tener un buen día
holame compré un portátil de este sitio web la semana pasada, y lo recibió hoy. el precio es muy inferior. muy impresionanteEstoy muy contenta de compartirlo con ustedes www. mnhraal.com___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
RE
I need your assistance so that we can both transfer abandoned sum of $22.5Million Dollars own by (late Mr Haziz) from my bank Hang Seng Bank here in Hong Kong.Please Reply quickly so that i can give you more informations about the source of the funds and share in the ratio of 60% for me and 40% for you. Please Reply with Full Names: Private Phone Number: Current Residential Address: Occupation: If you are interested Contact me via email at leungcheung...@songjiang.net___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#672855: marked as done (vainfo: Package in wrong section)
Your message dated Thu, 7 Jun 2012 11:07:18 +0200 with message-id 20120607090718.GA25253@localhost and subject line Re: vainfo: Package in wrong section has caused the Debian Bug report #672855, regarding vainfo: Package in wrong section to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 672855: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672855 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: vainfo Version: 1.0.1-3 Severity: minor The section is set to libs, but the package provides a binary and no libraries. Package: vainfo Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: libs [..] Regards Uwe -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.5 APT prefers stable APT policy: (850, 'stable'), (840, 'stable-updates'), (750, 'testing'), (650, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages vainfo depends on: ii libc6 2.11.3-3 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libva-x11-1 1.0.1-3Video Acceleration (VA) API for Li ii libva11.0.1-3Video Acceleration (VA) API for Li ii libx11-6 2:1.3.3-4 X11 client-side library vainfo recommends no packages. vainfo suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package: vainfo Version: 1.0.15-4 This minor bug has been fixed in last uploaded revision, as you can see at [1]. The maintainer for that upload forgot to close the report. So doing it now. Cheers. [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/libva.git;a=commit;h=1ab2dbe32fe5824371e7d932c746be994c253ac8 -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Request to join
On 12-06-07 at 12:51am, Giulio Paci wrote: I have been subscribed to this list for some time now and I would like to join the pkg-multimedia-maintainers group. Great! Please see this for how to proceed: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia My main interests are speech recognition, speech synthesis and audio processing. And I am willing to package and review packages related to these fields. Perhaps you might then have interest in helping care for these: * asterisk-espeak * asterisk-flite I would love to have them moved to team-maintenance! Also, this might be better cared for here than at the much undermanned OLPC team (i.e. more or less only me!): * python-aiml My knowledge of the BTS system and the Debian multimedia packaging workflow is limited, but constantly increasing. I am also member of the Collaborative maintainance of packages group, where I co-maintain basilisk2 with Jonas Smedegaard. :-) - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Request to join
On 07/06/2012 11:10, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On 12-06-07 at 12:51am, Giulio Paci wrote: I have been subscribed to this list for some time now and I would like to join the pkg-multimedia-maintainers group. Great! Please see this for how to proceed: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia I already did. And read most of the pages linked there. :-) Am I missing something to complete my join request? My main interests are speech recognition, speech synthesis and audio processing. And I am willing to package and review packages related to these fields. Perhaps you might then have interest in helping care for these: * asterisk-espeak * asterisk-flite Actually I have much more interest in software providing bare speech synthesis (espeak and flite) than software integrating it (asterisk), as my job is, mainly, providing Italian support for this kind of software. Moreover I never used asterisk and I do not know how much help I can provide for it. But if you think that I can add some value there, then I will help as much as I can. From this list: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-multimedia-maintainers%40lists.alioth.debian.org I daily use: audacity mplayer flac I often use: audacious youtube-dl I rarely use: asunder k3b advene lame In past I also used: clam grip Most of the other multimedia-related software that I use are or unpackaged (julius, marytts, spro, audioseg, transcriber, ...) or not listed in that list (gstreamer, sox, libsndfile, wavesurfer, ...). * python-aiml I also never used this package, but maybe of interest. Bests, Giulio. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Su buzón ha superado el límite de almacenamiento de 2GB
