b1-1_i386.changes is NEW
ffmpeg-dbg_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/ffmpeg-dbg_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb ffmpeg-doc_0.7~b1-1_all.deb to main/liba/libav/ffmpeg-doc_0.7~b1-1_all.deb ffmpeg_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/ffmpeg_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb libav-dbg_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/libav-dbg_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb libav-doc_0.7~b1-1_all.deb to main/liba/libav/libav-doc_0.7~b1-1_all.deb libav-source_0.7~b1-1_all.deb to main/liba/libav/libav-source_0.7~b1-1_all.deb libav_0.7~b1-1.diff.gz to main/liba/libav/libav_0.7~b1-1.diff.gz libav_0.7~b1-1.dsc to main/liba/libav/libav_0.7~b1-1.dsc libav_0.7~b1.orig.tar.gz to main/liba/libav/libav_0.7~b1.orig.tar.gz libavcodec-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/libavcodec-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb (new) libavcodec53_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb optional libs Libav codec library This is the codec library from Libav (both encoding and decoding). . It supports most existing codecs (MPEG, MPEG2, MPEG4, AC3, DV...). libavdevice-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/libavdevice-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb (new) libavdevice53_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb optional libs Libav device handling library This is the device handling library from Libav. libavfilter-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/libavfilter-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb (new) libavfilter2_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb optional libs Libav video filtering library This is the video filtering library from Libav. libavformat-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/libavformat-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb (new) libavformat53_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb optional libs Libav file format library This is the library for handling file formats from Libav. . It supports most existing file formats (AVI, MPEG, OGG, Matroska, ASF...). libavutil-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/libavutil-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb (new) libavutil51_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb optional libs Libav utility library This is the common utility library from Libav. It contains shared code used by all other ffmpeg libraries. libpostproc-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/libpostproc-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb (new) libpostproc52_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb optional libs Libav video postprocessing library This is the video postprocessing library from Libav. libswscale-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/libswscale-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb (new) libswscale1_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb optional libs Libav video scaling library This is the video software scaling library from Libav. Changes: libav (4:0.7~b1-1) experimental; urgency=low . * New upstream version * bump SONAME and SHLIBS * configure flags --disable-stripping was removed upstream * the MAINTAINERS file was removed upstream * remove patch disable-configuration-warning.patch * drop avfilter confflags, it is enable by default in 0.7 * libfaad wrapper has been removed upstream * also update the *contents* of the lintian overrides Override entries for your package: ffmpeg-dbg_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - extra debug ffmpeg-doc_0.7~b1-1_all.deb - optional doc ffmpeg_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - optional video libav-dbg_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - extra debug libav-doc_0.7~b1-1_all.deb - optional doc libav-source_0.7~b1-1_all.deb - optional devel libav_0.7~b1-1.dsc - source libs libavcodec-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - optional libdevel libavdevice-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - optional libdevel libavfilter-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - optional libdevel libavformat-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - optional libdevel libavutil-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - optional libdevel libpostproc-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - optional libdevel libswscale-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - optional libdevel Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New packages are usually added to the override file about once a week. You may have gotten the distribution wrong. You'll get warnings above if files already exist in other distributions. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of mididings_0~20101119-2_amd64.changes
mididings_0~20101119-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: mididings_0~20101119-2.dsc mididings_0~20101119-2.debian.tar.gz python-mididings_0~20101119-2_amd64.deb mididings_0~20101119-2_all.deb mididings-doc_0~20101119-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
mididings_0~20101119-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: mididings-doc_0~20101119-2_all.deb to main/m/mididings/mididings-doc_0~20101119-2_all.deb mididings_0~20101119-2.debian.tar.gz to main/m/mididings/mididings_0~20101119-2.debian.tar.gz mididings_0~20101119-2.dsc to main/m/mididings/mididings_0~20101119-2.dsc mididings_0~20101119-2_all.deb to main/m/mididings/mididings_0~20101119-2_all.deb python-mididings_0~20101119-2_amd64.deb to main/m/mididings/python-mididings_0~20101119-2_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: mididings-doc_0~20101119-2_all.deb - optional doc mididings_0~20101119-2.dsc - source sound mididings_0~20101119-2_all.deb - optional sound python-mididings_0~20101119-2_amd64.deb - optional python Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
libav_0.7~b1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into experimental
