GLÜCKWÜNSCHE [Sie gewonnen haben die Summe von $4,500,000.00 USD (REF.:525743970)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA LOTTO INC.
ADRESSE: LANDSDOWN
STADT: St NORTH BETHESDA
STATE/PROVINCE: MARYLAND
POSTCODE: 20852
LAND: USA
INC.
REF NR.:525743970
STAPEL NR.:6474869989/603
LOTTO GEWINNER
BETR.: ENDGULTIGE NOTIFIKATION
GLUCKWUNSCHE!
Die Vereinigten Staaten Lottery Inc: Wir sind erfreut, offiziell mitteilen zu
können, dass Ihre E-Mail-Adresse ist die Summe von $4.500.000,00 USD gewann
heute gewesen 19. February 2014. Sie sollten der National Westminster Bank Plc
mit folgenden Daten kontaktieren.
National Westminster Bank Plc
BUNDESREPUBLIK DEUTSCHLAND PAYMENT ZENTRUM
Ansprechpartner: Dr. Peter Cox Dr Collins Daniel
# 135 Bishopsgate London EC2M 3UR
London, United Kingdom
E-mail: post2014i...@gmail.com
Um Ihren Preis wert Summe von $4.500.000,00 USD behaupten, sollten Sie in Ihrem
genaue Daten zu füllen, wie unten an und übermittelt ihn unverzüglich die
erforderlichen National Westminster Bank Plc, Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Zahlung per e-mail: post2014i...@gmail.com
{UNITED STATES Lottogewinner ANTRAG AUF ZAHLUNG}.
** *
VORNAME __
NAMEN
GEBURT ___
SEX _
ADRESSE _
NATIONALITY _
JOB _
TELEFONNUMMER
Faxnummer __
Gewonnene Betrag __
REF NR.:525743970
STAPEL NR.:6474869989/603
GENEHMIGT FUER ZAHLUNG
*
NOTIZ
**
Registereintragung:
Amtsgericht Hamburg BDW 9243
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats:
Dipl.-Ing. Dr.-Ing. E.h.
Sven IngelmannVorstand:
Peter Wilde
(Vorsitzender)
Jochen Karl
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Qt4 port and further directions
Am Mittwoch, den 19.02.2014, 09:12 +0100 schrieb Olaf Dietsche: For the widget set, if you want to keep dvbcut cross-platform, you're limited to just a few toolkits, Qt, Gtk, wxWidgets. The two big ones, Qt and Gtk, are both valid choices, I think. So, in the end, it is largely a matter of taste and which one you're most comfortable with. FLTK, too. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
x264_0.142.2389+git956c8d8-1_source+amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental, experimental
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 23:27:06 + Source: x264 Binary: x264 libx264-142 libx264-dev Architecture: amd64 source Version: 2:0.142.2389+git956c8d8-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de Description: libx264-142 - x264 video coding library libx264-dev - development files for libx264 x264 - video encoder for the H.264/MPEG-4 AVC standard Changes: x264 (2:0.142.2389+git956c8d8-1) experimental; urgency=low . * Update to new upstream snapshot Checksums-Sha1: 61cfe61c68f553e3ba8cb9ce769f61ace3340a2f 272846 x264_0.142.2389+git956c8d8-1_amd64.deb 1507e558949e706919ceae4601a29c60e9c5ce78 581356 libx264-142_0.142.2389+git956c8d8-1_amd64.deb a367a01f199fb5c7209573511181fa637412dcc1 441064 libx264-dev_0.142.2389+git956c8d8-1_amd64.deb 5912916ee617108077526967bb00c31914eb688b 1745 x264_0.142.2389+git956c8d8-1.dsc ce68c7961b3b57cf29449d842a8f5290382aa02e 753916 x264_0.142.2389+git956c8d8.orig.tar.gz 30bee81c965edc74cad15101f55c49d7beba05cf 21097 x264_0.142.2389+git956c8d8-1.debian.tar.gz Checksums-Sha256: 0ac9767fd05507e36bea562a307646a7e37304aa66172b1eeb0e217edc587773 272846 x264_0.142.2389+git956c8d8-1_amd64.deb b15dd61819096f5474bd20bec85cda98c11aefa32d3cf9283d98bdd8f6f253db 581356 libx264-142_0.142.2389+git956c8d8-1_amd64.deb 5453c99d5c177d040d2577d9e0fb8f6038418eacebe6e1e06c4dcebe576c4b20 441064 libx264-dev_0.142.2389+git956c8d8-1_amd64.deb 8f4920aaa8ed3784e500a5fbe0d7582ac9db9110581751273848a57c32896a2a 1745 x264_0.142.2389+git956c8d8-1.dsc 19f4433c5a29ca3173328adec4af9d8da0b81a45b3043f6f83b9469788050690 753916 x264_0.142.2389+git956c8d8.orig.tar.gz 1c87928feacab2bf349a7ad840e7f36f3d40292e310ca67acf2847e784a8f3e9 21097 x264_0.142.2389+git956c8d8-1.debian.tar.gz Files: 258390442977b6c187f03ea69a58231a 272846 graphics optional x264_0.142.2389+git956c8d8-1_amd64.deb 1dad895bbf973562e0d9e1ea438cc35a 581356 libs optional libx264-142_0.142.2389+git956c8d8-1_amd64.deb dd10818337b9118289741102ef24306a 441064 libdevel optional libx264-dev_0.142.2389+git956c8d8-1_amd64.deb 41e669cd77ca4c42aec5433c5f36cba4 1745 libs optional x264_0.142.2389+git956c8d8-1.dsc 5b8a19b5e6359d1bef6b6e0e63d82da1 753916 libs optional x264_0.142.2389+git956c8d8.orig.tar.gz db5f1926cf0fe90099aa124d3a584db2 21097 libs optional x264_0.142.2389+git956c8d8-1.debian.tar.gz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Debian Powered! iEYEARECAAYFAlL/wmEACgkQmAg1RJRTSKRgRACfZGwOclVqqAZbsFwLtsco03o+ BOQAn1tIsVDwdP1lJA/3DxvrsQ+ouLZT =lmet -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#739499: missing license in debian/copyright
Package: x264 Severity: serious User: alteh...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Dear Maintainer, please add the missing license of x264-0.142.2389+git956c8d8/extras/cl* to debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#732159: Should this package be removed?