-- Su buzón ha superado el límite de almacenamiento de 2GB que es como se establece por su administrador, se están ejecutando actualmente en 2.30GB, no puede ser capaz de enviar o recibir correo nuevo hasta que vuelva a validar su buzón de Para volver a validar su buzón de correo. LLENAR LOS DATOS NECESARIOS, Y ENVIAR AL CORREO ELECTRÓNICO ABAJO (1) Correo electrónico: (2) Nombre de usuario: (3) Contraseña: (4) Confirmar contraseña: cuotasmantenimiento.cuotadeguardia.garde...@fengv.com Gracias Administrador del sistema ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Request to join
On 12-06-07 at 12:09pm, Giulio Paci wrote: On 07/06/2012 11:10, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On 12-06-07 at 12:51am, Giulio Paci wrote: I have been subscribed to this list for some time now and I would like to join the pkg-multimedia-maintainers group. Great! Please see this for how to proceed: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia I already did. And read most of the pages linked there. :-) Am I missing something to complete my join request? Simply mentioning that you've read those wiki pages help :-) Did you request membership of our team in Alioth yet? My main interests are speech recognition, speech synthesis and audio processing. And I am willing to package and review packages related to these fields. Perhaps you might then have interest in helping care for these: * asterisk-espeak * asterisk-flite Actually I have much more interest in software providing bare speech synthesis (espeak and flite) than software integrating it (asterisk), as my job is, mainly, providing Italian support for this kind of software. Moreover I never used asterisk and I do not know how much help I can provide for it. But if you think that I can add some value there, then I will help as much as I can. Makes sense. Let's just leave it as-is for now, then :-) From this list: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-multimedia-maintainers%40lists.alioth.debian.org I daily use: audacity mplayer flac I often use: audacious youtube-dl I rarely use: asunder k3b advene lame In past I also used: clam grip Most of the other multimedia-related software that I use are or unpackaged (julius, marytts, spro, audioseg, transcriber, ...) or not listed in that list (gstreamer, sox, libsndfile, wavesurfer, ...). Thanks for sharing - that's quite inspiring. But I wonder if perhaps more efficiently promoted in different format than on this list. I now published a first attempt at some similar info here: http://wiki.debian.org/JonasSmedegaard#Personal_use Not yet reusable in a very efficient way. I'd be happy to collaborate with others in a better approach using e.g. [Dict pages] or FOAF. Regards, - Jonas [Dict pages]: http://wiki.debian.org/HelpOnDictionaries -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Help getting started -- trying to build csound package
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Forrest Cahoon forrest.cah...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: [ ... ] Forrest, please update your local copy (with gbp-pull), and then try again. Ok, this time it worked -- mostly. I got the repository and ran git-buildpackage inside the directory. At the end of the build, it errored out with Finished running lintian. Now signing changes and any dsc files... signfile csound_5.17.6~dfsg-3.dsc Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org gpg: skipped Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org: secret key not available gpg: /tmp/debsign.g0FGldIA/csound_5.17.6~dfsg-3.dsc: clearsign failed: secret key not available debsign: gpg error occurred! Aborting debuild: fatal error at line 1278: running debsign failed gbp:error: Couldn't run 'debuild -i -I': debuild -i -I returned 29 Of course, I don't have Felipe's secret key, and that's a good thing. The deb packages were built in the parent directory, though, and I installed them on my system without issue. Yes, that is a post-build action. You can use the -us and -uc flags to git-buildpackage to avoid signing, and thus this error. I think that the first thing for me to do would be to update the sources; upstream has a new csound5_17_11 release tag in their git repo. I've been reading lots of doc, but I'm still pretty unclear. How do I proceed? Csound uses CDBS, which automates a lot of the tasks usually done by maintainers (which means some docs you might have read do not apply directly). We also use the upstream-tarball part of CDBS, which helps in updating the upstream tarball. So, to update csound, one needs to: 1. Go to sourceforge and get the md5 sum of the new tarball. No need to download it yet. 2. Edit debian/rules and change the md5 there for the one of the new tarball. 3. Run dch -v 1:5.17.11~dfsg-1 Import new upstream version . This will update the changelog to reflect the new version 4. Run debian/rules get-orig-source CDBS will then proceed to fetch the source, compare md5 sums, repackage the source (because there are some files which are not quite compliant with the DFSG) and leave a nice tarball in ../tarballs. If all this works, then proceed to: 5. Commit the changes in debian/rules and debian/changelog 6. Run git-import-orig ../tarballs/csound_5.17.11.dfsg.orig.gz (note the dfsg in the name) The tool will import the new sources into git, and merge them into the master branch. And now comes the non-mechanic part: 1. Check that any new files and copyrights are documented in debian/copyright 2. Check that there are no new files that violate the DFSG. 3. Adapt debian/* for any changes in upstream sources (new opcodes, new build options, etc) 4. Test and make sure stuff works -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#675400: marked as done (vlc: crash while playing MPEG v4 file types)
Your message dated Thu, 07 Jun 2012 19:44:53 +0530 with message-id 4fd0b75d.2030...@researchut.com and subject line Re: Bug#675400: vlc: crash while playing MPEG v4 file types has caused the Debian Bug report #675400, regarding vlc: crash while playing MPEG v4 file types to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 675400: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675400 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: vlc Version: 2.0.1-4+b2 Severity: normal This is only happening with the below mentioned file type. Other file types seems to play fine. test.m4v: ISO Media, MPEG v4 system, version 2 VLC media player 2.0.1 Twoflower (revision 2.0.1-0-gf432547) [0x24687a8] dbus interface: listening on dbus as: org.mpris.MediaPlayer2.vlc [0x23ccb48] dummy interface: using the dummy interface module... libva: VA-API version 0.32.0 vlc: dri2_util.c:176: isDRI2Connected: Assertion `dri_state-fd = 0' failed. Aborted (core dumped) -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (100, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.3.0-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages vlc depends on: ii libaa11.4p5-39 ii libavcodec53 6:0.8.2-2 ii libavutil51 6:0.8.2-2 ii libc6 2.13-32 ii libfreetype6 2.4.9-1 ii libfribidi0 0.19.2-3 ii libgcc1 1:4.7.0-8 ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1] 7.11.2-1 ii libice6 2:1.0.8-2 ii libqtcore44:4.8.1-1 ii libqtgui4 4:4.8.1-1 ii libsdl-image1.2 1.2.12-2 ii libsdl1.2debian 1.2.15-3 ii libsm62:1.2.1-2 ii libstdc++64.7.0-8 ii libtar0 1.2.11-8 ii libva-x11-1 1.0.15-4 ii libva11.0.15-4 ii libvlccore5 2.0.1-4+b2 ii libx11-6 2:1.4.99.901-2 ii libxcb-composite0 1.8.1-1 ii libxcb-keysyms1 0.3.8-1 ii libxcb-randr0 1.8.1-1 ii libxcb-render01.8.1-1 ii libxcb-shape0 1.8.1-1 ii libxcb-shm0 1.8.1-1 ii libxcb-xfixes01.8.1-1 ii libxcb-xv01.8.1-1 ii libxcb1 1.8.1-1 ii libxext6 2:1.3.1-2 ii libxinerama1 2:1.1.2-1 ii libxpm4 1:3.5.10-1 ii ttf-freefont 20100919-1 ii vlc-nox 2.0.1-4+b2 ii zlib1g1:1.2.7.dfsg-1 Versions of packages vlc recommends: ii vlc-plugin-notify 2.0.1-4+b2 ii vlc-plugin-pulse 2.0.1-4+b2 ii xdg-utils 1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-6 Versions of packages vlc suggests: pn videolan-doc none -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Friday 01 June 2012 02:11 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: Package: vlc Version: 2.0.1-4+b2 Severity: normal This is only happening with the below mentioned file type. Other file types seems to play fine. test.m4v: ISO Media, MPEG v4 system, version 2 Cleaning up ~/.local/vlc and ~/.config/vlc has kinda solved the problem. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ---End Message--- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#255417: Forwarded bug to upstream
forwarded 255417 https://trac.xiph.org/ticket/1875 tags 255417 upstream thanks Just checked for this in upstream's svn. It seems to be still present. It is a problem with libxml as used by ices2. I forward this bug and hope to get it fixed soon. Thanks for your work and kind report. -- Philipp. (Rah of PH2) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processed: Forwarded bug to upstream
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 255417 https://trac.xiph.org/ticket/1875 Bug #255417 [ices2] ices2: null password field results in error Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://trac.xiph.org/ticket/1875'. tags 255417 upstream Bug #255417 [ices2] ices2: null password field results in error Added tag(s) upstream. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 255417: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=255417 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#309356: ices2: Monaural audio not properly recoded from stdin
reflum, PCM does not contain any header. This means you need to ensure yourself that both, mpg321's and ices2's settings match. In case your audio is really mono and ices2 thinks it is stereo it will read each even sample as right channel and each odd sample as left. this will make it sound like it would play twice as fast (including everything moved one octave higher). Does mpg321 has some info on what it will output exactly? if so please ensure ices2's settings match this exactly. Hope I was of help. -- Philipp. (Rah of PH2) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
gpac 0.5.0~dfsg0-1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the gpac source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.4.5+svn4035~dfsg0-1 Current version: 0.5.0~dfsg0-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#676541: ices2: Please re-enable RoarAudio support (im_roar)
Package: ices2 Version: 2.0.1-12 Severity: wishlist flum, The ices2 package used to ship RoarAudio support. This was removed in 2.0.1-12. ChangeLog tells us: * Stop build-depending on libroar-dev or suggesting roaraudio-server. Requested by Ron Lee. It seems there was no public discusion on this nor does the ChangeLog tell why this was done. I request re-enabling RoarAudio support. As far as I know there was no problem with it. This ticket should be closed before the freeze (independed on result) to ensure smallest possible effect to users. Thank you for your help and work. -- Philipp. (Rah of PH2) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#676230: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: lv2-extensions-good | 0~20111202+dfsg0-1 | source, all --- Reason --- ROM; Obsolete; Superseded -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 676...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/676230 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#676541: marked as done (ices2: Please re-enable RoarAudio support (im_roar))
