Re: Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1

2012-08-01 Thread Niels Thykier 
On 2012-08-01 10:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
 Am 28.07.2012 17:47, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
 On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
  Depends: vlc libav (not considered)

 The new libav does not have an unblock request ttbomk and from a quick
 look at the diff I'm not prepared to unblock it without at least some
 discussion (there are changes which don't appear to be mentioned in the
 changelog and some of the changes listed in the changelog don't actually
 appear tohave been made).
 
 So, will libav 6:0.8.3-5 get unblocked or should we request this
 separately?
 
  - Fabian
 
 

There is a bug for it, #683247, tagged moreinfo.

~Niels


___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: [Lmuse-user] [ANN] MusE 2.0.1 released

2012-08-01 Thread Reinhard Tartler 
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Fabrice Coutadeur coutade...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 Any help needed for this update? Alessio seems to be the only active
 member of the git repo, and I could help.

Cool, please do!

 Also, where is it possible to see the 2 'official' maintainers of a
 package?

Actually, I really think that *each* package within pkg-multimedia
should have *at least* two people working on it. Otherwise, I see
little point spending team ressources such as mailing list for git
commit notifications and bug reports on it.

So, yes, if you have time, please clone the repository and start hacking on it!

 IS there any wiki page?

http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/DevelopPackaging
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FAQ


 Thanks,
 Fabrice

-- 
regards,
Reinhard

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1

2012-08-01 Thread Fabian Greffrath 

Am 28.07.2012 17:47, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:

On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

 Depends: vlc libav (not considered)

The new libav does not have an unblock request ttbomk and from a quick
look at the diff I'm not prepared to unblock it without at least some
discussion (there are changes which don't appear to be mentioned in the
changelog and some of the changes listed in the changelog don't actually
appear tohave been made).


So, will libav 6:0.8.3-5 get unblocked or should we request this 
separately?


 - Fabian



___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1

2012-08-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt 

On 01.08.2012 09:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote:

Am 28.07.2012 17:47, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:

On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

 Depends: vlc libav (not considered)

The new libav does not have an unblock request ttbomk and from a 
quick
look at the diff I'm not prepared to unblock it without at least 
some
discussion (there are changes which don't appear to be mentioned in 
the
changelog and some of the changes listed in the changelog don't 
actually

appear tohave been made).


So, will libav 6:0.8.3-5 get unblocked or should we request this 
separately?


The libav discussion moved to (the cloned) #683247, where Reinhard said 
he was going to upload -6.  That bug also contains some discussion which 
suggests the previous m-a:foreign changes were incorrect.  In any case, 
let's move the discussion there, please. :-)


Regards,

Adam

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#683465: marked as done (yafaray: Can't set yafaray plugins path)

2012-08-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:44:57 +0200
with message-id 20120801144457.GA6118@localhost
and subject line Re: Bug#683465: yafaray: Can't set yafaray plugins path
has caused the Debian Bug report #683465,
regarding yafaray: Can't set yafaray plugins path
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
683465: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683465
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: yafaray
Version: 0.1.2+really0.1.2~beta5-3
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

I'm attempting to use yafaray from the commandline (yafaray-xml).
Also saw the problem below with the wheezy version, but updated
to the experimental version just to check whether that fixed it.

The test file below yafarayRender.xml is linked from
  http://www.yafaray.org/community/forum/viewtopic.php?f=13t=3204
unzipped to /tmp but I don't think its content affects anything
below.

First attempt:

$ yafaray-xml /tmp/yafarayRender/yafarayRender.xml 
INFO: YafaRay (None)
INFO: The plugin path is: /usr/lib/yafaray/yafaray
INFO: Environment: Loading plugins ...
ERROR: Environment: There is no image handlers registrered
ERROR: Couldn't find any valid image format, image handlers missing?

OK... well /usr/lib/yafaray/yafaray doesn't exist,
but the package seems to provide a bunch of stuff in
/usr/lib/yafaray/plugins
and the man page describes a -p option which sets the path.