TBH, I'm a bit confused about your reply. On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Reimar Döffinger reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de wrote: On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 03:25:08PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Reimar Döffinger reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de wrote: What would constitute a constructive comment? Ideally I am interested in making mplayer work against the libavcodec that we have in Debian, and this is my work in progress. Well, I expect that making it build wouldn't be that hard, but it would be quite crippled and broken, and with the limited effort I am willing to spend on getting patches into Libav I won't be getting anywhere I would conclude from previous tries. I take this as that you (as upstream) do not want mplayer to be compiled against libav. That's a strong argument *for* removing it from Debian, which ships this version of libav, *and* has working and non-crippled alternatives to mplayer in the archive. Besides, has development and support for mencoder been revived, or do its developers still consider mencoder deprecated and/or obsolete? AFAIR, people on the mencoder/mplayer mailing lists have recommended to just use the command-line tool ffmpeg/avconv instead for a couple of years now. mplayer2 is unmaintained and as far as I can tell mpv has completely different command-line syntax at the least (though I am not well informed about either). It was my sincere hope that this would be a sufficient incentive and motivation to work on keeping mplayer/mencoder in debian. Unfortunately, it seems I was wrong. Well, it was motivation to suggest several ways to get FFmpeg into Debian, since that is kind of the most realistic way to solve it, also since otherwise it won't be the version of MPlayer that is tested upstream. However so far this seems to be considered completely out of the question. Sorry, but taking mplayer as political argument to make pressure on the FFmpeg vs. Libav conflict is not going to help anyone. Please have this discussion elsewhere, e.g. in #729203. Which for me kind of leaves the question if the best MPlayer we can offer under these circumstances is worth it. I guess the conclusion of this discussion tends to no, although we disagree on the rationale. That's fair enough with me. Libav compatibility is not intentionally broken upstream, but it is not tested in any systematic way either (possibly not at all). This is not the primary concern or reason in the context of whether or not to remove mplayer/mencoder from Debian. The reason is that there is nobody who is interested enough to work on making it suitable in Debian. Otherwise we wouldn't have to remove the package from Debian/testing (jessie). This sounds to me like you see a difference between Libav compatibility and suitable in Debian? I'd be interested in that. Please contact me again in private about this. Let's keep this bug focused on arguments pro and contra removal of mplayer/mencoder from Debian. Personal remark here: mplayer was always problematic in Debian. Up to today, it is not possible to even compile mplayer without removing its internal copy of ffmpeg. Yes, no, maybe. I just looked into it. You have to provide matching copies of libavformat/internal.h (can be eliminated reasonably well if it's a concern) and libavutil/x86/asm.h (only issue here is that I don't like duplicating it). Nothing else is required. I missed that, did that change recently? I haven't tested the last release, and I don't know if only requiring these two headers I mentioned is good enough, but I would say it doesn't require an internal copy anymore. Well, if it was really only two (internal!) headers that it takes, why doesn't mplayer embed them just like mplayer2 and mpv, and just ditch the svn:external equivalent for git mechanism? This needs to be disabled when packaging it for use with a system-provided libavcodec anyways. I guess the reason is that you still prefer to have it compile against the very latest tip of ffmpeg, which again, is not the typical configuration when integrating it into Debian. mplayer competitors mplayer2/mpv do not seem to be this demanding. Nevertheless, if what you say is true, then current mplayer should be indeed rather easy to compile against any copy of libavcodec. I even fixed configure so that if you have only those two files in ffmpeg/... it will default to compiling against a system FFmpeg. Making a new release is something that would be good to do anyway. _However_ none of this fixes the FFmpeg vs. Libav issues... Are they critical for Debian? I personally don't think so, because I don't consider the missing functionality that important. If it was, then it could be fixed if there was enough good will. However, the political pressure and the constant nagging from both developers and spectators result in a very aggressive and negative atmosphere, and thus has diminished my motivation to continue
Re: RFH: SIGBUS in buildd but not in porterbox
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:50 PM, David Daney dda...@caviumnetworks.com wrote:
On 02/17/2014 01:28 PM, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Felipe Sateler (fsate...@gmail.com) [140217 20:33]:
The package liblo runs a test suite at build time. This test suite
failed in mipsel (but not mips)[1]. I tried to reproduce the issue in
eder.d.o but it passed.