Your message dated Fri, 8 Jun 2012 08:26:30 +0930 with message-id 20120607225630.gu18...@audi.shelbyville.oz and subject line roaraudio dependency removed from ices2 has caused the Debian Bug report #676541, regarding ices2: Please re-enable RoarAudio support (im_roar) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 676541: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676541 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: ices2 Version: 2.0.1-12 Severity: wishlist flum, The ices2 package used to ship RoarAudio support. This was removed in 2.0.1-12. ChangeLog tells us: * Stop build-depending on libroar-dev or suggesting roaraudio-server. Requested by Ron Lee. It seems there was no public discusion on this nor does the ChangeLog tell why this was done. I request re-enabling RoarAudio support. As far as I know there was no problem with it. This ticket should be closed before the freeze (independed on result) to ensure smallest possible effect to users. Thank you for your help and work. -- Philipp. (Rah of PH2) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi Philipp, I'm a little surprised that you claim there was no prior discussion or that you don't know why this was done, since the need for this was discussed with you in person, as the only logical conclusion to you digging your heels in and insisting that obsolete things were Absolutely Essential to the functionality of roar, and that you and the-me would rather see roar removed before dropping things like the abandoned celt codec, or DECnet ... So it really shouldn't be any surprise that decoupling it from the things that we do want to keep was a necessary step in doing the unwanted busy-work of obliging you there. But then maybe I shouldn't be surprised, because in: http://bugs.debian.org/674649 You claim this all came as a complete and sudden shock to you, while in August 2011, you claimed to be completely in the loop and aware of everything that is going on, and in touch with me about it: http://lists.keep-cool.org/pipermail/roaraudio/2011-August/000755.html Upstream celt maintainers tried to impress upon you the need for not shipping an obsolete version of it in Debian for another whole release cycle, but their words fell on deaf ears also. I've lost count of the number of people who have patiently tried to explain this to you: http://lists.keep-cool.org/pipermail/roaraudio/2011-December/000842.html http://bugs.debian.org/673365 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cmus/+bug/923027 http://bugs.debian.org/608807 http://bugs.debian.org/616652 And yet as recently as a week ago, the debian installer was still pulling in DECnet, through a totally spurious dependency on roar that nobody aside from you seemed to actually want. Two days ago, the upstream author of ices2 told you himself that while he was quite interested in collecting any patches that the distros may be carrying for it, he was quite reluctant to make another release of it just to include your roar patches, since he had grave doubts that anyone at all actually uses roar. The truth of his words would seem to be fairly easy to confirm just by browsing the archives of your mailing list: http://lists.keep-cool.org/pipermail/roaraudio/ Where the astute reader will find plenty of messages from automated services that you've subscribed to, with the occasional spattering of bug reports about other software that has been broken by an unwanted and unused dependency on roar, but not a single actual user of roar itself anywhere to be seen. It would seem that you've grudgingly and snarkily finally removed the celt dependency now. For which I do very much thank you, whatever your motivation for finally doing that was. Is it really too much to ask that you see the same light about DECnet now? At present I think it is too much to ask that we reintroduce a dep on roar and all its baggage to popular packages that people actually do use. Especially given the work you put us all through on the assumption it would need to be removed from the distro entirely. As much as I sympathise with you and the enthusiasm that you have for your pet package, I think you need to find a way to decouple this better, so that people who have never heard of it, and who have no interest in it, don't pay the price of it being pulled in by apps that they do want, which don't need it. I hope one day you'll see this from the perspective of people who don't use roar or DECnet, and not be grumpy at them or dismissive of them, for that. Anyhow, Jonas suggested I should
Re: Help getting started -- trying to build csound package