So try:

$ yafaray-xml -p /usr/lib/yafaray/plugins /tmp/yafarayRender/yafarayRender.xml 
INFO: YafaRay (None)
INFO: The plugin path is: /usr/lib/yafaray/yafaray
INFO: Environment: Loading plugins ...
ERROR: Environment: There is no image handlers registrered
ERROR: Couldn't find any valid image format, image handlers missing?

or

$ yafaray-xml -p /usr/lib/yafaray /tmp/yafarayRender/yafarayRender.xml 
INFO: YafaRay (None)
INFO: The plugin path is: /usr/lib/yafaray/yafaray
INFO: Environment: Loading plugins ...
ERROR: Environment: There is no image handlers registrered
ERROR: Couldn't find any valid image format, image handlers missing?

but no joy either way.
Since the /usr/lib/yafaray/plugins directory does contain
a bunch of .so libs with jpeg/png/ppm/tga in the name, I'm
guessing there are suitable image handlers there, if only
the default path was right or could be set.

Haven't tried using yafaray from blender at all.

Thanks for any attention this gets.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages yafaray depends on:
ii  libc6 2.13-33
ii  libfreetype6  2.4.9-1
ii  libgcc1   1:4.7.1-2
ii  libilmbase6   1.0.1-4
ii  libjpeg8  8d-1
ii  libopenexr6   1.6.1-6
ii  libpng15-15   1.5.11-1
ii  libpython3.2  3.2.3-2
ii  libstdc++64.7.1-2
ii  libtiff4  3.9.6-6
ii  libxml2   2.8.0+dfsg1-4
ii  python3   3.2.3-4
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.7.dfsg-13

Versions of packages yafaray recommends:
ii  blender  2.63a-1

yafaray suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Package: yafaray
Version: 0.1.2+really0.1.2~beta5-3

Hi!

On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 12:31:20AM +0100, Local user wrote:
 OK... well /usr/lib/yafaray/yafaray doesn't exist,
 but the package seems to provide a bunch of stuff in
 /usr/lib/yafaray/plugins
 and the man page describes a -p option which sets the path.

Wrong.
The correct parameter to use is -pp and:

 $ yafaray-xml -pp /usr/lib/yafaray/plugins path-to-file/yafarayRender.xml

works fine here.

So, closing.

Cheers.

-- 
Matteo F. Vescovi
Debian Maintainer
GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A---End Message---
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#662628: Reported upstream

2012-08-01 Thread Benjamin Drung 
severity 660700 grave
tags 660700 - upstream + fixed-upstream
merge 662628 660700
thanks

Am Montag, den 30.07.2012, 19:23 +0200 schrieb gregor herrmann:
 The upstream trac instance claims that the bug is fixed since
 yesterday including a commit (actually a revert):
 
 http://git.videolan.org/?p=vlc/vlc-2.0.git;a=commit;h=e89f4296febf218a5669a8ceb09ee79d9def0f25

Yes, this bug is fixed in the upstream branch. I will wait for the 2.0.4
bug-fix release to fix this RC bug.

-- 
Benjamin Drung
Debian  Ubuntu Developer


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#662628: Reported upstream

2012-08-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 660700 grave
Bug #660700 [vlc-plugin-notify] vlc-plugin-notify: application blocks at 
startup when activated
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
 tags 660700 - upstream + fixed-upstream
Bug #660700 [vlc-plugin-notify] vlc-plugin-notify: application blocks at 
startup when activated
Removed tag(s) upstream.
Bug #660700 [vlc-plugin-notify] vlc-plugin-notify: application blocks at 
startup when activated
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
 merge 662628 660700
Bug #662628 [vlc-plugin-notify] vlc: Serious problems with playing video files
Unable to merge bugs because:
forwarded of #660700 is 'http://trac.videolan.org/vlc/ticket/6641' not 
'https://trac.videolan.org/vlc/ticket/6641'
Failed to merge 662628: Did not alter merged bugs
Debbugs::Control::set_merged('transcript', 'GLOB(0x1ae0210)', 
'requester', 'Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org', 'request_addr', 
'cont...@bugs.debian.org', 'request_msgid', 
'1343840243.29962.5.camel@deep-thought', 'request_subject', ...) called at 
/usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Control/Service.pm line 537
eval {...} called at 
/usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Control/Service.pm line 536
Debbugs::Control::Service::control_line('line', 'merge 662628 660700', 
'clonebugs', 'HASH(0x1ad99e8)', 'limit', 'HASH(0x1ad9430)', 
'common_control_options', 'ARRAY(0x1ad9478)', 'errors', ...) called at 
/usr/lib/debbugs/service line 471