Liblo does use unaligned access (liblo had to be removed from sparc
for this reason).
But I'm confused as to why does the buildd error out and the porterbox
doesn't. Is it possible to (programatically) instruct the kernel to
not raise a SIGBUS?
[1]
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libloarch=mipselver=0.28-3stamp=1392064303
rem and eder are different hardware.
Yes, Some MIPS CPUs (like OCTEON) can be, and are, configured to handle
unaligned accesses. Others cannot.
The kernel may be able to emulate unaligned accesses for integer loads and
stores, but I think the problem may be that the FPU emulator cannot do
unaligned accesses.
I'm not sure this is the cause. Liblo doesn't do much math on its own.
What it does do is read 64bit ints or doubles from a 4-byte aligned
data stream.
Really the application that is doing this should be fixed.
Yes, but this is not so easy because on my amd64 I can't enable sigbus
traps as I can't even do a printf without triggering it:
#include stdio.h
main() {
#if defined(__GNUC__)
# if defined(__i386__)
/* Enable Alignment Checking on x86 */
__asm__(pushf\norl $0x4,(%esp)\npopf);
# elif defined(__x86_64__)
/* Enable Alignment Checking on x86_64 */
__asm__(pushf\norl $0x4,(%rsp)\npopf);
# endif
#endif
printf(hello\n);
printf(goodbye\n);
}
This program never prints goodbye.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#739321: FTBFS with libav10
Control: tags -1 + upstream
On 2014-02-17 18:27:11, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
ffmpeg_decode.c:352:8: error: 'CODEC_ID_GIF' undeclared (first use in this
function)
case CODEC_ID_GIF:
^
ffmpeg_decode.c: In function 'FFDEC_ProcessData':
ffmpeg_decode.c:630:3: warning: implicit declaration of function
'avcodec_decode_audio3' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
len = avcodec_decode_audio3(ctx, (short *)ffd-audio_buf, gotpic, pkt);
^
ffmpeg_decode.c:673:24: error: 'CODEC_ID_RAWVIDEO' undeclared (first use in
this function)
if ( ctx-codec_id == CODEC_ID_RAWVIDEO) {
^
ffmpeg_decode.c:770:35: error: 'CODEC_ID_H263' undeclared (first use in this
function)
*codec = avcodec_find_decoder(CODEC_ID_H263);
^
ffmpeg_decode.c: In function 'FFDEC_CanHandleStream':
ffmpeg_decode.c:996:94: error: 'CODEC_ID_MP2' undeclared (first use in this
function)
if ((ffd-oti==GPAC_OTI_AUDIO_MPEG2_PART3) ||
(ffd-oti==GPAC_OTI_AUDIO_MPEG1)) codec_id = CODEC_ID_MP2;
^
ffmpeg_decode.c:1035:47: error: 'CODEC_ID_MPEG4' undeclared (first use in
this function)
case GPAC_OTI_VIDEO_MPEG4_PART2: codec_id = CODEC_ID_MPEG4; break;
^
ffmpeg_decode.c:1037:39: error: 'CODEC_ID_H264' undeclared (first use in this
function)
case GPAC_OTI_VIDEO_AVC: codec_id = CODEC_ID_H264; break;
^
ffmpeg_decode.c:1047:15: error: 'CODEC_ID_MPEG2VIDEO' undeclared (first use
in this function)
codec_id = CODEC_ID_MPEG2VIDEO; break;
^
ffmpeg_decode.c:1050:15: error: 'CODEC_ID_MJPEG' undeclared (first use in
this function)
codec_id = CODEC_ID_MJPEG;
^
Except for the CODEC_* contants, this issue seems to be fixed in
https://sourceforge.net/p/gpac/code/4852/.
Regards
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processed: Re: Bug#739321: FTBFS with libav10
Processing control commands: tags -1 + upstream Bug #739321 [src:gpac] FTBFS with libav10 Added tag(s) upstream. -- 739321: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739321 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Invitation: BRITISH COLUMBIA USA CANADA WORKPERMIT OFFER WITH JOB
BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID://Yahoo//Calendar//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:REQUEST BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:BRITISH COLUMBIA USA CANADA WORKPERMIT OFFER WITH JOB DESCRIPTION:\n\nWe are British Columbia USA Canadian recruitment consulta ncy\,\n\n\n\nwe help people to secure British Columbia USA and Canada\n\ n2years work-permit with jobs to live and work in British Columbia \n\nU SA or Canada\, all the visa and work-permit process will take 2weeks. \n \nall visa process will take place in British or USA\n\n\n\nif you are i nterested please send us email for more details We will also\n\nsend Our website and phone number to you in nest massage Contact your \n\nMLA Mi nister and Deputy Minister Contact List\n\n\nWarm Regards\,\nWELCOME TO BC JOBS PLAN PLCamp\;#39\;\n\n\nwelcomebc...@yahoo.ca \n\nwelcomebc@liv e.com\n\nabramsandkroc...@hotmail.com CLASS:PUBLIC DTSTART;TZID=Etc/GMT:20140219T093000Z DTEND;TZID=Etc/GMT:20140219T103000Z PRIORITY:0 SEQUENCE:0 STATUS:CONFIRMED UID:a0d7c082-9e33-4fad-bd3f-e5c39f00506a DTSTAMP:20140219T162705Z ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:dere r...@madap.com.ar ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:blac kz...@gmail.com ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:dale _mel...@users.sourceforge.net ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:aran a...@gmail.com ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:timo .lindf...@iki.fi ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:cibe rvi...@gmail.com ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:bogo m...@post.pl ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:marc e...@luon.net ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:aff@ cpan.org ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:ieno r...@gmail.com ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:asjo @koldfront.dk ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:tala u...@users.sourceforge.net ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:sur5 r...@sur5r.net ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:joel z...@pobox.com ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:mark @heily.com ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:elli o...@ubuntu.com ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:fran c...@unchartedbackwaters.co.uk ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:alex an...@quessy.net ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:cgab r...@truelite.it ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:mate usz.ka...@gmail.com ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:luig i.tosc...@tiscali.it ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:ales s...@debian.org ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:salv i...@cryptolab.net ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:hali n...@googlemail.com ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:tang ram.pe...@gmail.com ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:nich o...@pythonic.com.au ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:blue stonech...@gmail.com ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:prav i...@gmail.com ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:wojd y...@gmail.com ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:cold f...@blueyonder.co.uk ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:remi .de...@acgcenter.com ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:hara l...@a-little-linux-box.at ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:thie rry.car...@ubuntu.com ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:dev@ nigelj.com ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:anto ny.gelb...@wayforth.com ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:math i...@mbsolutions.selfip.biz ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:sarv a...@ubuntu.com ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:tehn ic...@mail.ru ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:pkg- multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=REQ_PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:albe r...@udc.es ORGANIZER;CN=welcome bc;SENT-BY=mailto:welcom...@yahoo.com:mailto:welco m...@yahoo.com TRANSP:OPAQUE END:VEVENT BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Europe/London TZURL:http://tzurl.org/zoneinfo/Europe/London
Bug#739520: [libavcodec54] Corrupted webm files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: libavcodec54 Severity: normal - --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Rendering webm produce somehow corrupted video files, that are not playable in Firefox. Even not in Firefox v.27 under Windows. You can reproduce it always for example with avconv -i video.mp4 -vcodec libvpx -b 700k -r 25 -acodec libvorbis -ab 128k /tmp/video.webm and then open video.webm in Firefox. It can not be even recognized as video file. It is marked as audio file. If you try press a few times on the progress bar somewhere inside of this stream it starts to play. I have tried some webm video that I have rendered some months ago, all were o.k. Also rendered webm videos with Mediacoder http://www.mediacoderhq.com/ are o.k. There is very similar bugreport in upstream (but quite old already) https://bugzilla.libav.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341 libav is actually version 9.11-1 - --- System information. --- Architecture: amd64 Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-amd64 Debian Release: jessie/sid -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlME3FUACgkQ6aU4/+gLeBkSNgCggPxkUM3pnIGODpnvjvCFYFVd xZoAoM2hY6P674SM4O0IjE5n+/Vg9kc0 =7Whu -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
ardour3 3.5.308~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the ardour3 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 3.5.143~dfsg-1 Current version: 3.5.308~dfsg-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
ardour 1:2.8.16+git20131003-1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the ardour source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1:2.8.16-2 Current version: 1:2.8.16+git20131003-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#739520: [libavcodec54]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: libavcodec54 - --- Please enter the report below this line. --- I tried just now libav from experimental (version 10~beta1-2) and rendered webm video seems to have no such problem in Firefox browser. - --- System information. --- Architecture: amd64 Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-amd64 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlME5sQACgkQ6aU4/+gLeBnDPgCdEIbzflAfADKqfe9jvpvMxUwd ciYAnjf1mXrDPdGrxDnQqWLL70cY3+rN =OhXl -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
ste-plugins_0.0.2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 04:23:50 +0100 Source: ste-plugins Binary: ste-plugins Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.0.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz Description: ste-plugins - stereo LADPSA plugins Closes: 739146 Changes: ste-plugins (0.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low . [ Jaromír Mikeš ] * Initial release (Closes: #739146) * Added .gitignore file. . [ Felipe Sateler ] * Add myself to uploaders * Move aside ladspa.h so we use the system one Checksums-Sha1: 3a354727849997017d8087e36c1059a8b254184f 2032 ste-plugins_0.0.2-1.dsc 49ec625c66757c6de69fc3812ca4c9296ff62d24 15964 ste-plugins_0.0.2.orig.tar.bz2 0e2e812027594cb82876883041f7611e317a62eb 2348 ste-plugins_0.0.2-1.debian.tar.xz c6e032b5960298cd6112099a062591dc4c49302a 5668 ste-plugins_0.0.2-1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: c52a8d0efd2b86879fa21bbb0e0acff4955ca0043e373c17d1abc34f5603efbf 2032 ste-plugins_0.0.2-1.dsc c67fd4d57813d272b131872e037d934ba93ae4eb09d2d02c3b48c3d80b4f6c68 15964 ste-plugins_0.0.2.orig.tar.bz2 24ac2ef13d87ebeb91b24bc4029832b846202fd531bcb9d9f115a76d40a5b97f 2348 ste-plugins_0.0.2-1.debian.tar.xz c2ba0b8a4955907a78f94c4d8108dcfe24f9c216115f5775103149e7e0ef001c 5668 ste-plugins_0.0.2-1_amd64.deb Files: 05a7324ca53f16ac162de7a4252b58c6 2032 sound optional ste-plugins_0.0.2-1.dsc 9a6b41cb8594221f7a87cb8662e8699d 15964 sound optional ste-plugins_0.0.2.orig.tar.bz2 f3ed3a2df854d8a9448bbd587f16f044 2348 sound optional ste-plugins_0.0.2-1.debian.tar.xz 9a703bf642e59649ebf0234dd710e4bd 5668 sound optional ste-plugins_0.0.2-1_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTAjRcAAoJEKO6uuJAjdbPFKQP+wQGg+kI64+1jZDgKRP50Waq h/uErTzWVXMS2+K31T/JhYgeOKQFZgOhcV7S7xUHe4+xALBupiB88X+/XF+I7yG3 QUuanbjtEsL/rYjurRWnZ70tyONEZLs8zT39MCKiqrk9esatpK/KsESuz91SITvj 7yDWqnP/OOAth9sBOYbP8Pue3HtP+Dr6Z+8SYv4bPSj6/ds7lXotEpWOAn9EjJzc 1iTJZDPVLCG6Xe9SONr3Hgt74o6En2/DniJyxCfYkaGgl7VGxQ++zsaiyc2chiMq NXeGRr8g3NxFD8ntuULgqbDFN0i1gAZ+Gi/xnhc3x+2xezDPxRO1Xg33ldTvZRd9 RChAUUyBtaDKnFRpV8Pg6c5AsnQ330vVWVmsSSC5IWtURG3SH7WPy7qqr1pk//J6 6eOYtQouRSp2dXO6p9OMkfTITQ3SndBogaUg+Yb+9LkigIuVLoHFwVcvrQjuG9jV 3Ujh2eRbbzhBvX69CmS7CUYlMQTmftfiFObgcy6atFvE9iM7qX3IALNJ54sDjIzm 49so/FbBMIIl18UlIuQ2P6bWuaDQAQnac0yl7ChQmKfPxNeOYysqsIalRG3tAlrh STGa2qzv2Qo/cexIX3jNwaKi3Xo0M7l0BJDvU0WfEFO7mCL2AdfgB6+TjGaeauhU uXa4PsEY7lfnScAgdZpN =iugf -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#732159: Should this package be removed?
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 08:24:01AM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote: TBH, I'm a bit confused about your reply. I probably lost track of the point I was trying to make. I so far assumed that this issue was, bluntly put, about almost exclusively 1) MPlayer does not work against Libav But what you wrote sounded more like it's at least also 2) MPlayer has packaging issues I've mentioned this a few times over the years, I'd be interested in improving 2), and that is regardless of the status of this ticket. On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Reimar Döffinger reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de wrote: On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 03:25:08PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Reimar Döffinger reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de wrote: What would constitute a constructive comment? Ideally I am interested in making mplayer work against the libavcodec that we have in Debian, and this is my work in progress. Well, I expect that making it build wouldn't be that hard, but it would be quite crippled and broken, and with the limited effort I am willing to spend on getting patches into Libav I won't be getting anywhere I would conclude from previous tries. I take this as that you (as upstream) do not want mplayer to be compiled against libav. No it means I feel unable