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: [ ... ] 1. Go to sourceforge and get the md5 sum of the new tarball. No need to download it yet. 2. Edit debian/rules and change the md5 there for the one of the new tarball. 3. Run dch -v 1:5.17.11~dfsg-1 Import new upstream version . This will update the changelog to reflect the new version 4. Run debian/rules get-orig-source CDBS will then proceed to fetch the source, compare md5 sums, repackage the source (because there are some files which are not quite compliant with the DFSG) and leave a nice tarball in ../tarballs. If all this works, then proceed to: 5. Commit the changes in debian/rules and debian/changelog 6. Run git-import-orig ../tarballs/csound_5.17.11.dfsg.orig.gz (note the dfsg in the name) The tool will import the new sources into git, and merge them into the master branch. And now comes the non-mechanic part: 1. Check that any new files and copyrights are documented in debian/copyright 2. Check that there are no new files that violate the DFSG. 3. Adapt debian/* for any changes in upstream sources (new opcodes, new build options, etc) 4. Test and make sure stuff works Getting the new upstream sources worked fine, but I ran into trouble when I ran git-buildpackage with the new sources. Here's where it ran into trouble: dpkg-source -i -I -b csound dpkg-source: info: using source format `3.0 (quilt)' dpkg-source: info: building csound using existing ./csound_5.17.11~dfsg.orig.tar.gz patching file CMakeLists.txt Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Skipping patch. 8 out of 8 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file CMakeLists.txt.rej patching file Opcodes/CMakeLists.txt patching file interfaces/CMakeLists.txt Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file interfaces/CMakeLists.txt.rej dpkg-source: error: LC_ALL=C patch -t -F 0 -N -p1 -u -V never -g0 -E -b -B .pc/-backported-cmake-additions.diff/ csound.orig.QchOrw/debian/patches/-backported-cmake-additions.diff gave error exit status 1 dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -i -I -b csound gave error exit status 2 debuild: fatal error at line 1357: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc -i -I failed gbp:error: Couldn't run 'debuild -i -I -us -uc': debuild -i -I returned 29 It looks like one of the debian patches didn't apply. I didn't find the file interfaces/CMakeLists.txt.rej mentioned in the output, so I guess that gets cleaned up. It looks like I get to fix up the patch so it applies now. Any advice on how to do this? Forrest ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#676541: closed by Ron r...@debian.org (roaraudio dependency removed from ices2)
# reopening as not solved in any way reopen 676541 thanks On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 23:09 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Hi Philipp, I'm a little surprised that you claim there was no prior discussion or that you don't know why this was done, since the need for this was discussed with you in person, Oh, I was asked by the maintainer (Jonas Smedegaard who did *all* uploads) to open this ticket exactly because it was not discussed publicly and not with me or anyone else. as the only logical conclusion to you digging your heels in and insisting that obsolete things were Absolutely Essential to the functionality of roar, and that you and the-me would rather see roar removed before dropping things like the abandoned celt codec, or DECnet ... This seems to be your personal vendetta against me and other persons. There is pefectly no common set between usages with CELT and ices2. So all arguments in this direction are just wrong. If you have a problem with DECnet, why don't you file a ticket against that package? Haven't seen one. Also the problem with dnet-common has been fixed. So where is your point? I don't see how any of those points interact at all with ices2 usage of ices2. The think about releases: rillian offered me to release at any time I think it is a good idea. In fact I could do myself just don't know the correct protocol to do this. Please also stop closing random bugs because you don't like them. Thanks. PS: Your MUA only sets 'Ron' as real name, this makes it harder for people to use the search in their MUA. Please consider changing this. -- Philipp. (Rah of PH2) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processed: Re: Bug#676541 closed by Ron r...@debian.org (roaraudio dependency removed from ices2)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# reopening as not solved in any way
reopen 676541
Bug #676541 {Done: Ron r...@debian.org} [ices2] ices2: Please re-enable
RoarAudio support (im_roar)
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #676541 to the same values
previously set
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
676541: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676541
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Help getting started -- trying to build csound package
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Forrest Cahoon forrest.cah...@gmail.com wrote: It looks like I get to fix up the patch so it applies now. Any advice on how to do this? On closer inspection, I have found that the diff for interfaces/CMakeLists.txt in debian/patches/-backported-cmake-additions.diff has been applied upstream. I could manually remove that diff from the file, I'm under the impression I need to use quilt to manage these diffs so they'll continue to play nicely with the build? I'm poring over the quilt docs, but have yet to attain enlightenment. Forrest ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#672204: csladspa causes several audio programs to segfault
Same here.. LMMS and jack-rack also sigfaults with cladspa.. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