Accepted: ffmpeg-dbg_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/ffmpeg-dbg_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb ffmpeg-doc_0.7~b1-1_all.deb to main/liba/libav/ffmpeg-doc_0.7~b1-1_all.deb ffmpeg_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/ffmpeg_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb libav-dbg_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/libav-dbg_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb libav-doc_0.7~b1-1_all.deb to main/liba/libav/libav-doc_0.7~b1-1_all.deb libav-source_0.7~b1-1_all.deb to main/liba/libav/libav-source_0.7~b1-1_all.deb libav_0.7~b1-1.diff.gz to main/liba/libav/libav_0.7~b1-1.diff.gz libav_0.7~b1-1.dsc to main/liba/libav/libav_0.7~b1-1.dsc libav_0.7~b1.orig.tar.gz to main/liba/libav/libav_0.7~b1.orig.tar.gz libavcodec-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/libavcodec-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb libavcodec53_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/libavcodec53_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb libavdevice-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/libavdevice-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb libavdevice53_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/libavdevice53_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb libavfilter-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/libavfilter-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb libavfilter2_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/libavfilter2_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb libavformat-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/libavformat-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb libavformat53_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/libavformat53_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb libavutil-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/libavutil-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb libavutil51_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/libavutil51_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb libpostproc-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/libpostproc-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb libpostproc52_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/libpostproc52_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb libswscale-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/libswscale-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb libswscale1_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libav/libswscale1_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb Override entries for your package: ffmpeg-dbg_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - extra debug ffmpeg-doc_0.7~b1-1_all.deb - optional doc ffmpeg_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - optional video libav-dbg_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - extra debug libav-doc_0.7~b1-1_all.deb - optional doc libav-source_0.7~b1-1_all.deb - optional devel libav_0.7~b1-1.dsc - source libs libavcodec-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - optional libdevel libavcodec53_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - optional libs libavdevice-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - optional libdevel libavdevice53_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - optional libs libavfilter-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - optional libdevel libavfilter2_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - optional libs libavformat-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - optional libdevel libavformat53_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - optional libs libavutil-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - optional libdevel libavutil51_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - optional libs libpostproc-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - optional libdevel libpostproc52_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - optional libs libswscale-dev_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - optional libdevel libswscale1_0.7~b1-1_i386.deb - optional libs Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
lame_3.98.4-1_i386.changes REJECTED
Hi maintainer, the package fails to comply with the LGPL. Quoting from the top level README: (LGPL, see www.gnu.org) with the following modification: ... 2. You agree not to enforce any patent claims for any aspect of MPEG audio compression, or any other techniques contained in the LAME source code. But the LPGL is clear: You may not impose any further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights granted herein. Note that I haven't checked other issues (software patents maybe?). Torsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: lame_3.98.4-1_i386.changes REJECTED
Am 19.04.2011 21:42, schrieb Romain Beauxis: I do not think that it is the package maintainer's duty to check with all copyright holders that they agree with the license of an upstream package. Yes it is the maintainer's duty if the package obviously contradicts itself. Torsten ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: lame_3.98.4-1_i386.changes REJECTED
2011/4/19 Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org: Am 19.04.2011 21:02, schrieb Sebastian Dröge: On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 18:56 +, Torsten Werner wrote: the package fails to comply with the LGPL. Quoting from the top level README: (LGPL, see www.gnu.org) with the following modification: ... 2. You agree not to enforce any patent claims for any aspect of MPEG audio compression, or any other techniques contained in the LAME source code. But the LPGL is clear: You may not impose any further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights granted herein. What exactly is wrong with this? Sure, it's not LGPL anymore and not even LGPL compatible but by itself it should be a valid license. Many file headers suggest that the code is plain LGPL licensed. Why do you think the code got relicensed by all copyright holders? Please clearly document such a license change. I do not think that it is the package maintainer's duty to check with all copyright holders that they agree with the license of an upstream package. I have never seen that before and I do not think that this has been done for any other package. What exactly makes you think that the situation should be different with lame? Romain ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#623380: vlc: malloc(): smallbin double linked list corrupted: 0x00000000024952a0
Le Tue 19 Apr 11 à 21:09 +0200, Vincent Smeets a écrit : Package: vlc Version: 1.1.7-3 Severity: important Opening the link http://www.q-music.nl/asx/q-music.asx with vlc gives a core dump. I start vlc with the command: vlc -vvv vlc.out 21 and then open the media stream. It starts opening the stream and then (before playing anything) vlc quits. The terminal shows then the following lines: I can't reproduce on i386 (with the sid version 1.1.9-1) *** glibc detected *** vlc: malloc(): smallbin double linked list corrupted: 0x024952a0 *** Could you produce a valgrind trace Also could you tried which package owns /usr/lib/tls/libnvidia-tls.so.260.19.44 and try without it -- Xtophe ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: lame_3.98.4-1_i386.changes REJECTED
Am 19.04.2011 21:58, schrieb Romain Beauxis: However, the file ssl_stubs.c only has the following license header: This header contains: * This file is part of Ocaml-ssl. That seems to be more consistent. Torsten ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#534504: Fix for upstart/Ubuntu systems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mediatomb/+bug/212441/comments/19 Here's a patch for this bug I've been using on Ubuntu. Note that it uses upstart, so probably won't solve the problem for pure Debian. Still, it would be nice if we could push this patch or something like it into the Debian source rather than relying on downstream Ubuntu patching. - Daniel ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