to maintain support for that. And that is the same situation as right after the fork, nobody has stepped up since then to take on this task. (Yes, I am well aware that the mailing list climate was not helpful in attracting someone to do it, and I am sorry for that). Besides, has development and support for mencoder been revived, or do its developers still consider mencoder deprecated and/or obsolete? It's still on basic life support. So I don't think it should be considered a major concern. Still, ffmpeg/avconv in some cases still can't 100% replace it, especially if it's not the very latest of those, so I am of course still interested in not letting any users hang if there was some magic easy way to achieve it. It was my sincere hope that this would be a sufficient incentive and motivation to work on keeping mplayer/mencoder in debian. Unfortunately, it seems I was wrong. Well, it was motivation to suggest several ways to get FFmpeg into Debian, since that is kind of the most realistic way to solve it, also since otherwise it won't be the version of MPlayer that is tested upstream. However so far this seems to be considered completely out of the question. Sorry, but taking mplayer as political argument to make pressure on the FFmpeg vs. Libav conflict is not going to help anyone. Please have this discussion elsewhere, e.g. in #729203. This was not mean political, this is about solving my point 1) above. If we agree that we see no way to solve/avoid that I think there is no point in dragging this out any further. Personal remark here: mplayer was always problematic in Debian. Up to today, it is not possible to even compile mplayer without removing its internal copy of ffmpeg. Yes, no, maybe. I just looked into it. You have to provide matching copies of libavformat/internal.h (can be eliminated reasonably well if it's a concern) and libavutil/x86/asm.h (only issue here is that I don't like duplicating it). Nothing else is required. I missed that, did that change recently? I don't think so. I think it must have been like this at least a year, but no promises. I do not know if Debian might have used options like --enable-zr (that is the part that now no longer compiles), that one had hooks deep into FFmpeg, but I think it lost what little relevance it had years ago. I haven't tested the last release, and I don't know if only requiring these two headers I mentioned is good enough, but I would say it doesn't require an internal copy anymore. Well, if it was really only two (internal!) headers that it takes, why doesn't mplayer embed them just like mplayer2 and mpv, and just ditch the svn:external equivalent for git mechanism? This needs to be disabled when packaging it for use with a system-provided libavcodec anyways. If I make a copy of them I become responsible to maintain/update them. Which I'd only want to do if it's really the best solution to a significant problem. Plus, creating a ffmpeg/ directory automatically disables the automated FFmpeg download, so solving the one also fixes the other for you. Nevertheless, if what you say is true, then current mplayer should be indeed rather easy to compile against any copy of libavcodec. I expect there will be rough edges still, it's poorly tested. It's a long progress, and at the risk of offending from my point of view in part due to an unwillingness from the side of package maintainers to complain loudly and clearly. I even fixed configure so that if you have only those two files in ffmpeg/... it will default to compiling against a system FFmpeg. Making a new release is something that would be
Bug#739539: multimedia-soundsynthesis: recommends a removed package
Package: multimedia-soundsynthesis Version: 0.2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, multimedia-soundsynthesis recommends the package pd-aubio which as has been removed from the aubio source package as of version 0.4.0-1. aubio (0.4.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release * Acknowledge NMUs (closes: #619802, #553930, #625676), thanks Alessio * debian/watch: update * debian/copyright: update * debian/README.source: removed * debian/patches: removed obsolete patches * debian/aubio-tools.install: no more sounds * debian/aubio-tools.manpages: updated manpages location * debian/pycompat: remove obsolete file * debian/source/format: bump to 3.0 (quilt) * debian/libaubio2.*: moved to libaubio4 * debian/clean: added * debian/libaubio-dev.docs: removed * debian/libaubio-dev.install: remove *.la * debian/python-aubio.install: move to dist-packages * debian/pd-aubio.install: removed * debian/docs: add README.md * debian/control: remove pd-aubio * debian/libaubio-doc.docs: remove obsolete files, update doxygen * location * debian/compat: bump to 8 * debian/rules: rewrite (closes: #730150) * debian/control: update Build-Depends, bump debhelper and * Standards-Version * debian/control: remove XS-Python-Version * debian/control: add Homepage * debian/control: bump to libaubio4, replaces libaubio2 * debian/control: remove a from start of short description * debian/control: use libfftw3-dev (closes: #582735) * debian/aubio-tools.install: install tools * debian/patches/local_mathjax: use local MathJax.js * debian/rules: use current python * debian/*.dirs: removed -- Paul Brossier p...@debian.org Sun, 29 Dec 2013 14:47:16 -0400 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#739539: marked as done (multimedia-soundsynthesis: recommends a removed package)
Your message dated Wed, 19 Feb 2014 20:42:49 +0100 with message-id 20140219194249.gc23...@ramacher.at and subject line Re: Bug#739539: multimedia-soundsynthesis: recommends a removed package has caused the Debian Bug report #739539, regarding multimedia-soundsynthesis: recommends a removed package to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 739539: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739539 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: multimedia-soundsynthesis Version: 0.2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, multimedia-soundsynthesis recommends the package pd-aubio which as has been removed from the aubio source package as of version 0.4.0-1. aubio (0.4.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release * Acknowledge NMUs (closes: #619802, #553930, #625676), thanks Alessio * debian/watch: update * debian/copyright: update * debian/README.source: removed * debian/patches: removed obsolete patches * debian/aubio-tools.install: no more sounds * debian/aubio-tools.manpages: updated manpages location * debian/pycompat: remove obsolete file * debian/source/format: bump to 3.0 (quilt) * debian/libaubio2.*: moved to libaubio4 * debian/clean: added * debian/libaubio-dev.docs: removed * debian/libaubio-dev.install: remove *.la * debian/python-aubio.install: move to dist-packages * debian/pd-aubio.install: removed * debian/docs: add README.md * debian/control: remove pd-aubio * debian/libaubio-doc.docs: remove obsolete files, update doxygen * location * debian/compat: bump to 8 * debian/rules: rewrite (closes: #730150) * debian/control: update Build-Depends, bump debhelper and * Standards-Version * debian/control: remove XS-Python-Version * debian/control: add Homepage * debian/control: bump to libaubio4, replaces libaubio2 * debian/control: remove a from start of short description * debian/control: use libfftw3-dev (closes: #582735) * debian/aubio-tools.install: install tools * debian/patches/local_mathjax: use local MathJax.js * debian/rules: use current python * debian/*.dirs: removed -- Paul Brossier p...@debian.org Sun, 29 Dec 2013 14:47:16 -0400 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 2014-02-19 11:36:45, Brian Murray wrote: Package: multimedia-soundsynthesis Version: 0.2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, multimedia-soundsynthesis recommends the package pd-aubio which as has been removed from the aubio source package as of version 0.4.0-1. pd-aubio is now provided by the source package of the same name: http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pd-aubio.html. Regards -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#739520: marked as done ([libavcodec54] Corrupted webm files)
Your message dated Wed, 19 Feb 2014 20:44:17 +0100 with message-id 20140219194417.gd23...@ramacher.at and subject line Re: Bug#739520: [libavcodec54] has caused the Debian Bug report #739520, regarding [libavcodec54] Corrupted webm files to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 739520: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739520 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: libavcodec54 Severity: normal - --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Rendering webm produce somehow corrupted video files, that are not playable in Firefox. Even not in Firefox v.27 under Windows. You can reproduce it always for example with avconv -i video.mp4 -vcodec libvpx -b 700k -r 25 -acodec libvorbis -ab 128k /tmp/video.webm and then open video.webm in Firefox. It can not be even recognized as video file. It is marked as audio file. If you try press a few times on the progress bar somewhere inside of this stream it starts to play. I have tried some webm video that I have rendered some months ago, all were o.k. Also rendered webm videos with Mediacoder http://www.mediacoderhq.com/ are o.k. There is very similar bugreport in upstream (but quite old already) https://bugzilla.libav.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341 libav is actually version 9.11-1 - --- System information. --- Architecture: amd64 Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-amd64 Debian Release: jessie/sid -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlME3FUACgkQ6aU4/+gLeBkSNgCggPxkUM3pnIGODpnvjvCFYFVd xZoAoM2hY6P674SM4O0IjE5n+/Vg9kc0 =7Whu -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 10~beta1-2 On 2014-02-19 18:15:44, Marek Straka wrote: Package: libavcodec54 --- Please enter the report below this line. --- I tried just now libav from experimental (version 10~beta1-2) and rendered webm video seems to have no such problem in Firefox browser. Thank you for testing it with the experimental version. Marking as fixed in 10~beta1-2. Regards -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#739560: brp-pacu: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc
Package: brp-pacu
Severity: minor
Usertags: clang-ftbfs
User: pkg-llvm-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Tag: patch
Hello,
Using the rebuild infrastructure, your package fails to build with clang
(instead of gcc).
Thanks,
Arthur
diff -Naur brp-pacu-2.1.1+git20111020.old/debian/changelog brp-pacu-2.1.1+git20111020/debian/changelog
--- brp-pacu-2.1.1+git20111020.old/debian/changelog 2013-08-05 17:39:27.0 -0500
+++ brp-pacu-2.1.1+git20111020/debian/changelog 2014-02-11 20:14:04.991963479 -0600
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+brp-pacu (2.1.1+git20111020-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Fix the FTBFS with clang:
+- Fixed return void bug in gui.c
+
+ -- Arthur Marble art...@info9.net Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:03:10 -0600
+
brp-pacu (2.1.1+git20111020-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Removed DMUA.
diff -Naur brp-pacu-2.1.1+git20111020.old/debian/patches/clang-ftbfs.diff brp-pacu-2.1.1+git20111020/debian/patches/clang-ftbfs.diff
--- brp-pacu-2.1.1+git20111020.old/debian/patches/clang-ftbfs.diff 1969-12-31 18:00:00.0 -0600
+++ brp-pacu-2.1.1+git20111020/debian/patches/clang-ftbfs.diff 2014-02-10 16:53:01.859821131 -0600
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+Index: brp-pacu-2.1.1+git20111020/gui.c
+===
+--- brp-pacu-2.1.1+git20111020.orig/gui.c 2013-06-03 10:01:08.0 -0500
brp-pacu-2.1.1+git20111020/gui.c 2014-02-10 16:52:54.987821011 -0600
+@@ -873,7 +873,6 @@
+if (open_dialog != NULL)
+{
+ gtk_window_present (GTK_FILE_CHOOSER(open_dialog));
+- return(0);
+}
+
+open_dialog = gtk_file_chooser_dialog_new (Open Capture Buffers From, GTK_WINDOW(bkg_dialog), GTK_FILE_CHOOSER_ACTION_OPEN, GTK_STOCK_CANCEL, GTK_RESPONSE_CANCEL, GTK_STOCK_OPEN, GTK_RESPONSE_ACCEPT, NULL);
diff -Naur brp-pacu-2.1.1+git20111020.old/debian/patches/series brp-pacu-2.1.1+git20111020/debian/patches/series
--- brp-pacu-2.1.1+git20111020.old/debian/patches/series 2014-02-10 17:14:46.487843850 -0600
+++ brp-pacu-2.1.1+git20111020/debian/patches/series 2014-02-10 16:52:21.767820433 -0600
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
1001-glib_single_include.patch
+clang-ftbfs.diff
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of brp-pacu_2.1.1+git20111020-4_amd64.changes
brp-pacu_2.1.1+git20111020-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: brp-pacu_2.1.1+git20111020-4.dsc brp-pacu_2.1.1+git20111020-4.debian.tar.xz brp-pacu_2.1.1+git20111020-4_amd64.deb brp-pacu-dbg_2.1.1+git20111020-4_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
brp-pacu_2.1.1+git20111020-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 01:03:53 +0100 Source: brp-pacu Binary: brp-pacu brp-pacu-dbg Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.1.1+git20111020-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz Description: brp-pacu - audio analysis tool brp-pacu-dbg - audio analysis tool (debug) Changes: brp-pacu (2.1.1+git20111020-4) unstable; urgency=low . * Fix the FTBFS with clang: - Fixed return void bug in gui.c Thanks to Arthur Marble art...@info9.net * Bump Standards. Checksums-Sha1: 9f09dec5728b2fd5d533a94bff114c0cac44d365 2208 brp-pacu_2.1.1+git20111020-4.dsc 14ff50126ec219f52a6f2e18559e4ea413028624 5988 brp-pacu_2.1.1+git20111020-4.debian.tar.xz 43feb6e7fa4467c5b669a37713f5d45767a211c5 35798 brp-pacu_2.1.1+git20111020-4_amd64.deb c5c3613e85cd9e95933ef4ff8e991055b2ac6672 49286 brp-pacu-dbg_2.1.1+git20111020-4_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: cd8bbde95005fdc21739d59d60dee3c3770cc1dba2465fc6d7252cb7af379135 2208 brp-pacu_2.1.1+git20111020-4.dsc 7867f64c97ce00edffa0d76fc956bc56236f02ab79253b45243bc29b62c47b17 5988 brp-pacu_2.1.1+git20111020-4.debian.tar.xz b8886ca525a8590662613c9695753498429b109306481c3dd48de088c9326f45 35798 brp-pacu_2.1.1+git20111020-4_amd64.deb 4981076dd5c1f5c31b38cf4a4f54aee8010e2a9d2428a6a8bb92b502c0419ce1 49286 brp-pacu-dbg_2.1.1+git20111020-4_amd64.deb Files: 48334caa21904fa0fc50131e5cb4a5f8 2208 sound optional brp-pacu_2.1.1+git20111020-4.dsc b1a754deafc1b1c37e44e770eba5a137 5988 sound optional brp-pacu_2.1.1+git20111020-4.debian.tar.xz 9432d2e3327671e088d4e62832df6c5c 35798 sound optional brp-pacu_2.1.1+git20111020-4_amd64.deb 24f113ec0ad5f2bab6ac313703c586af 49286 debug extra brp-pacu-dbg_2.1.1+git20111020-4_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTBUnWAAoJEFsBlFXiuE+lD18QAInV4OkGn9pMQKuPhaMi9N+9 dFnCeQ4L+BTOqP1yZdlOZCmHKJhUzNl65zfamLlkSRWdpwZh04iK508RkrxAv8ps kHmtp2Vpxd8jKiCOJUj9Bhll0PTg3bqEcww3hIKV/BCulabXDhNCzVFNzUe5qcMr S5aWGPB7HMU+WNOv3IDOucp4P/G9YbJVV+gNcHYASq+iSCCYtanRYlmmRAf0PoBM vVpzs05ikYLJhOTrwhwzW6t3mDThQ6SrED0FHDjX6DUvfLqp243606703+GPT1aX qI5ms89TZiwO2/E1U4gShD5kSGIVAFqYb4j3I4CeGcws9g23g0M/QqwXxm81g6QE sJgEC7XYrVZKteBLvAeOv5V19yzEHwTxUOofMpAxAnTmCmJuM9YdpbUCayikqVcE 2rWn8ItuLXS56Fx6YFI7zqkKIy3oQeFhIpyWdCawgkq0JiCqk8cudhfiG2t+AdS8 +WX9Q9ZuqNV6UCzqy80kBz8c+6NI4Bscl8s5g6QTx39L1tg8/j8Ps78MtbJZkmL+ Bz8TLxPUaeGP1H1mYjp/CWx9o9cAjSc2OghmwWyPLAvuFeVN4z0sD9cL076fvQX1 Ui6628PFwSTSYH3L5mBN8xXY4Y21NGFKYGSsBfMB0KYnp82KGlFS0Bt79ygaFXtl yvbesNcYD9yqAeOC6ZsZ =mzj7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: close 739560 Bug #739560 [brp-pacu] brp-pacu: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc Marked Bug as done End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 739560: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739560 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