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
660700: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660700
662628: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662628
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: merge the bugs

2012-08-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 forwarded 660700 https://trac.videolan.org/vlc/ticket/6641
Bug #660700 [vlc-plugin-notify] vlc-plugin-notify: application blocks at 
startup when activated
Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://trac.videolan.org/vlc/ticket/6641' 
from 'http://trac.videolan.org/vlc/ticket/6641'
 merge 662628 660700
Bug #662628 [vlc-plugin-notify] vlc: Serious problems with playing video files
Bug #660700 [vlc-plugin-notify] vlc-plugin-notify: application blocks at 
startup when activated
Marked as found in versions vlc/2.0.0-6.
Bug #662628 [vlc-plugin-notify] vlc: Serious problems with playing video files
Marked as found in versions vlc/2.0.0-1.
Merged 660700 662628
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
660700: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660700
662628: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662628
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1

2012-08-01 Thread Stepan Golosunov 
01.08.2012 в 09:45:12 +0100 Adam D. Barratt написал:
 On 01.08.2012 09:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
 So, will libav 6:0.8.3-5 get unblocked or should we request this
 separately?
 
 The libav discussion moved to (the cloned) #683247, where Reinhard
 said he was going to upload -6.  That bug also contains some
 discussion which suggests the previous m-a:foreign changes were
 incorrect.  In any case, let's move the discussion there, please.
 :-)

These multi-arch changes were correct (the packages cannot be
Multi-Arch: foreign because they provide architecture-specific
interface) but not ideal (architecture-specific packages should not be
Architecture: all). And problems created by this non-ideality are
mitigated by general uselessness of the packages (they are intented to
transition packages which were never in stable).

Also, multi-arch changes were described correctly in the changelog
before
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/libav.git;a=commitdiff;h=677532340a55be1e0974de241f06aa605e2be083
The architecture change of libav-extra-dbg (with libav-regular-dbg
forgotten again) was in fact related to #680602, not #680613. And it
also creates architecture-dependent Architecture: all package
problems. Which are again mitigated by uselessness of the package
(it is not only intended to transition from package not found in
stable, but also does not have reverse dependencies).

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#683465: yafaray: Can't set yafaray plugins path

2012-08-01 Thread Tim Day 
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 16:44 +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
 The correct parameter to use is -pp and:
  $ yafaray-xml -pp /usr/lib/yafaray/plugins path-to-file/yafarayRender.xml
 works fine here.
 So, closing.

Ah, thanks!

In that case the real problem is with the man page which says

   -p path
   Set an alternative path for the plugins.

I (now) note that running the binary with no options does list -pp in
the resulting help text.  But it also lists a bunch of other/different
options which lead me to believe the yafaray-xml.1 man page provided in
the package is now rather obsolete/misleading... seems to be one of
those created-for-Debian ones cooked up in the absence of one being
provided by upstream.  Update, or reduce it down to simply refer to
another source of documentation ?  (Better to contain no information
than false information IMHO).

Anyway, I'll leave it at that... thanks again
Tim

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

guten Tag

2012-08-01 Thread lizhiwei . 504 
Hallo
dies ist ein Elektronik-Unternehmen
das Unternehmen verkaufen haupts?chlich iPhone, iPad, Kamera, Rolex-Uhr, 
MacBook .
der Preis ist sehr niedriger

W e b; mndlrrr.com



___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers